|
The dem cspan stream is much more entertaining than the republican cspan stream. Much more authentic caucus feel.
|
#
¿
Feb 2, 2016 02:47
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 14, 2024 18:08 |
|
|
SpiderHyphenMan posted:What the gently caress is a "spousal unit" Old silly turn of phrase that isn't offensive or even necessarily gendered. See also "parental units".
|
|
#
¿
Feb 2, 2016 03:24
|
|
|
As a voter who is deeply concerned with proper visual representation of information, I cannot in good conscience vote for Microsoft
|
|
#
¿
Feb 2, 2016 03:35
|
|
|
Seriously, am I missing something or are the graphs on this website just offensively bad
|
|
#
¿
Feb 2, 2016 03:49
|
|
|
Where can I find a feed for these candidates about to speak? What network is saying they're covering which?
|
|
#
¿
Feb 2, 2016 04:34
|
|
|
I think it's somehow more fitting that Jeb!, rather than getting no delegates, gets one by dint of a rounding error.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 2, 2016 05:06
|
|
|
Bhaal posted:I'm confused, I tuned in and got a Rubio speech with a byline on CNN saying he won the republican caucus. But looking at the numbers Cruz is crushing both him and Trump. He massively outperformed his polls, and so is declaring victory. In spite of coming in at what looks to be a close third.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 2, 2016 05:09
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/daveweigel/status/694380295177531392
|
|
#
¿
Feb 2, 2016 05:46
|
|
|
Epic High Five posted:Trump is almost 70 and if he didn't have a the Michelangelo of tailors people would be worried about his heart giving out Pretty sure the hair can take over for short periods, in event of an emergency.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 2, 2016 05:52
|
|
|
Joementum posted:
Not the same without a Karl Rove 
|
|
#
¿
Feb 2, 2016 06:13
|
|
MSNBC has Steve Kornacki making the same walk Megyn Kelly made election night 2012
|
Please, someone link me to something about this Santorum supporter's pen dying. I need to see this.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 2, 2016 07:48
|
|
|
Thank you, this is everything I'd hoped it would beJoementum posted:Just to reiterate what I think has been made clear tonight: Caucuses own
|
|
#
¿
Feb 2, 2016 08:02
|
|
|
remusclaw posted:OK thanks. A way around it might be to double the amount of delegates each place that earns one gets. Thus, there will always be at least 2, and so they can be split. Too many people? You can't remove the possibility of a tie by doubling the number of things to be apportioned, because they can be apportioned between more than two candidates. O'Malley did get a few.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 3, 2016 05:11
|
|
|
Microsoft could've integrated random.org's third party service into the app, I guess. But that'd totally kill the mood of a caucus.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 3, 2016 05:39
|
|
|
Aliquid posted:Texas held a primary and caucus and it sucked. The Texas thing was pretty different from what he's suggesting. They awarded most delegates by a primary, then had a caucus where they awarded some, but you had to vote in the primary in order to caucus.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 3, 2016 06:11
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 14, 2024 18:08 |
|
|
Aliquid posted:Are you sure about that? I skipped the primary and participated in the caucus no problem in 2008. I even introduced a change to the platform to guarantee healthcare as a right at my precinct My main point was that the delegate issue was different, but yeah, I'm fairly sure about the eligibility thing? Just going off of wikipedia and the first few google hits, but I didn't see anything to the contrary. Going for 2008 specifically gets me this U.S. News article, for example. e: From the 2013-2014 rules available here quote:B. Precinct Conventions e2: I should have specified that I know nothing about the Republican side of all that. eviltastic has issued a correction as of 07:06 on Feb 3, 2016 |
|
#
¿
Feb 3, 2016 06:55
|
|
