|
Joementum posted:A Good Debate with Good Moderators. Good Night. uhhhh, hey baby
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2015 05:04
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2024 17:00 |
|
|
paranoid randroid posted:loving what they said donald trump was most like huckleberry finn by mark twain i just googled it i guess they interviewed this guy http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2015/10/28/upshot/matching-candidates-with-the-books-they-sound-like.html
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2015 05:04
|
|
|
Zoran posted:Same. Thank you, Boosted_C5, for your lucid evaluation of the Republican debate. Again of all the crazy republican gimmicks we have, Boosted is probably the best. Thanks, Boosted. Thoosted. Joementum posted:A Good Debate with Good Moderators. Good Night. Ha
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2015 05:05
|
|
|
theyre putting axis lower ont he complex/simple axis than fuckin beowulf what the heck
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2015 05:05
|
|
|
Joementum posted:A Good Debate with Good Moderators. Good Night. loving wow
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2015 05:05
|
|
|
how the gently caress is middlemarch more complex than ulysses what the gently caress is the encyclopedia of needlework
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2015 05:06
|
|
|
Joementum posted:If the precious snowflakes of the Republican party can't take questions from uber-LIEberals like Jim Cramer, Rick Santelli, and Larry Kudlow, can they handle the White House? Kudlow & Santelli pass for Liberals? WTF. How loving far right are you? Both of those guys endorsed and do so everyday the most hawkish monetary and tax policy you could get away with on national cable tv. So using the SA vs. Reddit straw poll, would you watch CNBC again? or was this a flaming trainwreck? Party opinion I hear was that Trump was correct, this was supposed to be a mega 3-hour event (network saving some would suggest vs. MSNBC) but it seems the late start, technical errors and horrible mods were a big distraction.
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2015 05:07
|
|
|
I think I read somewhere that being able to communicate with people at a lower grade level is actually a good thing so I'm not sure why that's really a knock against Trump.
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2015 05:07
|
|
|
why is this graph
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2015 05:07
|
|
|
trump deals with other businessmen, he HAS to explain like they're five
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2015 05:07
|
|
|
paranoid randroid posted:how the gently caress is middlemarch more complex than ulysses when i read treasure island in middle school i thought it was pretty confusing im guessing this is all made up and is the kind of thing someone creates to get interviewed on npr for five minutes
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2015 05:07
|
|
|
TEAYCHES posted:when i read treasure island in middle school i thought it was pretty confusing https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9U4Ha9HQvMo&t=61s
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2015 05:09
|
|
|
clinton and cruz are disturbingly close to the kama sutra on that graph i dont need that mental image, nyt
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2015 05:09
|
|
|
Hal_2005 posted:Kudlow & Santelli pass for Liberals? WTF. How loving far right are you? Both of those guys endorsed and do so everyday the most hawkish monetary and tax policy you could get away with on national cable tv. 
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2015 05:09
|
|
|
Hal_2005 posted:Kudlow & Santelli pass for Liberals? WTF. How loving far right are you? Both of those guys endorsed and do so everyday the most hawkish monetary and tax policy you could get away with on national cable tv. It's pretty well known that Joe is a right-wing troll. Please do not engage him
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2015 05:10
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2015 05:10
|
|
|
Like the whole point of this app is to get people to write at a lower grade level: http://www.hemingwayapp.com/
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2015 05:11
|
|
|
Epic High Five posted:It's pretty well known that Joe is a right-wing troll. Please do not engage him 
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2015 05:12
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2015 05:13
|
|
|
Your assertions both that Santelli would be the unscrupulous founder of a far right, incredibly damaging ideological movement is almost as laughable as your assertions that he is also somehow totally creepy, like in a 3am infomercial kind of way. I'm onto you mr mentum signed  edit - drat YOU RANDROID
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2015 05:14
|
|
|
TEAYCHES posted:they said donald trump was most like huckleberry finn by mark twain They say that they use the SMOG index to determine complexity, but how do they analyse the positivity/negativity of the statements?
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2015 05:15
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2015 05:16
|
|
|
Epic High Five posted:edit - drat YOU RANDROID 
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2015 05:17
|
|
|
Hey there friend. Radiohead sucks.
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2015 05:18
|
|
|
Milk Malk posted:They say that they use the SMOG index to determine complexity, but how do they analyse the positivity/negativity of the statements? 
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2015 05:19
|
|
|
Milk Malk posted:Hey there friend. Radiohead sucks. hm, questionable
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2015 05:20
|
|
|
Sephiroth_IRA posted:Hey Boosted were you my pal Chris Christie a few years ago or was that someone else? Chris Christie is dead, the Boost is loose.
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2015 05:35
|
|
|
Songs About loving
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2015 05:37
|
|
|
I thought the CNBC moderators were great. Blew CNN out of the water. They seemed to do a good job getting everyone involved and they didn't take any poo poo from the candidates. The moment when they called out Cruz for dodging a substantive question to rant about the lack of substantive questions and refused to give him extra time was excellent. I would love to see Bernie and Hillary face the same questioners. Does anybody know if CNBC doing a democratic debate at any point?
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2015 05:47
|
|
|
FuriousxGeorge posted:I thought the CNBC moderators were great. I've heard of fakeposting but this is ridiculous. Mods?!
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2015 05:49
|
|
|
the cnbc moderators were not better than cnn, just somehow even more shameless and playing into the insanity for further ratings. unless they are playing some genius long game i dont see it as good
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2015 05:52
|
|
|
Pompous Rhombus posted:I've heard of fakeposting but this is ridiculous. Mods?! You really prefer Anderson Cooper interrupting candidates every 10 seconds? I loved the part of the CNN debate where they asked for one sentence answers to, "What is the greatest threat to America?" and then went to commercial with zero elaboration from anyone. Certainly not a topic worthy of 30 second responses, that would be way too much. CNN also did a much worse job at giving even time with half the number of candidates on stage. It was a joke of a debate. FuriousxGeorge has issued a correction as of 05:55 on Oct 29, 2015 |
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2015 05:52
|
|
|
im glad jim cramer is still on a national stage though
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2015 05:52
|
|
|
I think the CNBC moderators legitimately feared for their lives and that’s why they phoned in the second half.
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2015 05:53
|
|
|
zen death robot posted:The CNBC moderators asked terrible questions and got stepped on all night for it. It was a trainwreck. What questions did you take issue with?
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2015 05:56
|
|
|
zen death robot posted:The CNBC moderators asked terrible questions and got stepped on all night for it. It was a trainwreck.
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2015 05:56
|
|
|
Platystemon posted:I think the CNBC moderators legitimately feared for their lives and that’s why they phoned in the second half. A smart call once Trump said he may be packing heat.
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2015 05:57
|
|
|
what are your top three favorite apps. how do you feel about fantasy football. what is your biggest weakness and how are you overcoming it?
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2015 05:58
|
|
|
The moderators were loving shouting over each other to try and be the one to ask the next question. It doesn't get much worse than that.
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2015 06:01
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2024 17:00 |
|
|
TEAYCHES posted:what are your top three favorite apps. how do you feel about fantasy football. what is your biggest weakness and how are you overcoming it? I must have missed the app question. You're a gullible rube if you fell for Republicans spinning a question about the massive unregulated daily fantasy gambling industry that is currently under federal scrutiny as "a question about fantasy football", and the reason that weakness question is asked in job interviews is it can be very revealing of a candidate's character. It was also like one of the first questions, which is fair territory for a softball. FuriousxGeorge has issued a correction as of 06:03 on Oct 29, 2015 |
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2015 06:01
|
|