|
Mesadoram posted:I used the derp. It is fun when you hit/pen. Overall it is OK, I wanted to get out of that tank ASAP so I just used it till I was done. I sort of feel the same way, which is kind of disappointing after reading good reviews of the tank elsewhere.
|
#
?
Sep 10, 2015 22:37
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 4, 2024 02:02 |
|
|
Here we demonstrate the difference between total XP and basic XP, and why basic XP matter when it comes to mastery badges: 
|
|
#
?
Sep 10, 2015 23:28
|
|
|
Kuntz posted:I really want the 113, but that would mean suffering through the WZ 111-4 so Please link to the thread it came from when you post quotes from the WoT forums. Gervasius posted:Here we demonstrate the difference between total XP and basic XP, and why basic XP matter when it comes to mastery badges: Holy poo poo did you two loving carry hard enough?
|
|
#
?
Sep 10, 2015 23:57
|
|
|
Hellsau posted:Holy poo poo did you two loving carry hard enough? It almost wasn't enough. Although, that AT-2 saved my rear end from enemy hellcat so kudos to him, he hasn't done much damage, but he did it at the right time and against right enemies. I guess that counts as well.
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2015 00:07
|
|
|
1600 base, holy gently caress.
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2015 01:10
|
|
|
Gervasius posted:Here we demonstrate the difference between total XP and basic XP, and why basic XP matter when it comes to mastery badges:
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2015 01:28
|
|
|
Green Dam posted:Well, it was the WZ-111 4~5 and it made the IS-7 look like a worse version of it and you can't really have that with Wargaming. The 113 has a really weak frontal fuel tank, which is conveniently located in the middle front of the tank. Didn't they also do something to its beak to make it weaker, lost some health, and kept its tier 10 gun? which is way better than the 113 and is still a better tier 10 than it aswell?
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2015 03:20
|
|
|
Desuwa posted:Race to the bottom with posters in this thread. Not nearly enough to catch up to the other guy, though. the 113 kicks rear end and im a great poster
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2015 03:28
|
|
|
DonkeyHotay posted:the 113 kicks rear end and im a great poster It loving does not. Its mediocre at best.
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2015 03:36
|
|
|
Saint Celestine posted:It loving does not. Its mediocre at best. How about, 'it is perfectly viable to win with and is also fun to play'
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2015 03:55
|
|
|
DonkeyHotay posted:How about, 'it is perfectly viable to win with and is also fun to play'
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2015 04:32
|
|
|
Look at this motherfucking game right here.  http://wotreplays.com/site/2141471#himmelsdorf-axetrain-o-ni 6000 damage at tier 7 apparently just doesn't cut it when carrying the pubs in this stupid game.
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2015 04:49
|
|
|
 Having fun in E50 today, tanks thread
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2015 04:49
|
|
|
Salean posted:
typical wallet warrior playing OP gold tank E50 go play warplanes noob
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2015 05:08
|
|
|
"lmao just lmao" e: reminder that the Jagdhitler is still for sale for a limited time only Terrorist Fistbump fucked around with this message at 05:37 on Sep 11, 2015 |
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2015 05:22
|
|
|
I had some more fun in my PREMIUN poo poo. http://wotreplays.com/site/2141671#winter_himmelsdorf-rossmum-pz_kpfw_ii_ausf_j http://wotreplays.com/site/2141672#mines-rossmum-pz_kpfw_ii_ausf_j
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2015 08:18
|
|
|
rossmum posted:I had some more fun in my PREMIUN poo poo. Does that tank see tier 5s? Because it looks pretty ludicrous as it is.
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2015 11:38
|
|
|
Axetrain posted:Look at this motherfucking game right here. You got kamikaze in a Japanese tank.
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2015 12:54
|
|
|
Problematic.
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2015 12:57
|
|
|
 What an arduous slog. I got my T28 Concept this morning thanks to the heroics of Sergeant Blows and the brave men of orbital strike platform 53/55. gently caress playing arty and the uphill climb to the T-55 now I am going to go soak my head.
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2015 13:10
|
|
|
Axetrain posted:Does that tank see tier 5s? Because it looks pretty ludicrous as it is. It can't even pen most tier 4 heavies. It's pref. 
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2015 13:52
|
|
|
Stevefin posted:Didn't they also do something to its beak to make it weaker, lost some health, and kept its tier 10 gun? which is way better than the 113 and is still a better tier 10 than it aswell? I think they nerfed the stats on the gun, not 100% though. It was a long time ago. Axetrain posted:Look at this motherfucking game right here. gently caress man, that is brutal.
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2015 14:06
|
|
|
I don't really remember what nerfs (if any) happened to the WZ-111 4~5 before they decided to remove it. The 113 actually has a worse gun than the 121, aside from 2 degrees more gun depression, it uses the tier 9 medium WZ-120's gun.unlawfulsoup posted:
Hey, Qumefox. How've you been?
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2015 14:20
|
|
|
Green Dam posted:I don't really remember what nerfs (if any) happened to the WZ-111 4~5 before they decided to remove it. None, it never made it to live. It was so overperforming that WG actually pushed the whole Chinese tree back a patch to replace it. (well, it wasn't the only one. but still)
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2015 14:38
|
|
|
I know it didn't. I was happy about it too when it was first revealed in 2012 since it seemed pretty much like a better IS-7. Wargaming always keeping China down.
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2015 15:47
|
|
|
Green Dam posted:Hey, Qumefox. How've you been?  Green Dam posted:Wargaming always keeping China down. Counterpoint,
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2015 15:51
|
|
|
Anyone taken a look at not!WoT? My friend's got me an early access code to it, but I'm not sure what to make of it.
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2015 17:52
|
|
|
http://worldoftanks.com/en/news/pc-browser/22/tanks-thru-time2/ So does anyone know if the 15% Free Exp bonus stacks with the personal Free Exp boosters, or if you can only have one or the other?
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2015 17:56
|
|
|
Salean posted:
Doing gods work
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2015 17:57
|
|
|
frood posted:http://worldoftanks.com/en/news/pc-browser/22/tanks-thru-time2/ My money is on it stacking because bonuses from events are separate from bonuses from boosters, but this is WarGaming so who knows. Edit: This whole "Tanks Through Time" event is dumb as hell. Just look at this poo poo: WarGaming posted:Jungle Roads McGavin fucked around with this message at 18:12 on Sep 11, 2015 |
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2015 18:08
|
|
|
Agrajag posted:Take your Type 59 and shove it up your butt! Why don't you take your type-59 and sh- wait, Oh, oh I'm so sorry. 
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2015 18:40
|
|
|
Pornographic Memory posted:it was probably one of those tanks through time missions giving a huge bonus frood posted:It's ZombieLenin, he has a history of not understanding what's going on on his screen, and also not being able to read. ZombieLenin posted:Deliberate elision of jargon dragging this thread back down again to point out frood implicitly conflated Pornographic Memory with Zombie Lenin. How will PM respond to this heinous allegation? I'd just enjoy it if ZL cared so little that he had two whole accounts for one forlorn argument. Hellsau posted:British tanks have a known Win % multiplier. It's in the .xml files, look it up.    in 2013 at least Brit turreted tier 10s were tanks only good players got anything out of. I mention this to segue into a query about whether anyone else has done more up to date statistical analysis of a similar method or if the whole method was discredited somehow. McGavin posted:"Tanks Through Time" event is dumb as hell. Just look at this snip Did WG nab one of Blizzard's humanities degree event managers or something? That is impenetrable. stephenfry fucked around with this message at 19:05 on Sep 11, 2015 |
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2015 18:54
|
|
|
MariusLecter posted:Why don't you take your type-59 and sh- wait, Oh, oh I'm so sorry. drat man, ice cold.
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2015 19:00
|
|
|
PerrineClostermann posted:Anyone taken a look at not!WoT? My friend's got me an early access code to it, but I'm not sure what to make of it. PvP is campy and snipery to the extreme, you can forget about doing any aggressive stuff until the game is already won our you'll get your face blasted. If your scouts suck/die you might aswell leave the game. PvE is pretty chill with a group, enjoy your 0.5-1% research progress per game.
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2015 20:46
|
|
|
sauer kraut posted:PvE is pretty chill with a group, enjoy your 0.5-1% research progress per game. I think you're talking about Armored Warfare? http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3724899
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2015 21:13
|
|
|
I'm still waiting for AW to do something about their tank models. The fact that they look waay worse than WoT models and are using the Cryengine makes me sad. Like seriously their tank models look really really terrible in comparison to WoT.
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2015 21:13
|
|
|
Agrajag posted:I'm still waiting for AW to do something about their tank models. The fact that they look waay worse than WoT models and are using the Cryengine makes me sad. Like seriously their tank models look really really terrible in comparison to WoT.
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2015 21:24
|
|
|
Some AW models look really good while others look like poo.
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2015 21:39
|
|
|
Bort Bortles posted:Is it that or because you are waiting for them to have a Type 59 for sale? T-34-3 > Type 59 brah
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2015 21:42
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 4, 2024 02:02 |
|
|
Agrajag posted:T-34-3 > Type 59 brah Donkey as a fellow delusional Chinese tanker, do you agree with this statement?
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2015 21:48
|
|