Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
FuzzySkinner
May 23, 2012

cuz a lot of the current "liberals" are actually rockefeller republicans who flipped over to that side after the southern strategy.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

FuzzySkinner
May 23, 2012


http://www.counterpunch.org/2004/10/30/how-monica-lewinsky-saved-social-security/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_Responsibility_and_Work_Opportunity_Act

oh it goes back farther than that...

FuzzySkinner
May 23, 2012

Oh Snapple! posted:

reminder that the lady Bill exploited as a mascot for the latter thing there would go on to have a stroke and died a few years ago at age 59.

http://americablog.com/2010/08/koch-industries-gave-funding-to-the-dlc-and-served-on-its-executive-council.html

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Democratic_Leadership_Council

The Koch Bros. also helped to fund the DLC which helped to get people like Bill Clinton, Al Gore, etc into positions of power.

FuzzySkinner
May 23, 2012

Pener Kropoopkin posted:

If Democrats really wanted public improvements and welfare, they would be campaigning on them instead of investigating Russian ties to the Trump campaign.

quoting this

FuzzySkinner
May 23, 2012

dk2m posted:

mmhmm, yes the guy that burns the cross on the yard deserves respect because he's *~poor~*

the true left wing project is to not humanize anybody against egalitarianism and to not have sympathy for fascist scum just because they're poor

facist scum =/= Poor Midwesterner who lost their job because of poo poo trade deals, and has no economic opportunities.

If we're talking about some guy who has pictures of Adolph, and Himmler is his crib? Agreed, gently caress him. The likelihood that one can be "Deprogrammed" out of that mindset with economic programs is slim to none. That comes from a change of heart on a personal level. You can't legislate that away.

I think the point that the current left has done is disheartening. Bailing out Wall Street rather than Main Street was a massive mistake. Acting more like Rockefeller Republicans than the Party of FDR? Also a grave mistake.

We need a guaranteed income, inexpensive (or free) access to higher education/job training, single payer healthcare, end the war on drugs, end the prison pipeline and end the ability for companies to stop shipping jobs overseas/using H1-B Visa's for cheap labor/paying illegal immigrants under the table illegally. These are things that need to be championed by the current left wing party in this country as a solution to a lot of problems I see my friends, family and neighbor's experience.

FuzzySkinner
May 23, 2012

dk2m posted:

remove your pity for those who are poor but are conservative - they believe nothing in the ideas of liberty and egalitarianism. they are the enemy as they keep in power those that destroy labor.

YEAH THAT'S IT. KILL THEM ALL BECAUSE I DISAGREE WITH THEIR PEROSNAL POLITICS. THAT'S THE TICKET. PURGE LIKE STALIN!

...

Seriously. Seek mental help. That's the sort of talk I'd expect from a psychopath.

FuzzySkinner
May 23, 2012

dk2m posted:

did i say kill them all? nope, just that we shouldn't show them pity or compromise. i am not concerned of their well being as they are not of mine.

Really? Because I've actually interacted with these human beings before and there's a lot of evidence to the contrary.

I'm in no way a "privileged" person, but I can tell you on a personal level these people are concerned for my well being and the well being's of others. Perhaps stop thinking of people as groups, and rather think of them as individuals? Just a thought.

FuzzySkinner
May 23, 2012

Main Paineframe posted:

imo people don't deserve to be poor and oppressed, not even if they have white skin or embrace political opinions I disapprove of

No one deserves that.

We can argue about means to alleviate the problem, but at least we can agree that there IS a problem, and it needs to be solved. There's never going to be an end to poverty, but we can at least make for drat sure that no one dies from lack of medical care in this richest goddamn country on the face of the earth.

FuzzySkinner
May 23, 2012

Main Paineframe posted:

insane, hosed up poo poo has befallen people around the globe every day for over a century as a result of American policies

and also the policies of many other countries, organizations, and entities

sparking wars and misery in the middle east is something the US has been doing since the 40s, and I guarantee that you have voted at one point for a politician that at least tacitly supported that

Bingo.

That whole poo poo show that befell the middle east and has led us to being at war all the time? thank the loving CIA backing coups propping up oppressive dictators

FuzzySkinner
May 23, 2012

Just posting to say Trans people are awesome human beings and are some of the most kindest souls I've ever ran into

I think it's lovely we boil people down to their identities though.

Also, I saw this old article, and it's relevant right now

https://medium.com/@lowenaffchen/i-got-mad-at-the-radio-f1515110ffb6

quote:

I got mad at the radio
I usually remember to emphatically mash my fist against the car radio when NPR segues from classical music into the afternoon news program. Unfortunately, today, as the clock approached 4pm and the final movement of Saint-Saens’ 3rd symphony faded out, I spotted a man wearing JNCO-sized basketball shorts walking down the sidewalk while chugging an entire 2 liter of Dew. The image of this horrible man so entranced me that I spent the next 10 minutes passively listening to the worst loving schlock on the planet.
They interviewed David Brooks about the newest chapter in Hillary’s extended coal miner gaffe and for a minute or two I didn’t even realize it was him: his May 6 column asserts that to compete with Trump’s rhetoric her platform needs more Big Ideas. This is undeniably true. Hillary’s “America Is Already Great” message is largely responsible for her inability to generate any enthusiasm among young people. Her promises of tax credits and job retraining programs are not enough to win over post-industrialites, hence why they cut her speech short by stripping her mic cable with their teeth so they could harvest the copper wire inside. What does Brooks suggest as an alternative? That she emulate David Cameron. That she propose “migration zones” to truck the unemployed out of the Rust Belt and into a region with an excess of full-time jobs for long-term unemployed high school graduates (???). This is almost word-for-word what Kevin “Gay Dracula” Williamson of the National Review wrote about the white working class in March:

quote:

Forget your sanctimony about struggling Rust Belt factory towns and your conspiracy theories about the wily Orientals stealing our jobs. Forget your goddamned gypsum, and, if he has a problem with that, forget Ed Burke, too. The white American underclass is in thrall to a vicious, selfish culture whose main products are misery and used heroin needles. Donald Trump’s speeches make them feel good. So does OxyContin. What they need isn’t analgesics, literal or political. They need real opportunity, which means that they need real change, which means that they need U-Haul. If you want to live, get out of Garbutt.

This stuff plays great with the poor and downtrodden, much like “listen to Bill Cosby and pull up your pants” preceded a massive exodus of black voters to the GOP.
Next up was an excerpt of John Kerry’s commencement speech at Northeastern University, itself a perfect encapsulation of the modern Democratic Party:
First, the superficial appeal to diversity:

quote:

“You are the most diverse class in Northeastern’s history — in other words, you are Donald Trump’s worst nightmare.”
Second, a vision of the world where American military adventurism is a positive good and the Third World is eternally grateful for our failed attempts at nation-building. Essentially the White Man’s Burden, but you can’t say that anymore:

quote:

“When you consider the range of challenges that the world is struggling with, most countries don’t lie awake at night worrying about America’s presence; they worry about what would happen in our absence. We cannot be seduced.”
Third, a defense of free trade featuring a namedrop of capital-T Technology so devoid of context that it makes Thomas Friedman look coherent:

quote:

"We will never come out on top if we accept advice from soundbite salesmen and carnival barkers who pretend the most powerful country on Earth can remain great by looking inward and hiding behind walls at a time that technology has made that impossible to do and unwise to even attempt.”

Why does technology, gee-whiz, this stuff is nuts, we got all these apps on there and I barely even know how to turn the thing on, prevent us from adjusting our trade policies to benefit domestic workers? Whom amongſt us doth not underſtandeth the neceſsity to Uberize the global economy? I don’t know! Maybe there would be time for an explanation if the sentiment wasn’t expressed in the form of a literal, actual soundbite.

FuzzySkinner
May 23, 2012

Iron Twinkie posted:

God, rereading pre-election coverage just feels so surreal. At time it seemed we were lamenting the inevitable. On November 8th, Punxsutawney Phil will see his shadow and we'll get another 8 years of neoliberalism as things will gradually get worse. That inevitability was so well cemented they couldn't even bother to offer the thinnest emptiest shreds of hope to people their policies have immiserated over the last 30 years. Of course these bloodless, alien loving ghouls lost to Trump.

I keep listening to Chapo's Trap House and their words, along with this post accurately describes my feelings of disgust for them right now.

I used to think the old Conservative talking point about there being a "LIBERAL" media was horseshit. But you know what...it's a half truth. They are liberal, but only when it comes to the sort of liberalism that is espoused by Bill, Hillary and Obama. Beyond that? Well we see what happened during the primary and election cycle.

Honestly? I'm tired of their influence. They've hitched their wagons with neocons and all they care about are just the least important poo poo imaginable. Vague platitudes, and Red baiting 2.0. It feels like they're bizarrely threatened by any sort of change to their current control of the affairs and are now trying to protect that influence with Bush era republicans assisting them. It's really gross and disgusting.

I don't understand why people like Donna Brazille, Debbie Wasserman Schultz and Hillary herself just don't go away at this point. It feels like outlets like Time Magazine and others are so desperate to have this sort of neoliberal/west wing fantasy that the rest of the country has moved on from and wants nothing to do with.

FuzzySkinner
May 23, 2012

Iron Twinkie posted:

I'm trying to articulate my thoughts without it coming out as a string of profanity with the word GLOBALISTS inserted at random intervals. In my mind the core of the problem is that we have a Political and Media class in the first place and more importantly how insulated and isolated it has become. In order to get anywhere in politics or in one of the six companies media has been consolidated down to, you need both social connections to get your foot in the door and the financial means to work for little or no pay. To even get someone's coffee, you need to be in a position where food, clothing, shelter, or any other basic necessity isn't a concern and never has been. Their focus on tone, procedure, and palace intrigue is because those are the topics and social capital of everyone else they have ever known. They themselves and no one they have known has ever had a real problem in their lives.

I think what makes me angrier than anything else is that they have no comprehension of just how much they are loathed and hated. The increasing desperation of huge swaths of the population isn't even background noise in their world. They believe they are loved.

I drove through a part of Akron that I spent the first two years of my life in, and my mother grew up in.

It was tough to see a lot of businesses I used to recognize as things as trivial as a "Wendy's" convert into Check Cashing places, Mobile Networks you've never heard of and the like. What Mark Blyth said about Trump/Brexit is completely accurate in this regard. These are people that are forgotten. It doesn't matter the race. The African Americans in those neighborhoods I see suffer from similar problems as their white counterparts.. Things like Flint...do not matter to these people.

It's gotten so bad that even my :911: dittohead father has now fully embraced elements of "New deal" leftism. I've heard him bitch about how corrupt the banks are, how we need to invest in infastructure spending...all of this.

But they keep putting their heads in the sand, and ignoring these people. They don't matter to them. They bailed out wall street and gave the finger to main street. They get to go back to their white upper class neighborhoods, or gentrified neighborhoods, then look down at everyone else that doesn't share their sesame street version of "diversity".

FuzzySkinner
May 23, 2012

Typo posted:

something I thought of

Obama took Andrew Jackson from the $20 last year

Trump (prob at Bannon's behest) layed the wreath at Jackson's tomb and tweeted about him and put his portrait in the oval office

there's prob no better symbolism for the way democrats gave up their original core identity as anti-bank, anti-northeastern elite populists with its core constituents in the south and midwest than this

i know his background kinda contradicts this, but when's the last time you've heard a Dem champion FDR and his legacy?

I got stamps the other day and the post office worker from behind the counter seemed so drat proud they featured "New Deal" programs on them. Those programs are STILL taught in school to this day as an example of how we dug our asses out of financial ruin and helped grow the middle class.

They don't do that. You know who they do like to talk about. i'll give you a little hint:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VXqz0-fVcn4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=seBrOcoj89s

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UV0AjH0ahWU

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FQai93glsy0

(That last one? Ran in Ohio during the election btw).

FuzzySkinner
May 23, 2012

Typo posted:

I was gonna say bernie but then I remembered that he's not a democrat

"He's not a democrat"

Thank loving christ.

(Edit: Not directed at you. But a lot of HRC mainstream supporters said that poo poo as a smear).


Condiv posted:

that makes me wanna vomit

bad dems are disgusting :barf:

i showed this to my father and several others that despise Hillary, view Reagan as the 2nd coming of Lincoln.

The sheer look of disgust on their face was incredible. They were so angry at it that they went "I don't even want to talk about it". I don't know who they were trying to reach in that ad. Reagan supporters generally love Trump. Old school Democrats hate Reagan and what he did to unions.

They were trying to reach some small sliver of "NEVER TRUMP" republicans that is such a minuscule, pathetic sample size that it's not even worth addressing.

FuzzySkinner
May 23, 2012

The Brown Menace posted:

the size is 3 (bill kristol, jennifer rubin and rick wilson)

and they all probably still voted trump or abstained, lol

Glenn Beck.

Who's pissed all of his credibility among right wing circles as a result.. A lot of liberals are calling him "one of the good ones" now along with war criminals George W. Bush, Dick Cheney and others.

FuzzySkinner
May 23, 2012

https://twitter.com/LanaDelRaytheon/status/847755420168994817

FuzzySkinner
May 23, 2012

Majorian posted:

Well, it doesn't help that for most Americans, "liberal" and "left-wing" are synonymous. They're not, but it's important for lefties to specify what they mean when they say "liberal" to normies, IMO.

It's funny because when "red state/blue collar" types are introduced or asked about "leftist" ideas? They' seem either for it, or open to the idea. Christ I've even seen them willing to admit that Global Warming is real.

But I can't blame them any more for ranting and raving against "LIBERALS" because they are right on the matter. Those people are assholes, and sadly some of the criticisms of them are right. (Ie: "rich. Don't care about workers, authoritarians).


Main Paineframe posted:

FDR hated conservative Dems, and he's not bipartisanly popular anymore because the revisionist right has recast him as an incompetent corrupt idiot who doubled the length of the Depression through his foolish redistributive policies

Glenn Beck being hailed as a "Historian" and ripping on TR, FDR...still pisses me off to this day. gently caress him.

FuzzySkinner
May 23, 2012


That article is stunning in how they destroyed everything.

Pro-click.

I also would recommend this excerpt from "LISTEN LIBERAL", a book I have to get because it nails down the failure of neoliberalism:

http://listenliberal.com/excerpt.html

FuzzySkinner
May 23, 2012

David Pakman once had a segment about authoritarian leftists and kinda nailed things a while back.

Pretty much a lot of :911:'s are actually "left" when it comes to their opinions on political issues, but are kinda driven to become moderates, centrists and conservatives via quite a few shitheads out there.

FuzzySkinner
May 23, 2012

Azathoth posted:

It seems like neoliberals are what happens when someone is both authoritarian and leftist but has spent their political career assiduously avoiding accusations of being a COMMUNIST or a SOCIALIST by being pro-laissez faire capitalism.

That's kind of what I was getting at.

I think what offends most blue collar red state types is idiots that will talk a big game, tell them they're the problems with the country, they're the ones that need to change, and then jet off back to their mansion.

This is kinda different than say a Bernie Sanders or a Dennis Kucinich who will go back to their districts, speak to people about the problems facing the country, and why their forms of government programs would help the working class.,

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

FuzzySkinner
May 23, 2012


Whats amazing about that quote is that she hits the nail perfectly on the head, identifying exactly the segment of Trump supporters who could be appealed to with a little effort, and then proceeded to continue ignoring and failing to empathize with 'the other basket' for the entire election. And, of course, the quote displays the usual Hillary tactic of insulting and attacking a broad swathe of people first, thus tainting everything that comes after it.
[/quote]

Trump pounced on it too, and used it in ads.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QPfGxdx7dK8

But this is something a lot of lefties were calling out before this election. Hillary's surrogates kinda did the same tactic to Hillary's leftwing critics. It actually weakened actual claims of sexism/racism.

Also? Unlike the Left, the right doesn't give a poo poo, and will own up to the label.

  • Locked thread