|
Iron Lung posted:This is what is so frustrating. She literally didn't even get a chance to do that with him there constantly interrupting. I'm pretty sure thst was the plan from the start
|
#
¿
Sep 27, 2016 03:48
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 15, 2024 21:39 |
|
|
Gio posted:It's the Republican primary debates all over. She's an empty suit, emblematic of people's angst toward politicians, corruption, and nepotism. Matt Taibbi said it best months ago: He's the WWE bully who comes in and knocks a chair over the head of the nasally dweebish nice guy, all to the cheers of the idiot masses. Trump will win tomorrow
|
|
#
¿
Sep 27, 2016 03:57
|
|
|
Jygallax posted:I was expecting a calm trump. I was expecting a sedate, bland trump reading out paul ryan policy positions. I got a 70 year old orange man rambling about hotels and acting like a 10 year old with ADHD in the back of a boring class. That's actually just what nornal people sound like when they're having a regular argument
|
|
#
¿
Sep 27, 2016 03:58
|
|
|
Lester Holt was honestly a bit biased when he wasn't getting steamrolled
|
|
#
¿
Sep 27, 2016 04:01
|
|
|
Lead out in cuffs posted:As a citizen of two "other countries" and resident of another Why would you do this and why would anyone trust you
|
|
#
¿
Sep 27, 2016 04:02
|
|
|
Vermain posted:That, "It's called business," line is gonna get plastered across every broadsheet by tomorrow. Doubtful
|
|
#
¿
Sep 27, 2016 04:04
|
|
|
vyelkin posted:also my two favourite moments were the repeated "I HAVE PROPERTY THERE" and "YOU WALK DOWN THE STREET, YOU GET SHOT" He's not wrong on yhe second part. Chicago is indeed a shithole
|
|
#
¿
Sep 27, 2016 04:06
|
|
|
euphronius posted:Hillarys economic plan is not important I thinm it's more accurate to say that she'll never pass progressive legislation. I'm sure she will get the TPP through as well as banking "reform" and also maybe a few authorizations for military force (if she even bothers to get them which she probably won't)
|
|
#
¿
Sep 27, 2016 04:11
|
|
|
punk rebel ecks posted:She's essentially Obama, only a little more hawkish and lacks the rhetoric. Jill Stein is running too dude
|
|
#
¿
Sep 27, 2016 04:11
|
|
|
vyelkin posted:She would be legit good, she's spent the last 40 years fighting for the rights of the weak against the powerful and has some cool ideas about how to improve the country Is this a joke
|
|
#
¿
Sep 27, 2016 04:12
|
|
|
Phoenixan posted:
However he did correctly predict their outfits
|
|
#
¿
Sep 27, 2016 04:14
|
|
|
Knyteguy posted:Nice way to back up your claim UnfortunateSexFart (you don't back up your claim). That's because both are actually right-wing candidates
|
|
#
¿
Sep 27, 2016 04:18
|
|
|
Scrapez posted:The only major point Trump is willing to address is the economy and foreign relations as they relate to monetary subjects. If he were campaigning for Secretary of the Treasury this would be great but he's campaigning for the POTUS. I think that when it comes to monetary concerns, he would probably make a better president than Hillary Clinton. I think that in almost all other major concerns, Hillary would be the better president. It's the economy, stupid
|
|
#
¿
Sep 27, 2016 04:24
|
|
|
Rexicon1 posted:MSNBC Just had a panel of swing voters in Ohio ie. The stupidest people with no opinions or convictions. And what did they say
|
|
#
¿
Sep 27, 2016 04:24
|
|
|
Fojar38 posted:Holt wasn't biased, he was loving fact checking I thought he wasn't supposed to do that
|
|
#
¿
Sep 27, 2016 04:45
|
|
|
Lead out in cuffs posted:So you vote out of a combination of nihilism and FYGM? Seems pretty sensible to me
|
|
#
¿
Sep 27, 2016 04:51
|
|
|
davebo posted:Congrats on making over $250,000 a year so that the "low tax" party actually affects you. Is this meant to be an insult or what
|
|
#
¿
Sep 27, 2016 04:53
|
|
|
Zeeman posted:I've been seeing some Trump supporters desperately claiming that Holt didn't ask her difficult questions, but the cybersecurity question was such an obvious setup about the emails that he completely hosed up. He seemed legitimately thrown off when she said she made a mistake earlier, like it's unfathomable for someone to admit they were wrong. She said "I take responsibility for that" only after she found out she would receive zero punishment for breaking the law which is a pretty weirf snd bullshit thing to say Essentially her strategy was just to blankly deny anything with zero explanation and annoy her opponent. Her debate was pretty much the opposite of fact or issue focused which is why it worked. Unfortunately this isn't really a good sign either... OXBALLS DOT COM fucked around with this message at 12:08 on Sep 27, 2016 |
|
#
¿
Sep 27, 2016 12:03
|
|
|
Cthulhumatic posted:What the gently caress even is this. I don't even understand how some of you are drawing these conclusions. I'm saying she won the debate but only by playing her opponent and bullshitting and not on the strengths of her platform or whatever
|
|
#
¿
Sep 27, 2016 18:15
|
|
|
Wade Wilson posted:It still boggles my mind that the whole "He probably doesn't want anyone to find out he hasn't paid a penny in income taxes out of that $694 million dollar income" being responded to with "That's just smart business" hasn't raised a bigger outcry. Everybody already knows that anyone with money in America doesn't pay taxes. The fact that Trump admits this casually only confirms what his supporters already suspectef, that the entire system is crooked and broken. It validates their viewpoint, which makes it way more palatable
|
|
#
¿
Sep 27, 2016 18:22
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 15, 2024 21:39 |
|
|
Panfilo posted:So what will happen when their angry white boomer demographic dies out? It's like they killed the golden gosling when it comes to Latinos ; a group that values starting their own businesses, fairly religious, strong family values, embraces hard work and complains very little on the job. They'll be replaced seamlessly by the angry jobless white millenial demographic
|
|
#
¿
Sep 27, 2016 18:26
|
|