|
Follow minimum rules to get Centrelink benefits: bad Follow tax rules to avoid paying billions: nothing can be done
|
#
¿
May 1, 2017 05:30
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 28, 2024 20:17 |
|
|
Bogan King posted:How about we just give those poor people $2,500 payments in cash every quarter and let them improve the quality of their lives a bunch. This way we can feel good about helping people and it isn't costing us any extra money over what we're paying now for this crock of poo poo. wash out your dirty mouth
|
|
#
¿
May 1, 2017 23:41
|
|
|
I love both of these together
|
|
#
¿
May 7, 2017 11:02
|
|
|
Bogan King posted:That pic is a screenshot of what Ludlam was replying to so they do kind of go together. NSWPol deleted the tweet though because it's ok to hide evidence if you're a cop. I'm saying I love the humour of the police post, and I love the response from Ludlam too
|
|
#
¿
May 7, 2017 11:33
|
|
|
free market baby 
|
|
#
¿
May 8, 2017 00:08
|
|
|
maybe we should just let them destroy Domain though, after that try and shut them down
|
|
#
¿
May 8, 2017 00:11
|
|
|
christ, someone post an ad for one of those dilapidated 25m^2 townhouses in Sydney that sell for $1m plus
|
|
#
¿
May 8, 2017 02:29
|
|
|
a mature response
|
|
#
¿
May 8, 2017 02:58
|
|
|
Periphery posted:Doesn't that just excuse being ignorant of the law? You can't intend to commit an offence if you don't know it's an offence. I also thought ignorance of the law was no excuse
|
|
#
¿
May 8, 2017 09:38
|
|
|
thatbastardken posted:mens rea or the guilty mind only applies to your intention to commit the offense, not knowledge that it is an offense. also it doesn't apply to strict liability offenses, where it doesn't matter what your state of mind was. so it's the difference between something being criminal and something being a different type of offense?
|
|
#
¿
May 8, 2017 10:06
|
|
|
thatbastardken posted:in old common law stuff and some of the time in criminal codes a criminal act has two distinct parts, the act and the intention. you have to both do the thing and intend to do it for it to be criminal. you don't have to know you're committing a crime, you just have to know what you're doing. ignorance of the law remains (mostly) no excuse. thank you for explaining, but how did Tudge not know he was releasing a persons details which is clearly not right
|
|
#
¿
May 8, 2017 10:18
|
|
|
Bogan King posted:Caleb still trying to be relevant with recycled hot takes affirmative action now for all elected positions of government. Shall men and women take turns running for election or have to share the job 50/50?
|
|
#
¿
May 8, 2017 13:02
|
|
|
Aesculus posted:Greens update: Parliamentary right in NSW is now openly defying the membership's decision making and boycotting the party, instead crying to RDN and the federal right to impose top-down MP leadership control. You heard it here first. Now don't go leaking it to the arsetrayan Qld was trying to have a very similar conversation, about the power of the party to bind elected representatives, at the State Council meeting last weekend. It wasn't pretty.
|
|
#
¿
May 8, 2017 13:03
|
|
|
thatbastardken posted:were you at state council yesterday? or do you just read the minutes? I'm a delegate
|
|
#
¿
May 8, 2017 13:21
|
|
|
time for a voting block splits bro
|
|
#
¿
May 8, 2017 13:27
|
|
|
you're the person his thread didn't know it needed
|
|
#
¿
May 8, 2017 13:31
|
|
|
Anidav posted:So what snag Bifauxnen and inspire me hard enough to renew my membership and we can go to the on together? Sir, are you having a stroke?
|
|
#
¿
May 8, 2017 14:11
|
|
|
haha, now I want to know who they are
|
|
#
¿
May 8, 2017 14:19
|
|
|
hooman posted:Sounds like we have a gay dead forum quorum. 
|
|
#
¿
May 8, 2017 15:46
|
|
|
why do you keep posting the same picture?
|
|
#
¿
May 8, 2017 23:51
|
|
|
NTRabbit posted:Melbourne to Adelaide to Darin is standard gauge, Perth to Adelaide to Sydney is standard gauge, that should be enough to settle it; the rolling stock wouldn't need to share lines with metro systems anyway. whose standard? starkebn fucked around with this message at 12:08 on May 9, 2017 |
|
#
¿
May 9, 2017 12:06
|
|
|
sensible
|
|
#
¿
May 9, 2017 12:19
|
|
|
Anidav posted:then the welfare payment becomes managed by the JSA which has the power to dictate what you can and cannot spend it on. What the actual? We know by now how great the ethics and decision making practices of these places are right?
|
|
#
¿
May 9, 2017 13:10
|
|
|
Solemn Sloth posted:_________________________________/ at least FDotM is getting more succinct lately
|
|
#
¿
May 9, 2017 13:55
|
|
|
JBP posted:Real talk: drug testing welfare recipients is off the loving hook and must be a violation of something. The Greens aren't going to be quiet about it
|
|
#
¿
May 9, 2017 14:13
|
|
|
NTRabbit posted:Which Green splinter groups? The Greens, the Real Greens, the Provisional Greens, the Continuity Greens, the Green Liberation Army, or the Green Liberation Front? Watermelon Greens
|
|
#
¿
May 9, 2017 14:32
|
|
|
BBJoey posted:i agree, opposing bad things that only affect a small number of people is a bad idea, which is why hitler did nothing wr she's not-so-slyly making GBS threads on the idea
|
|
#
¿
May 10, 2017 00:50
|
|
|
BBJoey posted:i was referring to foolish_fool's post, not jacqui; i didn't notice the post before mine :thumbup:
|
|
#
¿
May 10, 2017 00:58
|
|
|
JBP posted:Already had four conversations this morning about how people get tested for drugs at their work, so why not test welfare. It's just Common Sense. well, all those safety concerns for people who can't find work right?
|
|
#
¿
May 10, 2017 01:05
|
|
|
JBP posted:Office workers get tested for drugs at a lot of corporations that also employ blue collar workers to make it fair, so try again. they still may be affected in performing their duties correctly, so try harder. I guess safety wasn't the correct way of putting it initially
|
|
#
¿
May 10, 2017 01:10
|
|
|
there's also the fact receiving welfare from the government to prevent further social problems is not equivalent to selling your time and skills to an employer
|
|
#
¿
May 10, 2017 01:14
|
|
|
JBP posted:Labor budget. 
|
|
#
¿
May 10, 2017 01:18
|
|
|
I would blow Dane Cook posted:NSW Liberal MP Peter Phelps has compared the State Government's healthy canteen strategy to sex acts, suggesting students are being told that oral sex is "OK" three times a week but sausage rolls can only be had once a semester. I imagine you'd have to suck a lot of cocks to get fat from it
|
|
#
¿
May 10, 2017 02:12
|
|
|
at least they're showing evidence based reasons behind their policies for screwing students
|
|
#
¿
May 10, 2017 02:22
|
|
|
Anidav posted:If you get four demerit points in six months you’ll enter a three strike “Intensive Compliance Phase” and will: any word yet on how you pay rent or bills once they cut your payments?
|
|
#
¿
May 10, 2017 02:35
|
|
|
how the gently caress is that even a worthy NTNews front page?
|
|
#
¿
May 10, 2017 03:38
|
|
|
Anidav posted:It's a very Labor budget! So maybe it's safe to vote Liberal now! they sure are working together pretty hard to forge that narrative
|
|
#
¿
May 10, 2017 04:19
|
|
|
http://www.betootaadvocate.com/entertainment/cocaine-dependent-liberal-staffer-says-drug-testing-welfare-recipients-well-overdue/
|
|
#
¿
May 10, 2017 07:09
|
|
|
How do you make them accountable though? All I can see is threat of disendorsing them, and that's poo poo for the party.
|
|
#
¿
May 10, 2017 08:32
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 28, 2024 20:17 |
|
|
the big problem I haven't sorted out for myself is whether people vote for the party or for the candidate
|
|
#
¿
May 10, 2017 08:46
|
|