|
Ok 3000b really is as cool as everyone says it is. I've had three packs sitting in my closet since Christmas, and I finally got the nerve to bring it to a shoot. img001 by LargeHadron, on Flickr img002 by LargeHadron, on Flickr
|
# ? Aug 25, 2014 20:06 |
|
|
# ? May 15, 2024 13:27 |
|
I made a 4x5 pinhole camera this weekend out of a lightbulb housing, cardboard, felt and tears. Only one fp-3000b shot came out decent so far. I need to stock up on more before the price gets crazy. I think I want to make a wider focal length one next, maybe out of a cigar box or something.
|
# ? Aug 28, 2014 06:38 |
|
Northwest, Portland by Ashade76, on Flickr
|
# ? Aug 29, 2014 02:31 |
|
Seems that The Impossible Project is realizing that they can get only so far on PR alone, and is shutting down most of its worldwide HQs in order to "concentrate on developing new emulsions and cameras". I wonder why they have decided to get into the camera business so early in the game, as there is no shortage of working polaroid cameras out there.
|
# ? Aug 29, 2014 20:20 |
|
Putrid Grin posted:Seems that The Impossible Project is realizing that they can get only so far on PR alone, and is shutting down most of its worldwide HQs in order to "concentrate on developing new emulsions and cameras". New camera means the possibility of proprietary film. Which means locked into their new system for film an accessories.
|
# ? Aug 29, 2014 22:21 |
|
Putrid Grin posted:Seems that The Impossible Project is realizing that they can get only so far on PR alone, and is shutting down most of its worldwide HQs in order to "concentrate on developing new emulsions and cameras". Where did you see this?? Musket posted:New camera means the possibility of proprietary film. Which means locked into their new system for film an accessories. This would mean the death of them. It would have to be a camera/cameras that are mind blowing awesome for this to work. The Polaroid cameras out there right now are so goddamn good that it would be a miracle for them to surpass them.
|
# ? Aug 29, 2014 23:12 |
|
Whitezombi posted:Where did you see this??
|
# ? Aug 29, 2014 23:25 |
|
It seems like they've realised they need more engineers and less hipsters to be viable, as they can't survive on PR alone when their films are pretty sub-par and expensive.
|
# ? Aug 30, 2014 01:24 |
|
Musket posted:New camera means the possibility of proprietary film. Which means locked into their new system for film an accessories. I doubt they're going to make special film since they already have film branded "For Impossible Cameras", and it's just 600 film without a battery.
|
# ? Aug 30, 2014 09:18 |
|
IMG_0008.jpg by Ashade76, on Flickr IMG_0005.jpg by Ashade76, on Flickr
|
# ? Sep 2, 2014 15:55 |
|
Rumor has it that Fuji is working on a new Instax Wide camera to be released in 2015. I am cautiously optimistic.
|
# ? Sep 6, 2014 05:55 |
|
I hope it looks even uglier and stupider.
|
# ? Sep 6, 2014 10:19 |
|
try it with a lime posted:I hope it looks even uglier and stupider. I hope the viewfinder is even farther to the side of the lens
|
# ? Sep 6, 2014 15:47 |
|
I hope there's even less exposure control.
|
# ? Sep 6, 2014 16:04 |
|
I hope the flash is always on. Like even when you're not taking pictures, it's just perpetually emitting blinding light.
|
# ? Sep 6, 2014 16:12 |
|
Um, I hope it looks even more like a Fisher-Price product? I actually am cautiously optimistic too.
|
# ? Sep 6, 2014 20:54 |
|
http://www.fujifilmusa.com/press/news/display_news?newsID=880646
|
# ? Sep 10, 2014 16:48 |
|
What the hell is even different?quote:INSTAX Wide 300 key features: Oh man a tripod socket for a camera that can't expose for longer than 1/64th of a second
|
# ? Sep 10, 2014 16:58 |
|
So I saw the new Instax mini camera in classic brown. I really like the look of it, no so crazy about the quality of the film output (as far as I can tell from youtube videos). What's your guys' opinions? Is there any similar product in similar price blanket I should look into?
whatever7 fucked around with this message at 17:02 on Sep 10, 2014 |
# ? Sep 10, 2014 16:58 |
|
I'm really hoping somebody figures out a way to market a cheap adapter for the belair instant back so it can be mounted on less terrible cameras. Some guy on flickr managed to adapt one to a graflok back.
|
# ? Sep 10, 2014 17:05 |
|
whatever7 posted:So I saw the new Instax mini camera in classic brown. I really like the look of it, no so crazy about the quality of the film output (as far as I can tell from youtube videos). What's your guys' opinions? Is there any similar product in similar price blanket I should look into?
|
# ? Sep 10, 2014 18:19 |
|
ansel autisms posted:What the hell is even different? uh... so they only changed the casing, and called it a day? And it doesn't even look better than the Fisher -Price original.
|
# ? Sep 10, 2014 19:07 |
|
Rastor posted:Are you referring to the Mini 90? I kickstarted the Lomo'Instant, I'll check in when it arrives (November/December?) but Lomography isn't famous for their image quality either. The link is dead
|
# ? Sep 10, 2014 21:38 |
|
whatever7 posted:The link is dead
|
# ? Sep 10, 2014 22:02 |
|
ape posted:I'm really hoping somebody figures out a way to market a cheap adapter for the belair instant back so it can be mounted on less terrible cameras. Some guy on flickr managed to adapt one to a graflok back. There is a guy who has adapted the back for the Polaroid 600SE and Mamiya Universal. I have one. Need to modify my 600SE to use it. Will be modifying a Polaroid Big Shot to use it as well.
|
# ? Sep 10, 2014 22:05 |
|
ansel autisms posted:What the hell is even different? still no loving self timer?
|
# ? Sep 11, 2014 03:05 |
|
The new display / controls sound like they adopted those from the Mini 50S, so who knows, maybe a future version will adopt those from the Mini 90. Sure would've been nice if they had jumped to that point with this one though. Edit: actually, the Mini 50S has a self-timer, so it's not even to that point then.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2014 03:44 |
|
Rastor posted:It works for me? Try going directly to the Lomo'Instant page? If all else fails, despite the apostrophe you can Google for Lomo'Instant. OK I finally can see it at home. So it just use Instax mini film? Any reason why I should pick this over the Instax mini?
|
# ? Sep 11, 2014 04:00 |
|
I haven't used either, so can't give a first-hand opinion. The Lomo'Instant does not exist in production form yet. Both use the same film packs (Instax Mini / Polaroid 300). The Instax Mini 90 seems to be a bit "tighter" or more "professional" unit, uses a modern rechargeable battery, has a digital display, etc. It can do multiple exposures, but only up to 2. It can do long exposures, but only up to 10 seconds. The Lomo'Instant seems to be the more "creative" unit. Uses 4 AAA batteries. Has physical levers / controls instead of a digital display. Can do unlimited multiple exposures. Can do unlimited length exposures. Has more optional lens attachments. Likely to be even more "plastic-y" than the Fujifilm camera. May not have as high of a lens quality. Lets you do painfully hipsterish things like attach a fisheye lens and an orange color gel.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2014 04:36 |
|
Have a cartridge and a half of instax 210 film if anyone wants it, just pay postage (if its even worth it) my camera drowned in beer in china. Shoot me a pm.
|
# ? Sep 20, 2014 13:56 |
|
|
# ? Oct 8, 2014 04:07 |
|
At Play 1 by TheJeffers, on Flickr
|
# ? Oct 8, 2014 22:39 |
|
TheJeffers posted:
Sorry for the dumb question but are you cropping? I only ask because my square instants aren't using as much negative space as this. Untitled by Dev Luns, on Flickr Untitled by Dev Luns, on Flickr Is there a particular back that I need? Shooting on a Hasselblad 500 C/M btw. pootiebigwang fucked around with this message at 19:34 on Oct 9, 2014 |
# ? Oct 9, 2014 19:19 |
|
pootiebigwang posted:Sorry for the dumb question but are you cropping? I only ask because my square instants aren't using as much negative space as this. The Mamiya RB and RZ have an ~8x8cm opening for the back. Your Hasselblad can only expose 6x6.
|
# ? Oct 9, 2014 19:38 |
|
pootiebigwang posted:Sorry for the dumb question but are you cropping? I only ask because my square instants aren't using as much negative space as this. As MrBlandAverage notes, the Mamiya RB and RZ, the latter of which I use, both shoot large squares on Polaroid (6.9cm, according to the manual). The weird corners are a result of the rotating back setup. Here's the camera/back: TheJeffers fucked around with this message at 23:45 on Oct 9, 2014 |
# ? Oct 9, 2014 23:29 |
|
img001-3a by LargeHadron, on Flickr The left one looks pretty cool as a negative: img002 by LargeHadron, on Flickr Which brings me to a question: How do you keep your FP-whatever negatives from looking all grimy? Mine always have water spots and other marks on them. Is that just the name of the game with this? LargeHadron fucked around with this message at 01:33 on Oct 15, 2014 |
# ? Oct 15, 2014 01:12 |
|
In 4x5 sleeves.
|
# ? Oct 15, 2014 15:06 |
|
ansel autisms posted:In 4x5 sleeves. I mean, right after I take them. They are all wet, and then when they dry they have all kinds of marks on them.
|
# ? Oct 15, 2014 16:46 |
|
LargeHadron posted:I mean, right after I take them. They are all wet, and then when they dry they have all kinds of marks on them. I let them sit out until they're dry. If you're hoping to save 3000b negatives they'll just get solarized and turn to poo poo, I haven't found a good way to prevent that.
|
# ? Oct 15, 2014 17:01 |
|
|
# ? May 15, 2024 13:27 |
|
ansel autisms posted:I let them sit out until they're dry. If you're hoping to save 3000b negatives they'll just get solarized and turn to poo poo, I haven't found a good way to prevent that. Yea there is no real way to store the 3000b negative that wont allow it to stop decaying. Scan it the same day and throw it away. Its not going to last like the FP100c negs. Deep Throat, Portland by Ashade76, on Flickr Bar Culture project is coming along.
|
# ? Oct 19, 2014 19:19 |