Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
(Thread IKs: dead gay comedy forums)
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Son of Sorrow
Aug 8, 2023

Hillary alt spotted.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Son of Sorrow
Aug 8, 2023

I'm very confused. Before we pile on, I'd like some clarification from the OP.

BP: Are you critiquing the tendency as wrong because it doesn't account for the phenomena of racism and sexism, or are you critiquing it because it's right despite not accounting for institutional bigotry?

Either way, Marx definitely did account for those but I think it would be helpful to understand the direction you're approaching from.

Son of Sorrow
Aug 8, 2023

Socialism is too expensive because it doesn't incentivize innovation.

Son of Sorrow
Aug 8, 2023

BillsPhoenix posted:

(In a perfectly competitive, no barrier, theory world)

BillsPhoenix posted:

In theory perfect world, profit would be limited to a minimum of zero?

Al! posted:

the word my buddy uses for this type of mentality is "perfectly spherical"

for example "well hamas attacked israel first so theyre the bad guys" is an example of a perfectly spherical liberal position

Son of Sorrow
Aug 8, 2023

edit: dumbass

Son of Sorrow
Aug 8, 2023

Respectfully, I don't think he's ready for the dialectical approach yet.

BP, to make this a bit easier, you're mistaking profit with surplus. They're not the same thing. Any enterprise, under any mode of production, can produce a surplus where the value of the product is greater than the value of the inputs (indeed this is the point of the process). But that's not profit. When the surplus is taken by the capitalist for himself under the auspices of "return on investment", that act of theft transforms surplus into profit. This profit is transformed again into capital by the capitalist when they purchase more productive property with which to produce more surplus and then steal that additional surplus as additional profit.

This cycle is the core mechanism of capitalism. There is no capitalism without it, meaning it is the sole raison d'etre of the capitalist. There is no motive but the profit motive. Because there is more than one capitalist, this means they're all in mortal competition with each other. If your flow of stolen profits slows or stops, you can't transform as much into capital to buy more property. Barring some random chance event, you will continue to fall behind your competitors whose profit flows continue to multiply and grow, and they will eat you, and then you will become a regular jackoff like everyone else and have to get a real job. So the capitalist is as trapped in the cycle as the worker they exploit, eternally reaching for monopoly.

Son of Sorrow
Aug 8, 2023

More efficient at what OP

Son of Sorrow
Aug 8, 2023

BillsPhoenix posted:

Not calling you out, just wanting to note I'm not the only poster here that doesn't find that question crystal clear.

Answer my question, please.

Son of Sorrow
Aug 8, 2023

Fine I'll bite BP: What is the first question?

Son of Sorrow
Aug 8, 2023

Is it like The First Question or just something I don't remember from upthread?

Son of Sorrow
Aug 8, 2023

Fat-Lip-Sum-41.mp3 posted:

mfers just dont know to read multiple nested independent clauses that may or may not be someone marx is quoting rather than something marx is saying, most likely a mixture of both (and you wont know which)

I know which.

Son of Sorrow
Aug 8, 2023

Let me get straight to the point:

Raise your hand if you've killed the cop in your head. Good. :same:

Now, raise your hand if you've killed or are killing the German in your head. Many of you are asking "w-what...?", "lol are you serious?", etc

Son of Sorrow
Aug 8, 2023

BP should be permitted to post imo. He's dumb and annoying and poorly educated but that's no different than anyone else in this forum.

Son of Sorrow
Aug 8, 2023

Except me. I'm lovely.

Son of Sorrow
Aug 8, 2023

The question of whether and how one can recruit American military personnel is putting the cart before the horse. In order to answer it, you'd need to know the conditions in which a revolutionary socialist organization they could join operates. We don't have that, obviously (at least here in the States). Furthermore, it's my suspicion that we won't really know anything useful about those conditions and interactions without there actually being one we can analyze, being that there hasn't been a serious socialist movement in the US in like a century. To my mind the more relevant question is how knowledgeable and committed anti-capitalists can develop and grow a stable and focused party, and whether enough those actually exist to wrangle together.

Son of Sorrow
Aug 8, 2023

BillsPhoenix posted:

Lmao a thread full of philoshers can't identify Douglas Adams.

I guess I will gently caress off, I over estimated everyone.

(USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)

The only Douglas Adams I'm aware of are the Hitchhiker's Guide guy and an obscure linguist. When you get off probation, can you link to some of their work so I can get a better idea what you're talking about? Unlike the know-nothings and ne'er-do-wells in this thread, I am happy to discuss and educate further.

Son of Sorrow
Aug 8, 2023

How are we supposed to have fun if you idiots chase off all the schizos. Do better.

Son of Sorrow
Aug 8, 2023

The core motivation for western socialists is being a hater.

Son of Sorrow
Aug 8, 2023

GDP is a measurement of the production of only one commodity: money. That's why poo poo like derivatives and other financial instruments are included in it, and why it's effectively unable to represent actual economic productivity (the production of needed physical goods and services). To me a more ideal metric would be the measure of aggregated social need met by domestic production, which would require a rather radical reformation of society.

Son of Sorrow
Aug 8, 2023

Juche economics

Son of Sorrow
Aug 8, 2023

What if the coat was made by a chud, huh? What's Marx got to say to that?

Son of Sorrow
Aug 8, 2023

BP is right and the thread lacks the fortitude and moral clarity to accept it.

Son of Sorrow
Aug 8, 2023

Hefty Leftist posted:

capital is perfectly readable if you stop being a gigantic baby about it

Son of Sorrow
Aug 8, 2023

Comrade Koba posted:

best metaphor for the united states of america i've ever seen

Son of Sorrow
Aug 8, 2023

AnimeIsTrash posted:

hows it feel knowing that your entire ideology can be defeated by showing people graphs like this



Wow, socialist Bill Clinton!

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Son of Sorrow
Aug 8, 2023

BillsPhoenix posted:

These are based on a series of previous posts.

Something great about Capital is the simple building blocks work without having to add in a lot of "real world" complexities.

Western economics are built off the rational actor, once you move beyond introductory levels, things change a lot. It's a source of valid criticism in this thread.

As far as longevity, a large number of machinery in its initial form fit the bill. To keep it simple, a steel axe outlasts a stone axe. It also holds a sharper edge and can produce faster, adding a competing rise and fall in profits as competitors also adopt a steel are.

Market saturation isn't really relevant, and supply and demand certainly isn't.

Ultimately when you're talking about the tendency of the rate of profit to fall, the machines themselves and their specific nature are irrelevant. It would function exactly the same with a workshop full of artisans as it would with an automated gigafactory, as long as the capitalist owns both. The tendency of the rate of profit to fall is a consequence of the competitive nature of capitalist social relations. If you're a capitalist making and selling keychains, you're going to be driven by the profit motive to make your keychains more cheaply, because that increases your profit margin at the same price point. Every time you figure out how to do this, everyone else who makes and sells keychains is going to take that idea and do it too. Then one of you is going to decide that you can take a smaller cut off each unit in order to gain more market share and make more profit in volume, because capitalists must compete with one another for higher profits or be eaten. Before you know it, now everyone who makes and sells keychains is doing your thing and the market reaches a new equilibrium at the lower price point. You're right back where you started, so when someone else comes up with a new way to make cheaper keychains, you're going to adopt the same strategy. This continues on and on in a never-ending race to the bottom. The core foundations of capitalism - competition and the profit motive - are the spring from which the tendency flows. You can try to expand the system by opening up new markets (the impetus for colonialism and imperialism), for example, but every strategy contains the same poison pill of diminishing returns. Market saturation and supply/demand are environmental forces both driving and reacting to this process.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply