Infinitum posted:

This dude 100% produces and distributes pornography, sexts people other than his partner, and their partner is considering divorce.

Asterite34 posted:

Yeah all those are being shipped off to developing countries like the shirts of teams that lose the Superbowl that year

Frank Frank posted:

Who the gently caress cares who celebrities endorse for President? Does that even matter to anyone at all?

Hollismason posted:

I'm sorry the ham roll what now.. they compared her what to a ham roll

Mr Ice Cream Glove posted:

We went from



To

https://twitter.com/highbrow_nobrow/status/1752358905659707719?s=20



Bonus Mike Lindell

https://twitter.com/CalltoActivism/status/1752413818003628407?s=20

Seth Pecksniff posted:

Judge Engoron is a frequent visitor to SA so every time you post demanding he release his judgment he pushes back the publishing by the day

Pope Corky the IX posted:

Is she aware that Jordan doesn't share a border with Mexico?

tek79 posted:

What sorts of people are they? Are they full-on MAGA cultists just astroturfing or are they more sane/left and just want Biden nailed on his support for Israel? I think the latter can be reasoned with. Maybe.

redshirt posted:

But hey, Biden is weak on these matters. To the youth.

Vampire Panties posted:

IMO it really happened, but it was a setup. Not to go to bat for , but procuring high-end hookers and having them do pee stuff on a bed Obama supposedly slept in is wayyyyyy too intelligent/creative for Trump

Now if he was zooted out of his mind on Russian Adderall, and a Putin croney said "hey, these ladies want to show you a very special show, and we can do it on the bed Obama slept on!"... , seems like the kind of idiotic situation would willingly walk right into, and also seems like the kind of kompromat Putin/Russia likes to work in

Big Mouth Billy Basshole posted:

Yes, it's called being alive.

Burning_Monk posted:

C
U
Next
Tuesday

Holy poo poo I never heard this and it's incrediblly dumb but definitely something Trump said to women many times.

Catastrophe posted:

Look, he may not be absolutely perfect but the guy is pretty funny. Sporting shorts and a "tux" hoodie for a congressional dinner.

Almost Smart posted:

I’m so loving tired/stupid that the first thing that crossed my mind was “who the hell names their cancer?”

PhazonLink posted:

wonder what Don's mushbrain remembers about modern UK history and politics, like does he think the king was always the king and being a good enough posting buddy will get him the throne?

NoiseAnnoys posted:

turbo cancer.

Azuth0667 posted:

Trump would cry on stage if he had to interact with a modern day Diogines at a rally.

Grey Cat posted:

Vax gives everyone turbo cancer. Trump took the vax and is in peak health. Amazing mental disconnect as usal.

Total Party Kill posted:

I hope the Piano Guys are ready to play a double set at Trump's second inauguration now that Koby Tieth is dead.

bird with big dick posted:

I'm two pages back can someone tell me how long the battle for uber IT nerd supremacy goes on so I can skip those pages

RandExt posted:

https://x.com/lawrencehurley/status/1754896281976152503

Hirayuki posted:

What...what am I supposed to notice?

Deptfordx posted:

Wait. Mike Pence is still running?!?

Apollodorus posted:

Vampire Panties posted:

Karenheit 451

Toxic Mental posted:

But wait why would the liberal tears be shooting flames at the books? Shouldn’t it be like, Republican Rage or something?

Data Graham posted:

That's the thing though, isn't it. It isn't just "mispronouncing" so much as "completely misunderstanding the nature of the concept". I have painfully taught myself to be descriptivist thanks to many run-ins on these here forums but I persist in thinking there is a whole lot to be studied linguistically about people who think, for example:

Like okay, she got it wrong and is doubling down because she is incapable of understanding how dumb and uneducated she is. But it also should be alarming in that it indicates that there have to be more people out there who think "inalienable" has something to do with a bank coming to take away your rights because you haven't paid your rights rent. And that puts kind of a profound and worrisome spin on people's popular conception of "rights".

Or another example I often bring up: "tax returns". People think, apparently, that what happens on April 15th is that the government "returns" money to you that they have borrowed from you over the course of the year. Which, in many people's cases, is effectively true, because they've overpaid for one reason or another. For many people the opposite is true, they owe the government money because they've underpaid. But people use "tax return" when what they mean is "tax refund", and rather than just assuming it's a silly malapropism, I tend to think it's actually indicative of a pervasive idea among the groundswell of weirdo sovcit type people who think taxes are fundamentally your money and the thieving government is just borrowing it from you without your permission. Then they "return" it to you at "tax return" time. That feels to me like a real problem in a country where we have to fight tooth and nail for the very survival of the idea of a government funded by taxes at all!

So when Boebert or whoever says something like "there enlies" and tries to pass it off as a "typo", like the keys were just close together and she hit the wrong button or something, I am not prepared to give her a pass for just being careless. She is being uneducated and she is trying to use vocabulary she doesn't have a grasp of. She's intrinsically lying about what she knows about how to use language. And I find that a lot more worrisome in a public figure than a "typo".

By the way, an underappreciated Jacob Wohl front-stoop symposium was the one where he had some woman stand at the podium to read a prepared statement about whatever wild allegation it was (maybe it was the one where he tried to frame Mueller for being a sex pest who had assaulted her? I can't remember). And it was supposedly a statement that she had written herself. But when she got to the word "undeterred", she pronounced it "un-deetered". Which obviously implies that she was handed this sheet of paper by Wohl just that moment, because she wasn't even familiar with the word. And everyone goes "aw, shucks, lol" at the funny lying guy. But well .... here we are now with the House of Representatives being taken over and eaten from the inside by people who uncomprehendingly read words off sheets and use terminology they have no comprehension of, and we're letting them off the hook because of and letting them pass them off as "typos" and simple mistakes.

Roast me if you want but I think if there's one place we need standards of meaning it's in our goddamn legislature

John Wick of Dogs posted:

Isn't that theft and willful destruction of property? Can't they, fuckin, arrest her?

Asterite34 posted:

I kinda wonder if all the in-dick-ta-bull and ina-lien-a-bull and there enlies poo poo is like how scam emails will sometimes intentionally misspell stuff and be obviously janky on purpose. People who notice or care about the weird malapropisms weren't likely to listen to what they had to say anyway, so anyone who makes it past that screening process is an easy mark for the actual content.

Corn Glizzy posted:

I assume it’s just your autocorrect loving with you at this point, but if it’s not, this is good comedy, thank you.

Rhonne posted:

So like, does no one in Russia realize that Tucker isn't on TV and has nowhere near the reach he once had anymore? Why are they bringing him in to do a propaganda piece?