Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
SKULL.GIF
Jan 20, 2017


Docjowles posted:

I think Saleh is pretty safe unless Rodgers just SUCKS, like final year Peyton level cooked.

Wouldn't that be a point in favor of keeping Saleh? You can't really blame him for a QB being taken out behind the shed by Father Time.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

SKULL.GIF
Jan 20, 2017


For a laugh look at Jordan Love's opening 6-7 weeks and compare that to Rodgers's.

SKULL.GIF
Jan 20, 2017


Benne posted:

It's honestly a great bit that Nathaniel freakin Hackett is like the only coach Aaron has ever liked

Rodgers also liked Alex Van Pelt who is now the Browns OC, and Tom Clements who returned as the Packers QB coach.

SKULL.GIF
Jan 20, 2017


Pontius Pilate posted:

Eh, they were trying to build the best team possible without completely mortgaging the future. Part of the charm of having an ~elite~ qb is that they can elevate the offense around them and you don’t have to spend tons of capital on that side of the ball, and he still enjoyed a good line for a lot of that time. The defense hasn’t panned out (yet) but Love was really the only move that wasn’t trying to take advantage of the Rodgers window

What's amusing is looking at the current Packers and realizing that the past few years have actually been about giving Love maximum advantage while balancing out giving Rodgers as many tools as he could get to push for a Super Bowl without, as you said, mortgaging the future. The current roster has zero receiving targets with more than 2 years of experience (excepting Josiah Deguara, who's now a fullback). Despite that Love's inheriting an incredible pass-blocking line, a stacked RB room, and loads of potential at receiver/TE.

Rodgers was justified in his beef with the Green Bay front office for not giving him more to work with, but at the same time, Green Bay -- a small-town team very reliant on revenue-sharing and sustained success -- was justified in perpetually planning for the future.

SKULL.GIF
Jan 20, 2017


Impossibly Perfect Sphere posted:

That's not how the NFL works.

???

?????????

Sorry are you going to tell me that the NFL doesn't have revenue sharing??????????????? Or is this yet another dumbass loving comment from a dumbass loving poster???

SKULL.GIF
Jan 20, 2017


Green Bay doesn't have a billionaire who can bankroll the team through lean years. They explicitly have something like $400 million stashed away in a reserve fund for this reason. It's been a while since I looked at the numbers but iirc the majority of the Packers' income comes from the revenue share.

If the team starts sucking for an extended period of time the league won't hesitate to move the franchise, they won't care about all the cute little bylaws forbidding this.

SKULL.GIF
Jan 20, 2017


Benne posted:

COOL
Matt Eberflus, Chicago Bears

Couple guys I’m keeping an eye on here. [...] Eberflus didn’t show much in year 1, and if the Bears (and specifically Justin Fields) don’t make a leap I’d question what he’s actually doing there.

Oh boy...

SKULL.GIF
Jan 20, 2017


From the NFC North thread:


This man is mild. And I don't just mean his job status.

SKULL.GIF
Jan 20, 2017


The Bears have a very late bye (Week 13) which probably helps to keep Eberflus safe until at least that time. If you're firing a coach midseason it's because they're either grossly incompetent (Hackett, Urban) or because you're concerned they might gently caress up the development of your players (Fields... leading into my next point). If you're firing Eberflus and installing someone else as head coach, you probably want to do it during the bye so the interim has extra time to acclimatize and prepare.

SKULL.GIF
Jan 20, 2017


Bears are so bad that firing Eberflus feels pointless. You gotta change it from the top down. Everything

SKULL.GIF
Jan 20, 2017


Sean Payton may possibly be a first-year candidate. The Broncos openly quit on him today.

SKULL.GIF
Jan 20, 2017


crosspost from N/V:

Harlock posted:

Does your team suck? Will your head coach be escorted out of the building around midnight at the end of the regular season?

This is who will be likely to take over <insert your favorite bad team> here.

https://www.si.com/nfl/2023/09/29/future-nfl-head-coach-candidates-daily-cover

SKULL.GIF
Jan 20, 2017


Phobeste posted:

Was this article unearthed from a time capsule from july

Yeah, I got that sense too, that it was written weeks ago and they sat on it to plug it into their release schedule when they saw a slow spot or something like that.

SKULL.GIF
Jan 20, 2017


Roasted Donut posted:

He's the perfect example of a coach that looks wonderful from the outside and to the national media but has been showing terrible cracks for years now to the local media and fans who watch this garbage up close week to week.

Ah, the Mike McCarthy conundrum.

SKULL.GIF
Jan 20, 2017


Benne posted:

Kraft is 82 years old, does he want to sit through a long rebuild? I think the wacky bullshit is just getting started whenever Bill finally leaves.

Does Kraft have any children who would inherit the team?

SKULL.GIF
Jan 20, 2017


biceps crimes posted:

Mike McCarthys moving on up. Not quite on the hot seat yet, but what the gently caress

I dunno if getting blown out by the best team in football is a good reason to upgrade McCarthy.

SKULL.GIF
Jan 20, 2017


It owns how the Rams traded for Stafford, immediately won a championship, and then all these other teams tried trading for their own franchise QB and ate poo poo.

Copycatting doesn't work!!

SKULL.GIF
Jan 20, 2017


Benne posted:

I've seen enough, Arthur Smith sucks

SKULL.GIF
Jan 20, 2017


I still think it's weird Rich Bisaccia never got a look anywhere after being extremely well received as interim coach for the Raiders and getting promoted to assistant head coach after only one year with the Packers.

SKULL.GIF
Jan 20, 2017


a neat cape posted:

After next season. But he's only making 4m per year.

I'm kind of surprised more players don't try to flex on their coaches given they make 10x the money.

SKULL.GIF
Jan 20, 2017


Rod Hoofhearted posted:

So…. When do we start talking about Matt LaFleur?

Not until/unless the Packers get a new GM.

SKULL.GIF
Jan 20, 2017


Rivera seems to alternate between having a very good year for his defense and outright sucking the next year, before repeating.

...... I'd still take him over Joe Barry.

SKULL.GIF
Jan 20, 2017


Even if Murphy wasn't retiring, LaFleur doesn't go unless Gutekunst does.

SKULL.GIF
Jan 20, 2017


Not saying LaFleur will (or even should) be fired (yet), but here's an interesting article looking at the future records of coaches who go through terrible losing seasons: "Keeping the Coach Never Works Out". Very relevant to this thread where we decide if coaches suffering through bad losing seasons should be fired!

quote:

To try to answer that question, I looked at the history of the National Football League to find examples of coaches who are in similar situations to LaFleur. What I found was that in the Super Bowl era, only 14 coaches had five wins or fewer in Year 5 or later of a coaching stint and were retained — without having won a Super Bowl in a previous season. These are LaFleur’s comparables, at the least the ones who survived the (immediate) chopping block.

Below are the coaches, listed in order of their subsequent win percentage after they were retained following a sub-six-win season:

  • Jason Garrett: 40-24 (.625)
  • Dan Reeves: 20-12 (.625)
  • Marvin Lewis: 85-73-2 (.538)
  • Wayne Fontes: 34-30 (.531)
  • Jeff Fisher: 49-47 (.510)
  • Bart Starr: 26-29-2 (.482)
  • John McKay: 22-25 (.468)
  • Jack Del Rio: 18-25 (.419)
  • Sam Rutigliano: 10-14 (.417)
  • Dick Nolan: 11-17 (.393)
  • Mike Smith: 6-10 (.375)
  • Jack Patera: 6-12 (.333)
  • Dave Wannstedt: 4-12 (.250)
  • John Robinson: 3-13 (.188)
In total, only 5 of those 14 coaches had a winning record after they were kept. It’s worth noting here that the two most successful coaches in this group, Garrett and Reeves, had pretty interesting circumstances for being on this list.

Garrett went 4-12 in 2015, in between 12-4 and 13-3 seasons, because quarterback Tony Romo — who finished the season with a 3-1 record — battled through injuries. Without Romo in the lineup, the combination of Matt Cassell, Kellen Moore and Brandon Weeden under center went a combined 1-11.

Reeves hadn’t won the Super Bowl, but he got about as close as you could before going 5-11 in 1990. In the previous four seasons, Reeves’ Denver Broncos were named AFC Champions three times in four years. Reeves spent two seasons as the Broncos’ head coach before being replaced.

So if you exclude those two circumstances, the next best examples of coaches having this bad of a season this late into their coaching careers and bouncing back are Marvin Lewis, Wayne Fontes and Jeff Fisher. Woof.

SKULL.GIF
Jan 20, 2017


Shinji2015 posted:

I think it's more that no one was expecting them to be this bad.

Yep, we were expecting a rebuilding year where we'd see at least flashes of progress, not nearly the entire team looking lost and confused.

The Week 2 Falcons and Week 3 Saints games were more or less how I expected the season would be going.

SKULL.GIF
Jan 20, 2017


mcmagic posted:

...having a team wide meltdown that forced them to bench him twice and ....

Speaking of which, it seems like the Jets roster has been much more amenable towards Zach this year compared to last year. What's different? Simply the prospect of having Rodgers back at some point?

SKULL.GIF
Jan 20, 2017


McDaniels being sacked this early honestly feels kinda anticlimactic.

It is funny it happened on Halloween.

SKULL.GIF
Jan 20, 2017


https://www.si.com/nfl/2023/11/05/raiders-josh-mcdaniels-firing-players-meeting-broke-head-coach

quote:

The calls from disgruntled Raiders fans for the franchise to part with head coach Josh McDaniels came to a head on Halloween. Owner Mark Davis made to decision to fire both McDaniels and general manager Dave Ziegler in a result that was still ultimately a slight surprise.

But after the move was announced, the following days didn't make things look much better when evaluating the tenure of McDaniels as head coach. And apparently, the open-floor meeting McDaniels held with players didn't quite go as planned, according to a report from NFL Network's Ian Rapoport.

"...We talked to sources inside the building, and [McDaniels' firing] was not as surprising to them. It goes back to last Thursday's practice before the Lions loss. McDaniels had just had a vicious team meeting. Players, coaches had ripped into him, it was ugly — they voiced their displeasure," Rapoport said on NFL Network's The Insiders.

"Then at practice a couple of hours later, he was described as 'not himself.' He was distant, he let plays happen instead of correcting. Players felt he was there in body but not in spirit, essentially based on the sources I've spoken with, it broke him."

SKULL.GIF
Jan 20, 2017


Diva Cupcake posted:

lol Arthur Smith has to be fired soon right?

Unless the Falcons go on a loss streak he's not gonna be fired while they're 1 game back of the division title.

SKULL.GIF
Jan 20, 2017


a neat cape posted:

Fire Staley

What'd he do now?

SKULL.GIF
Jan 20, 2017


LaFleur won't be fired (this year) unless the Packers completely collapse in an extremely ugly way and he openly loses the locker room. The offense lost every single veteran it has except Aaron Jones, it's the youngest offense in the league by like a full year of average age.

SKULL.GIF
Jan 20, 2017


Love is having a really weird season and I don't know we can accurately evaluate him until he puts together a full game, either good or bad. Obviously I'd hoped he would be better than this and the accuracy issues are incredibly concerning, but at the same time:

Love ranks 30th in the NFL in first-half passing yards. In the second half, he ranks tied for second. He's tied for 30th in first-half passing touchdowns... and tied for first in second-half passing touchdowns.

SKULL.GIF
Jan 20, 2017


It's really weird the Chargers have had now 3 consecutive head coaches who have all had the exact same problem of snatching defeat from the jaws of victory. At some point you've got to look deeper into the organization.

SKULL.GIF
Jan 20, 2017


mcmagic posted:

The Chargers should try to hire Bill.

If he leaves New England, Belichick is gonna go to a historically downtrodden franchise that already has talent on the roster. He's too old for a rebuild, he's trying to prove that he's a good coach without Brady and also wants that all-time wins record.

Chargers are a fit. Who else? Falcons?

SKULL.GIF
Jan 20, 2017


Impossibly Perfect Sphere posted:

I can't help but picture Gruden and Peyton yelling 10 word playcalls at an 11 year old.

Gruden: "I said... scatter to west right tight f left 352 y stick spider z spot banana! What is so hard about that?!!! JESUS gently caress!!"

There's a gif somewhere of Brett Favre hollering at some teenage kid to throw the ball the right way and finishing with "GOD DAMNIT!"

SKULL.GIF
Jan 20, 2017


I don't think it's complicated, it boils down to it's a lot more fun cheering for a team on an upwards trajectory than watching to see if they'll finally get over the hump this time around. It doesn't really matter too much if the hump is "more than 6 wins" or "the NFCCG", coming up short is exhausting in its own way compared to going further every time.

Obviously no one's gonna have any sympathy for the perennial winners who can't get it done in the playoffs, and I'm not saying there should be sympathy for them. Just saying the fun/hype factor is a lot different when your team is going through not the playoffs -> playoffs -> winning playoff games compared to when you're going not the playoffs -> not the playoffs -> not the playoffs, or brutal playoff loss -> brutal playoff loss -> brutal playoff loss.

SKULL.GIF
Jan 20, 2017


Chargers have now lost five games by 3 points or fewer this season: 34-36, 24-27, 17-20, 38-41, and 20-23.

This is the inverse of the Steelers. They're finding ways to lose.

SKULL.GIF
Jan 20, 2017


a neat cape posted:

Lol Staley melting down at the press conference

What is he saying?

SKULL.GIF
Jan 20, 2017


fartknocker posted:

Yeah, that's been the Chargers for many, many years.

https://twitter.com/Keenan13Allen/status/1183752686383984640

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

SKULL.GIF
Jan 20, 2017


Forrest on Fire posted:

The Night of Short Drives

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply