Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Nemo2342
Nov 26, 2007

Have A Day




Nap Ghost
https://twitter.com/TPM/status/867055105958436864

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Nemo2342
Nov 26, 2007

Have A Day




Nap Ghost
https://twitter.com/ddale8/status/867607186507169792

Nemo2342
Nov 26, 2007

Have A Day




Nap Ghost

Propaganda Hour posted:

I sent Don Young an email about the AHCA the first time around and he sent me back a solid page about tort reform.

I kind of figured emailing Young was a waste of time, but I did send both Sullivan and Murkowski emails. Only Murkowski replied though.

Nemo2342
Nov 26, 2007

Have A Day




Nap Ghost

Propaganda Hour posted:

Murkowski is really great about replying. I seem to always get something back from her whenever I contact her office.

True, I think I have gotten something back every time I've emailed her to complain this year. It might take awhile, but at least I know my tiny angry voice got added to someone's data set.

Nemo2342
Nov 26, 2007

Have A Day




Nap Ghost

apokaladle posted:

Are there any specifics on what they're rumored to be compromising on? I am concerned that they might see the writing on the wall and want to shove as much reprehensible poo poo through while they can, but I'm really hoping that they're still too shitheaded to pull it off.

No idea yet, though Planned Parenthood has sent out an email telling people to be on their toes because Senators are pushing to get a vote before the July 4th recess.

Nemo2342
Nov 26, 2007

Have A Day




Nap Ghost

BENGHAZI 2 posted:

there was just a big one in boston on may day but let me find the IGD article about this

edit nothing in mass according to this https://itsgoingdown.org/nationwide-day-action-muslims-june-10th-need-stop/ but some things may have changed in a couple weeks

This article CAIR sent out lists one happening in Boston, MA on June 10th.

Nemo2342
Nov 26, 2007

Have A Day




Nap Ghost

eviltastic posted:

It depends on what kind of case is up for trial, and approaches vary. And it's much more art than science. What you're trying for in voir dire (at least, with respect to actually selecting jurors) should be identifying biases that are problematic for your case; demographics can help you guess at that, but that should be secondary to engaging with the jurors actually in the room.

I recall hearing about at least one study out there finding that there wasn't a bias against juror educational level in the cases they looked at.

When I was impaneled for a sexual assault case last week, the defense attorney spent a lot of time asking questions that were (to me at least) obvious defenses he could have used. It definitely ended up weeding out people who answered or reacted "wrong" to them.

Nemo2342
Nov 26, 2007

Have A Day




Nap Ghost

Cabbit posted:

That's called Kickstarter.

I mean, it worked for MST3K!

Nemo2342
Nov 26, 2007

Have A Day




Nap Ghost

RoboChrist 9000 posted:

They're absolutely admissable. They are clearly things the man has said. I think the legal question was about whether or not they constitute 'official statements of the president' or whatever.

The Whitehouse just cited his tweet in an official response to the Senate about the existence of any tapes, so they're going to have a pretty hard time arguing that they're not 'official statements' (which is also something Spicer claimed they were).

Nemo2342
Nov 26, 2007

Have A Day




Nap Ghost

evilweasel posted:

yeah, but with $700b in medicaid cuts and a $200b slush fund, some relatively simple math suggests that if McConnell really needed to, he could easily pay for a "medicaid cuts, except for alaska, which gets an extra 5% medicaid bonus because of...reasons"

the only problem is then you've got every other expansion state senator asking for an equally huge handout and 200b might not be enough to go around, and might piss off lee/cruz enough they torpedo it with paul

The big problem is going to be Planned Parenthood; they provide a lot of care for women in rural Alaska, and gutting their funding is going to screw the state over hard. They could give Alaska more money to make up for Medicaid cuts, but I don't see how they fix the Planned Parenthood issue without pissing off the whole "this bill isn't evil enough" contingent.

Nemo2342
Nov 26, 2007

Have A Day




Nap Ghost

Sexual Aluminum posted:

They'll blow our planet up!

no one will get this

No one will get it because it's actually "We'll blow your planet up"

Nemo2342
Nov 26, 2007

Have A Day




Nap Ghost
https://twitter.com/garywhitta/status/879894173226123268

Nemo2342
Nov 26, 2007

Have A Day




Nap Ghost

Mr Ice Cream Glove posted:

I am rather shocked that 41 states have said no to Trump election comission request

I personally wish there had been more "hard no" responses, but at this point I'm just glad to see any kind of pushback.

Nemo2342
Nov 26, 2007

Have A Day




Nap Ghost
https://twitter.com/ddale8/status/882643667999051776

Nemo2342
Nov 26, 2007

Have A Day




Nap Ghost

https://twitter.com/AhoyLemon/status/882697577342349312

Nemo2342
Nov 26, 2007

Have A Day




Nap Ghost

Gyges posted:

This seems like just the right level of inept hamhandedness to make Murkowski an even firmer No. Also the type of thing to really piss off all the other Senators(except maybe Rand and Cruz who get excited at the thought of the Feds not doing things).

Well, it is certainly the kind of thing to piss Alaskans off! There is pretty much nothing that gets Alaskans madder than having someone from "Outside", especially the Federal government, come in and try to tell them what to do.

Nemo2342
Nov 26, 2007

Have A Day




Nap Ghost

FlamingLiberal posted:

Good on you Murkowski

I've been contacting her and Sullivan (even though he's useless) every few days about healthcare, but this was the first time I've had to call and tell a Senator that I support her telling the President to gently caress right off.

Nemo2342
Nov 26, 2007

Have A Day




Nap Ghost

evilweasel posted:

https://twitter.com/RVAwonk/status/890637906389291008

bet eliminating that fund is how they qualify under reconciliation, but I don't know what it is

They've definitely written off Murkowski if this is their plan.

Nemo2342
Nov 26, 2007

Have A Day




Nap Ghost

Bottom Liner posted:

Summary of the 5 minute video?

Murkowski supports Planned Parenthood, because it provides a lot of medical care in Alaska. If that's still part of the plan, then my guess is that they're already counting on her being a No.

Nemo2342
Nov 26, 2007

Have A Day




Nap Ghost

Rigel posted:

Holy loving poo poo, McCain finally became so concerned to the point where he actually did something.

:bravo: Thanks, I really needed that laugh.

Nemo2342
Nov 26, 2007

Have A Day




Nap Ghost
Time to call Murkowski again and thank her for standing firm.

Nemo2342
Nov 26, 2007

Have A Day




Nap Ghost

Al Borland Corp. posted:

Why don't they loving ask Collins and Murkowski what they need and make a bill out of that?

Because they refuse to defund Planned Parenthood, which instantly makes things unpalatable to some of the more terrible shitheads in the Senate.

Nemo2342
Nov 26, 2007

Have A Day




Nap Ghost
https://twitter.com/CaseyMalone/status/893590318603542530

Nemo2342
Nov 26, 2007

Have A Day




Nap Ghost

Mister Adequate posted:

Realtalk the risk isn't that North Korea flattens the US, even in an absolute worst-case scenario they might take out like two cities, which is... you know, horrific, but losing Anchorage and Seattle is in no way terminal. The risks are that A) people throwing nukes around gets someone with a lot more nukes (China or Russia) involved, or B) that people throwing nukes around normalizes nuke use going forwards.

Since I live in Anchorage, losing it would be terminal in a very real way for me.

Nemo2342
Nov 26, 2007

Have A Day




Nap Ghost

https://twitter.com/ddale8/status/895726795290431488

Nemo2342
Nov 26, 2007

Have A Day




Nap Ghost

Ague Proof posted:

He stared into the sun. That was today.

https://twitter.com/darth/status/899716606405730307

Nemo2342
Nov 26, 2007

Have A Day




Nap Ghost

Ugato posted:

I didn't see the original tweet since I'm just catching up, but I thought it was at least noteworthy that whatever was said before, either they didn't mean it or they didn't really want to look that bad

https://twitter.com/VA_GOP/status/900443931539890176

https://twitter.com/naluap_/status/900458108350332929

Thankfully someone else did save them.

Nemo2342
Nov 26, 2007

Have A Day




Nap Ghost
https://twitter.com/SenJohnMcCain/status/901276851561222144

Nemo2342
Nov 26, 2007

Have A Day




Nap Ghost

There Bias Two posted:

What compounds are we looking at here?

From: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2017/08/29/texas-chemical-plant-in-critical-condition-raising-possibility-of-explosion/

"Arkema, a maker of organic peroxides commonly used by the plastics and rubber industries, evacuated all personnel from the plant and was attempting to operate the facility remotely."

Nemo2342
Nov 26, 2007

Have A Day




Nap Ghost

Propaganda Hour posted:

Not even close. All of our permafrost is receding/disappearing so our entire state is going to poo poo. Small towns are sinking into the ocean and the big towns are starting to get wicked frost-heaves and sinkholes.

Also we're out of money*. Please do not come to Alaska.


*It's more that we have no income, we have savings.

Wait, no. We need the money, so they're welcome to come and visit, they just can't stay.

Nemo2342
Nov 26, 2007

Have A Day




Nap Ghost

Rigel posted:

Reminder: Tomorrow afternoon the pro-Trump "mother of all rallies" takes place at roughly the same time and at nearly the same place as the Juggalo march.

edit: wow, a 9-hour schedule

https://twitter.com/icp/status/907788007763308544

https://twitter.com/dc_dsa/status/907804732206600192

Nemo2342
Nov 26, 2007

Have A Day




Nap Ghost

evilweasel posted:

Collins is almost certainly a no (she would not have introduced a new bipartisan stabilization bill after McConnell killed the old one otherwise). Murkowski and McCain are the two that have previously voted no that are "in play". If either of them votes no, then it's dead.

McCain probably has few, if any, concerns with the substance but serious concerns over the process and killed "skinny repeal" as a result, has been quite open that this process is equally garbage. But on the other hand, he has suggested he could vote for it and it's being pushed by his best friend in the Senate. Nobody would consider his concerns an actual threat that he would vote against the bill if he hadn't sunk skinny repeal. So given that he did that, but has also been "deeply concerned" about things he voted for so many times that it became a meme, who knows.

Murkowski has been voting no consistently, but the thing about Alaska senators is they're usually looking out for Alaska and have a reputation as being able to be bought off with Alaska-specific giveaways. Murkowski plays her cards close to the vest though so it is difficult to tell if she's seriously negotiating or if she's stalling. It's possible the bill could be amended to give Alaska a specific giveaway to buy her vote. However she's also not in favor of defunding planned parenthood and it is not likely that can be removed from the bill without collapsing the ability to pass.

I think Murkowski is a safer bet for "no" than McCain and I think at the end of the day it's likely that at least Murkowski is a hard no, pulling along McCain and the "moderates" who will only vote for a bill that will pass.

Here's the reason that Murkowski cares so much about Planned Parenthood (from this opinion piece back in February):

"Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program cover 1 in 5 people in this country. According to the Guttmacher Institute, 17 percent of women in Alaska of reproductive age are covered by Medicaid.

These women are often less likely to have a steady provider, many live in rural areas, and rely on services from Planned Parenthood. Experts predict in communities that already have a shortage of providers, other existing clinics and doctors would not be able to absorb Planned Parenthood patients."

...

"Seventy-five percent of Planned Parenthood's health centers are located in communities with formally recognized provider shortages, and patients have nowhere else to turn. The majority of services we provide in these areas are preventive, including contraception, STI testing, cancer screenings and smoking cessation counseling — all part of the valuable health services also provided."

Cutting Planned Parenthood fucks over rural Alaska (which is most of it) HARD, and no amount of health care subsidies really fixes that since you can't really use those to build and staff new facilities.

Nemo2342
Nov 26, 2007

Have A Day




Nap Ghost

evilweasel posted:

there's still better than even odds apparently that the prime selling point to conservatives of graham-cassidy, "state flexibility", is...not compliant with reconciliation

https://twitter.com/nicholas_bagley/status/910872695499304960

"Flexibility" was the big selling point in the article about this latest bill in this morning's local paper (local being Anchorage, Alaska). Basically "less money = bad, but flexibility = good!", so if that gets stricken that tears away one of the fig leafs these assholes are trying to hide behind.

Nemo2342
Nov 26, 2007

Have A Day




Nap Ghost

Hunt11 posted:

Didn't the president still have his nanny as part of his cabinet?

His Nanny was the Vice President and the one actually running things.

Nemo2342
Nov 26, 2007

Have A Day




Nap Ghost
In more "If Obama did it, I must undo it" news: Trump offered to change Denali back to Mount McKinley. ‘We said no!’

quote:

One by one, regarding Obama administration executive actions for the National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska, the Arctic Ocean, a road out of King Cove, Trump would turn to Zinke and ask, "'well can we change that to help Alaska?" Sullivan relayed. To each, Zinke replied, "yes, sir."

But Trump had one final issue on his mind. "He looked at me and said, 'I heard that the big mountain in Alaska also had – also its name was changed by executive action. Do you want us to reverse that?'" Sullivan said.

He and Murkowski "jumped over the desk, we said, 'no! No. Don't want to reverse that,' " Sullivan said.

Nemo2342
Nov 26, 2007

Have A Day




Nap Ghost
https://twitter.com/AP/status/923671449877041152

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Nemo2342
Nov 26, 2007

Have A Day




Nap Ghost

GreyjoyBastard posted:

I like to think that one or more Senate staffers went dead white and rushed to inform the Turtle, but were too late.

The best part was that they even voted against giving people time to read the bill, which would have caught poo poo like this.

  • Locked thread