|
AAA DOLFAN posted:Doltos you're likely banned from 2015s TFF mock draft if I do it simply because updating the op would drive me insane Who is going to be your QB  edit: Oh you traded for Eli, nvm Blitz of 404 Error fucked around with this message at 21:31 on Mar 5, 2014 |
#
?
Mar 5, 2014 21:24
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 10, 2024 09:21 |
|
|
Zypher posted:Packers receive: gently caress!!! I really wanted to trade up for Matthews and would have gladly give a 1st, 3rd, and 6th. This thread moves too fast.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2014 21:26
|
|
|
Blitz7x posted:Who is going to be your QB Lache Seastrunk.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2014 21:27
|
|
|
I will make that trade, Puppy Bowl. Are you sure you have a 6th to trade? I'll trade you Matthews instead of the pick, if anyone objects to the retro thing.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2014 21:28
|
|
|
Yeah, the Ravens have their natural 6th, no 4th, 5th, or 7th though. And I will absolutely make that trade.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2014 21:30
|
|
|
Blitz7x posted:Who is going to be your QB We traded for Eli Manning
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2014 21:30
|
|
|
Sorry I stole your thunder in the picks thread. Done. Matthews for your 1st(17), 3rd, and 6th.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2014 21:31
|
|
|
Why in the world are the Packers trading for a QB
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2014 21:31
|
|
|
Because of last season. Because he played pretty well in 2013 and I'm spending what amounts to a late 3rd or early 4th for a guy taken in the first round last year (a reach, sure, but still). Also, Flynn is a free agent. In reality, he will probably be back. At the moment, I have no reliable backup, though. smuggler fucked around with this message at 21:38 on Mar 5, 2014 |
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2014 21:34
|
|
|
Reminder that Sataere asked me to pick for the Bears since he's busy, I'll be picking shortly
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2014 21:36
|
|
|
smuggler posted:Sorry I stole your thunder in the picks thread. Done. Matthews for your 1st(17), 3rd, and 6th. Couldn't care less. You have made me a very happy Ozzie Newsome.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2014 21:45
|
|
|
Bears pick is in
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2014 21:47
|
|
|
One of only a few goon picks that will probably be replicated on draft day. Good pick, Rasczak.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2014 21:54
|
|
|
With the gooniest pick of all time smuggler traded his starting OT to move 16 spots up in the draft to take another OT. I would have done that too if Dattserberg would have taken Will Beatty instead of Randle.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2014 21:55
|
|
|
And then, in the most unrealistic trade ever, sent said tackle away immediately. When he's the cousin of a player on my team. Even though they're related, Clay is a QB-slaying supervillain from Marmo and Jake will not suffer to company with such long-haired evil-doers. He immediately refused to answer my phone calls and I had to send his rights elsewhere. 
smuggler fucked around with this message at 22:07 on Mar 5, 2014 |
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2014 22:05
|
|
|
Draft owns. I hope we go the distance so we can make this poo poo super nuts.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2014 22:07
|
|
|
smuggler posted:One of only a few goon picks that will probably be replicated on draft day. Good pick, Rasczak. Oh I'm totally going to put this thing on my resume when I try to wrest control of the Cowboys draft away from Jerry
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2014 22:12
|
|
|
The picture I used looks like he is pooping maybe? Haha? I dunno
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2014 22:17
|
|
|
Nice pick Goetta, I was pretty much back and forth between Jernigan and Dennard at 14
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2014 22:20
|
|
|
Thanks. Having arguably the best player at a position of glaring need fall to them is a Steeler tradition.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2014 22:25
|
|
|
Goetta posted:The picture I used looks like he is pooping maybe? Haha? I dunno hah, pooping
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2014 22:25
|
|
|
Dallas is looking to trade down still. I'm at work so I'm going to wait an hour or so before picking. PM me offers.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2014 22:31
|
|
|
Goetta posted:Thanks. Having arguably the best player at a position of glaring need fall to them is a Steeler tradition. Yeah, Lions passed on Gilbert and Dennard because they already have 4 young CBs on the roster and the Defensive Coordinator is a former secondary coach. I could see him wanting to bring in another rookie, but I think they will try and pull in a veteran FA instead.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2014 22:44
|
|
|
Haloti Ngata is on the trading block, I have PMs so just let me know if you're interested.
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2014 00:02
|
|
|
Parmasean Basil, would you maybe be interested in trading up to #17?
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2014 00:37
|
|
|
The Dallas Cowboys have traded the 16th pick to San Francisco for the 30th and 61st picks.
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2014 01:21
|
|
|
The Puppy Bowl posted:Haloti Ngata is on the trading block, I have PMs so just let me know if you're interested. Yo
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2014 01:21
|
|
|
Not ideal as the guys I really was hoping would drop a bit didn't, but this pick would allow the Niners to continue getting younger and cheaper in the secondary. Safety is one of the few positions where the team could potentially need a new starter if Whitner doesn't return (and he will undoubtedly be looking for a premium contract), and Clinton-Dix is the unanimous best prospect at the position and would not have lasted much longer on the board if I hadn't made the move now. I was able to get value I was comfortable with trading with Dallas, so I went out on a bit of a limb. Plus, look at that loving name. You can't tell me you wouldn't want a guy with that name on your team.
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2014 01:26
|
|
|
smuggler posted:Parmasean Basil, would you maybe be interested in trading up to #17? Nah, gonna chill here for a while.
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2014 01:30
|
|
|
Disillusionist posted:The Dallas Cowboys have traded the 16th pick to San Francisco for the 30th and 61st picks. I hope this means your approach to the draft is WWJD (What Would Jerry Do) You just know Amaro or Seferian-Jenkins would be a sexy 2nd round pick
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2014 01:34
|
|
|
Rasczak posted:I hope this means your approach to the draft is WWJD (What Would Jerry Do) When Manziel went off the board my entire plan was thrown into disarray, so now I'm just hoping to own the entire 7th round. In all seriousness, I would've taken Jake Matthews instantly if he fell to 16. The thought of Tyron Smith and Matthews being locked down for at least 4 years was too enticing to pass up. Once he was taken there was only one prospect I would've taken at 16, and a bunch I liked who will probably still be there at 30 so I went with getting more picks in a deep draft.
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2014 01:45
|
|
|
I'm trying to get all the green properties in the 6th round.  Didn't get one this time, oh well. Packers trade #17 to Seahawks for #32 and #64. Seattle is on the clock. E: and 192 
smuggler fucked around with this message at 03:37 on Mar 6, 2014 |
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2014 02:02
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2014 02:20
|
|
|
Disillusionist posted:When Manziel went off the board my entire plan was thrown into disarray, so now I'm just hoping to own the entire 7th round. Yeah I agree, there was one guy still on the board there I would've liked for Dallas (not Clinton-Dix) and with a draft this deep (and the amount of holes that the Cowboys need to fill with little cap room) a trade down certainly makes sense E: oh damnit Seahawks 
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2014 02:21
|
|
|
Seattle looks forward to putting Mr. Lewan on the right path, under mentors Breno Giacomini and recently-signed Richie Incognito "We're in a conference with Jeff Fisher and Jim Harbaugh. gently caress the world, watch it burn." 
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2014 02:25
|
|
|
I guess the Jets are on the board then.
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2014 02:37
|
|
|
Hollar at me son. This is grade A Samoan beef I'm selling at cut rate prices, especially because all of his prorated bonus is on me.
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2014 02:49
|
|
|
So is Taylor Lewan still available or no?
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2014 02:50
|
|
|
32 and 64 is on the cusp of unreasonable trade value. Group thoughts?
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2014 02:59
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 10, 2024 09:21 |
|
|
The Puppy Bowl posted:32 and 64 is on the cusp of unreasonable trade value. Group thoughts? According to the trade chart: 17 is worth 950 32 is worth 590 64 is worth 270 for a total of 860 So it comes out to 90 points in Seattle's favor, which is worth an early 4th rounder. Since Green Bay has already traded and gotten more picks, it seems reasonable to me. That's the old chart, though. According to the Harvard chart, Green Bay got a lot of value in the deal.
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2014 03:05
|
|