|
Shaggar posted:hopefully it allows the mistaken judgement in the apple case to be corrected What was the mistake? Apple doesn't have to pay cash bribes to anyone else to stop them from releasing iOS applications outside of the app store.
|
# ¿ Dec 12, 2023 02:54 |
|
|
# ¿ May 2, 2024 11:48 |
|
Cybernetic Vermin posted:i honestly don't even know what we're arguing at this point. Realistically this is going to force Google's cut down in the future, no matter what the specific remedy is.That's a good thing.
|
# ¿ Dec 12, 2023 17:27 |
|
Oh yeah it's probably going to get really stupid for a few years, but you're insane if you don't think that this is a positive anti-monopoly action for consumers in the long run. edit: well, we haven't had any action yet and this is going to get appealed. i'm counting chickens way early here
|
# ¿ Dec 12, 2023 18:38 |
|
Sapozhnik posted:as a consumer, i am so glad to be free of the tyrannical netflix monopoly and i can now choose from twelve different subscription streaming services, each of which has a monopoly on each of the shows that i want to watch. If Netflix still had their monopoly it'd cost $100/mo now
|
# ¿ Dec 12, 2023 20:40 |
|
Perplx posted:why don’t you get your mom an iPhone? But my mom wants porn, so Steve Jobs told her to buy an Android https://techcrunch.com/2010/04/19/steve-jobs-android-porn/ So you're supposed to have an iPhone to text your family and an Android device to get off?
|
# ¿ Apr 12, 2024 02:01 |