|
They were shopping Bishop at the draft, too.
|
# ¿ Feb 2, 2017 04:52 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 28, 2024 18:02 |
|
Ginette Reno posted:Are you saying 5 guys standing stationary and passing around the perimeter isn't the key to a good PP?
|
# ¿ Feb 2, 2017 16:17 |
|
If Washington thought that Vegas would for sure take Grubauer they could trade him to get some return. Or they could make a trade with LV to leave him unprotected from Washingtons side or not take him from Vegas' side.
|
# ¿ Feb 6, 2017 02:55 |
|
I saw someone use the abbreviation VGK and I had no idea what the heck they were talking about until a day later.
|
# ¿ Feb 6, 2017 03:01 |
|
bewbies posted:he grows on you after some period of time, you just have to wait it out
|
# ¿ Feb 6, 2017 18:16 |
|
Gretzky was also a really great player deep into the 90's. In 98 he was 1 point off 2nd for scoring when he was 37, his back was shot and he was on a crap team.
|
# ¿ Feb 6, 2017 19:10 |
|
Bigger rinks wouldn't increase scoring
|
# ¿ Feb 6, 2017 19:48 |
|
Remember when the Bruins were really well stocked for the future and then made poorly conceived trades for Seguin and Hamilton?
|
# ¿ Feb 7, 2017 15:33 |
|
ThinkTank posted:Yup, it boils down to the fact that those with responsibility (generally older) are jealous of the unencumbered nature of those without it (the young and carefree). Placing the expectations of a 53 year old family man on a single 22 year old guy leads to situations where Seguin gets traded for a bundle of soiled rags. People do a hell of a lot of growing up and settling down in their twenties, it just requires a modicum of patience to play out.
|
# ¿ Feb 8, 2017 17:55 |
|
I also think that more than young players they target good players.
|
# ¿ Feb 8, 2017 18:01 |
|
ThinkTank posted:Of course, these are pro-athletes we're talking about. You don't get to the NHL by coasting on talent alone (Kovalev excepted). Players are required to commit full time from the age of 12 Still, Gostisbehere isn't some rookie who dominated junior and is now struggling at the pro level. He's had success in the NHL, some would say a great deal of it. He's having a sophmore slump, but they happen. Nothing has changed from his rookie season in regards to work ethic, training, etc. (or at least we can assume he hasn't suddenly decided to start hanging out at strip clubs and chugging codeine). So why has the team suddenly decided he's not trying hard enough? Why wasn't that identified last year? And if it was, why did the team feel they had to modify a successful formula? Why is it that apparently coasting on talent worked one year, then isn't close to good enough the next? Rotten Cookies posted:e:f,b.
|
# ¿ Feb 8, 2017 20:48 |
|
Levitate posted:Eh I think the biggest criticism I can think of with Kovalev is that if he was a smarter player he could have been considered one of the greats. All the physical tools were there and he could do pretty much anything any of the top players in the league could do, often better than they could, but but he didn't necessarily apply them as well as some other players. It's like...Crosby is the best in the league not because he's obviously the most physically talented player in the league...I think there are a lot of players you could say are on Crosby's level in terms of the outright talent department, but he's so good at just playing the game and knowing what to do or knowing how to take advantage of his opponents and use his skills to their best advantage. Kovalev didn't quite get that, at least consistently. I also don't agree with that assessment of Crosby. Physically he is both a top tier skater and freakishly strong, and he has one of the best skillsets of any player in history with elite as hell passing, stickhandling, shooting, etc.
|
# ¿ Feb 8, 2017 22:53 |
|
JoelJoel posted:And two seasons ago when they were top if the east. Definitely worth complaining about all the time. I mean having the best goalie in the world is so horrible because he could get injured.
|
# ¿ Feb 9, 2017 07:19 |
|
Dale Ouise posted:The possession numbers are north of 50 in 5v5 all situations, but they drop like a rock once you adjust for leading by at least one. It's really irritating to see them lay off the pressure in the third, and even Capuano got a ton of poo poo for that.
|
# ¿ Feb 9, 2017 23:55 |
|
Ginette Reno posted:I was being a bit hyperbolic by calling it poo poo but compared to the rest of the playoff teams their depth is nothing special. It's enough to win with given they have the best goalie in the world.
|
# ¿ Feb 10, 2017 00:00 |
|
The difference between a really good coach and a really bad coach is marginal, there are no miracle workers and you can win a Cup with Randy Carlyle, I saw it happen.
|
# ¿ Feb 10, 2017 01:05 |
|
Dale Ouise posted:http://naturalstattrick.com/teamtable.php?season=20162017&stype=2&sit=5v5&score=u1&gpf=82&loc=B&rate=n
|
# ¿ Feb 10, 2017 01:09 |
|
Levitate posted:Dolan is a great owner for the Rangers because he focuses all his energy on loving up the Knicks and just opens his wallet for the Rangers. Every time I see anything about the Knicks I'm just super glad they exist to distract Dolan from the Rangers.
|
# ¿ Feb 10, 2017 20:40 |
|
If you get 6 great years, 3 good years and 3 bad years in a 12 year contract then it worked out phenomenally, even though it comes out as "too long" in the end. It's the ones that turned bad in the 3rd year that were the real issue.
|
# ¿ Feb 10, 2017 21:44 |
|
ThinkTank posted:Burns has been excellent offensively but Green was as impressive or moreso in his 30 goal season and he didn't even get the Norris. They play basically exactly the same fourth forward role. Other than Burns not breaking out until thirty, I don't see what he's doing as being so much more outstanding than what Green or even Karlsson has done at their best.
|
# ¿ Feb 13, 2017 02:44 |
|
Even by the standards of which we expect guys to get axed, Joe Sakic really should be dead man walking. Instead I haven't heard anything about him being let go and the Avs are trusting him with the fire sale.
|
# ¿ Feb 13, 2017 05:13 |
|
bub spank posted:Burns definitely deserves the Norris this year, but it's interesting to see the unanimous hype for Burns given the intense debate over the award last year. On the same date last year, Karlsson had 62 points in 56 games (3rd in NHL scoring), led his team in scoring by 17 points, and led the next-highest scorer on defense (Burns) by 16 points. This year, Burns has 59 points in 57 games (4th in NHL scoring), is leading his team in scoring by 11 points, and leads the next-highest scorer on defense (Karlsson) by 14 points. Aside from the goals and overall team strength, not all that much difference - but the Norris front runner all last season was Doughty, whereas there hasn't been much talk of anyone but Burns winning it this year. As for the Hart, there's also no Kane blowing away everyone else. Currently McDavid is in the league lead but is under 90 point pace, so they won't necessarily default to forward, especially if Burns is basically right there. And if Burns falls off the pace or the Sharks go on a big losing streak than we'll hear rumblings about the Norris.
|
# ¿ Feb 13, 2017 17:10 |
|
ThinkTank posted:Crosby has a 1.25ppg (103 point pace over 82) and should be the slam dunk winner. ThinkTank posted:Yeah, Karlsson was as good or better and apparently that didn't even warrant serious Norris consideration. Karlsson finished 9th in Hart trophy voting last year for arguably as good a season. Burns is not doing anything especially unusual or outlandish, and even considering him for the Hart trophy would be pretty much unprecedented post-lockout. No defenceman has been a Hart trophy finalist since before the cancelled season, and no one has finished above 8th since Lidstrom was 4th in 07/08. At some point you'd hope they'd consider more defensemen for the Hart. Lidstrom never getting nominated was absolutely ridiculous, particularly in 07/08, In the case of Burns we're talking about him being nominated over guys that he's currently ahead of or a point/2 behind, and conceivably could be ahead of by the end of the season. It's not that uncommon for the voters to just go right down the scoring list anyways. We're also not going to see any records smashed by defensemen for the same reason we won't see any smashed by forwards. Spring Break My Heart fucked around with this message at 17:42 on Feb 13, 2017 |
# ¿ Feb 13, 2017 17:33 |
|
grack posted:Ain't it great that Therrien's gonna get fired after Bergevin traded away a legitimate star player and a fan favourite to appease him?
|
# ¿ Feb 13, 2017 18:45 |
|
iospace posted:Let me think of an owner-
|
# ¿ Feb 14, 2017 00:54 |
|
On a scale of 1 to 10, how regrettable is Lucic's contract going to be? At least a 9, right?
|
# ¿ Feb 14, 2017 18:13 |
|
Infidel Castro posted:He could wind up being a top pairing guy someday
|
# ¿ Feb 15, 2017 21:04 |
|
Jordan7hm posted:Maybe for Ottawa? He's pretty tall, definitely worth taking a flyer on him being a perfect match for Karlsson. He can be the defensive conscience.
|
# ¿ Feb 15, 2017 21:23 |
|
Pittsburgh was broke as hell in the late 90's/2000's before Crosby, shedding big players like crazy from their good days until they had a frighteningly low payroll and Dick Tarnstrom was their leading scorer. There was some expectation that they would move to KC. Lemieux got ownership stake because they owed him so much money from his playing days.
|
# ¿ Feb 16, 2017 18:02 |
|
Slappy Pappy posted:Or if he tried when he was in DC?
|
# ¿ Feb 18, 2017 06:38 |
|
VJeff posted:lmao 45 years old.
|
# ¿ Feb 18, 2017 18:41 |
|
Pancakes by Mail posted:Anyone not ranking Gretzy #1 is being transparently contrarian and boring
|
# ¿ Feb 18, 2017 21:12 |
|
Pornographic Memory posted:"lets see him play for a couple decades like gordie howe before we make any claims about how great gretzky is "
|
# ¿ Feb 19, 2017 00:13 |
|
Sharks Eat Bear posted:Honest question -- is there a more unbreakable individual record in modern major sports than Gretzky's scoring lead?
|
# ¿ Feb 19, 2017 01:17 |
|
Levitate posted:Eichel is really good at it's probably a bit of a shame that he'll be overlooked compared to some of the other guys like McDavid, Matthews, Laine, etc
|
# ¿ Feb 20, 2017 21:42 |
|
DJExile posted:what's easily the worst division in the league
|
# ¿ Feb 20, 2017 22:00 |
|
Aye Doc posted:so with the news that the Lakers are about to get ruined by Magic Johnson for the indeterminate future, I was thinking about former franchise greats who came back to drive their franchise down down down. the obvious one is Linden in Vancouver, I'd say Neely in Boston is on his way, and that's about it for current ones. who else has done this?
|
# ¿ Feb 22, 2017 03:07 |
|
Lots of teams just hire former stars for cushy jobs so they can pal around with corporate sponsors, attend celebrity golf games with team branded equipment and maybe offer guidance to the rookies.
|
# ¿ Feb 22, 2017 07:55 |
|
Wow, Hainsey has really hung in there.
|
# ¿ Feb 23, 2017 17:14 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 28, 2024 18:02 |
|
At worst they'll be back in Canada with better deals than when they left. That feels like Fox Sports is giving up.
|
# ¿ Feb 23, 2017 18:38 |