|
At first we thought the failure of the game was due to PWEs policies, but it turns out the lead developer is a trek sperg with his head up his rear end. Either PWE reigns him in or the game burns a slow agonizing death. And so far, PWE has taken a get the talent out and wash our hands of it approach.
|
# ? Apr 16, 2015 16:24 |
|
|
# ? May 10, 2024 10:54 |
|
I guess I'll look into this again for the open space content - when's that supposed to be due? It's only on tribble so far yes?
|
# ? Apr 16, 2015 17:57 |
|
Official season 10 annoucement http://www.arcgames.com/en/games/star-trek-online/news/detail/9195103 Starts April 21st
|
# ? Apr 16, 2015 18:15 |
|
oh hey more Mass Effect looking enemies
|
# ? Apr 16, 2015 20:47 |
|
Technical Analysis posted:At first we thought the failure of the game was due to PWEs policies, but it turns out the lead developer is a trek sperg with his head up his rear end. They will look at the new login figures and players spending on new Delta Recruits and clap him on the back.
|
# ? Apr 16, 2015 21:06 |
|
Technical Analysis posted:Either PWE reigns him in or the game burns a slow agonizing death. Nope - someone not long back in the thread correctly identified that the moment that they can't pay the license fee, the product gets pulled.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2015 03:53 |
|
Technical Analysis posted:At first we thought the failure of the game was due to PWEs policies, but it turns out the lead developer is a trek sperg with his head up his rear end. Something to note also is with licensing fees for a game based on a property like this is that they will be more apt to pull the plug when profits drop than they would on an original IP. They really need to turn this poo poo around in a big way quickly Edit: god dammit beaten
|
# ? Apr 17, 2015 03:55 |
|
So long as the game turns a profit, they'll keep paying the license fee. So long as trek spergs are dumb (and they are) they will keep buying new ships and keep buying into the lock boxes. The game is gonna burn slowly unless something even more drastic happens.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2015 03:55 |
|
Yea, the tone here is nothing like the tone you see on reddit or in response to Sto Facebook posts. I've had people very unabashedly tell me that yes they would not only buy a T6 Defiant but also a T7, T8, etc if and when the time comes. There's a good chunk of people that'll keep this going forever. To give you an idea, here's something I came across the other day, who loves this game so much you may ask? The type of autistic that needs 20000 words to communicate the idea "DPS goes up if you sit closer to targets" http://www.reddit.com/r/stobuilds/comments/32r087/was_certain_id_crack_30k_in_my_finallyupgraded_dd/cqdvzh1
|
# ? Apr 17, 2015 04:14 |
|
I only peek at the reddit now and then and I've seen people seriously argue that their dedicated tank or healing or rainbow or beam+cannon ships are totally fine for PVE and damage isn't the only thing that matters so why should they care about damage? How dare you try and give them advice to not be poo poo, it's a game and games should be fun and it doesn't matter if I'm a special snowflake! Just in case you were wondering why anyone with two firing neurons could have predicted the hard failure conditions in advanced queues would have wound up as a disaster. And the official forums are somehow even worse. Asimo fucked around with this message at 04:22 on Apr 17, 2015 |
# ? Apr 17, 2015 04:20 |
|
Cyberball 2072 posted:I've had people very unabashedly tell me that yes they would not only buy a T6 Defiant but also a T7, T8, etc if and when the time comes.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2015 04:58 |
|
Asimo posted:I only peek at the reddit now and then and I've seen people seriously argue that their dedicated tank or healing or rainbow or beam+cannon ships are totally fine for PVE and damage isn't the only thing that matters so why should they care about damage? How dare you try and give them advice to not be poo poo, it's a game and games should be fun and it doesn't matter if I'm a special snowflake. What I never got about those types of people is why would they like that? It totally ruins the feel of flying a huge gently caress off battleship if you're just reduced to bitch agro management or healing duty. Like being a self sustaining dps juggernaut is how to do no trinity right, what is wrong with these people?
|
# ? Apr 17, 2015 08:06 |
|
Eimi posted:What I never got about those types of people is why would they like that? It totally ruins the feel of flying a huge gently caress off battleship if you're just reduced to bitch agro management or healing duty. Like being a self sustaining dps juggernaut is how to do no trinity right, what is wrong with these people?
|
# ? Apr 17, 2015 08:23 |
|
Another reason some people want to be "tanks" so much is they're the type of person who can't stand seeing their character or ship die/blow up because it literally breaks them a little more mentally. I wish I was making this up. Saw this frequently in ArcheAge where leaders of guilds would force their subordinates to give them all the tanking loot from world bosses and such, would order everyone to concentrate their heals on themselves and just outright have a mental breakdown yelling at and kicking people from their guild when they "failed" to keep them alive.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2015 17:53 |
Hrm, that's weird. I remember when I was in high school and I first tried MMOs character death was daunting and awful and etc., but I grew out of tha...oh. I see.
|
|
# ? Apr 17, 2015 18:03 |
|
UoI posted:Another reason some people want to be "tanks" so much is they're the type of person who can't stand seeing their character or ship die/blow up because it literally breaks them a little more mentally. I wish I was making this up. Saw this frequently in ArcheAge where leaders of guilds would force their subordinates to give them all the tanking loot from world bosses and such, would order everyone to concentrate their heals on themselves and just outright have a mental breakdown yelling at and kicking people from their guild when they "failed" to keep them alive. You were in FC?
|
# ? Apr 17, 2015 19:39 |
|
Nah, we fought FC a bit, though. That game was a huge poo poo sandwich of terrible people, terrible management, terrible design, and terrible goons.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2015 19:54 |
|
Preechr posted:Nah, we fought FC a bit, though. That game was a huge poo poo sandwich of terrible people, terrible management, terrible design, and terrible goons. I meant the other dude. I heard tell of FC sperglordery like that, and I remember there were some goons in FC. I learned yesterday that balistafreak is still going strong in AA, as leader of goons there. Bless him. I used to think that STO was the worst game I ever played. Then I played archeage. Now the lord has delivered me, and I play Project Gorgon, which is legitimately really really good. And I can run it and sto in different windows. I do miss the AAGoons mumble though sometimes, it was good.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2015 20:02 |
|
Eimi posted:What I never got about those types of people is why would they like that? It totally ruins the feel of flying a huge gently caress off battleship if you're just reduced to bitch agro management or healing duty. Like being a self sustaining dps juggernaut is how to do no trinity right, what is wrong with these people? There is so much wrong with these people, you could,write a doctoral dissertation about it.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2015 20:04 |
|
hakimashou posted:You were in FC? Oh god no, I was just on the same server and their drama was always leaked. Even the goons in FC couldn't deal with the pubbies and FC's leader; they used the CTS mumble instead of whatever FC was using.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2015 20:10 |
|
Trebuchet King posted:Hrm, that's weird. I remember when I was in high school and I first tried MMOs character death was daunting and awful and etc., but I grew out of tha...oh. At least when I was in high school, dying in an mmo was actually a lovely experience, with losing a lot of XP, gear deteriorating/breaking/dropping, etc. Dying in STO means practically nothing (I didn't play ArcheAge long enough to die).
|
# ? Apr 17, 2015 21:06 |
|
http://www.arcgames.com/en/games/star-trek-online/news/detail/9196503 Cash grab... get your cash grab! Hot cash grab here! quote:Tier 6 Fleet ships have four levels of Starship Mastery, like T5-U ships and therefore do not have a starship trait. blahaha.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2015 21:12 |
|
Don't forget http://www.arcgames.com/en/games/star-trek-online/news/detail/9196243-xindi-terrestrial-lock-box I want that Insectoid Escort, I love the design.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2015 21:19 |
|
Burning_Monk posted:http://www.arcgames.com/en/games/star-trek-online/news/detail/9196503 quote:blahaha.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2015 21:51 |
|
New powers on boffs. Didn't take long.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2015 22:01 |
|
How many ships have they released since DR came out? Nearly 100 by this point? Good thing balance or discretion is a concern.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2015 22:06 |
|
Tunicate posted:New powers on boffs. Didn't take long. Not exactly thrilled by having multiple ranks of them and putting them in a lockbox though, good luck on reasonable prices there. Berke Negri posted:How many ships have they released since DR came out? Nearly 100 by this point? Good thing balance or discretion is a concern.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2015 22:27 |
|
Fleet Qib is going to wreck poo poo.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2015 23:20 |
|
I missed all of Delta Rising, and really all of the Romulus stuff. At this point I am about 10 missions into the first season, but i'm a rear admiral. I guess what i'm trying to say is, what did I miss?
|
# ? Apr 18, 2015 01:22 |
|
Fargin Icehole posted:I missed all of Delta Rising, and really all of the Romulus stuff. At this point I am about 10 missions into the first season, but i'm a rear admiral. I guess what i'm trying to say is, what did I miss? New tac ability is always triggered by torpedoes. good.
|
# ? Apr 18, 2015 02:22 |
|
Tuskin38 posted:http://www.arcgames.com/en/games/star-trek-online/news/detail/9196243-xindi-terrestrial-lock-box Craptic posted:In an effort to address any potential confusion that might come from releasing a second “Xindi Lock Box,” the existing “Xindi Lock Box” is going to be renamed as the “Xindi-Amphibious Lock Box” due to its inclusion of primarily Aquatic and Reptilian species assets. This new Lock Box, which will be arriving with Season 10, will be called the “Xindi-Terrestrial Lock Box” as it includes ideas and assets inspired by the land-based Primates, Arboreals, and Insectoids.
|
# ? Apr 18, 2015 06:31 |
|
MjolnirMan posted:Biology interjection: neither aquatic organisms nor reptiles are amphibians. Amphibians are a third, distinct group. Frogs and salamanders are not reptiles or fish; lizards or sharks are not amphibians. Ah, but the lockbox itself is amphibious, because it goes between land and sea xindi.
|
# ? Apr 18, 2015 06:56 |
|
and also because it's going right into the toilet, where it belongs
|
# ? Apr 18, 2015 06:59 |
|
DAVE!!!(c)(tm) posted:Fleet Qib is going to wreck FTFY. Because queues will remain empty.
|
# ? Apr 18, 2015 07:11 |
|
So, with fleet T6 ships coming... Scryer, Pathfinder, or Dauntless? There's pretty subtle differences, but they're big enough. Scryer would probably be in the lead except for the tac seating being really strict and it, well, being a bit fugly. Can kind of get away with reciprocity and like TT/APB1 + FAW1 but I'd prefer not to, and while doubling up attack powers with Surgical Strikes is handy that's been nerfed a lot too and I'm not sure how it compares to FAW now. Dauntless meanwhile is really tac heavy, but that means giving up a science console if I want to do anything beyond plas leech+assimilated console. While the Pathfinder's pretty good all around and the best looking of the lot, but lacks the gimmicks and flexibility of the scryer and a bit of the potency of the dauntless. I mean I could just buy them all but
|
# ? Apr 18, 2015 11:43 |
|
Dauntless because it's an adorable tiny space cuttlefish. Priorities!
|
# ? Apr 18, 2015 12:19 |
|
The important thing is, I can buy a Cloakyprise with just EC now, right? And then never fly it because Excelsior forever.
|
# ? Apr 18, 2015 14:20 |
|
Wait, which one is cloakyprise?
|
# ? Apr 18, 2015 14:25 |
|
MikeJF posted:Wait, which one is cloakyprise? The Eclipse, since it is a cruiser and can cloak. EDIT: At some point Fleet modules hit 13mil. Forget that then. AfroSquirrel fucked around with this message at 14:51 on Apr 18, 2015 |
# ? Apr 18, 2015 14:35 |
|
|
# ? May 10, 2024 10:54 |
|
AfroSquirrel posted:
They said I was crazy...
|
# ? Apr 18, 2015 19:28 |