Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Shear Modulus
Jun 9, 2010




nice

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Shear Modulus
Jun 9, 2010



The Nastier Nate posted:

democrats are going to pick up seats and the only ones owned will be cspam

imo the most democrat option is that they somehow gain enough seats that they don't need manchin and sinema to support anything and then still do nothing for the next two years

Shear Modulus
Jun 9, 2010




nobody fuckin knows whats in it because all the media has been talking about for the past six months is that it's too dang expensive and that crazy wacky ocasio cortez wants a bunch of unrealistic hooey

this wouldn't be a problem if the dems had any PR strategy beyond just relying on the media to carry water for them

Shear Modulus
Jun 9, 2010




lmao

Shear Modulus
Jun 9, 2010



https://twitter.com/TheOnion/status/1451228049480065030?s=20

Shear Modulus
Jun 9, 2010



gimme the GOD drat candy posted:

i don't think all the fixing in the world could get harris through the primary, even.

if biden says he's leaving after one term and letting harris take over there would be just as much a primary as if biden himself decided to run for re-election

Shear Modulus
Jun 9, 2010



heated game moment posted:

Thinking about how the dems are pushing everyone to start commuting back to the office to prop up commercial real estate in a time of extremely high prices for cars, gas, childcare, and housing and smiling serenely

in a show of bipartisanship, president biden is beginning his own program of putting stickers of himself saying "i did that!" on basic needs that are getting increasingly expensive

Shear Modulus
Jun 9, 2010



do you think lots of high-profile democrats proudly saying they'll be happy to make gas and food and whatever else more expensive to help ukraine will be good at winning over swing voters

Shear Modulus
Jun 9, 2010



LastInLine posted:

Am I missing something or would it not be more effective to simply subsidize the cost of gasoline directly? Granted I wouldn't say that's a good idea, but if you specifically wanted to reduce the final cost of fuel why not just force retail outlets to price the good at x and then pay the difference they're losing buying wholesale?

Obviously I understand that the reason is SOCIALISM but if you're going to do it there are easier ways.

Any functional government would've set up such a system years ago simply to curb financial shocks from fuel price volatility and insulate politicians from such but then ExxonMobil wouldn't be the third most valuable company on the planet and we can't have that.

richard nixon had an even better idea of handling surging inflation when he was president where one day he just declared that nobody could increase their prices or wages on anything and that if the government found out you did then they would send goons to throw you in jail

incredibly, prices not being allowed to increase somehow stopped inflation. i imagine economists remain baffled as to how this could have happened, since it's economics 101 that direct government intervention into pricing doesn't work

Shear Modulus
Jun 9, 2010



LastInLine posted:

I'm aware and while I understand it's probably not a popular opinion I'd argue that Nixon's economic policies and unimplemented proposals were more sustainable than he's given credit for. They weren't all bangers, and his intentions were definitely sus, but taken on the whole they were far more beneficial to the average American than the neoliberal direction taken in the Reagan-to-Clinton era.

price controls are an appropriate response to inflation. Not just for what we consider transient inflation like today's or the nixon era one but also for consistent and consistently insane levels of price increases that we've seen for the past several decades in medical costs, education, and housing. in fact, in countries where those things have remained affordable it's either through price controls or public ownership

Shear Modulus
Jun 9, 2010



DoubleDonut posted:

yeah this is the big thing to me. this is literally not going to accomplish anything other than piss off people, specifically ones who usually vote democrat if they vote at all

so? What are they going to do, vote republican? and showing a "tough on blacks" policy will help them win swing voters. really this might be biden's sistah souljah moment

fast cars loose anus posted:

Thank god for Chantix, if only something like that existed for booze I'd have been able to change my life a lot quicker

I went from smoking nearly a pack a day to having smoked half a pack, total, between 2019 and now

I've discovered that such a thing does exist for booze and it's called weed

Nix Panicus posted:

When I still had cable I recall seeing a poo poo ton more anti-vaping ads than anti-smoking ads. Arent those all funded and produced by the cigarette industry as part of some self-policing awareness measure? I'd ask why not just fine the companies directly and then have people not entangled with the cigarette industry make the ads, but I know the answer would be some variation on the theme of corruption

The anti-smoking ads you see are part of the big settlement (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tobacco_Master_Settlement_Agreement) that the government made with the tobacco industry that closed the case on the tobacco companies lying about nicotine being addictive and cigarettes causing cancer for decades. The tobacco companies have to pay money every year to the government and part of that money funds the anti smoking ad nonprofit (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Truth_Initiative)

Shear Modulus
Jun 9, 2010



Apraxin posted:

democrats getting out of this with only being 'destroyed' looking a bit too hopeful and optimistic lol
https://twitter.com/Cavalewis/status/1520095372949049346?cxt=HHwWhMC-lYOsu5gqAAAA
edit: oh wait the hispanic subgroup in the poll has an MoE of 9%, so maybe just destroyed after all

stop arzying

Shear Modulus
Jun 9, 2010



vyelkin posted:

I realize I'm preaching to the choir here but one of the most deranged aspects of the horse race approach to American politics is how every bit of news is always framed as a win or a loss for politicians and political parties and not a win or a loss for ordinary people. Child tax credit expired? That's a loss for Biden and for the Democrats' midterm chances! Not a loss for the millions of people thrown back into poverty, it's a win for the Republican Party! Abortion made illegal in most of the country? Sure, it'll affect millions of women, but what really matters is it's an opportunity to fundraise and get voters to the polls in November! It's loving sickening, and I'm certain it contributes to people's sense of politics as a team sport completely detached from reality rather than something with seismic consequences for ordinary people.

when's the last time anyone in politics or the media ever spoke to or saw an ordinary person

Shear Modulus
Jun 9, 2010



MSDOS KAPITAL posted:

if you think roe getting overturned is going to depress gop turnout then I'm sorry but the diagnosis is terminal democrat-brain and there is no cure.

only a democrat could look at a political party doing stuff their base wants them to do in a decades-spanning effort, and conclude that the party is finished

i don't think it's republican turnout they're thinking about, they're saying that now those lazy bums who don't vote in every election will come out and vote. They're still operating under the assumption that high turnout always helps democrats because marginal voting propensity voters are mostly democrats. This supposedly ironclad rule needs to be reconsidered because a substantial amount of newly activated voters started voting so they could vote for trump. For example, turnout in florida increased substantially in 2016 and again in 2020 and trump's margin of victory went up each time. in ohio, turnout increased drastically in 2020 relative to 2016, and trump's margin of victory stayed the same. there were of course states that biden got more new voters than trump, notably georgia and texas, but at best higher turnout is a mixed bag rather than a flat +democrat vote bonus

Shear Modulus
Jun 9, 2010



fast cars loose anus posted:

This has to be peak access right

"We will give you access to food to keep your baby from starving to death if you meet some criteria"

It sounds like they're either giving it to some people already on WIC or letting some people who previously didn't qualify for WIC apply for it

i think it's the second one

Shear Modulus has issued a correction as of 03:40 on May 24, 2022

Shear Modulus
Jun 9, 2010



i still think the exact moment the democrats gave up on winning hispanic votes and doubled down on pandering to mitt romney voters was when hispanics broke bigly for bernie

Shear Modulus
Jun 9, 2010



Ron Burgundy played straight

Shear Modulus
Jun 9, 2010



it's pretty nuts that trump implemented the biggest (only?) federal gun control measure in like 20 years

Shear Modulus
Jun 9, 2010




How many of the republican-leaning seats currently held by dems were redistricted into R+10 and how many were won by dems in the 2020 anti-trump wave that they're desperately trying to recreate by begging elon to let trump back onto twitter

Shear Modulus
Jun 9, 2010



Pryor on Fire posted:

The democrats have been acting like such pathetic losers for the entire time they have had unlimited power it's really almost as if they have already lost in november. I know that's not technically how time works but it sure seems like it.

they intended to do nothing and claim credit for the pandemic ending on its own and the economy rebounding and then when that plan ran into trouble they panicked and decided they needed to do nothing harder

Shear Modulus
Jun 9, 2010




lol

what's chait's position on this these days

Shear Modulus
Jun 9, 2010



Real hurthling! posted:

lmao hes flinching

it was a pretty obvious trial balloon.

the twitter feedback they were fishing for was negative as usual so looks like it's back to the drawing board for team Joe

Shear Modulus has issued a correction as of 03:29 on May 29, 2022

Shear Modulus
Jun 9, 2010



papa horny michael posted:

I don't think Biden admin says this stuff tbh. It's just reporters spinning their wheels because they can't report on Biden like trump

i could be remembering wrong but i thought the original reports were citing biden admin members involved in the discussions who spoke anonymously because the proposals were not yet finalized, which i generally interpret as intentional leak to gauge reactions

Shear Modulus
Jun 9, 2010



papa horny michael posted:

Lol bad quote purposeful to stoke anger and resentment from people paying private student loan debt?

i would bet that this spokesman is unaware private student loan debt exists

Shear Modulus
Jun 9, 2010



Shear Modulus
Jun 9, 2010



Biden didn't have to run though. obama supposedly tried to talk him out of it and wanted to coronate deval patrick instead of biden.

Shear Modulus
Jun 9, 2010



the bitcoin of weed posted:

this is a flawless parody of politics dipshits, rather than just telling people what our plan is we will try to convince them we definitely do have a plan and we'll get started on that any day now

Biden has a plan to tackle inflation, and it's to tell jpow to fix it

Shear Modulus
Jun 9, 2010



i remember during one of the debates there was a question to biden about what he would do about the novel coronavirus and he said that trump had done a terrible job and had no idea what he was doing, but that if joe were president he would take bold, decisive action of asking all the experts what they think and then do what they say (which is of course what trump was doing for the first few weeks before he defected to the side of the virus)

Shear Modulus
Jun 9, 2010



a better question than how is biden's approval rating lower than trump's, is how is biden's approval rating as high as it is? does 35% of the country really think he's doing a good job?

Shear Modulus
Jun 9, 2010




lmao this article is apocalyptic for dems

Shear Modulus
Jun 9, 2010



projecthalaxy posted:

I thought the main problem is/was there just flat wasn't any formula to buy or did I get MSM'd on that

they're buying formula in england and australia and then flying it over in military cargo planes

https://twitter.com/DeItaone/status/1532030762517774337

then they're giving it to target

https://twitter.com/DeItaone/status/1532031137526296580

Shear Modulus
Jun 9, 2010



fast cars loose anus posted:

https://twitter.com/SimonWDC/status/1531608610815586304

This is the sort of poo poo that makes people see red. "We" might be better off in many ways in the aggregate, depending on how you look at it. I am objectively worse off than last year simply because gas and groceries cost so goddamn much more. Guess which one is gonna motivate people to vote?

Builder of political things, looking ahead | NDN, DNC, DCCC, Clinton War Room, New Dems | Tufts, Aspen Crown Fellow | 30 yrs in the fight | Slava Ukraini!

lmao

Shear Modulus
Jun 9, 2010



the dems finally figured out a response to reagan speaking into the camera at the final debate with Carter and asking, "are you better off now than you were four years ago?" and it's to tell people that yes, despite what their lying eyes may tell them, they are.

Shear Modulus
Jun 9, 2010



THS2 posted:

whats bidens plan for monkeypox

tell everyone not to worry about it

Shear Modulus
Jun 9, 2010




hahaha

Shear Modulus
Jun 9, 2010



here's me

https://twitter.com/LaurieFare1/status/1532346558641016832

Shear Modulus
Jun 9, 2010



Subvisual Haze posted:


It's a a very unstable ruling coalition, it's hard not to see the parallels to 1930s rising fascism era or the 1848 liberal revolutionary regimes that almost instantly collapsed because their base of support (educated liberals) was so narrow. You get the impression a halfway competent strongman could seize control of the whole system and the majority of this country would just shrug their shoulders.

How does this not describe what trump has already done

Shear Modulus
Jun 9, 2010



ok but since then the republicans have built the machinery to install him as president no matter what the real result of the next presidential election is

Shear Modulus
Jun 9, 2010



Subvisual Haze posted:

To exercise real autocratic control you'd need to purge the bureaucracies. Which obviously Trump was too unfocused and lazy to even attempt to do.

If attempted, it might well be possible though, particularly with the current makeup of the supreme court. And again, would the majority of the country really care all that much if the President fired a bunch of unelected bureaucrats? It would be a violation of our sacred norms, but how many people really believe in system and its norms at this point?

well, he did a pretty good job at purging the bureaucracies of a lot of professional bureaucrats that actually made the bureaucracy function without even trying by prompting mass resignations. He also facilitated the complete takeover of the ultimate political-bureaucratic authority by completing the takeover of the supreme court, which gave him and the republicans ultimate control over every facet of the bureaucracy (even moreso than the president who is nominally in control of the federal bureaucracy, since the court can overrule the president).

e: oh you already mentioned the court

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Shear Modulus
Jun 9, 2010



Dr. Kyle Farnsworth posted:

Really enjoying all the pieces coming out by anonymous staffers about Biden wondering why nobody likes him

Seriously they make me happy

there's finally an accompaniment to the ones about harris

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply