Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
Slanderer
May 6, 2007

Sheng-Ji Yang posted:

But, generally speaking, the Protective system in these days is conservative, while the Free Trade system works destructively. It breaks up old nationalities and carries antagonism of proletariat and bourgeoisie to the uttermost point. In a word, the Free Trade system hastens the Social Revolution. In this revolutionary sense alone, gentlemen, I am in favor of Free Trade.

- Karl Marx

*people 100 years ago* the inherent contradictions of the current economic system are at a breaking point. late stage capitalism is upon us
*people 50 years ago* the inherent contradictions of the current economic system are at a breaking point. late stage capitalism is upon us
*people 5 years ago* the inherent contradictions of the current economic system are at a breaking point. late stage capitalism is upon us
*people today* im gay (59,245 likes, 10,959 retweets)

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Slanderer
May 6, 2007

Slanderer posted:

*people 100 years ago* the inherent contradictions of the current economic system are at a breaking point. late stage capitalism is upon us
*people 50 years ago* the inherent contradictions of the current economic system are at a breaking point. late stage capitalism is upon us
*people 5 years ago* the inherent contradictions of the current economic system are at a breaking point. late stage capitalism is upon us
*people today* im gay (59,245 likes, 10,959 retweets)

i guess what im saying is that marx was wrong about free trade's effects but right about the Jews

Slanderer
May 6, 2007

Pener Kropoopkin posted:

You're not gonna reverse late stage capitalism by giving people healthcare or whatever. There's only one way to return profitability.

late stage capitalism, like fusion power, has always been 10 years away

Slanderer
May 6, 2007

Pener Kropoopkin posted:

ShriekingMarxist is making a very simple and straightforward claim that social democracy isn't going to work and it's naive to think of that as the ultimate political horizon, which is basically true for all the reasons we've already gone over. That doesn't mean "don't do anything except organize swamp maoist cadres."

actually, this is wrong

Slanderer
May 6, 2007

ShriekingMarxist posted:

-Stop believing you can reform capital by using its own tools (the federal government) against it
-Understand that global warming is an extinction-level threat that's at our doorstep and needs urgent address starting yesterday if we're to live past it
-Act accordingly

Obviously within the scope of your ability to do so, for some that's shitposting, great, but if that's it, at least call people like Matt Bruenig a fuckre when he's being a fuckre.

so what do you want to do, besides make posts that convince no one of anything?

Slanderer
May 6, 2007

Pener Kropoopkin posted:

Ok, so we shouldn't pressure them to move even further left because you're afraid that might be unpopular? If the definition of socialism in the United States is the Nordic Model, then that's inherently problematic because the Nordic Model is already failing.

let's pressure them to move further left to PSL, a failed organization full of rapists, FBI informants and divorced fathers.

Slanderer
May 6, 2007
join today

https://pslweb.zone

Slanderer
May 6, 2007

Pener Kropoopkin posted:

Buddy we're living in late stage capitalism.

Late stage capitalism is a doomsday cult fixation for posters. the system will soon collapse, so instead of worrying about the physical world, we should concern ourselves with the spiritual world (forums) instead

Slanderer
May 6, 2007

Sheng-Ji Yang posted:

and maybe they can alleviate some of the more brutal evils of capitalism in the meantime with whatever power they can win.

you idiot, this is exactly what the capitalists want. they WANT to have their power slightly lessened. the millions poured into lobbying and elections to oppose these things is just a clever ruse.

Slanderer
May 6, 2007

ShriekingMarxist posted:

Here's the thing about the progressive resurgence; okay let's hold the Nordic model up as a place we want to go, all of those places are seeing their services and systems assailed by capitalist interests as global finance tailspins and keeps making GBS threads its pants by being overly greedy. They're not going to find another third world population to exploit, so everything is furniture re-arrangement and austerity until the revolts start.

The underlying disease is capitalism/neoliberalism, and unless you're attacking that directly and meaningfully, you cannot build lasting gains in its boughs.

entropy dictates that lasting gains are impossible

Slanderer
May 6, 2007

the real careerists are the ones that he didnt rehire send tweet

Slanderer
May 6, 2007

Graphic posted:

https://twitter.com/GuillotinePod/status/1050499766503858177

Hate to say "I told you so" to everyone that sucked themselves dry when our benevolent silicon valley overlords deplatformed Alex Jones, but it was obviously leading to this to anyone who isn't a dupe.

Any evidence this is actually happening outside of this one guy having 20 of his libertarian spam pages depublished?

Slanderer
May 6, 2007

Graphic posted:

https://twitter.com/isgoodrum/status/1051256702794756096/photo/1

https://twitter.com/isgoodrum/status/1051256773846286336

another reason why the fall of the USSR and it's satellites will be looked back on as one of the worst things that has ever happened.

IDK where this is coming from because there aren't citations, but I found reporting on China's forests from 2016. Apparently they're still actively cutting down forests, but they're replanting rubber trees, so uhhh totally fine I guess. But more importantly, reforestation initiatives haven't actually affected lumber consumption--they're just importing more lumber from South America and SE Asia (including a lot of illegally cut lumber. AFAIK, China hasn't agreed to any treaties banning the import of illegally harvested lumber yet, but maybe they'll consider it?)

Slanderer
May 6, 2007

GorgonLiker posted:

then someone who has read those books should make an easily digestible pamphlet for her. someone still has to read the books, and just like every important but not pleasurable thing on the planet anybody can come up with excuses not to

no one has to read the books, they were written by losers. time to forge a new trail baby

Slanderer
May 6, 2007
anyway check this out

Slanderer
May 6, 2007
reading is only important when it's about:

1) science and mathematics
2) urban fantasy wizard detectives

economics is neither science nor math, politics is fantasy but not the good kind.

Slanderer
May 6, 2007

Zas posted:

he's being autistic, in the literal, not strictly pejorative sense. its not a big deal

his argument is: technically correct, a deliberate troll and also missing the post

a masterpiece of posting

Slanderer
May 6, 2007

GalacticAcid posted:

he is such a loving dweeb

Nothus posted:

He's a bowtie dipshit but he's our bowtie dipshit.

Slanderer
May 6, 2007

Karl Barks posted:

who was it that figured out propaganda of the deed didn't work so that everyone else wouldn't try it?? that's right, the anarchists

Slanderer
May 6, 2007

GalacticAcid posted:

Self indulgent 60s “radical” individualism must go. Long hair is for wreckers.

Discipline is “in”

The swamp maoists have been known for years that long hair leads to lice during an insurgency.

Slanderer
May 6, 2007

R. Guyovich posted:

like this isn't fuckin rocket science. you set maximum thresholds for the people still holding debts and subsidize out the difference, and set up a reparations system on a sliding scale based on how much debt was paid. it won't be 100 percent in either case but you do your best to make people feel as whole as they can. that whole article is gonna be used as ammunition by opponents of free tuition

bring on the means testing

Slanderer
May 6, 2007

i think i know the basis for this statement, but still lol

Slanderer
May 6, 2007

haven't been checking twitter much today, but are people actually mad at matt for proposing "tax carbon and redistribute the tax revenue to people"

Slanderer
May 6, 2007

GalacticAcid posted:

Matt sucks poo poo who cares

typical NYC elite attacking working class hero / data savant Matt Bruenig

Slanderer
May 6, 2007
his brain is a powerful computational engine and, with any lucky, he will create Socialism in Our Time using nothing but microsoft excel

Slanderer
May 6, 2007

gradenko_2000 posted:

Neera Tanden recently tweeted something to the effect of "why are progressives protesting Macron, when Macron instituted a carbon tax?", which is missing the point by a whole loving bunch.

Matt riding that wave and engaging in a similar framing is ticking people off.

oh no doubt, he does this constantly. beyond the Pure Joy of Trolling, he's often reacting to people jumping on an argument that they haven't really thought through. he's pedantic about this stuff in the same exact ways wrt medicare for all

Slanderer
May 6, 2007

writers don't choose the headlines chief

Slanderer
May 6, 2007
nice try, liberal, but i read the original

Slanderer
May 6, 2007

R. Guyovich posted:

the practices of the gibbering morons in the chapo thread make it seem like a reasonable precaution

yeah, that thread is full of absolute morons who do nothing but search for words that make them mad

https://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3804951&pagenumber=1662&perpage=40#post490187292

Slanderer
May 6, 2007

seems weird to omit the rest

quote:

Treach­er­ous at­ti­tudes and be­ha­vi­ors to­ward oth­er ex­ploited and op­pressed groups was hardly lim­ited to the white work­ing class.

Need­less to say, as a side note, I do not in any way deny the hor­rors en­dured by black and in­di­gen­ous people in Canada, the US, and else­where throughout the world. For a far bet­ter ac­count of ra­cism and white su­prem­acy check out Theodore W. Al­len’s The In­ven­tion of the White Race (1994), Bar­bara and Kar­en Fields’ Race­craft: The Soul of In­equal­ity in Amer­ic­an Life (2012), or Loren Gold­ner’s ma­gis­teri­al es­say on “Race and the En­light­en­ment” from Race Trait­or (1997). Or Adolph Reed’s “Black Particularity Reconsidered,” or CLR James’ classic The Black Jacobins.

No one should read Settlers, it sucks rear end

Slanderer
May 6, 2007

A Big Fuckin Hornet posted:

what is even the point though. they may as well have brought up IRISH SLAVERY

e:

the point is that Sakai presents a facile analysis of hierarchies of exploitation that can’t hold up to even flippant critiques

Slanderer
May 6, 2007
maybe a better world isn’t possible

Slanderer
May 6, 2007

Question Friend posted:

Reparations is a good example of how much of a dead end that discourse usually is

modern reparations discourse is basically just reframing blood quantum laws as the woke new model for economic redistribution and justice

Slanderer
May 6, 2007

Pener Kropoopkin posted:

the existence of a racially oppressed minority bourgeois doesn’t debunk Sakai’s analysis of racialized class hierarchies at all. well off blacks of their day, the black kulaks or petite bourgeois, were openly dispossessed by whites for being too showy or uppity. Black Wall Street in Tulsa was burned to the ground because of racialized class resentment. It’s almost as if none of you get why W. E. B. DuBois became a communist.

Sakai’s central thesis isn’t really even that controversial, and knee jerk leftists only dismiss it out of hand because they refuse to admit they themselves are products of a settlerist culture.

this post makes me thing you didn’t actually read Settlers

Slanderer
May 6, 2007

MizPiz posted:

The left seriously needs to require less reading. At least a third of it is just people explaining esoterically complicated words and concepts they made up to make themselves sound more academic.

Ah, I see you’ve read Geohell

Slanderer
May 6, 2007

Pener Kropoopkin posted:

any actually existing socialism would involve a massive transfer of wealth from whites to people of color, and if that's not reparations then what is?

reparations mean redistribution of wealth through non-universal programs (actual socialism is scary) combined with a great spiritual renewal that will exorcise the demons of Racism from our hearts

Slanderer
May 6, 2007

smarxist posted:

nah man, we're gonna do champagne socialism, the other 5-6 billion people will get to consume as much resources as lovely westerners and we're gonna make it all work within climate death!

just lol if you've not even faced to the reality of how much deconstruction we have to do to survive as a species, might as well just go full fygm chud

only privileged white kids write poo poo like this lol

Slanderer
May 6, 2007

Pener Kropoopkin posted:

not all socialist programs are gonna be universal my dude.

I think you mean social fascist

Slanderer
May 6, 2007

smarxist posted:

This shitbird has a canny knack for interpreting reality in whatever way will least threaten his comfortable treat boy lifestyle and 401k, gently caress off back to cum town liberal

is this what happens to your brain when you google Murray Bookchin?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Slanderer
May 6, 2007
have you considered that you could dramatically decrease your ecological footprint by not polluting the forums with your dumbass posts?

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5