|
The bond amount is token anyway. Fleeing the country would mean leaving behind orders of magnitude more assets that any bail they could reasonably set.
|
# ¿ Aug 22, 2023 15:38 |
|
|
# ¿ May 17, 2024 06:45 |
|
Sounds like he intends to challenge the RICO laws themselves
|
# ¿ Aug 25, 2023 00:23 |
|
Tbh I assumed that the prosecutor has some quiet deal with the governor and other important Georgia republicans that protects a few people with the right friends in exchange for their tacit protection.
|
# ¿ Sep 8, 2023 17:28 |
|
Is there something I’m missing with the hearings about the DC case gag order? It seems like the actual objection is to the effect of the order on Trump’s political campaign. I feel like this idea that politicians (and possible other public figures?) benefit from a high standard of first amendment protection is a pretty dangerous one, given how many outright con men run for office to protect themselves already.
|
# ¿ Nov 21, 2023 00:12 |
|
Sorry what is the theory that this is harmful to the defendant? Like, assuming that she did nepotistically bring in an under qualified prosecutor then that’s bad for her office and for justice in general but it outright benefits the defense.
|
# ¿ Feb 4, 2024 16:37 |
|
The filing won’t pull up for me, what is trump requesting here? More time or a waiver for the bond?
|
# ¿ Mar 18, 2024 17:13 |
|
snorch posted:Calling it now, he rejected it because he was butthurt by their insultingly low valuations. And/or they wanted a really iniquitous amount of collateral because they know they have Trump over a barrel.
|
# ¿ Mar 18, 2024 18:07 |
|
Yeah I don’t see why some corrupt actor would take this as collateral but not some overvalued properties?
|
# ¿ Mar 22, 2024 17:10 |
|
Jeffery of YassPos??
|
# ¿ Mar 22, 2024 21:08 |
|
Yeah the judge and Bragg are free game because they’re public figures. They’re specifically left out of the gag order.
|
# ¿ Mar 27, 2024 17:57 |
|
The Mueller She Wrote people are obnoxious grifters, don't listen to them.
|
# ¿ Mar 31, 2024 02:53 |
|
Pillowpants posted:You mean the meidas touch people right? MSW seems pretty decent to me. They were founded on pretending to have secret anonymous insider information, and continue to misrepresent or exaggerate actual news for attention.
|
# ¿ Mar 31, 2024 15:15 |
|
Hieronymous Alloy posted:*can* he sell without board permission, or is it just a federal crime to sell without such permission? My understanding is that he outright can't unless he gets the board in on it or somehow tricks the DTCC. Like if he tries to transfer the shares they'll basically go "uh, says here that these shares aren't allowed to change hands, do you have proof of permission?"
|
# ¿ Apr 1, 2024 19:19 |
|
It would be subject to gift tax if the loan is obviously noneconomical but like, I don't think this dude is just giving Trump 175 mil. It probably IS a loan, probably just on favorable terms in terms of interest and timeframe.
|
# ¿ Apr 2, 2024 20:28 |
|
Hot tip for doubling your time to find a bond: file an obviously fake one first! Courts hate it!
|
# ¿ Apr 4, 2024 21:13 |
|
Wouldn’t be the first idiot to fling themselves onto a grenade for Trump in exchange for gratitude that will not be forthcoming.
|
# ¿ Apr 4, 2024 21:59 |
|
Randalor posted:Could he use them as the collateral for the bond? I mean that as an honest question. He’s specifically prevented from doing so by the same clause that prevents him from selling.
|
# ¿ Apr 6, 2024 00:05 |
|
The question is how will the court respond? Because they they just wag their finger and say “submit a new bond within 10 days” then this is unambiguously a win for Trump: he’ll have scammed himself and extra month to get things in order.
|
# ¿ Apr 6, 2024 20:40 |
|
Xiahou Dun posted:The whole point of the bond is that it delayed getting his poo poo taken until he appeals in September. (Or whenever). It's delaying enforcement if he can't get a real bond.
|
# ¿ Apr 7, 2024 05:07 |
|
Trump also has a tendency to run off competent lawyers by trying to get them to risk their careers for him.
|
# ¿ Apr 12, 2024 18:19 |
|
Lol I’ve been called for jury duty roughly annually for the last seven years, been dismissed during jury selection thrice, and served once. It’s obnoxious. I was called once prior to that but these last seven years I’ve been on the quick list or something.
|
# ¿ Apr 16, 2024 03:39 |
|
The list of secret famous goons is highly confidential information known only to Jeff and a few other select admins.
|
# ¿ Apr 19, 2024 02:50 |
|
Nitrousoxide posted:Yeah, I don't get why you'd use a bond company at that point. It makes some sense when you're securing the bond with otherwise non-liquid assets. But using fully liquid assets to secure a bond just means you're paying extra for no reason. Yeah the answer is "so he could play stupid games with the money".
|
# ¿ Apr 23, 2024 00:15 |
|
John Yossarian posted:Do think Trump will be found gulity for the Stormy Daniels trial? I know being found guilty won't change anything for the chuds, but I hope people still on the fence will wake and vote for Biden this November. Way too early to know for sure. Depends on how much doubt Trump's legal team can generate.
|
# ¿ May 1, 2024 03:03 |
|
Who will rid me of this turbulent poster?
|
# ¿ May 3, 2024 01:29 |
|
Deteriorata posted:They're deep into "the ends justify the means" rationalization. Nah they’re just fascists and don’t care. Evangelicals have been reactionaries playacting at religious revival for a century and a half
|
# ¿ May 7, 2024 18:27 |
|
|
# ¿ May 17, 2024 06:45 |
|
Yeah there's no reasonable way to regulate public figures opining on a trial being covered in the media. Unless like, they catch Trump coercing/bribing them to do it. It's not even a socioeconomic or overly-permissive American free speech jurisprudence issue.
|
# ¿ May 14, 2024 05:04 |