Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Skull Servant
Oct 25, 2009

Coohoolin posted:

So everyone's shat it and gone back to elect the other fuckups?

Kinda. Looks like the only government that can be made is a grand coalition of FF and FG with FF being the smaller party.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Skull Servant
Oct 25, 2009

lemonadesweetheart posted:

Shatter is done. At least something good happened.

Renua also don't look like they're getting anywhere.

Skull Servant
Oct 25, 2009

Are people really thinking that Enda will step down? I never thought his position was fragile. Hell, the problem is more with Labour, not FG.

I have no love lost for Enda or FG but these talking points are coming out of left field.

Skull Servant
Oct 25, 2009

That's also an issue. People are saying Leo, but his seat is apparently in trouble? There is no real anointed one or anyone who seems to want to take the position right now.

Skull Servant
Oct 25, 2009

Ah, makes sense. I was getting old news then.

kustomkarkommando posted:

You are going to have to blast Enda out with dynamite. No way is he going to forfeit the opportunity to be the first ever FG Taoiseach to serve two consecutive terms

This also. He will hang on tooth and nail.

Skull Servant
Oct 25, 2009

I bet Enda is raging about the result.

Skull Servant
Oct 25, 2009

Possibly? Who else would go in apart from a rainbow of independents? One could argue that would be even less stable than a FG/FF government. It would also mean that we would be guaranteed a FF/Other government within the next year.

Skull Servant
Oct 25, 2009

Burn it down. Start again.

Skull Servant
Oct 25, 2009

I mean surely that would only work if FF get more or equal seats to FG? It'll be a very tough sell otherwise.

Skull Servant
Oct 25, 2009

I really do not understand why turnout was so low. 65% is American levels of turnout.

Skull Servant
Oct 25, 2009

Four seats for AAA/PBP!

Skull Servant
Oct 25, 2009

I was planning to myself but I have work tomorrow. Was burned by the counting taking place today rather than overnight Friday.

I was spoiled by the quickness of Canada and the UK.

Skull Servant
Oct 25, 2009

Sinn Fein aren't doing as well as polls suggested which is disappointing, but they're outperforming 2011 which is a plus. Ideally we'd have a bigger left wing party but I'll take what I can get.

At the very least these results mean I might be able to vote still this year.

Skull Servant
Oct 25, 2009

Ooh I actually read up on Pringle a few weeks ago. Mostly due to the name. He seems pretty good.

Skull Servant
Oct 25, 2009

I mean, he isn't wrong.

Skull Servant
Oct 25, 2009

kustomkarkommando posted:

Well there goes Ged Nash

G'wan Louth

Skull Servant
Oct 25, 2009

My fingers are still crossed for an error for Burton tbh.

Skull Servant
Oct 25, 2009

I think the left's issue with Labour is they have shown they are not committed to a left platform. It isn't "sniping" as such as justifiable anger after being let down.

Skull Servant
Oct 25, 2009

The question is if Kelly gets leadership will he be as happy as he was today?

https://twitter.com/thejournal_ie/status/703958965906845696

Skull Servant
Oct 25, 2009

Drunk on power, I'd say. Just happy to get his fix.

Skull Servant
Oct 25, 2009

Blut posted:

They're more committed to a left platform than FF or FG though, at the least. I completely understand previous Labour supporters switching to other left parties (myself being one of them) for their 1st/2nd pref votes. But it seems silly to not even give a lower pref vote to Labour when it might potentially kept a right-wing TD out. SF seem to be more concerned with hurting Labour's brand for their own gain than with furthering the broader ideological left-wing cause.

Which would be fine, if Labour weren't actively campaigning for a continue of the coalition. To vote for Labour is basically to vote for FG. Leftists don't want to continue to coalition because of how little Labour did to pull FG left.

Your point that they are "more committed" to a left ideology makes no sense either. The last five years have not proven that. The only thing I will give them credit for is the Marriage Ref and the Gender Recognition bill, but FG are taking all the credit for that anyway and it downplays their involvement.

Quinntan posted:

Honestly, from what I know of their governance up north and of some of their more rural members, I'd be very surprised if they actually proved to be all that left-wing while in government.

I think you're comparing apples to oranges here. Northern Ireland's power sharing would not allow them to push a left platform when you consider how right wing the DUP/UUP are.

Skull Servant fucked around with this message at 15:55 on Feb 29, 2016

Skull Servant
Oct 25, 2009

Quinntan posted:

No, a vote for Labour is a vote for at least some of the left's policies to be enacted. There's no way in hell the gay marriage referendum goes through without Labour being involved, for example.

Some of the left's policies such as austerity, increased cost of third level education, cutting welfare and restricting it for younger people, HSE being barely funded... I could go on all day.


The Marriage Ref was a good thing, but Jesus if that is the only thing they have to show for multiple failings over 5 years what reason does ANYONE have to support them? They were elected on a wave of promises to protect the people who were hurt most by the recession and they failed them. They had their chance in power and they did very, very little to help.

Blut posted:

It's all well and good to (correctly) disparage Labour's left credentials/actions since 2011 though, but in some constituencies the last seat this week was between an FF/FG candidate and a Labour candidate. In that scenario anyone who actually has left-leaning political views, regardless of party affiliation, should be hoping for a Labour win. I don't think anyone can doubt that both FG and FF are at the very least slightly to the right of Labour. And Labour have far more potential to swing back left than either of FF/FG.

Neither is ideal, but I'd far rather a FG/LAB coalition government than FG/FF, given the choice. And they are/were the most likely choices facing us.

The very angry, Labour-are-terrible-in-every-way SF supporter sentiment just seems either selfish (a ploy by SF to get more votes) or childish (seeing everything in black&white good vs bad instead of shades of grey). The left's ridiculous tendency to fight each other / split parties constantly instead of coalescing against the centre-right has been a major problem in Ireland for the past 90 years.

I hope with the retirement of Gerry's Generation from SF they lose some of the irredentist nationalism, and gain more people committed to actual left wing economic policies. But we'll see.


Again, the same points. It's not as if Labour are our only left wing party. There are SF, there is AAA/PBP, Social Democrats, Socialists, and a swarth of left leaning Independents. We are not dealing with a FPTP system. Ireland benefits from having a broad spectrum of parties and independent candidates. If we have the opportunity to punish a party who has failed us, we should take it. If Labour come back in 2021 or whenever and have reformed themselves into a party where they will actually put their foot down and represent the poor I will give them a preference. As it stands, myself, and other leftists, have no reason to put any preference for them in 2016.

EDIT: The point that the left splits and can be reluctant to work together is true, but I do not think that this is the main reason for people pulling away from Labour in 2016.

kustomkarkommando posted:

PBP have been making a ruckus in West Belfast attacking SF for being weak on austerity and have been found quite a bit of agreement with voters, they are posed to take one seat from them in the next assembly election there.

And that's West Belfast. You can't get more of an SF heartland than there.


I will concede this point. I honestly do not know much of the current political rumblings in the North. I still find it hard to blame SF with the way the political system is set up in the North, but I will listen to people who know more about the North. Shame to hear, tbh.

Skull Servant fucked around with this message at 17:44 on Feb 29, 2016

Skull Servant
Oct 25, 2009

The fact is that a vote for Labour was always a vote for a FG/Labour coalition. Leftists were tired of feeding Labour votes just so they can prop FG up. Maybe circumstances would be different if Labour weren't so married to FG and expressed an openness to coalition with SF and other leftists. This was not the case in 2016. They were passive in government and they were passive in the election. They deserved what they got.

The problem you are addressing isn't one of leftists not voting Labour. It's people voting for FG or FF.

When it comes down to brass tacks what exactly would happen if Labour got as many seats as 2011? If your answer isn't that they would prop up FG then I don't know what to tell you. People don't want another 5 years of FG/Labour. The reason they don't want it is because of how bad Labour handled being in government.

Also, the point still stands that a FF/FG will not be stable. Both sides will be ratfucking each other instantly. Hard to see how either party comes out the better in that instance. The opposition parties like SF. SocDems, AAA/PBP, and yes even Labour if they are excluded will benefit hugely from a FF/FG government.

Skull Servant
Oct 25, 2009

Quinntan posted:

They're also over half the 2016 electorate judging by first preferences in this election. If you're casting out over half the electorate as lost causes or awful people, ye'll never get anywhere. Besides, if over half the electorate is going for the centre-right, as has happened in pretty much every national election ever in this country, it will take a lot of work from the left to get close to getting a leading party in a government.

Of course ignoring the incumbent effect and the fact that these people have been the only parties in government since the foundation of the state, the fact that these parties have a lot more funding for advertising and for campaigners.

There is also the fact that a lot of people just don't care for politics and vote for whoever their parents voted for pretty much.

And of course you have the whole idea that these two juggernauts of Irish politics can only muster half of the popular vote together. The results for both parties are disappointing. This is hardly a victory for the centre right.

Blut posted:

The problem I'm addressing is not people voting for FG or FF. They're already lost causes/awful people. My problem is when you see SF/AAA candidates being eliminated, and their votes aren't transferring to Labour candidates still in the running. Thats a lack of lower preference voting for LAB from people of leftist views.

Labour were never in line to get as many seats in 2011 as part of an unpopular government. But lets say they got a LOT of transfers and got 15 more seats, so were sitting at 22. And FG/FF both got 5-8ish seats less than they currently have, so were both sitting around 40. That's a very optimistic, but still possible outcome. We'd still be facing a FF/FG government, but we'd have a lot more leftish TDs in the Dail. Presuming more gains for LAB/SF/AAA etc in the next election we'd then be looking at the possible prospect of a LAB/SF/others left-wing coalition government.

Instead, with Labour being eviscerated and more seats going to FF/FG as a result we're going to have a more stable FF/FG government than otherwise. And the sum total of 'left' parties is only 38 (LAB/SF/AAA/SD/GR) seats. Which means they'd need to double their numbers in any new election to form a government, which seems unfortunately unlikely.

Basically, it just seems self-defeating of any proclaimed leftist to not give Labour a lower preference vote. Because its not SF/AAA you help, its FF/FG.

My point still stands, that there are plenty of other options to vote left and not Labour. I really don't think that FF/FG sucked up as many Labour seats as the other left leaning candidates. We aren't dealing with a Conservative/Lib Dem situation here.

Skull Servant fucked around with this message at 20:59 on Feb 29, 2016

Skull Servant
Oct 25, 2009

Quinntan posted:

The whole of the left, including Labour, doesn't even get a third of the popular vote. It's progress since 2007, to be sure, but whether ye can continue making gains is something I'd be curious about.

I would be very surprised if the left didn't continue to make gains with the current climate. The left's biggest issues are the incumbent effect and the uninterested voter's fear of change.

Skull Servant
Oct 25, 2009

Crowsbeak posted:

So how likely is it that there is another election in 12 months?

Likely, but we really won't know until we see who will and won't work with who.

Skull Servant
Oct 25, 2009

Blut posted:

The number of other left options isn't relevant to my point at all - once again, its that anyone of leftish political views not giving LAB even a low preference vote potentially results in an extra FF/FG candidate. Which is wasteful, if they actually want to increase the influence of leftish political views in the Dail.

I think the issue here is you are treating STV like FPTP. Not giving Labour a preference does not mean that FG or FF will get the seat. The leftist support will drift to the leftist parties. The issue there is the Labour voter putting FG (or less likely FF) as a preference.

With regards to leftism in Ireland, one could argue that the people of the 1916 Rising were trying to build a socialist Ireland. It's a weak argument because it ignores a lot of the different groups who were involved in the Rising, but it is an argument nonetheless.

You can also argue that even our right wing parties have been more left wing than similar centre right parties in other counties. Anecdotal, but I have found that despite Canada's touting of being so liberal they actually have eroded a lot of workers rights, the welfare state exists, but is not as strong as Ireland's is also. Of course there is the factors of US osmosis and Harper's 10 years in power but that isn't for this thread.

We do seem to be seeing a surging in leftism and it resonates strongly with the population. We will have to see how that will play out with regards to the recovery. If we do find ourselves in a comfortable position it may wash away for the most part and we could settle back into the status quo.

Skull Servant fucked around with this message at 02:49 on Mar 3, 2016

Skull Servant
Oct 25, 2009

Bedshaped posted:

Labour in coalition did almost nothing for the left.

So we've actually gone from 26 left TDs in opposition to 40 left TDs in opposition. So I would call that a significant gain.

Exactly this. Even if Labour were in power they did piss all. They married themselves to FG and if you were voting for Labour you were voting for them to prop up a FG government. If Labour got more seats who exactly would they prop up in government, Blut?

kustomkarkommando posted:

Sounds like Pat the Cope Gallagher may be emerging as the front runner for Ceann Comhairle - FG don't seem that interested as it would mean losing a seat, no way Labour is going to throw away a seat as well. SF have nominated Caoimhghín Ó Caoláin and there's talk of Finian McGrath maybe running.

Might make Martin happy as Gallagher practically forced his way back into his seat, supposedly he is still well miffed with Martin over the 2014 Euro elections when the party decided to run two candidates in his constituency - he's a member of the old guard and doesn't necessarily see eye to eye with Martin. Punting him off to shout at people and stand up a lot might get rid of him.


Seems odd that FF would sacrifice a seat but if he wants to get Gallagher out of the way it works very well.

Skull Servant
Oct 25, 2009

kustomkarkommando posted:

Getting someone in the seat to back FFs attempts to fiddle with the standing orders would be a plus for them, and I'm sure the rest of the opposition would prefer someone from the opposition being given the reigns of the Dail rather than another government TD (if FFs plan for the time being is to remain in opposition with a confidence deal as it seems to be)

It's a risky move if they go into a supply deal and also go for CC. It could backfire hardcore or they could actually end up taking government next election.

Skull Servant
Oct 25, 2009

Blut posted:

I'll take your lack of engagement with the above figures as a backing down from your "Not giving Labour a preference does not mean that FG or FF will get the seat." factually incorrect stance so!

If LAB were plus 5-10 seats currently they wouldn't be propping anyone up in government. We'd still be looking at an FG minority or FG/FF coalition government. There would just be less FG/FF TDs. Which would be helpful in the next election, when every extra left leaning TD would increase the possibility of a genuine 'left' government - one that excludes both FF & FG. Any potential left government in the near future is realistically going to have to contain LAB/SF/AAA/SD/GR at the minimum, and that's being very optimistic given their current combined seat numbers.

No, I did not engage because it is still an amazing misunderstanding of STV. You cited five seats of 30 that Labour lost. You also ignore that we have seen an increase in left wing TDs.

You also seem to ignore how against SF Labour are and were. They are, were, and seemingly always will be, very against combining forces with other left parties. They will stick to one of the big two and that is that. This will forever mark them in leftist minds as not being true leftists. They are very happy to talk the talk of being leftist but when they get into government they suddenly forget about that and back FG because it we just have to.

You seem to be very stuck on the notion that Labour will somehow suddenly become leftist when their track record for years has not proven that. Labour will not save the left in Ireland and the left does not need to support Labour. We have other options.

Skull Servant
Oct 25, 2009

forkboy84 posted:

You're not a centre-left party just by declaring you are a centre-left party. If you are a party who used to be centre-left but are explicitly involved with a government which pushes through a right wing agenda for very little in return then people who view themselves as on the left on the spectrum are justified in punishing them for that betrayal. How else does a formerly centre-left party know that voters don't appreciate their going from centre-left to centre or centre right?

This is exactly what I keep stressing. If Labour actually proved themselves to be centre-left in government then I would vote for them, I'd tell my friends to vote for them. But as it stands they do not want to work with left parties and while they put leftist points in their manifesto, they do not act on them nine times out of ten.

Again, I agree that the left vote does split and that is a problem. People are not putting preferences for Labour because of their pure ideology, they are leaving them out because they constantly say leftist things and help implement right wing mandates.

kustomkarkommando posted:

Anyone who can get the votes becomes Taoiseach. After a Ceann Comhairle (speaker) various nominations will be put forward by the different parties and voted on, whoever gets a simple majority is appointed - there is no special position given to the largest party.

For example back in 1948 the First Inter-Party Government was knocked together from every opposition party (the largest single party being FG who were still 37 seats behind FF) and didn't even manage to muster a majority then - they relied on the support of several independents in the nomination vote to get their man in the top seat

The First Inter-Party Government was a wild ride and not something we will ever see again, I don't think. The early days of Irish self-determination where we didn't know what the gently caress to do.

I'm actually surprised how little information is being leaked or reported on in the aftermath of the election. Everyone is really waiting for the dust to settle here.

Skull Servant
Oct 25, 2009

SocDems, Independents and the Green Party. Everyone else underpreformed.

All in all it was a win because Renua didn't get a single seat.

Skull Servant
Oct 25, 2009

https://twitter.com/JohnBurnsST/status/706241426108112896

Skull Servant
Oct 25, 2009

Holy poo poo this is really going to fall to pieces in the next month, isn't it.

Skull Servant
Oct 25, 2009

How the hell would that work anyway?

Skull Servant
Oct 25, 2009

That sounds completely unworkable.

Skull Servant
Oct 25, 2009

Holy poo poo the idea of FF going broke is too good. Call the election now!

Skull Servant
Oct 25, 2009

Blut posted:

SF votes not transferring to a left-wing candidate, resulting in an FF/FG person being elected? Who could have seen that coming :derp

Yes, because FF getting CC hasn't been the favourite since the results came in. Good job.

How long do they have to tussle with this before a second election is called?

Skull Servant
Oct 25, 2009

Jesus Christ this is going to be a mess.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Skull Servant
Oct 25, 2009

Wait so he is stepping down from Taoiseach... to become a caretaker Taoiseach... while still looking to become Taoiseach?

  • Locked thread