Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
skaboomizzy
Nov 12, 2003

There is nothing I want to be. There is nothing I want to do.
I don't even have an image of what I want to be. I have nothing. All that exists is zero.
I can't wait to buy some sweet Bernie swag. I'm hoping for a red/white/blue foam hammer and sickle with his campaign logo on it, but I'll settle for a syrup bottle or ice scraper or something.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

redreader
Nov 2, 2009

I am the coolest person ever with my pirate chalice. Seriously.

Dinosaur Gum

Leviathan Song posted:

A more radical approach would be to take the beat cops' guns away and put lethal force only in the hands of a small subset of highly trained officers.

Call in the kill squad!

esto es malo
Aug 3, 2006

Don't want to end up a cartoon

In a cartoon graveyard


humor and wishful thinking

site
Apr 6, 2007

Trans pride, Worldwide
Bitch

Dolash posted:

I guess we'll see who else declares in the Democratic primary. Were I American, I'd consider campaigning as hard and as to the left of Clinton as possible, just to try and gin up interest in those issues, before voting for her in the general.

It seems to "work" in the Republican primary, in that the hard right wing gets to weigh the scales and force their "moderate" candidates into a bunch of conservative positions, although they tend to go so hard that it actually damages their electability. The left is pretty far from being that influential though so it should probably be safe to press Hillary as much as possible and at most eke out a few progressive promises.

It'll actually be interesting to see how Hillary's platform has adapted with the times even before the primary starts shaping it, a lot of things have changed under Obama's tenure and topics like healthcare, gay marriage, net neutrality, negotiations with Iran and so on have altered the landscape. No one would say a Clinton can't be flexible to get elected.

Yeah, for how psyched everyone is now, I'm actually pretty interested in seeing just how much to the left Bernie can take the Hillary/the party in the primaries because honestly i doubt it'll be very much.

Captain_Maclaine
Sep 30, 2001

site posted:

Yeah, for how psyched everyone is now, I'm actually pretty interested in seeing just how much to the left Bernie can take the Hillary/the party in the primaries because honestly i doubt it'll be very much.

I expect him to campaign heavily but manage to shift the platform only modestly, much as I'd wish it be otherwise.

site
Apr 6, 2007

Trans pride, Worldwide
Bitch

Captain_Maclaine posted:

I expect him to campaign heavily but manage to shift the platform only modestly, much as I'd wish it be otherwise.

I think my problem is that so many topics have been dragged over to the center i don't recognize them as "left" issues anymore to pull them over. Maybe something will come of that.

Vox Nihili
May 28, 2008

Sgt. Anime Pederast posted:

Wow, I actually checked out reddit for some reason and they're going loving crazy over Sanders. Absolute chaos. Broke college kids saying they'll donate every penny they can, random bullshit. It's the dumbest thing I've ever seen.

Yeah, there are two reasons for that. 1) He is actually that good and actually supports the things they believe than, unlike the other candidates and 2) They don't know or don't care that his chances are next to zero.

Personally, I think it's great that young people have someone on the left to get excited about. If you're not at least a little hyped about Bernie you have no heart.

Grouchio
Aug 31, 2014

I do wonder sometimes if Bernie actually has any power to upset Clinton's campaign to the point of snatching it away...

Skeptically of course.

site
Apr 6, 2007

Trans pride, Worldwide
Bitch
That would be quite the show. Then we could change the name to the Socialist party and really gently caress with the reds.

Dolash
Oct 23, 2008

aNYWAY,
tHAT'S REALLY ALL THERE IS,
tO REPORT ON THE SUBJECT,
oF ME GETTING HURT,


Edit:^^^^I'm reminded of Obama's great line at the correspondent's dinner about Bernie running: "Some people want a pot-smoking socialist in the White House - we might get that third Obama term after all!"

At most I can see him getting some surprising share of an early primary vote, like 20% to Clinton's 50%, and people starting to at least take him seriously as an actual candidate for the nomination even if they acknowledge he won't win. I wouldn't be surprised if Hillary's practically courting some opponents like Bernie who can't actually win just to give her a bit of a contest, since the primaries can be good for building some hype with the base and it keeps the Republicans from owning the news cycle during their primary. The real race might actually be for second place, since if Bernie beats out a more conservative Democrat that'd encourage incorporating his ideas to win more of the base.

I'm also curious what specific issues people would want to see Bernie pull Hillary left on, if he can. Hillary will probably continue a lot of Obama's policies on things like allowing gay marriage and marijuana legalization in the states without really pushing them along federally. Immigration's pretty jammed as an issue aside from what Obama's already done executively (short of easing off on enforcement, I guess). Healthcare was a signature issue for Hillary but Obamacare might be as far as things can go while Congress is obsessed with rolling it back. I guess income inequality would be a big sticking point since the Clintons are associated with thrid-way neoliberalism, privatization and corporatism although I don't know what specific points she could be moved on.

Would foreign policy be a contentious point? I can only imagine Hillary'd want to run away from her Iraq vote wherever possible, although with Iraq, Syria, Ukraine, Libya, Yemen and so many other nations in chaos Presidential candidates are going to need a clear vision for what they'll do to fix the situation.

Dolash fucked around with this message at 20:14 on Apr 30, 2015

Cheesus
Oct 17, 2002

Let us retract the foreskin of ignorance and apply the wirebrush of enlightenment.
Yam Slacker

Dolash posted:

I'm also curious what specific issues people would want to see Bernie pull Hillary left on, if he can. Hillary will probably continue a lot of Obama's policies on things like allowing gay marriage and marijuana legalization in the states without really pushing them along federally.
Exactly. On today's "The Takeaway" one of the guests said that the biggest impact Sanders will have on Hilary is forcing her to support more left causes.

My thought was "like Obama, rhetorically, in campaign only". Let nobody suffer under the delusion that Sanders will succeed in anything but the (incredibly useful, critically important) task of spreading the "word" to the American public. Nothing he does or say will change a hypothetical (*) Clinton presidency from operating exactly like Obama's.

(*)Because Bush will win.

Bob Ojeda
Apr 15, 2008

I AM A WHINY LITTLE EMOTIONAL BITCH BABY WITH NO SENSE OF HUMOR

IF YOU SEE ME POSTING REMIND ME TO SHUT THE FUCK UP

Dolash posted:

I'm also curious what specific issues people would want to see Bernie pull Hillary left on, if he can. Hillary will probably continue a lot of Obama's policies on things like allowing gay marriage and marijuana legalization in the states without really pushing them along federally. Immigration's pretty jammed as an issue aside from what Obama's already done executively (short of easing off on enforcement, I guess). Healthcare was a signature issue for Hillary but Obamacare might be as far as things can go while Congress is obsessed with rolling it back. I guess income inequality would be a big sticking point since the Clintons are associated with thrid-way neoliberalism, privatization and corporatism although I don't know what specific points she could be moved on.

I suppose I hadn't thought about specifics much. But I guess what I'd hope for is the political dynamic of the race not so much forcing Clinton to commit to specific progressive policy planks, as for it to make it harder for her to do regressive poo poo once she's in office. If she has to make noise about income inequality and all that stuff in the primary because of Bernie, then maybe it'll be a little bit more politically costly for her to cut welfare or roll back Wall Street regulations or whatever awful Clintonite poo poo she might want to do once she's in office.

But really, that's more about my fear and pessimism than anything, it's not a real political analysis. I agree that the real value of a Bernie run is in getting the word out and trying to shift the conversation and the internal party dynamics, more than any effect he would have on a Clinton administration

MaxxBot
Oct 6, 2003

you could have clapped

you should have clapped!!
He could pressure her on the TPA, she hasn't taken a side on it because the base hates it and her Wall Street buddies love it.

Ignite Memories
Feb 27, 2005

I agree. Bernie knows he's not going to win, but getting to be there for the debates could open up more national dialogue about issues like income inequality.

He actually genuinely cares about improving the lives of the American citizenry, and getting his message out there is important. He's the kind of politician there needs to be more of.

Biased vt-raised liberal trash here, but I admire the poo poo out of him. He's the only public figure I can point to and say "I am proud of this american politician."

Tempest_56
Mar 14, 2009

Question that's not about Bernie: With all the stuff that's going down in Baltimore and in light of things coming up in the news (what David Simon wrote, for example) what if any impact is this likely to have on O'Malley's situation? Particularly since he's been positioning to try and run to Hillary's left. I'm not familiar enough with Maryland to know how much tar he's gonna get hit with before the feathers come out.

PupsOfWar
Dec 6, 2013

Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

Bernie was functionally a Democrat in every way, he just kept the I for symbolic reasons. The DSCC even followed their policy of trying to stop primary challenges of incumbent Senators with Bernie.

That is not the greens being ideologically pure, Bernie didn't change any positions, it is just them clinging to their "outsider" label and being pedantic and ineffective.

TheAmericanLeft.txt

american greens make more sense after you realize that they have no intention of being an effective organ of party politics, and are content to serve as a support-group for dysfunctional college youth and the mentally ill

PupsOfWar fucked around with this message at 20:56 on Apr 30, 2015

Nonsense
Jan 26, 2007

PupsOfWar posted:

american greens make more sense after you realize that they have no intention of being an effective organ of party politics, and are content to serve as a support-group for dysfunctional college youth and the mentally ill

I've never seen college youth involved with the Greens. It's always middle-aged people. College is Dem territory, because duh.

site
Apr 6, 2007

Trans pride, Worldwide
Bitch
Does anybody take the greens seriously after 2000?

PupsOfWar
Dec 6, 2013

site posted:

Does anybody take the greens seriously after 2000?

nobody took the greens seriously in 2000, an election where they got probably more a-pox-upon-both-your-houses protest votes from ultraconservatives than they did genuine votes from leftists or liberals.

Chamale
Jul 11, 2010

I'm helping!



PupsOfWar posted:

nobody took the greens seriously in 2000, an election where they got probably more a-pox-upon-both-your-houses protest votes from ultraconservatives than they did genuine votes from leftists or liberals.

The Greens got 2.74% of the popular vote that year, more than twice as much as any third party since.

atelier morgan
Mar 11, 2003

super-scientific, ultra-gay

Lipstick Apathy
Green Party of the USA enshrines homeopathy in its platform. It's not just an irrelevant nonsense 3rd party, but an awful irrelevant nonsense 3rd party. Please don't vote green party.

OneTwentySix
Nov 5, 2007

fun
FUN
FUN


As much as I love Bernie, wouldn't he end up being an absolutely terrible president? He wouldn't be able to get anything done with Congress, and when things start to fall apart, the Republicans would just blame him rather than their horribleness. I feel like he'd be an amazing dictator, but not such a good president under current conditions.

mlmp08
Jul 11, 2004

Prepare for my priapic projectile's exalted penetration
Nap Ghost

Chamale posted:

The Greens got 2.74% of the popular vote that year, more than twice as much as any third party since.

Taken twice as seriously as the other laughable joke parties!

Prosopagnosiac
May 19, 2007

One of us! One of us! Aqua Buddha! Aqua Buddha! One of us!

Tempest_56 posted:

Question that's not about Bernie: With all the stuff that's going down in Baltimore and in light of things coming up in the news (what David Simon wrote, for example) what if any impact is this likely to have on O'Malley's situation? Particularly since he's been positioning to try and run to Hillary's left. I'm not familiar enough with Maryland to know how much tar he's gonna get hit with before the feathers come out.

I mean, he will probably still run regardless, I was listening on NPR today and he had been visiting some of the communities in Baltimore that were hardest hit in the riots. But I can't think that this really helps his chances, given that he is literally the basis for Tommy Carcetti from the Wire.

The fact that these mass arrests took place under his tenure and somewhat precipitated the climate that led to the unrest there, with it getting national attention, definitely does not help his case. Before all this, his main selling point was that he was the first white mayor elected in Baltimore in a generation, and he could be expected to do well with minority voters. But given the current climate in Baltimore I can't really see him trying to repair his reputation effectively.

I have very little knowledge of his record as a governor, but he won't be touting his "Baltimore miracle" in stump speeches anytime soon.

silvergoose
Mar 18, 2006

IT IS SAID THE TEARS OF THE BWEENIX CAN HEAL ALL WOUNDS




OneTwentySix posted:

As much as I love Bernie, wouldn't he end up being an absolutely terrible president? He wouldn't be able to get anything done with Congress, and when things start to fall apart, the Republicans would just blame him rather than their horribleness. I feel like he'd be an amazing dictator, but not such a good president under current conditions.

On the other hand, literally anything he thinks he'd have executive authority to do, with actions or such...he could probably do a serious amount of good. Plus, appointments, he might appoint better people to departments, judgeships, assuming he could get them approved of course.

atelier morgan
Mar 11, 2003

super-scientific, ultra-gay

Lipstick Apathy

OneTwentySix posted:

As much as I love Bernie, wouldn't he end up being an absolutely terrible president? He wouldn't be able to get anything done with Congress, and when things start to fall apart, the Republicans would just blame him rather than their horribleness. I feel like he'd be an amazing dictator, but not such a good president under current conditions.

Do you really think the republican party would hate him more than they hate Hillary Clinton?

FAUXTON
Jun 2, 2005

spero che tu stia bene

UberJew posted:

Do you really think the republican party would hate him more than they hate Hillary Clinton?

No but they aren't getting blatantly anti-semitic against Hillary.

Vox Nihili
May 28, 2008

OneTwentySix posted:

As much as I love Bernie, wouldn't he end up being an absolutely terrible president? He wouldn't be able to get anything done with Congress, and when things start to fall apart, the Republicans would just blame him rather than their horribleness. I feel like he'd be an amazing dictator, but not such a good president under current conditions.

Packing the courts and administrative agencies is enough for me. It's not like Congress is about to get anything worthwhile done if someone else is elected.

The republicans aren't going to vote for anything Hillary wants, either, unless it's a war or trade "deal."

MaxxBot
Oct 6, 2003

you could have clapped

you should have clapped!!

OneTwentySix posted:

As much as I love Bernie, wouldn't he end up being an absolutely terrible president? He wouldn't be able to get anything done with Congress, and when things start to fall apart, the Republicans would just blame him rather than their horribleness. I feel like he'd be an amazing dictator, but not such a good president under current conditions.

He has sponsored some major bipartisan legislation before such as this VA reform bill, it's not like he's a liberal version of Ron Paul.

http://www.sanders.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/senate-passes-veterans-health-care-bill

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster
Hillary coming out against the TPP; citing Elizabeth Warren as reason to be skeptical of the deal.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/04/30/hillary-clinton-trans-pacific-partnership_n_7173108.html?ncid=fcbklnkushpmg00000013

quote:

Hillary Clinton Agrees With Elizabeth Warren On Trade Dispute With Obama

Hillary Clinton is opposed to a critical piece of the Obama administration's Trans-Pacific Partnership, which would give corporations the right to sue sovereign nations over laws or regulations that could potentially curb their profits.

The policy position is contained in her book Hard Choices, and was confirmed to HuffPost by a spokesperson for her presidential campaign. Obama and congressional Democrats are locked in a bitter public feud over TPP -- a deal between 12 Pacific nations -- with much of the controversy derived from concerns it will undermine regulatory standards.

Clinton writes in her book:

Currently the United States is negotiating comprehensive agreements with eleven countries in Asia and in North and South America, and with the European Union. We should be focused on ending currency manipulation, environmental destruction, and miserable working conditions in developing countries, as well as harmonizing regulations with the EU. And we should avoid some of the provisions sought by business interests, including our own, like giving them or their investors the power to sue foreign governments to weaken their environmental and public health rules, as Philip Morris is already trying to do in Australia. The United States should be advocating a level and fair playing field, not special favors. (Emphasis added.)
Obama's TPP deal would be enforced by a process known as "investor-state dispute settlement," which allows foreign companies to attack domestic laws or regulations before an international tribunal if they believe those rules unfairly curb investment returns. Those tribunals can't directly overturn laws, but they can impose hefty fines on the countries they rule against.


Financial watchdogs and environmental activists are particularly concerned the process will be used to stymie future rulemaking with the threat of international fines. Congress often considers trade commitments when debating domestic legislation, at times diluting or derailing it. Foreign countries have halted anti-smoking rules over ISDS lawsuits.

Obama has vigorously defended ISDS against criticism from Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and others, insisting it is necessary to protect American companies abroad.

"In a lot of countries, U.S. companies are discriminated against, and going through their court system would not give them relief," Obama told reporters on a conference call last week. "The notion that corporate America is going to be able to use this provision to eliminate our financial regulations and our food safety regulations and our consumer regulations -- that's just bunk. It's not true."

The Australian case that Clinton referenced in her book, however, is instructive. The Australian government enacted legislation that would require tobacco products be sold only with plain, simple packaging that includes health warnings -- labeling the tobacco companies objected to. Philip Morris Asia is suing Australia under a different free trade pact, using a similar ISDS provision, arguing that the Australian law is cutting into its profit. It's easy to see how laws in, say, New York City, would be similarly targeted.

On the same conference call, Obama defended the system further:

There are over 3,000 different ISDS agreements among countries across the globe, and this neutral arbitration system has existed since the 1950s. The United States has investment agreements with 54 different countries over the last 30 years. Under these various ISDS provisions, the U.S. has been sued a total of 17 times. Thirteen of those cases have been decided so far; we’ve won them all.

They have no ability to undo U.S. laws. They don’t have the ability to result in punitive damages. ISDS has come under some legitimate criticism when they’re poorly written, because they’ve been used in particular by some tobacco companies in some countries to challenge anti-tobacco regulation. And that’s why we have made sure that some of the legitimate criticisms around past ISDS provisions are tightened, are strengthened so that there is no possibility of smaller countries or weaker countries getting clobbered by the legal departments of somebody like R.J. Reynolds so that they can’t pass anti-smoking legislation. That, by the way, is more of a legitimate concern for the other signatories to the deal who would not be able to manage expensive litigation, than it is an argument that our laws would be challenged.

Indeed, environmental watchdogs are concerned corporations will use TPP to undermine environmental protections abroad. And while ISDS provisions have existed for a long time, companies didn't really take advantage of them until the 21st century. As Warren noted in an op-ed for The Washington Post, less than 100 ISDS cases were initiated between 1959 and 2002, while 58 were filed in 2012 alone. Warren and others are not only worried the U.S. might lose ISDS cases, but that expanding the ISDS regime will prevent governments from enacting future regulations.

There are other ways to enforce trade deals that do not elevate corporations to the same status of sovereign nations. Under World Trade Organization treaties, companies must first convince their home government to accept the case. The governments of the two countries then face off before WTO adjudicators.


Clinton has been cautious about Obama's TPP deal since launching her campaign. In mid-April, a Clinton spokesman issued a statement saying Clinton "will be watching closely to see what is being done to crack down on currency manipulation" and to "improve labor rights, protect the environment and health" in the final deal.

"We shouldn’t be giving special rights to corporations at the expense of workers and consumers," the statement reads.

Obama opposes using TPP to combat currency manipulation -- a tactic by which Japan and China have been able to curb U.S. exports by making their own goods cheaper.

Other potential candidates for the 2016 Democratic presidential nomination, including Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and former Maryland Gov. Martin O'Malley, have been sharply critical of TPP.

Committees in the House and Senate approved legislation last week that would grant Obama "fast track" authority on trade, stripping Congress of its power to amend whatever deal the administration ultimately reaches.

WhiskeyJuvenile
Feb 15, 2002

by Nyc_Tattoo

Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

Hillary coming out against the TPP; citing Elizabeth Warren as reason to be skeptical of the deal.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/04/30/hillary-clinton-trans-pacific-partnership_n_7173108.html?ncid=fcbklnkushpmg00000013

Democratic primary pandering to the left instead of running to the center?

:getin:

Joementum
May 23, 2004

jesus christ


from 23 Bernie Sanders Reactions For Everyday Situations

Captain_Maclaine
Sep 30, 2001
:siren: The Onion has weighed in on Bernie's candidacy. :siren:

My favorite bit (hard to choose, admittedly):

quote:

Vermont Public Radio Show: Power Of Darkness Bernie Sanders Metal Hour

Joementum
May 23, 2004

jesus christ
The campaign slogan bit is believable.

Captain_Maclaine
Sep 30, 2001
I'm tempted to go back through the various Bernie Buzz* emails I get to see if they lifted that bit directly.

*This is their actual, official title.

computer parts
Nov 18, 2010

PLEASE CLAP

UberJew posted:

Do you really think the republican party would hate him more than they hate Hillary Clinton?

Democrats would probably hate him too for many issues.

Under the vegetable
Nov 2, 2004

by Smythe
Bernie will totally win this, guys.

Vlex
Aug 4, 2006
I'd rather be a climbing ape than a big titty angel.



Captain_Maclaine posted:

:siren: The Onion has weighed in on Bernie's candidacy. :siren:

My favorite bit (hard to choose, admittedly):

Bernie benches a hell of a lot more than he deadlifts.

Lost my vote.

Joementum
May 23, 2004

jesus christ
There is a minor issue with Bernie's candidacy.

quote:

He could hit an early roadblock in New Hampshire -- not with Hillary Clinton, but William Gardner, who has guarded the state's first-in-the-nation presidential primary for four decades as Secretary of State. He said he isn't sure whether Sanders meets the state's requirement to be on the presidential ballot.

"If they're going to run in the primary, they have to be a registered member of the party," Gardner told CNN. "Our declaration of candidacy form that they have to fill out says 'I am a registered member of the party.'"

And it seems does not surprise me that the last time this came up it was another Vermonter causing trouble.

quote:

But when reminded that Howard Dean, the former Vermont governor who sought the Democratic presidential nomination in 2004, qualified for the New Hampshire ballot, even though he was also not a registered Democrat, Gardner paused for several moments. He said he would dig out Dean's paperwork from storage and check.

I'm also curious as to whether Lincoln Chaffee is a registered Democrat. We know Jeb Bush is a registerd Republican, though he had trouble with other sections of the form.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

site
Apr 6, 2007

Trans pride, Worldwide
Bitch

Joementum posted:

There is a minor issue with Bernie's candidacy.


And it seems does not surprise me that the last time this came up it was another Vermonter causing trouble.


I'm also curious as to whether Lincoln Chaffee is a registered Democrat. We know Jeb Bush is a registerd Republican, though he had trouble with other sections of the form.

Ah man, the story was just getting good and it ends right there.

  • Locked thread