|
Zoness posted:Whatever black potus marks, dies. There is no escape. ...and you will know us by the trail of threads
|
# ¿ Nov 17, 2015 23:09 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 28, 2024 17:32 |
|
Ramos posted:Rarely have ego and madness been so delightfully wed as they have in our dear McMagic. He's big an' dumb an' ready to post. A lot like ol' Zoness here.
|
# ¿ Nov 17, 2015 23:30 |
|
method man is all about limited. he's got himself a forty. he's got himself a shorty.
|
# ¿ Nov 17, 2015 23:35 |
|
there's no type, they just need to fiat that it does something and domain and poo poo work fine
|
# ¿ Nov 18, 2015 01:38 |
|
oh someone else figured that one out ok
|
# ¿ Nov 18, 2015 01:39 |
|
Angry Grimace posted:It's perfectly possible they decided the Barry's Land issue (increasing Domain count) was less mechanically and functionally interesting than making Colorless mana itself matter plus giving EDH colorless decks a basic. this has no type, there are still only 5 types. the thing on the type line is the type not the name
|
# ¿ Nov 18, 2015 01:49 |
|
it means they just need to put a rule in that a basic land w/o a basic land subtype taps for 1 or w/e instead of a color of mana
|
# ¿ Nov 18, 2015 01:50 |
|
i'm v skeptical about these spoilers at the moment but not because they introduce some unsolvable rules issue
|
# ¿ Nov 18, 2015 01:51 |
|
the real great distortion here is turning the very funny start of this thread into bad speculation posts
|
# ¿ Nov 18, 2015 17:48 |
|
Zoness posted:When has this not been the case aside from artifacts/equipment as a pushed theme? remember when they made the set pushing enchantments and then put memory jar in it
|
# ¿ Nov 18, 2015 22:30 |
|
green would be significantly better if unnatural aggression gave a p/t boost. my first draft i assumed it did and didn't realize until i went to cast it and saw i was about to 2-for-1 myself.
|
# ¿ Nov 19, 2015 23:26 |
|
Foreskin Problems posted:SaffronOlive is what TWoo aspired to, but never achieved. a member of the master race???
|
# ¿ Nov 20, 2015 01:08 |
|
i looked up the top 8 decklists expecting to see stock UR twin having won but instead it was jeskai twin!! now i'm very angry that someone played cool cards like restoration angel in modern, please ban splinter twin to keep this from happening again.
|
# ¿ Nov 23, 2015 03:13 |
|
Barry Shitpeas posted:
instead of saying "i plow your mom" i'm going to start saying "your mom takes up farming" and winking suggestively
|
# ¿ Nov 23, 2015 19:28 |
|
don't worry, you get your mom's power in life
|
# ¿ Nov 23, 2015 19:31 |
|
sperling got mad at bivouac, because he's a grown man
|
# ¿ Nov 30, 2015 21:17 |
|
i love the smell of the color pie argument in the morning. it smells like dogmatism.
|
# ¿ Dec 1, 2015 23:07 |
|
BEFORE THE PYROMASTER A play in one act, by black potus Maro (at his dining table, ready for dessert): Ah! Color pie! My favorite. (he eats) Blue counterspells! White lifelink! Black removal! Green fatties! (abruptly stops, then does a dramatic spit take and throws the plate on the floor) WHAT'S THIS? RED CARD ADVANTAGE?!
|
# ¿ Dec 2, 2015 00:07 |
|
mcmagic posted:
ty for making the mirror match even uglier
|
# ¿ Dec 4, 2015 17:41 |
|
MCMAGIC: i think painful truths is not good in legacy and am willing to do a bet wherein if by some agreed upon metric it proves to be a real card within 6 months (# of top 8 appearances, but i can't look up an event schedule atm) i will do one of these: 1) post with proper caps and punctuation in the magic thread forever 2) play a major legacy event (SCG open/GP at least) with painful truths (and what the heck narset) in my maindeck and post a trip report on these forums 3) a humorous forums punishment of the threads choosing if you agree to this bet post and dear thread please provide us with stakes
|
# ¿ Dec 4, 2015 19:41 |
|
i will also take this bet with anyone else who feels strongly that painful truths is Good In Legacy and also side action on whether mcmagic will agree
|
# ¿ Dec 4, 2015 19:43 |
|
mcmagic posted:Sure. It's not going to be a 4 of but I would bet that it will show up in multiple decks in multiple top 8's. ok cool. thread help us set terms!
|
# ¿ Dec 4, 2015 19:48 |
|
mcmagic if you won't stop using ellipses please propose some stakes thank you
|
# ¿ Dec 4, 2015 21:26 |
|
run whatever list Chamale comes up with for wild pair through a gp/open/etc. and post a detailed tourney report
|
# ¿ Dec 4, 2015 21:39 |
|
MCMAGIC: are you comfortable calling FIVE (5) top 8 decks featuring Painful Truths in the next THREE (3) months, by March 8th, 2016 Anno Domini in ONE HUNDRED PLUS (this gimmick is hard, 100+) person events success in legacy for the purposes of our bet?
|
# ¿ Dec 9, 2015 00:45 |
|
odiv posted:Does that have to be five distinct decks? Or just five top 8s? the latter.
|
# ¿ Dec 9, 2015 01:11 |
|
Dr. Stab posted:Except now colorless mana is ♦, so it'd say (♦ can only be paid for with ♦) which is basically not saying anything. it's flavor text written by an idiot, full of sound and fury signifying nothing.
|
# ¿ Dec 9, 2015 01:44 |
|
i dont know if im estragon or vladimir but im def Waiting For Goodpost
|
# ¿ Dec 9, 2015 05:48 |
|
no im def estragon my boots hurt
|
# ¿ Dec 9, 2015 05:51 |
|
black potus posted:MCMAGIC: are you comfortable calling FIVE (5) top 8 decks featuring Painful Truths in the next THREE (3) months, by March 8th, 2016 Anno Domini in ONE HUNDRED PLUS (this gimmick is hard, 100+) person events success in legacy for the purposes of our bet? POLICE DETECTIVE (As an officer pulls the above post out of the river): Who do we think did this? The mob? Some serial killer? BLACK POTUS (swooping into the scene in a batmanesque costume except instead of a bat cowl I'm wearing an Obama mask and holding an alpha black lotus like a batarang): No. It's a new super villain. He goes by the name THE MAGIC THREAD.
|
# ¿ Dec 10, 2015 18:44 |
|
ALL A heavy sight! ANTONY I am dying, Egypt, dying. Give me some wine and let me speak a little. CLEOPATRA No, let me speak, and let me rail so high Animar is a fair commander and You're just a loving scrub.
|
# ¿ Dec 10, 2015 19:09 |
|
i dunno if we settled on me having to type properly forever or play painful truths in a big event
|
# ¿ Dec 10, 2015 19:26 |
|
Errant Gin Monks posted:It's the only red sweeper available that's not converge. Why would it be win more? Pyroclasm is a good card that is used all over. Printing a new one for 3 seems pretty relevant in standard. It's dumb that it's mythic, but it could do some work. Radiant flames isn't anywhere near as good. i'm guessing he means sphinx in legacy being anything besides trash, and if not i mean that e: ah ok well as i say i mean that also it's very funny to me that this difficult to deal with sphinx up and dies when kozilek returns
|
# ¿ Dec 14, 2015 19:27 |
|
*busts into the thread like kramer, tripping over legs and falling face down on page 78* s..s..sixth colorrr
|
# ¿ Dec 15, 2015 00:09 |
|
you may think you have won this game of Magic: The Gathering. but wait until i unleash the power of the SIXTH COLOR OF MANA
|
# ¿ Dec 15, 2015 00:38 |
|
my favorite part of this brand new sixth color is how it has been produced by cards -- by lands even! -- since literally the first set in magic. a ton of foresight there by Richard Channing Garfield, PhD truly he is one of the great minds of our time
|
# ¿ Dec 15, 2015 03:34 |
|
literally all thats new is colorless cost which has been possible forever just never used. "you must spend at least two colorless mana to pay Kozilek's mana cost" or something. plenty of mana restrictions. also how bout some sw8 pale moon synergy amirite
|
# ¿ Dec 15, 2015 03:56 |
|
cheetah7071 posted:Alpha has no lands that tap for colorless o true I confused antiquities lands w alpha
|
# ¿ Dec 15, 2015 03:57 |
|
mandatory lesbian posted:no man its new and impossible and it's breaking my mind *loud distressed grunting*
|
# ¿ Dec 15, 2015 04:11 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 28, 2024 17:32 |
|
reprint chaos moon in ogw that card's p neato
|
# ¿ Dec 15, 2015 04:11 |