|
blk posted:
That thing looks like it has the viewing angles of a T-55.
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2015 04:41
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 27, 2024 20:15 |
|
|
That thing looks terrible
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2015 04:44
|
|
|
Looks like a smooshed Durango
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2015 04:45
|
|
|
So it's a 6 wagon with wagon wheels?
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2015 04:46
|
|
|
Mazda should just build the Furai again.
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2015 04:54
|
|
|
blk posted:
Now make it a convertible 
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2015 04:54
|
|
|
I immediately said "eew" out loud like a teenage girl.
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2015 05:00
|
|
|
14 INCH DEVITO posted:Now make it a convertible Convertibles should only have two seats sorry
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2015 05:12
|
|
|
Nodoze posted:Convertibles should only have two seats sorry You shut your dirty loving mouth.  
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2015 05:28
|
|
|
Counterpoint:
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2015 06:06
|
|
|
skipdogg posted:Looks like a smooshed Durango It's just the 6 wagon the rest of the world gets with body cladding and concept car wheels.
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2015 06:18
|
|
|
Why even offer a hatchback if you're going to give up a lot of potential interior volume by putting in an angled rear window?
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2015 06:36
|
|
|
Enourmo posted:Counterpoint: If I lived in Florida this would be my car.
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2015 07:24
|
|
|
I've said it before but... My Aunt has a cross cabrio, and for cruising around Southern California, it's loving fantastic.
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2015 07:43
|
|
|
BraveUlysses posted:Why even offer a hatchback if you're going to give up a lot of potential interior volume by putting in an angled rear window? Because the entire point of the hatchback design is pleasing aesthetics first and foremost, with utility and practicality easily a distant fourth or fifth behind automatic ball fondlers in the seats and air conditioned USB charging ports.
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2015 07:45
|
|
|
Just bring the 6 wagon to NA ffs...
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2015 07:47
|
|
|
Olivil posted:Just bring the 6 wagon to NA ffs... Why would you ever want that when you can have a practical and attractive CUV instead?
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2015 08:14
|
|
|
I'd never buy that CUV thing but I don't think it looks too bad if you ignore the practical aspects  eyebeem posted:I've said it before but... My Aunt has a cross cabrio, and for cruising around Southern California, it's loving fantastic. Well it's a convertible, but pretty much any other one would be even better at that.
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2015 11:11
|
|
|
blk posted:
Some people have really weird taste in cars because although this is an CUV type arrangement, design wise it's attractive in that it all flows naturally and doesn't have a million pointless body lines like a lot of designs. Compare to a Juke that doesn't know whether it wants to be 90s melty box design or more modern sharper edge so has both and doesn't work; the fat, lardy looking Murano posted above or the Lexus NX that looks like a still from a Transformers film where the robot's halfway through changing... Y'all crazy.
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2015 11:20
|
|
|
88h88 posted:Some people have really weird taste in cars because although this is an CUV type arrangement, design wise it's attractive in that it all flows naturally and doesn't have a million pointless body lines like a lot of designs. Compare to a Juke that doesn't know whether it wants to be 90s melty box design or more modern sharper edge so has both and doesn't work; the fat, lardy looking Murano posted above or the Lexus NX that looks like a still from a Transformers film where the robot's halfway through changing... I just look at it and think "Ya'll wanna have some car to go with that huge set of wheels there?"
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2015 11:43
|
|
|
Friar Zucchini posted:I just look at it and think "Ya'll wanna have some car to go with that huge set of wheels there?" Sport Cup 2s on EVERYTHING
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2015 11:55
|
|
|
blk posted:
I really like this. Reminds me of the first gen Infinity FX.
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2015 13:23
|
|
|
I like it, like all of the other latest gen Mazda products. I'd prefer the wagon over a high centre of gravity CUV but I'm sure it'll sell a ton. They can call it the CX-7.
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2015 16:21
|
|
|
All crossovers should burn.
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2015 16:53
|
|
|
Top Hats Monthly posted:All people who buy crossovers should burn. Alternatively Top Hats Monthly posted:All crossovers should burn, with the people who bought them inside. Either way the problem would soon sort itself out.
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2015 16:55
|
|
|
What's wrong with crossovers?
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2015 17:09
|
|
|
Spergs don't like them because they're taking away wagon sales which would otherwise dominate the markehahahahahah I can't even finish this.
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2015 17:16
|
|
|
KYOON GRIFFEY JR posted:What's wrong with crossovers? They all look the same.
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2015 17:18
|
|
|
My car is so safe buh buh *crashes into person while you're texting* I hate crossovers cause they aren't good sedans and they aren't good SUVs
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2015 17:19
|
|
|
Crossovers are fine. Burn all large SUVs and luxury trucks.
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2015 17:20
|
|
|
go3 posted:Crossovers are fine. Burn all large SUVs and luxury trucks. At least luxury trucks can serve some purpose
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2015 17:23
|
|
|
Burn all cars except mine. Then I automatically have the best car. Checkmate.  Top Hats Monthly posted:At least luxury trucks can serve some purpose Dickwaving is not a purpose.
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2015 17:24
|
|
|
go3 posted:Crossovers are fine. Burn all large SUVs and luxury trucks.  Is it already time for this discussion again?
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2015 17:24
|
|
|
as an owner of a RWD manual brown diesel wagon, I
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2015 17:24
|
|
|
Top Hats Monthly posted:as an owner of a RWD manual brown diesel wagon, I Haven't you heard? Diesels are dead. It's about rotaries, now.
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2015 17:25
|
|
|
Top Hats Monthly posted:as an owner of a RWD manual brown diesel wagon, I Let me explain to you why my 19 year old BMW is objectively the best and most practical car:
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2015 17:26
|
|
|
CUVs and crossovers all look very similar and the marketing for them is such that I feel alienated from them. I don't like how companies market their trucks and I don't like how they market their SUVs, CUVs, and crossovers. I also don't like being associated with the typical market for either of them. I'm pretty sure this is the real reason so many car people are anti-popular thing and if you deny it you are lying.
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2015 17:42
|
|
|
KakerMix posted:CUVs and crossovers all look very similar and the marketing for them is such that I feel alienated from them. Or, you know, we've just driven them and found that they're understeering top-heavy poo poo you can't see out of.
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2015 17:52
|
|
|
KakerMix posted:CUVs and crossovers all look very similar and the marketing for them is such that I feel alienated from them. I belive CUV's are better in every way to most other types of car. I wouldn't trade in my
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2015 17:54
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 27, 2024 20:15 |
|
|
wargames posted:They all look the same. Have you looked at sedans recently or
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2015 17:54
|
|