Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Shageletic
Jul 25, 2007

Antifa Turkeesian posted:

People on twitter don’t actually mean what they say, but rather use things and events as an occasion to adopt a certain rhetorical posture that is some combination of strident, patronizing, moralistic, dismissive, and contemptuous. It doesn’t matter what’s being discussed or what might be true, but only what a person can do with the subject rhetorically.

The purest distillation of that is a form like “all the hot takes about [x] show that a lot of you have never [y] and it shows.”

Or “you might be surprised by [x], but all of us who have been through/are [y] know all about it and have been trying to tell you for years.”

Maybe the simplest version is “you might think [x], but it’s obviously [y] and you can’t see that because [x] is wrong with you.”

And I don’t mean that people on twitter are insincere or lying. Twitter is just a thing that makes you participate under certain conditions when you post there. That sex doula is probably a perfectly normal person when she’s not on twitter.

I would have said this was bad the other day, but after getting into an exhausting convo with some idiot saying Critical race theory is as bad as terrorism and his buddy in the thread saying the Tulsa massacre was really a massacre of white ppl, I can see the appeal. Why try to connect to these fucks.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Shageletic
Jul 25, 2007

tokin opposition posted:

Nobody involved in a ngo is going to be leftists. They tend to push out anyone to the left of Liz warren

Never guess who this about

Adolph Reed in 1996 posted:

“In Chicago, for instance, we’ve gotten a foretaste of the new breed of foundation-hatched black communitarian voices; one of them, a smooth Harvard lawyer with impeccable do-good credentials and vacuous-to-repressive neoliberal politics, has won a state senate seat on a base mainly in the liberal foundation and development worlds. His fundamentally bootstrap line was softened by a patina of the rhetoric of authentic community, talk about meeting in kitchens, small-scale solutions to social problems, and the predictable elevation of process over program — the point where identity politics converges with old-fashioned middle-class reform in favoring form over substance. I suspect that his ilk is the wave of the future in U.S. black politics, as in Haiti and wherever else the International Monetary Fund has sway. So far the black activist response hasn’t been up to the challenge. We have to do better.”

Personally have had alot of bad vibes from meeting ppl who work for NGOs abroad. Plenty if good ones but there's alot that exist just to create an investmwnt vehicle for awful rich ppl and employ newly minted Ivy League psychos who love to yell at minorities abroad

Shageletic
Jul 25, 2007

lobster shirt posted:

holy poo poo lol

what a hosed up island

Afaik there are still states in the US that dont allow no fault divorces

Shageletic
Jul 25, 2007

christmas boots posted:

Because that deal didn't technically exist in writing (although it did exist as a press release which iirc stated that the intention was to prevent Cosby from being able to plead the 5th during the civil case) the following DA didn't feel bound by the agreement and used the testimony. The courts ruled that the testimony was illegally used and that due to the scale of damage it did, not only does it pretty much ruin any chance of a fair trial going forward, the only way to remedy the damage is to return things to the situation where he couldn't be prosecuted.

It's a lovely outcome but AFAIK the actual legal argument is fairly sound and the takeaways are that the first DA hosed this all up and that only someone as rich and powerful as Cosby would have the means to fight something like this.

The PA Supreme Court recently ruled that the cops promising that someone who is promised by thr cops that they wouldnr be prosecuted could have their ensuing testimony allowed even if a lawyer wasnt present.

Guess the diff btw this dude and Cosby

Shageletic
Jul 25, 2007

F Stop Fitzgerald posted:

i have no idea what any of this means lol. you might be the one too online.

i just think everyones playing too loose with "socialist" these days. the bruenigs, really?

Praxis is when you try to make your circle as small as possible

Shageletic
Jul 25, 2007

tokin opposition posted:

D&D is that way, remember to vote your way into power lol

Do you believe the means of production should be controlled by the public versus the private sphere. Yes? Then youre a socialist.

gently caress this sniping poo poo. Its reactionary propoganda and its sad to see ppl falling for it.

Shageletic
Jul 25, 2007

tokin opposition posted:

Nancy Pelosi is a socialist

No because shes against health care being a government service and is still trying to strangle us with the ACA bullshit that is just a giveaway to healthcare companies.

Do you pay attn to American politics?

Shageletic
Jul 25, 2007

Pelosi was such a wildly bad rebuttal that its actually interesting. The big dividing line in our politics right now that seperates those that arent on the right spectrum of American politics is between those who believe a capitalist economy is inherently good and what it needs is flaking off some of its gains for the poor, after insane tests to make sure they're poor. And those who believe capitalism is itself flawed, that it inherently is a suction mechanism to gather wealth to a small few, and the only answer to that is the government taking over more and more of what has been monopolized or purloined by the capitalist elites.

People who voice the latter should be supported. Everything else is noise.

Shageletic
Jul 25, 2007


https://twitter.com/pmarmstro/status/1439923342673330185

worse case scenario of maximum bloodshed

Shageletic
Jul 25, 2007


Thomas Friedman is the patron saint of the Hot Takes thread

Shageletic
Jul 25, 2007

A Buttery Pastry posted:

In any case, no, I don't support a vote that potentially rewards the a state for imperialist aggression.

But Brexit?

Shageletic
Jul 25, 2007


I'm reading No Good Men Men Among the Living and I am astounded by how many times American soldiers machine gunned pro American Afghani officials and civilians. Mayor's waving flags and poo poo were hand cuffed and executed in schools by American soldiers who then got a star for it. What the gently caress

Shageletic
Jul 25, 2007


whatta thread

https://twitter.com/nikolaimcknight/status/1568613241005445125

Shageletic
Jul 25, 2007

Flesh Forge posted:

I mean, I guess if you're a little flexible with the definition of who is human and who isn't, then whether it was a homicide is debatable :shrug:

https://twitter.com/AP/status/1654169245775691792

e: Associated Press deleted this due to excessive bullying from left wing trolls :bahgawd:



Defence against disorder is a s tier hardcore band name

Shageletic
Jul 25, 2007

drat horror queefs posted:

I suspect the vast majority of people taking the NYC subway are probably fairly wealthy on average, given they can afford to live within NYC itself.

My understanding is that most of the working class of NYC drives into the city from Jersey in the morning and drives back at night, because real estate in the city itself is unaffordable.

I don't live there though so someone else can confirm or deny

2.4 million New Yorkers use the subway everyday. Everyone uses it and the only people who don't can afford to buy and park their cars which is way more rare.

Shageletic
Jul 25, 2007

Wraith of J.O.I. posted:

“being a cop is a form of being a person” —— incredible phrase

https://twitter.com/janecoaston/status/1696596500208554045

If you ever known anyone who had become a cop, it's pretty wild how the most mild mannered person transforms to someone who could bully on a dime. It's an occupation that is deleterious to the human spirit.

Shageletic
Jul 25, 2007

Spergin Morlock posted:

speaking of heretics lol

I guess the dude is a convert from some unnamed protestant denomination?

https://twitter.com/ShaneSchaetzel/status/1775972906612179220

Lol

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Shageletic
Jul 25, 2007

Take the plunge! Okay! posted:

But Lutheranism is Reformed, not Protestant?

It cuts off before this part

quote:

Just criticizing the pope, or a bishop, is not Protestantism. Telling people to stop listening to them (when they’re so obviously in error) is not Protestantism either. As a former Protestant teacher, I ought to know a thing or two about Protestantism. Criticizing the pope, doesn’t make you Protestant, but rejecting the office of the papacy itself does

What an oddball.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply