|
 
|
#
¿
Jul 20, 2016 06:02
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 29, 2024 08:02 |
|
|
|
|
#
¿
Jul 25, 2016 00:43
|
|
|
|
|
#
¿
Aug 8, 2016 03:52
|
|
|
nvm
|
|
#
¿
Aug 22, 2016 18:53
|
|
|
   This reminds me of Todd Hido eggsovereasy fucked around with this message at 06:18 on Aug 31, 2016 |
|
#
¿
Aug 31, 2016 06:02
|
|
|
 
|
|
#
¿
Sep 1, 2016 03:25
|
|
|
I've been scanning a lot of film this week  edit: redid white balance eggsovereasy fucked around with this message at 04:16 on Sep 3, 2016 |
|
#
¿
Sep 2, 2016 23:38
|
|
|
deaders posted:Your colours are fairly off. Seems to be lots of red/purple Thanks, I redid them is it better now?
|
|
#
¿
Sep 3, 2016 04:18
|
|
|
 
|
|
#
¿
Sep 8, 2016 04:11
|
|
|
|
|
#
¿
Sep 28, 2016 06:12
|
|
|
 
|
|
#
¿
Nov 21, 2016 05:28
|
|
|
 
|
|
#
¿
Nov 23, 2016 17:23
|
|
|
|
|
#
¿
Nov 28, 2016 21:57
|
|
|
 
|
|
#
¿
Dec 30, 2016 06:25
|
|
|
|
|
#
¿
Jul 5, 2017 05:13
|
|
|
I've not shot with my Chamonix in a long time, but I decided to take it to an old cemetary in town and work on a typology of old gave markers. Here's what I have so far:       
|
|
#
¿
Dec 3, 2017 21:59
|
|
|
bobmarleysghost posted:Cool, I think I would like it more if the bases of all of those stones matched up on a line, also all taken from the exact same distance from the stones. This is the first time I've tried something like this so thanks for the suggestion! I'll keep it in mind if I try it again.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 6, 2017 17:12
|
|
|
Rot posted:Unfortunately it kinda smells like cigarettes but hopefully that will pass. I got a Contax TVSII that smelled really bad like smoke. I wiped it down with some lysol wipes which helped some and the rest of the stink faded with time. The cloth case it came with was far worse but I doused it in febreeze a few times and it's not so bad now.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 27, 2018 05:18
|
|
|
I've been using my Bronica SQ a lot lately, digging 6x6 right now     
|
|
#
¿
Jun 15, 2019 05:46
|
|
|
CodfishCartographer posted:gently caress, the n2 is sold out I bought an F1 because the N2 was out of stock at the time. I'm pretty sure I've never used rear tilt, but I don't regret my decision. Also, the separate knobs for tilt and rise/fall on the F2 is a feature I wouldn't mind having. Been shooting my Bronica SQ a lot lately, here are some shots.    
eggsovereasy fucked around with this message at 05:00 on Jun 12, 2020 |
|
#
¿
Jun 12, 2020 04:53
|
|
Website says they'll be back in "4-6 months" but who knows when that was initially posted. I'll just have to keep my eyes on there I suppose. I'm not a huge fan of super wide-angle, and while I would like to take advantage of movements and such I dunno if I'd really need the flexibility provided by the 45F-2, I doubt I'd be able to take full advantage of it.
|
Anyone use a 75mm with their Chamonix? I'm assuming I'd have to move the rear standard forward to focus at infinity? Any issues with movements and the 'universal bellows'? Will vignetting be a problem? Would I need a center filter? It seems like the Nikon 75mm f/4.5 has the most coverage of the modern ones I could find specs for. I'm not backpacking or anything with it so weight isn't a huge concern.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 15, 2020 20:33
|
|
|
Awesome thanks for the advice guys.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 18, 2020 02:55
|
|
|
  
|
|
#
¿
Jul 10, 2020 03:48
|
|
|
CodfishCartographer posted:Sweet, took the plunge and ordered my chamonix Number all your holders and write down a description of each shot so if one has a leak you know which holder sucks.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 15, 2020 04:11
|
|
How can i tell the new style riteways specifically? Googling just seems to reveal people referring to them but not really describing them.
|
CodfishCartographer posted:My Chamonix arrived! You just kind of figure it out over time. I use the hole closest to the rear standard for my 90mm, second closest for my 135mm and the one furthest away for my 210mm. That said, I'm shooting at or near infinity all the time so I don't rack it out very far, so your YMMV.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 22, 2020 16:16
|
|
|
theHUNGERian posted:The leap from a V700 to the next thing will set you back ~$15k: https://petapixel.com/2017/05/01/16000-photo-scanner-vs-500-scanner/ There's a Plustek 120 scanner thats supposed to be good -- https://plustek.com/us/products/film-photo-scanners/opticfilm-120-pro/index.php I think they might be in the middle of transitioning to a new version, so they seem to not be in stock anywhere, but I remember the previous version being like $1500, so still pretty expensive.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 23, 2020 17:22
|
|
|
alkanphel posted:1. I don't think I've ever dusted my MF camera in a decade. I use a blower on the mirror and ground glass sometimes just because it annoys me.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 24, 2020 04:13
|
|
|
Dren posted:assume that’s why Silverfast’s software is per scanner model. Perhaps they correct for each scanner’s quirks to do all the mapping correctly. Silverfast charges per scanner to scam you out of more money.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 14, 2020 01:34
|
|
|
Some recent shots   
|
|
#
¿
Oct 16, 2020 03:19
|
|
|
theHUNGERian posted:Is the GX617 the most economical 6x17 camera (with interchangeable lenses) that can be taken seriously? If you already have some large format stuff (like a lens that covers 6x17) there is a Shen Hao 6x17 view camera thats about the same price ($3k). There is also the older G617 that is cheaper, it has a fixed 105mm lens and is scale focus (I think the GX617 is also scale focus)
|
|
#
¿
Dec 22, 2020 22:52
|
|
|
How are you going to focus it, ground glass on the back?
|
|
#
¿
Jan 14, 2021 20:50
|
|
|
This is excellent.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 17, 2021 23:34
|
|
|
theHUNGERian posted:First roll of Foma 100 is mostly a disappointment. Lots of defects that look like: Fomapan scratches pretty easy so it’s possible it happened at the lab.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 11, 2021 04:41
|
|
|
yeah i don't even know what i'm looking at and that's fun
|
|
#
¿
May 24, 2021 00:05
|
|
|
|
|
#
¿
May 25, 2021 04:21
|
|
|
Pondex posted:Are the Hasselblad "C"-lenses annoying to use? The ones with the coupled speed/aperature? From what I've read C lenses are harder to repair (and getting pretty old now), so it may be worth spending more in the long run.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 2, 2021 13:47
|
|
|
Google Butt posted:For those using Instax wide, what ND filter would you suggest I use if I want to most closely match how I'd meter for portra 400? not really sure if this is what you mean, but instax is 800 iso so i guess a one stop nd filter?
|
|
#
¿
Oct 3, 2021 02:59
|
|
|
135mm is a common focal length too if you want a touch wider than 150mm. nikkors are good (all of my 4x5 lenses are nikkors). you can't go wrong with any of the big 4 lf lens brands (nikkor, fuji, rodenstock or schneider)
|
|
#
¿
Jun 19, 2022 04:07
|
|
|
theHUNGERian posted:^ the effects of diffraction are less evident in larger formats, i shoot f/22 on 4x5 most of the time, but try to avoid it on 35mm for example. i've only shot on a pinhole camera once or twice, just to do it, but if i were looking for a project or something i'd try to really lean into the flaws (softness, low contrast, subject movement from long exposure etc). i enjoy this photograph
|
|
#
¿
Sep 27, 2022 16:38
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 29, 2024 08:02 |
|
|
these are both cool
|
|
#
¿
Nov 25, 2022 03:36
|
|
