Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Nocturtle
Mar 17, 2007

Polo-Rican posted:

this is good and any amount of change is better than no change, but this only protects a few neighborhoods of staten island specifically and won't be finished until 2024. absolutely pitiful when another sandy could wipe out half of new york's subways on any given year, which would practically end the city.

I've been seriously wondering about this, NYC is facing an imminent existential threat but there's been barely any work towards storm/sea rise protection. All of those billionaire pencil skyscrapers are worth nothing if the city stop working because the subways flooded. Maybe the authorities figure that NYC is doomed no matter what on a 100-year timescale, so investing money is pointless. But then why fund the LGA renovation, given that it's already regularly flooding.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Nocturtle
Mar 17, 2007

Sheng-Ji Yang posted:

It's true you can build 20 ft levees but not 25 ft ones :thunk:

though yeah itll cost money and unfortunately we are suddenly economic conservatives when it comes to saving a city

After the sea level rises above a certain point you're living not so much in a city but in a large open-air toilet. Sewage and rain won't drain away anymore, it will have to be pumped out. Do you really think that's sustainable? People here aren't conservatives, you've just missed how much warming and sea rise is baked in already.

Nocturtle
Mar 17, 2007

Just checked the airnow air quality map and did a double-take, I'm so sorry to everyone in the great lakes region.

Puppy Burner posted:

One of the provinces that is the most on fire doesn't believe in paying fire fighters so they had to beg for aid from the third world
Canada does suck for a lot of reasons but trying to put out fires in the massive Canadian boreal forests feels like pissing in the wind. Is this wrong? It's millions of square kilometers and if it's vulnerable to burn it's going to burn. This presumption that there's anything people can do to meaningfully limit fires in such a massive tinderbox seems unrealistic.

Not trying to jump on you, I just see this presumption go unchallenged in the media a lot.

Nocturtle
Mar 17, 2007

JAY ZERO SUM GAME posted:

summer number three of tropical weather in nyc. super humid, afternoon thunderstorms

totally normal

Hopefully we get some cooler smoke-filled air down from the north soon.

Nocturtle
Mar 17, 2007

Bip Roberts posted:

Halifax should think about detonating a giant ammo stockpile to stop the hurricane

Too soon.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Nocturtle
Mar 17, 2007

Not sure what suddenly accelerating a low mass star to 0.1% the speed of light four light years away would produce in terms of gravitational radiation but am inclined to think it wouldn't be noticeable here. Gravity wave weather remains elusive.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply