|
Lum_ posted:New Horizons already updated. AND patched the first update. I don't think they sleep. My excitement is bolded I laughed way too hard at the Kelpian part. 
|
#
¿
Feb 22, 2018 20:56
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 11, 2024 19:11 |
|
|
Gyshall posted:I have a pretty beastly machine (i7 @3.4, 64 GB ram, m2 ssd) and both on large and huge Galaxy sizes the ticks slow so bad end game that I'll probably never get to finish a game I know what you mean. Last year I’ve replaced my then five years old high end PC with a current high end one. Stellaris‘ performance was pretty much the same, slowing down to a crawl on bigger maps in the late game. If that does speak for or against the optimization of Stellaris I do not know. 
|
|
#
¿
Jun 5, 2018 06:14
|
|
|
I seem to have the worst luck with end game crises. It’s not that they are too hard, but with what shows up. Before Apocalypse it was the outsiders all the time, never got the old AI one and now in 6+ games it is always the contingency. In two years and dozens of games I have seen the Praethoryns a grand total of two times.  Edit: Also no horizon signal whatsoever. I’m almost convinced the DLC never installed properly.
Tarquinn fucked around with this message at 06:50 on Jun 27, 2018 |
|
#
¿
Jun 27, 2018 06:46
|
|
|
Okay, I am so tired of not having seen the worm yet. What’s the trick again? Having a science ship jumping back and forth between two black hole systems? These have to be unexplored, I presume?
|
|
#
¿
Jul 4, 2018 11:04
|
|
|
Thanks! 
|
|
#
¿
Jul 4, 2018 11:25
|
|
|
Okay, ten out of ten games I get the contingency as end game crisis. So very tired of it. I really want to continue playing ironman games, so modding is out of the question, right? Would save scumming work? At what point will the end game crisis be decided? Can I reload when I get the first end game pop up and eventually get a different one or is that decided way earlier?
|
|
#
¿
Jul 8, 2018 08:23
|
|
|
Jazerus posted:ironman is still functional, you just don't get achievements anymore Okay, good. Thanks. Kind of like getting the occasional achievement, though. Hmm.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 8, 2018 08:35
|
|
|
NextSundayA.D. posted:I save scummed out of the contingency to get the scourge for the queening achievement. It took more then one try but it worked. All right, I will try that in my next game. Thanks!
|
|
#
¿
Jul 8, 2018 12:00
|
|
|
Hey, it's me again, whining about how I only get the contingency as the end game crisis. 12 games in since apocalypse and only those AI fuckers show up. I stay far away from the materialist ethic, don't even research robots or sapient AI and even tried hard quitting and reloading two dozen times to get a different crisis to spawn, but no luck. Outside of modding the game (which I don't want to) or starting a new game with only spiritual AI empires and no fallen ones (because every time a robotic fallen one seem to spawn, making the contingency almost guaranteed, at least for me) I am out of ideas. So, this is me giving up the ghost (signal) and going on a Stellaris hiatus.  I really like the idea of the actions that take place before the crisis showing up influencing which one comes in at the end, but (at least for me) it only seems to lead to only one result. Clearly we need an end game crisis selection slider! Or an option to set it to a flat 33/33/33 chance. Wiz, plz! Edit: On a positive note, after two years without the horizon signal showing up, the black hole trick has worked and now it seems to show up every single game. Which is cool.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 15, 2018 08:16
|
|
|
Ihmemies posted:Wiz agreed today that end game crisis chances are hosed up: gently caress yeah!!!
|
|
#
¿
Jul 16, 2018 17:01
|
|
|
Is the contingency end game crisis probability fixed yet? Or does it still take place most of the time. Also, does anybody know what the "1999 A.D." achievement is a reference to?
|
|
#
¿
Sep 7, 2018 19:59
|
|
|
Psychotic Weasel posted:The end game crisis is still a bit messed up but I have seen the others show up. Still very heavily stacked towards Contingency though.  - That makes sense. Thanks!
|
|
#
¿
Sep 7, 2018 20:31
|
|
|
Hi guys, I haven’t played in like three years. In the current meta, what would be a good setup for a puppet master race that uses vassals to grow in power?
Tarquinn fucked around with this message at 12:40 on Dec 27, 2021 |
|
#
¿
Dec 27, 2021 12:35
|
|
|
Yami Fenrir posted:Note that vassals generally aren't a good way to do anything because they aren't reliable, but... Don't know what that means yet, but I'll find out. Thanks!
|
|
#
¿
Dec 28, 2021 19:13
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 11, 2024 19:11 |
|
|
darthbob88 posted:I expect you know most of this already, but- Megacorporations can build branch offices on the planets of any empire they a) have a commercial pact with, b) are the overlord of, or c) are in a federation with. One of the buildings you can construct in a branch office is the Mercenary Liaison Office, which gives you +10 naval capacity per building. If you combine that with Naval Contractors and Franchising maybe, you can be extremely effective militarily and still have enough people willing to let you build branch offices on their planets. Thanks. No, I did not know that. I had like 400 hours played in early 2019, but then did not touch the game again till now. I got like three (four?) full expansions to catch up on. Right now I am trying to figure out how the new planet management works and what to build where.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 29, 2021 09:47
|
|