|
Saw MT photo op with his grandkid and suddenly feel the historical precedent for him is Crassus making his way to Carrhae. 62-yo rich dude with maximum hubris about to be handed a shellacking by underestimated adversary.
|
# ¿ May 2, 2016 00:58 |
|
|
# ¿ May 16, 2024 07:16 |
|
Skimmed the rags waiting for my lunch today, Blot is having a dig at the French subs in the Arsetralian. Didn't read enough to find out why.
|
# ¿ May 2, 2016 04:14 |
|
australia needs landmines to protect critical areas like
|
# ¿ May 2, 2016 14:10 |
|
Jumpingmanjim posted:Queanbeyan I thought that was to stop people from getting out
|
# ¿ May 2, 2016 14:12 |
|
Jumpingmanjim posted:RBA cut to 1.75% now I get to borrow even stupider amounts of money to negatively gear
|
# ¿ May 3, 2016 05:40 |
|
MysticalMachineGun posted:Is that 80 000 gross or after tax? taxable income so you can finagle underneath with deductions
|
# ¿ May 3, 2016 05:47 |
|
the day the RBA drops rates to lowest ever levels because of deflation is probably not the right day to be worrying about bracket creep
|
# ¿ May 3, 2016 05:55 |
|
As well as much of Turnbull's personal popularity vis-a-vis Abbott being sourced from younger voters. The same class of voters he is alienating every time he professes his undying love for negative gearing.
|
# ¿ May 3, 2016 06:36 |
|
Okay somebody tell me if I'm wrong/crazy regarding the business tax cuts. For the local small-then medium-then any businessperson, because of dividend imputation/personal services attribution/div 7A (*chortle*), the local businessperson will pay a top up rate to hit the proper (higher) marginal rate. Because the individual brackets as largely unchanged, tax paid by the local entrepreneur will be largely unchanged.* For the multinational not in the sights of *yeah I know about using trusts to split income
|
# ¿ May 3, 2016 12:51 |
|
Doctor Spaceman posted:My team of in-house experts agrees, but says that's assuming profits are distributed? can't argue with that
|
# ¿ May 3, 2016 13:27 |
|
Actually releasing good economic policies that have been stolen by the Libs has been great for the ALP. It's framed the debate in such a way that the Libs are at a natural disadvantage because it's not about economic management anymore, it's about fairness.
|
# ¿ May 3, 2016 21:07 |
|
Also if you look at agency staffing in Budget Paper No. 4, TAX FORCE is 539 people, not 1000.
|
# ¿ May 3, 2016 21:12 |
|
someone please inform thread about Turnbull on Jon Faine re: housing (I'm on a phone)
|
# ¿ May 4, 2016 03:03 |
|
Amethyst posted:Okay, but this includes part timers. Negligent was specifically talking about full time workers. That's the trick.
|
# ¿ May 5, 2016 02:37 |
|
Malcolm Licinius Crassus Turnbull
|
# ¿ May 5, 2016 04:49 |
|
It's kind of hard to quantify the cost of the corporate tax cuts given how few of them pay the right amount now.
|
# ¿ May 5, 2016 04:54 |
|
Negligent posted:Turnbull is more like Gaius Julius Caesar IMO I'm giving this the shallowest of analyses but Bob Hawke is a far better Caesar analogue.
|
# ¿ May 5, 2016 04:56 |
|
neggy is going to attempt a self-vote by drawing a poo emoji on the ballot
|
# ¿ May 5, 2016 08:46 |
|
WhiskeyWhiskers posted:Does literally anyone care about signage? We have mandatory voting, it's not as if we need to be hyped for the election. Is it just for name recognition? To an extent, it gives the impression of legitimacy. It's hard for a challenger to knock off an incumbent if nobody knows who they are.
|
# ¿ May 7, 2016 08:41 |
|
tory scum checking in
|
# ¿ May 9, 2016 03:29 |
|
I keep seeing that Albo was "disadvantaged" by the redistribution but I don't see how, Balmain/Rozelle was solid for the ALP in 2013
|
# ¿ May 9, 2016 04:07 |
|
BOAT SHOWBOAT posted:Seems like this makes a Tory by the standards of this thread Stay strong comrade, the trots will soon be driven to distraction by splits.
|
# ¿ May 9, 2016 10:18 |
|
Laserface posted:Hahaha holy poo poo you should take that dude's advice
|
# ¿ May 10, 2016 01:32 |
|
Skellybones posted:I wonder what would happen if the Nationals just quietly dissolved. australia overrun by CAAARRRP
|
# ¿ May 10, 2016 02:57 |
|
Solemn Sloth posted:Pretty happy considering he runs his own reds under the bed campaign against the greens Greens under the sateen?
|
# ¿ May 10, 2016 21:29 |
|
Birdstrike posted:as if anyone in fuckin grayndler reads that poo poo anyway
|
# ¿ May 11, 2016 01:12 |
|
Turnbull shouldn't even waste anyone's time campaigning seeing as he's going to lose.
|
# ¿ May 11, 2016 05:51 |
|
Yet more lieberal waste
|
# ¿ May 11, 2016 05:52 |
|
None of our pollies are as good at looking at things as Kims Jong Il/Un
|
# ¿ May 12, 2016 02:07 |
|
Spudd posted:Mike Baird has this morning sacked me as the Mayor of Leichhardt and abolished Leichhardt Council. Good I didn't vote for you
|
# ¿ May 12, 2016 07:15 |
|
I take it you'll be boating to Cambodia then.
|
# ¿ May 12, 2016 10:19 |
|
what if amalgamations... are good?
|
# ¿ May 12, 2016 13:18 |
|
hot take alert: it is with some irony that government secrecy on refugees is blunting its effectiveness as a wedge issue
|
# ¿ May 13, 2016 00:31 |
|
Cartoon posted:Amalgamations are ridiculous. Counterpoint: councils routinely fail to extract a proper return for the community (in the form of infrastructure or otherwise) from developers because they don't have the scale/resources to negotiate commercial terms. You can count on one hand the councils that have these resources. Larger councils somewhat addresses this.
|
# ¿ May 13, 2016 02:06 |
|
llama you can't stop people getting hosed up from licking chemicals, you're proof of that
|
# ¿ May 13, 2016 09:02 |
|
ewe2 posted:This is the guy who represents conservative "balance" on ABC Radio National. This is the most bizarre thing I've read by a Liberal commentator who isn't a shill like Bolt, Devine, or Albrechtsen. So I'm going to rant about it. And to think that guy is head and shoulders above every other conservative commentator I've read.
|
# ¿ May 15, 2016 11:54 |
|
ScreamingLlama posted:True, but that's only one part of the equation. If the government couldn't manage your case properly why would you trust them to properly manage this?
|
# ¿ May 15, 2016 23:32 |
|
gay picnic defence posted:you loving idiot. This is the other side of the equation
|
# ¿ May 15, 2016 23:41 |
|
ScreamingLlama posted:Like in the movie, it could be strongly argued that the compulsory acquisitions did not occur 'on just terms' due to the significant hardships those evicted may face as a result of the Westconnex project. IANAL though. NSW has a Just Terms Act which sets out the matters to be taken into consideration when determining "just terms" (s55). If you were unhappy with the amount you could appeal to the Land & Environment Court as set out in that Act. If you were unhappy with the process you could conceivably run all sorts of administrative law arguments to try and delay the decision and have it remade properly, which may or may not net you any more money. Given the despicable machinations of the Baird government you may even have some success with this, although the courts are (sometimes) reluctant to exercise this power. I'm assuming you could do this because I didn't see a privative clause in the Act and I'm in my phone and I cbf looking. I am not an environmental lawyer though.
|
# ¿ May 19, 2016 08:41 |
|
|
# ¿ May 16, 2024 07:16 |
|
Di Natale story is bullshit, they weren't au pairs they were interns
|
# ¿ May 19, 2016 13:15 |