|
Mrit posted:It will be Hillary and Cruz, and the meltdowns will be bountiful and wonderful. If you're sure about Cruz you should hop on PredictIt post-haste.
|
#
¿
Feb 1, 2016 00:34
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 14, 2024 20:58 |
|
|
I'm calling a narrow Sanders win in terms of overall support, but Hillary will probably get the most delegates.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 1, 2016 00:35
|
|
|
Pinterest Mom posted:The fun part of that prediction is that the first part isn't falsifiable. Well it'll certainly be falsified in the case of a Hillary landslide, but yeah, a close result will basically be a question mark. Caucuses are loving dumb.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 1, 2016 00:45
|
|
|
Vox Nihili posted:I'm calling a narrow Sanders win in terms of overall support, but Hillary will probably get the most delegates. gently caress it, retracting this. Bernie edges the whole thing, dammit.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 1, 2016 00:54
|
|
|
Land of the Free
|
|
#
¿
Feb 1, 2016 01:06
|
|
|
Thump! posted:MOM and Trump getting into an actual fight would be the best thing. Martin would snap his limbs off, lmao
|
|
#
¿
Feb 1, 2016 01:09
|
|
|
Pragmatica posted:I'm a captain for the Sanders campaign. I plan on posting some updates and pictures when I can during and after caucus night. I'm located in Boone County, if you are interested in watching those results. Get 'em.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 1, 2016 09:04
|
|
|
Tatum Girlparts posted:Isn't Microsoft a big Sanders donor? Not that I know of. They did support Obama in 2008, which might be what you're recalling. https://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/recips.php?id=D000000115&type=P&state=&sort=A&cycle=2008
|
|
#
¿
Feb 1, 2016 09:08
|
|
|
Tatum Girlparts posted:https://www.opensecrets.org/pres16/contrib.php?cycle=All&id=N00000528&type of his corporate backing they're number three, so it'd be pretty weird of they were in the cabal to screwjob him. $16000 in individual contributions, a fraction of what Clinton has likely received from that same pool.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 1, 2016 17:05
|
|
|
Mitt Romney posted:Rubio is gonna win Iowa Nah. His puny campaign apparatus can't make the most of his last minute rubementum.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 1, 2016 21:30
|
|
|
Montasque posted:Donald Trump is currently sitting at 68% on Predictwise to win Iowa. So tempting to scoop some Cruz argh.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 2, 2016 00:20
|
|
|
I hereby declare victory in Iowa for myself.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 2, 2016 05:02
|
|
|
Top Bunk Wanker posted:They're not wrong. Die you poo poo.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 2, 2016 05:36
|
|
|
Amused to Death posted:Death to millennials Life to millennials IMO
|
|
#
¿
Feb 2, 2016 05:40
|
|
|
rscott posted:MSNBC just rolled back 2% what Microsoft just triggered the Nixon Protocol.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 2, 2016 05:43
|
|
|
a cop posted:God drat! Bernie is OLD! Old School Socialist, that is.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 2, 2016 05:49
|
|
|
The way Bernie's delegate share keeps bouncing back up to within 0.2% is mind-boggling. This is insane.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 2, 2016 06:03
|
|
|
Josh Lyman posted:Why does MSNBC polling information say Hillary has 665 and Bernie has 661? Caucus-goers aren't counted, they're counting bound precinct-level delegates.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 2, 2016 06:11
|
|
|
 Enten I will end you.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 2, 2016 06:35
|
|
|
a cop posted:This is why Hillary's going to win! Because a contested precinct had a landslide result for Bernie?
|
|
#
¿
Feb 2, 2016 06:49
|
|
|
 ENTEN.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 2, 2016 06:53
|
|
|
A SECOND PLANE JUST HIT THE DNC
|
|
#
¿
Feb 2, 2016 07:27
|
|
|
SirKibbles posted:MSNBC reporting that the DNC is disputing the 90 precincts DNC now reporting itself for fraud, wait, DNC now accusing itself of making false accusation!
|
|
#
¿
Feb 2, 2016 07:37
|
|
|
EugeneJ posted:America needs to wait in line and pay their doctor $100 to get prescribed that Xanax @ $200 per script or w/e
|
|
#
¿
Feb 2, 2016 07:38
|
|
|
Corek posted:Reminder that Ron Paul actually absconded with all the Iowa votes 4 years ago because of paulites taking over the iowa gop Ron Paul is a literal fey folk so they really should have seen that coming.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 2, 2016 07:39
|
|
|
Look Around You posted:Wasn't it the Sanders campaign accusing the DNC of fraud? DNC initially contacted the Sanders campaign about the 90 precincts thing. No idea what's actually going on. Sanders camp also says internal numbers show a 2 delegate lead, but that's another story entirely... maybe? There are no actual fraud accusations fwiw.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 2, 2016 07:40
|
|
|
Brannock posted:What happens to O'Malley's delegates now that he's dropped out? They are forced to commit ritual suicide.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 2, 2016 07:43
|
|
|
Narcissus1916 posted:In Nevada the caucus chair can be a volunteer from the Clinton or Sanders camp. So a Precinct Captain can pull double duty as a Captain AND as a chair - but they can't "openly advocate" for their candidate. Great system. Really great. Based on our excellent & well-established system of corporate governance, presumably.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 2, 2016 07:49
|
|
|
Arkane posted:this guy seems affable and normal He seems like a hapless dork to me. Just ask for a drat pen!!!
|
|
#
¿
Feb 2, 2016 08:01
|
|
|
Wait nevermind.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 2, 2016 08:07
|
|
|
Javert (Precinct Chair): Now Precinct Delegate 24601, time is up and the vote is tied. You know what that means? Jean Valjean: Yes, it means I'm free. Javert: No. [flips a coin] Javert: Follow to the letter your itinerary, this badge of shame you wear until you die. It warns that you're a Hillary delegate. Jean Valjean: The vote was 54-54. My sister's child had school tomorrow and had to leave. You've dragged this out for hours... Javert: And you will be here until dawn unless you learn the meaning of the law!
|
|
#
¿
Feb 2, 2016 17:07
|
|
|
Polling average underestimated Bernie's support by about 4 points relative to Hillary's based on the final tallies.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 2, 2016 19:52
|
|
|
Yoshifan823 posted:I'm going to kill all of my friends. They won't shut up about coin-flips and voter fraud, when it's such a minor, dumb thing that changes nothing. TBF the coin flip thing is mind-bogglingly idiotic and deserves its fair share of condemnation.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 3, 2016 03:16
|
|
|
Northjayhawk posted:You can't award half a delegate. Someone has to win, how else do you break a tie other than a coin flip? Wow, people really will defend anything. Award a half delegate to each or just award it to undecided. Or keep recounting until one side wins. The whole "delegate" construct is an insane farce anyway. Ideally just get rid of the caucus system entirely.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 3, 2016 05:17
|
|
|
Joementum posted:Delegates are actual people who participate in actual meetings. Yeah, that's dumb. But there's no reason you couldn't send someone as unassigned.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 3, 2016 05:26
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 14, 2024 20:58 |
|
|
Northjayhawk posted:Yes, there is. "Unaffiliated" is its own preference group. My caucus had literally zero unaffiliated voters, and thats not going to be uncommon, people who are willing to show up and endure an hour or more of bullshit probably have an opinion. Makes more sense than giving away extra votes by chance. It would be trivial to set up assignment rules that don't rely on that and it's endlessly amusing that people think the current way is in any way defensible.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 3, 2016 05:43
|
|