|
Published by sorcerers of the shoreline
|
#
¿
Jan 11, 2023 06:51
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 17, 2024 07:30 |
|
|
Xir posted:Dowsers of the Damp Shamen of the sand
|
|
#
¿
Jan 11, 2023 19:48
|
|
|
Demigods and dankness
|
|
#
¿
Jan 11, 2023 23:12
|
|
|
Charlatans of the shoal
|
|
#
¿
Jan 11, 2023 23:20
|
|
|
Did anyone get Magicians of the Moist yet?
|
|
#
¿
Jan 12, 2023 00:21
|
|
|
Good night sweet prince
|
|
#
¿
Jan 18, 2023 19:14
|
|
|
Megazver posted:https://www.reddit.com/r/Pathfinder2e/comments/11faxjl/paizo_announces_ai_policy_for_itself_and/ The pathfinder subreddits have all gone full authoritarian too, I'm watching regular non heated conversation on the subject being blanket nuked for even questioning the move. Rule breaking posts that defend the change are fine, but anyone who questions it, you can just see all their posts being deleted.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 1, 2023 23:54
|
|
|
Boba Pearl posted:I don't understand how this doesn't lead to people just lying? It absolutely does. But some people will grasp at any opportunity to enact their own little version of McCarthyism I guess. When the rules are arbitrary and entirely opaque you can just use your opinions in place of actual rules. I just saw a guy get banned because he doesn't post in the sub often enough to be entitled to an opinion? (According to the guy, I can't verify that) I worry that we are going to see people being forced to prove they created the art going forward, it's already started really, and since the rules are, again, arbitrary and opaque, it's going to be abused. Leperflesh posted:If Paizo says "you're not allowed to put AI generated art in stuff" and then people lie about it, that absolves Paizo of legal responsibility. It's cover. That's fair imho. I fully expect companies to follow suit, and reasonably so really. I'm more worried about the translation into community guidelines personally. Cousin Todd fucked around with this message at 00:08 on Mar 2, 2023 |
|
#
¿
Mar 2, 2023 00:05
|
|
|
Megazver posted:https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product/428080/Hoic-Haco You gonna pony up the $0 and write a review?
|
|
#
¿
Mar 2, 2023 22:23
|
|
|
The text on the cover looks like gibberish they just ran with instead of fixing it
|
|
#
¿
Mar 2, 2023 22:53
|
|
|
Fuzz posted:That's still illicit, as most of that stuff is copyright and/or intellectual property that wasn't opted in and gave no consent to be included. Please just don't. That's not what those words mean or how anything works. Kindly moralize elsewhere.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 17, 2023 12:37
|
|
|
It looks like the ai they are building into Microsoft office knows the contents of office in it's system for grounding purposes. I wonder if we will be able to leverage that by telling it to reference X document it has access to...
|
|
#
¿
Mar 21, 2023 00:35
|
|
|
Comrade Koba posted:I feel this comes pretty close to the argument that inevitably pops up whenever You feel incorrectly. This isn't a product that exists but isn't being purchased. This is a product that doesn't exist at all without being created by the user.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 24, 2023 15:02
|
|
is discussed, that it won't hurt sales because you would never have paid for the stuff you downloaded anyway.
|
Comrade Koba posted:It’s a product that isn’t being made and sold because someone would rather make a free copy of it instead. This is objectively incorrect. Leperflesh posted:There's a report and some frustration because this is a thread for AI tools for trad games, but what I said earlier was that debate & discussion is still allowed provided it remains civil. There is no other place in TG to have this conversation, basically, and the more generalized conversations in D&D and maybe GBS aren't about AI works in trad games. No offense intended, but showing up in the "cooking steak" thread to repeatedly yell about how meat is murder and nobody should eat steak isn't "debate and discussion". You are giving people free range to make abusive off topic posts. Cousin Todd fucked around with this message at 15:52 on Mar 24, 2023 |
|
#
¿
Mar 24, 2023 15:50
|
|
|
Comrade Koba posted:Looks like it's objectively correct! Saying incorrect things repeatedly isn't an argument.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 24, 2023 15:54
|
|
|
Comrade Koba posted:Then maybe you should stop doing it? I would, but then we would both be wrong. I'm going to mute you now.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 24, 2023 15:56
|
|
|
There's no place to have the discussion because the discussion is inherently abusive, as you can see on this page.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 24, 2023 16:58
|
|
|
Anonymous Zebra posted:I agree with the post in the GBS thread where they compared this technology to synthesizers in music, where people are going to keep coming in to say that it's not "real music". I really feel like these threads (both here and in GBS) are the equivalent of garages where amateur musicians (and a few pros) are fooling around with their brand new synthesizers and people are just walking in to tell them that they are all bad people who are going to ruin music. Well, the original OP is gone forever and the moderators here seem to not gaf that people are derailing the thread constantly and calling people names counts as "civil discussion" Is there a better subforum for this thread where the moderators might actually be inclined to moderate?
|
|
#
¿
Mar 24, 2023 17:23
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 17, 2024 07:30 |
|
|
Thread is just full of garbage people now. Unbookmark. People wonder why the forum is dying? These lovely people and a complete lack of reasonable moderation, full stop.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 27, 2023 11:30
|
|