|
Are we getting a day 1 FAQ or was that just wishful thinking?
|
#
¿
Jun 17, 2017 15:53
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 3, 2024 22:01 |
|
|
I usually can't stand these guys but I think his criticisms of 8th so far are pretty spot on. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bJjRSHR4S9Q&t=1107s edit: I put him on x2 speed because he triggers me, but now he sounds even more like a squeaky, whiny manchild.  edit2: lol "I've been married to my wife for 12 years, she's not perfect, there are things I could complain about her. I've got four kids, they drive me nuts, I love them though." - an adult drawing a comparison with a doll game. BIG MEATY SHITS fucked around with this message at 02:33 on Jun 22, 2017 |
|
#
¿
Jun 22, 2017 02:22
|
|
|
chutche2 posted:In the case of tyranids, yes. I don't understand how the tactical difference is enough to warrant two separate rules. Or worse, the dozen different rules that all say "set up in reserve and deploy >9" away at the end of any movement phase". The lack of USRs are baffling.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 22, 2017 14:15
|
|
|
Pendent posted:I'm not sure wanting something that you spent a bunch of time and money on to have a minimal degree of functionality in the new edition is being entitled. I and others sure have gently caress not been allowed to complain about it ITT.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 24, 2017 23:00
|
|
|
lol at monstrous rending claws still being free on a Hive Tyrant.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 2, 2017 19:15
|
|
|
Master Twig posted:There is no way in hell any tournament is going to allow you purposefully run understrength units to fill force org slots. ... It's the rules.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 3, 2017 02:13
|
|
|
The great tradition of tournament organisers of GW games banning GW rules will never not be funny.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 3, 2017 02:53
|
|
|
Floppychop posted:Stormboys are a neat kit, but obscenely expensive, even by GW standards. $25 for 5 models that you field in units of 30 is too rich for my blood. You're gonna love New GW's pricing on the new Primaris characters, friend.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 3, 2017 14:48
|
|
|
glitchkrieg posted:One of the people at my club has made a Kickstarter that could be useful for 8E - Woundwang* lol if I'm gonna watch over 3 minutes of this wankers face
|
|
#
¿
Jul 3, 2017 16:45
|
|
|
adamantium|wang posted:12/10 would get killed off-page by Ka'Bandha with   e: no really this happened? BIG MEATY SHITS fucked around with this message at 04:07 on Jul 4, 2017 |
|
#
¿
Jul 4, 2017 04:01
|
|
|
TKIY posted:Some guy just went 5-0 in a UK GT with this list: I could not have seen this coming. Not with this, the best 40K ruleset ever.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 4, 2017 16:13
|
|
|
Ayn Marx posted:This is the game you asked for! Stop trying to make that a thing!
|
|
#
¿
Jul 4, 2017 16:46
|
|
|
Needing two books to play one army already.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 5, 2017 15:32
|
|
|
Corrode posted:The Warseer posts are coming from inside the thread! If Primarchs were Harry Potter characters, who would they be?
|
|
#
¿
Jul 12, 2017 12:58
|
|
|
Which MLP character best represents your favourite chapter? Take our quiz and share it on Facebook!
|
|
#
¿
Jul 12, 2017 12:59
|
|
|
JesusIsTehCool posted:I think I would rather have an even more broken game (I don't think 8th is ever close to being balanced) that has more interesting rules and variation. These things are not dependent on each other.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 15, 2017 21:43
|
|
|
Senjuro posted:If anyone could use a new look it's Eldar. They're the most unchanged since the goofy Rogue Trader days. 
|
|
#
¿
Jul 16, 2017 17:28
|
|
|
I'm so excited to have my rules in even more places than before!
|
|
#
¿
Jul 18, 2017 03:56
|
|
|
ijyt posted:Nah 
|
|
#
¿
Jul 18, 2017 14:22
|
|
|
Holy poo poo did you guys know that if you register with GW's website you get FREE WALLPAPERS?BULBASAUR posted:For OOP stuff there's always Don't talk about  -ing wallpapers man you might upset Ghost Hand.
BIG MEATY SHITS fucked around with this message at 21:19 on Jul 22, 2017 |
|
#
¿
Jul 22, 2017 21:15
|
|
|
quote:Q: If an ability allows me to add 1 to saving throws, does it wut
|
|
#
¿
Jul 23, 2017 16:48
|
|
|
Also monstrous rending claws are still free lol.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 23, 2017 16:50
|
|
|
 srsly good job
|
|
#
¿
Aug 8, 2017 01:42
|
|
|
TheChirurgeon posted:Is that their reveal though? I was under the impression that was a leaked photo of the next white dwarf or something Every leaked picture is a grainy, low-res piece of poo poo. It's 2017. They gotta be doing it themselves to build hype.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 10, 2017 16:15
|
|
|
Stanyer89 posted:LOL.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 16, 2017 19:11
|
|
|
so now we're looking at up to three books required to play one army? lol
|
|
#
¿
Aug 31, 2017 18:41
|
|
|
Corrode posted:No? Index + Chapter Approved if you haven't had a Codex yet, otherwise Codex. But I need an Index if I want to take units/loadouts that aren't in the codex, right?
|
|
#
¿
Aug 31, 2017 19:06
|
|
|
Corrode posted:Yeah, but so far there's very few of those and a lot of them are weapon options which are generic or exist in other places so all you really need to know is the points, and how often does that come up in a game? Chapter Approved may even include updated point costs for index stuff (purely speculation on my part, though). that's all fair, but we're two months into this edition and if i'm going to do things the proper, non :files: way, i may already need three books for my one army, plus the rule book. it doesn't give me a good feeling.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 31, 2017 21:47
|
|
|
TheChirurgeon posted:How have your games of 8th edition gone so far, by the way? How do they compare to your games of 7th? im enjoying how streamlined it is comparatively but the lack of decent cover rules really kills my enjoyment of it. also the touted quickness of the game feels artificial in that turns take about as long but the game is usually decided sooner. im still standing around holding my dick for ages while my opponent takes his turn and vice versa. also the inexplicable number of identical special rules with different names does my head in. it's not AoS shields bad but still. what id really love (aside from cover) is for 40k to have some kind of alternating activation system like epic did. the fight phase is a tease like this and i think it works well, but poo poo like the first turn is still too goddamned important and i hate removing chunks of our armies before the have a chance to do anything. i dont see that changing tho. also like i said having poo poo spread out across multiple books two months in doesnt give me hope for where things are heading wrt creep and ease of play. its a step forward, and im hopeful that they listen to feedback like they seem to be doing for AoS, but i still cant say its a good game compared to some of the alternatives out there. ofc im still gonna keep playing it cause ive been in this hobby too drat long and am a sucker for the universe.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 31, 2017 23:54
|
|
|
SteelMentor posted:They're too bland to evoke a reaction beyond "Meh" from me. lol people liking things I don't really makes me mad *posts in the 40K thread*
|
|
#
¿
Sep 5, 2017 00:15
|
|
|
Yeah focusing on Tau auxiliaries from other races would have been thematically sweet and set them apart from the other armies. I keep forgetting that Vespid are even a thing.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 6, 2017 19:10
|
|
|
adamantium|wang posted:Yeah, looks like I'll just keep running my 30K dudes as regular SM better luck next edition!
|
|
#
¿
Sep 9, 2017 23:58
|
|
|
|
|
#
¿
Sep 11, 2017 03:36
|
|
|
|
|
#
¿
Sep 11, 2017 03:38
|
|
|
|
|
#
¿
Sep 11, 2017 03:39
|
|
|
|
|
#
¿
Sep 11, 2017 03:44
|
|
|
cult dilemma. 5 aberrants (3 with picks and 2 with hammers) cost the same as 12 stealers. the picks are 1S (5) and 1AP (-2) better than stealers, and do D3 damage. hammers are S10 and poo poo but hitting on 4s. abberants also have an extra wound (2). stealers get an extra attack (3), re-roll 1s to hit, and do -4AP on 6s to wound. they also have their 5++ and can advance and charge in the same turn. i think i know the answer, but ive already got a million stealers and the abberants are cool minis. help.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 12, 2017 22:16
|
|
|
Lovely Joe Stalin posted:See, I knew you were going to do that. I knew from the moment you brought it up. "He's going to use this to 'prove' his idiotic theory that the thread is unfair/hostile toward non-Imperium armies. show me where he said that, cause it sounds more like goose willis posted:The only "proof" here is that you care too much about my posts just loving lol
|
|
#
¿
Sep 13, 2017 02:51
|
|
|
chutche2 posted:Imagine trying to poll goons about the armies they play, and not just making a graph about it, but scheduling time later in your week to make more detailed followup graphs to prove a point. I didn't think nerding out over a cupola graphs would be one of your triggers
|
|
#
¿
Sep 13, 2017 03:09
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 3, 2024 22:01 |
|
|
Liquid Communism posted:Shocking news, noted critic Goose Willis does not know wot of the basic game mechanics. the game cannot fail it can only be failed
|
|
#
¿
Sep 16, 2017 19:29
|
|