Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Helsing
Aug 23, 2003

DON'T POST IN THE ELECTION THREAD UNLESS YOU :love::love::love: JOE BIDEN

rudatron posted:

make the post

So I had a look, and I came across this: there's a statistical basis for this claim, contra you perceptions. The mean number of partners for men + women is the same, as it should be in a majority heterosexual society, but the variance is actually much higher for men.

source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19627993

which gives this table:

code:
Table 1. Summary of published data on dispersion over the number of life-time heterosexual partners for men and women.
Study		Variance (mean)			IQR (median)	Ratio
		Male		Female		Male	Female	
Britain 1992a	6575 (9.9)	165 (3.4)	–	–	39.8
Britain 2000b	1239 (12.7)	94 (6.5)	–	–	13.2
Denmark 1992c	–	–	10 (5.2)g	6 (3.8)g	1.7
Sweden 1996d	1173 (14.5)	70 (6.7)	–	–	16.8
Den/Swe 2000e	–	–	12 (7.7)g	3 (2.7)g	4.0
Finland 1971f	353 (11.0)	16 (2.6)	–	–	22.1
Finland 1992f	369 (13.8)	67 (5.2)	–	–	5.5
Finland 1999f	420 (14.4)	88 (6.6)	–	–	4.8
Russia 1996f	310 (11.5)	31 (4.2)	–	–	10.0

Thanks for looking this up and posting it, it's nice to have some actual numbers to look at. Still, none of this seems to support Nagel's idea that the sexual revolution has brought about a "steep sexual hierarchy" in which a few people are promiscuous and everyone else is lonely.

I mean, I definitely know people (both men and women) who feel alienated by contemporary dating and hook-up culture but the idea of a steep sexual hierarchy is laughable. Most people I know don't struggle to get laid and the idea that there's a small sexual elite who are monopolizing the available partners is absurd. What does seem to be happening is that a statistically significant slice of the population have dropped out of the dating / hookup pool altogether but this seems to have more to do with social atomization, geographic isolation or mental health issues. The reason the nerdy guys I know don't have much sex is cause they never leave the house, not because there are no women who would deign to sleep with them.

Honestly, I barely registered what Nagel was saying the first time I read that passage and now that I'm rereading what I posted more closely I'm a bit shocked by how credulously she accepts an idea that seems to owe more to pornography than any statistics on marriage or divorce rates.

rudatron posted:

But your argument is circular - you're saying they're psycho-sexually stunted because they don't date, but also that they can't date because they're stunted. That works maybe as an argument as to why a vicious cycle can establish itself, but not why such a thing would establish itself in the first place. Furthermore, if this feedback loop were as strong as you're suggesting, then it would be the dominant case (using the mathematical definition here), because any random perturbation would begin that feedback loop (think of like an eigenvalue of a matrix) - you'd then have to explain why it isn't the case for everyone, or nearly everyone.

There has to another factor at play here, the explanation you're giving doesn't work well enough.

Presumably you could connect these nebulous cultural changes to more concrete materialist factors - suburbanization, physical fitness, mental health, employment patterns, and in particular the social changes brought about by the internet.

I do think there's an argument to be made that a growing percentage of the population are growing up socially stunted because of the internet and that this reduces their life opportunities, which frustrates them and primes them to join political movements that purport to solve their frustrations.

apokaladle posted:

I've almost finished reading Nagle's book and I'm really quite disappointed. For all the problems with this school of Tumblr leftism, or whatever you want to call it, it's not chiefly to blame for the rise of the alt-right. It has far more to do with the desire for group acceptance, toxic masculinity, and the denial of status to those who were never conditioned to expect it than anything else. I hope it inspires other, better books about the subject though. I was really excited to read a serious look at political and social trends in internet subcultures, because I am extremely normal.

Also, Nagle making GBS threads on non-binary people isn't cool.

I'm also fed up with this idea that budding Nazis need to be talked down and lovingly deprogrammed, but people on Tumblr are irredeemable and worthy only of mockery. I've said before that in a better world we'd have enough trained mental health professionals to lead them out of their destructive modes of thinking, but we live in this one, and there are literally millions of people I can reach out to right now who haven't explicitly called for me to be thrown from a helicopter.

I don't think my reaction to the book is as negative as yours is but I share some of your reservations. If I do get off my rear end and make a new thread about it I hope you'll come and post there!

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Helsing
Aug 23, 2003

DON'T POST IN THE ELECTION THREAD UNLESS YOU :love::love::love: JOE BIDEN
"third time as larp" :lol:

Helsing
Aug 23, 2003

DON'T POST IN THE ELECTION THREAD UNLESS YOU :love::love::love: JOE BIDEN
I just put together a thread discussing Angela Nagle's new book "Kill All Normies" which I encourage people to come post in if you want to talk more about the book or the specific topics it focuses on.

Helsing
Aug 23, 2003

DON'T POST IN THE ELECTION THREAD UNLESS YOU :love::love::love: JOE BIDEN

Pener Kropoopkin posted:

Liberals are the libertarians of 2017

Helsing
Aug 23, 2003

DON'T POST IN THE ELECTION THREAD UNLESS YOU :love::love::love: JOE BIDEN

BrutalistMcDonalds posted:

That neo-Nazi discord channel has slowed down quite a bit. Also they're scared of a Chicago gym that is training liberals in street fighting.

This place?

Helsing
Aug 23, 2003

DON'T POST IN THE ELECTION THREAD UNLESS YOU :love::love::love: JOE BIDEN
So apparently in the imagination of the alt right it takes the brain power of at least 3 right-wing pundits to debate a single leftist.

Helsing
Aug 23, 2003

DON'T POST IN THE ELECTION THREAD UNLESS YOU :love::love::love: JOE BIDEN

Jeb! Repetition posted:

From my experience they don't become nazis themselves, they just get sympathetic and ally with them.

"Moreno told jurors that Young is no neo-Nazi but a libertarian with an interest in politics who was committed to his job in law enforcement and his country."

Helsing
Aug 23, 2003

DON'T POST IN THE ELECTION THREAD UNLESS YOU :love::love::love: JOE BIDEN

rudatron posted:

just once, I'd like a white supremacist mass shooting to get half the news coverage a failed ISIS bomb threat or whatever does

Actually it would be way better if we never even published their names. Just read the article - posthumous fame and glory is why this guy shot two of his classmates instead of just killing himself.

Helsing
Aug 23, 2003

DON'T POST IN THE ELECTION THREAD UNLESS YOU :love::love::love: JOE BIDEN
Pardon my ignorance but how do twitter Nazis help bring in money? I don't really get Twitter's business model or how it is supposed to be consistently profitable, but the apparently heavy Nazi presence is particularly weird.

Helsing
Aug 23, 2003

DON'T POST IN THE ELECTION THREAD UNLESS YOU :love::love::love: JOE BIDEN

The best part of this is when Alex Jones can only list 4 breakfast cereals.

Helsing
Aug 23, 2003

DON'T POST IN THE ELECTION THREAD UNLESS YOU :love::love::love: JOE BIDEN
Hitler actually ordered the last Nazi commander in Paris to destroy the entire city and leave nothing but rubble, and the guy in question ignored the order and surrendered because he didn't want to be remember by history as the guy who demolished one of Europe's most famous cities.

Helsing
Aug 23, 2003

DON'T POST IN THE ELECTION THREAD UNLESS YOU :love::love::love: JOE BIDEN

Uncle Wemus posted:

Why do we want to restore the republic in star wars when it was so corrupt it allowed for palpatine to seize power and for the first order to build up after what 20 years after the emperor died?

Because the great blind idiot god of the market has determined that it has to be a story about plucky underdogs vs a looming threat no matter how self defeatingly absurd that narrative becomes the more often you repeat it.

In a meta sort of way the fact that capital demands the Star Wars universe be an endless relitigation of the same meaningless conflict is the most realistic thing about it.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Helsing
Aug 23, 2003

DON'T POST IN THE ELECTION THREAD UNLESS YOU :love::love::love: JOE BIDEN
Who can say how many youngling Jedi have perished while experimenting with auto erotic force choking in their private meditation chambers.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply