Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
(Thread IKs: fart simpson)
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Rutibex
Sep 9, 2001

by Fluffdaddy

Ardennes posted:

They just want the warlord period back, is that so bad?

do not pursue Lu Bu

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Rutibex
Sep 9, 2001

by Fluffdaddy

drat, i wish my country built things :(

Rutibex
Sep 9, 2001

by Fluffdaddy

thats a sick communism scarf

Rutibex
Sep 9, 2001

by Fluffdaddy
lol aliens. why doesn't the CIA just encourage everyone to be buddhist priest and renounce material possessions

Rutibex
Sep 9, 2001

by Fluffdaddy

Sing Along posted:

The US is far from blameless but investigating people's computers to arrest them for illegal religious activity is one of the few things we aren't doing.

that very much depends on your religion of choice

Rutibex
Sep 9, 2001

by Fluffdaddy


seriously? lol they are drinking their own kool-aid. brilliant analysis :golfclap:

Rutibex
Sep 9, 2001

by Fluffdaddy
bitcoins are so loving stupid

Rutibex
Sep 9, 2001

by Fluffdaddy

Grapplejack posted:

It looks like China is going to move forward with the electoral reforms in HK, assumedly to stamp out most of the pro-dem groups and reassert their control over the region.

i guess they are breaking their promise to the british empire. hopefully Boris doesn't invade

Rutibex
Sep 9, 2001

by Fluffdaddy

indigi posted:

idk why you'd want to de-dollarize with a currency that takes the electricity output of an entire nation to maintain, has a hard cap on transaction volume, and completely limits your ability to manage supply

also you can't escape the US dollar by using computer accounting tricks. the US dollar dominates the globe because the USA won WW2 and used military power to maintain its world hegemony after that.

the US dollar is backed by minute man ICBMs

Rutibex
Sep 9, 2001

by Fluffdaddy

gradenko_2000 posted:

I tend to believe that if China ever had enough combined hashing power to do a 51% attack on bitcoin*, or some other dumping scheme that would hurt its value at a time when it'd be advantageous to do so, that they'd pull the trigger.

* I imagine it's possible that China already has enough compute to do this, and it's more a matter of opportunity.

i have the feeling that china is collecting lots of these little western vulnerabilities and they plan to pull the trigger on all of them simultaneously

Rutibex
Sep 9, 2001

by Fluffdaddy

Grapplejack posted:

Or, and hear me out, maybe they aren't playing 50d chess and are just playing the same lovely game as the west with a different coat of paint

nah china is different than the west and pretending they are the same is a critical error. their system is clearly growing stronger over time as the west is becoming weaker

Rutibex
Sep 9, 2001

by Fluffdaddy

tractor fanatic posted:

it still sounds like you're conflating the PRC with a bunch of random chinese people

to be clear i am talking about the sovereign nation state of china, which is controlled by a one party system known as the PRC. thats why i said "china" and not "chinese people"

i am also not talking about taiwan, which also claims to be china. im sorry for the confusion

Rutibex
Sep 9, 2001

by Fluffdaddy

Chomskyan posted:

How is bitcoin going to replace the US dollar as a reserve currency?

a warlord could pay their army in bitcoins then tax the territory they conquer in bitcoins

Rutibex
Sep 9, 2001

by Fluffdaddy
but all currencies are just speculative commodities

Rutibex
Sep 9, 2001

by Fluffdaddy

Chomskyan posted:

How does bitcoin being around “water down” the US dollar?

people buy bitcoins to avoid USAs control of SWIFT international payment systems. this decreases the power of US hegemony

Rutibex
Sep 9, 2001

by Fluffdaddy

Antonymous posted:

no one is buying oil or silicon chips or consumer goods in bitcoins, but when italy needs motherboards from taiwan or south africa needs natural gas from saudi arabia they buy in United States Dollars. you think international remittance is what dollar hegemony means you needs to study the gently caress up

all money is just a mass confidence delusion. dollars and bitcoins don't exist except except in the minds of people, and there is a finite amount of delusion energy. if people lose faith in dollars and buy bitcoin it decreases the power of the dollar mass delusion.

Rutibex
Sep 9, 2001

by Fluffdaddy

Junkozeyne posted:

Except China is rapidly coming from behind while the west just doesn't care. Pretending both are the same is just centrism.

yeah china is going to be Star Trek in 20 years if they keep up the pace of progress. the west hasn't made progress in 50 years

Rutibex
Sep 9, 2001

by Fluffdaddy
i wonder how many people the USA has lifted out of poverty in the same amount of time

Rutibex
Sep 9, 2001

by Fluffdaddy
if they got rid of poverty who would work at starbucks? if there was no homeless people on the streets than who would i look down on when thinking of my own miserable existence?

no i am afraid the USA already has the correct level of poverty and we shouldn't try to decrease it

Rutibex
Sep 9, 2001

by Fluffdaddy

Not So Fast posted:

Yeah, direct payments and targeted spending in the community sounds a lot like what China has been doing, going by the testimony in their recent documentary on the program.

i'm watching this documentary and i am super jealous of these rural chinese people who have their own houses and more living space than i've ever dreamed of. this guy is supposedly poor and all i can think is "drat i wish i could live in a cave i dug myself"
:negative:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nuaJGPZCBYU&t=1117s

Rutibex
Sep 9, 2001

by Fluffdaddy

Fat-Lip-Sum-41.mp3 posted:

The value of what people produce for their own consumption is never part of the "...makes X dollars a year" figure. It is always assumed that everyone is an alienated worker whose only source of support is a paycheck.

seriously! i have been watching videos from a rural chinese grandpa who chills out and does woodworking projects all day for his grandson. would grandpa amu count as a poor making less than $2 per day? i mean i assume he sells this stuff, but lets suppose he just made things for his grandson
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yqpZ_enV9pg

i wish i was a chinese peasant :(

Rutibex
Sep 9, 2001

by Fluffdaddy

Rutibex
Sep 9, 2001

by Fluffdaddy
its not like the CCP is encouraging people to live contented lives in the countryside. they are trying to get as many people into cities working wage labor as possible. that propaganda documentary even had a rural family that was complaining
"they took our farm from us and make us live in this apartment. except they only gave one of our family a very low paid job, and now we cant grow our own food. we need to buy everything from the grocery store now"

then there is a scene with a CCP party member who is like
"they are used to a different lifestyle in rural life. but we will educate them and in one generation they will be adapted to this new lifestyle"

Rutibex
Sep 9, 2001

by Fluffdaddy
to be clear i said i want to live like Grandpa Amu, not a shenzhen factory worker

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rbe9oDWNSqk

Rutibex
Sep 9, 2001

by Fluffdaddy

Pulcinella posted:

Yeah there is definitely a nice little “war with China” consent manufacturing operation going on in the background the past several years. It’s not even about what stories are true and which aren’t, but what stories are presented at all and which ones aren’t.

is this guy a CIA operative? he seems like it, but youtube doesn't have that little "state media" warning label so i cant tell
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rr13Ja8sUw4

Rutibex
Sep 9, 2001

by Fluffdaddy
i doubt there will be any big upset in china. the system is repressive in many ways but they are delivering the goods. as long as standards of living continue improve every year they can get away with a a lot

living standards in the west are declining, people are less interested in tolerating bullshit

Rutibex
Sep 9, 2001

by Fluffdaddy
doesnt the CCP own all land in china? i thought the only thing you can get is a long term lease. seems like that alone would prevent any kind of property crash from messing up too many things

Rutibex
Sep 9, 2001

by Fluffdaddy
:allears:
did this court just rule that psychology isnt a science and can not produce facts?

Rutibex
Sep 9, 2001

by Fluffdaddy

Spergin Morlock posted:

sounds interesting. i'm gonna snag a copy from somewhere other than amazon. good on them for bringing this book to my attention

i just pirated a copy and posted the pirated copy to my facebook. go to hell censorship

Rutibex
Sep 9, 2001

by Fluffdaddy

sincx posted:

https://twitter.com/ForeignPolicy/status/1367610854888333312

Incredible, an article from Foreign Policy about China that's not complete trash

ahhahahahah

quote:

The most innovative aspect of this pressure campaign is a call to free up resources for competition with China via rapprochement with Russia.

Rutibex
Sep 9, 2001

by Fluffdaddy
i mean they are 100% correct. if america went full socialist right now and stopped spending all its money on foreign war and instead spent it on domestic infrastructure they might be able to beat china. america still has a lead on china, if it stops being a decaying empire and turns into an efficient planned economy than it would kick chinas rear end

but that would require all the rich ancient ghouls to lose influence and power so it wont happen

Rutibex
Sep 9, 2001

by Fluffdaddy

stephenthinkpad posted:

I don't know if this theory has a name, but the idea is that "America has to have an enemy, having an common enemy is the only way to unify the fractional domestic politic". I have heard this low key mentioned by senators and scholars here and there, I don't know if there is a doctrine name for it.

fascism

Rutibex
Sep 9, 2001

by Fluffdaddy

Xi posted:

“The biggest source of chaos in the present-day world is the United States,”

i mean hes not wrong....

Rutibex
Sep 9, 2001

by Fluffdaddy

stephenthinkpad posted:

India hasn't signed a new FTA with anybody for 10 years. And the agreements are mostly with small economies. India historically is a very protectionism country.

than why are they trying to sell out their farmers to international capitol to the point of massive riots?

Rutibex
Sep 9, 2001

by Fluffdaddy

wow asia really is a different world. i have never seen a KFC thats clean before

Rutibex
Sep 9, 2001

by Fluffdaddy

oh wow the rhizzone still exists? brings me back

Rutibex
Sep 9, 2001

by Fluffdaddy

Stairmaster posted:

if I was the united states I'd simply come to a mutual understanding with china and focus on my atlantic commitments and loving over south america and africa.

Rutibex
Sep 9, 2001

by Fluffdaddy

Grapplejack posted:

it literally doesn't matter how combat ready the troops are because you have nukes, that's the secret sauce. China and the US are invincible because of this. China could have a single hot dog floating in the ocean and would be able to fend off any US attack because of the 400+ ICBMs they have

i think if the USA sends over an invasion force it wold be better to use a nuclear torpedo? i assume china has those, they are easier to make than ICBMs. goodbye carrier group :twisted:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J7kgExpYzkE&t=51s

Rutibex
Sep 9, 2001

by Fluffdaddy

Mirello posted:

anyone talking about ship vs ship or w/e is braindead. if conflict broke out between china and amerikkka, all life on earth would end. there's no such thing as a limited war between two nuclear powers.

i dont think china has enough ICBMs to destroy all of the earth? i thought they had a lot less than the old school USSR

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Rutibex
Sep 9, 2001

by Fluffdaddy

drat, new dynasty warriors looking good

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply