|
He seems like such a gentle loner, I don't know why these evil G-Men arrested him.
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2015 01:50
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 1, 2024 13:48 |
|
|
Thump! posted:The distance between Robert Dear's home in Hartsel, Colorado and Colorado Springs is 64 miles. I don't see what that has to do with anything. You get that the hardcore types already are willing to shoot the Muslim guy in the areas (he's actually a mexican, but they don't know that) right?
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2015 01:50
|
|
|
fishmech posted:Ol shooty Jethro is sure going to be able to figure out which "Muhammed Arnold" is the right one, or even pick which one to kill out of the dozens that are out there. Get real, he'll get bored before he drives 50 miles. Implying he's going to care to differentiate when he runs across the first person with the name. Joementum posted:Obama's proposal for it provides for an process to appeal the decision. Oh cool, I get to triple quote this again! Thanks dumbshit! blue squares posted:Due process doesn't mean there is a process to get off the list. blue squares posted:Due process doesn't mean there is a process to get off the list. blue squares posted:Due process doesn't mean there is a process to get off the list. (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2015 01:51
|
|
This poster loves police brutality, but only when its against minorities!
|
GlitchThief posted:There's a lot of problems with the list, but I don't see how making it public would do anything but make it worse. It would make it harder to justify the list's existence.
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2015 01:51
|
|
|
It's already unjustifiable.
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2015 01:55
|
|
|
DeusExMachinima posted:Implying he's going to care to differentiate when he runs across the first person with the name. He's not going to run across anyone with the name because that kind of violent person just shoots at the first person who fails the paper bag test and angers him.
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2015 01:56
|
|
|
GlitchThief posted:It's already unjustifiable. Apparently not.
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2015 01:57
|
|
|
computer parts posted:Apparently not. How do you feel the list is justified?
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2015 01:59
|
|
|
Artificer posted:Christ Almighty this is a depressing as gently caress thread. Yeah we shoudl all just kill ourselves tbqh (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2015 02:02
|
|
|
Artificer posted:Christ Almighty this is a depressing as gently caress thread.
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2015 02:04
|
|
|
DeusExMachinima posted:Oh cool, I get to triple quote this again! Thanks dumbshit! I have been reading some literature on the NICS background checks and some various state laws. Under the existing system, it appears that at the federal level, the FBI can place a hold to delay a purchase without initial due process, and many states have a "subversive group" clause which does not seem that different from the idea of the no fly list, as well as denial at judicial discretion without conviction or existing indictment. It seems that the government position on "due process" and gun purchases is that they are allowed to delay your purchase as long as you have a route to appeal without it being a rights violation. Is this accurate, or are there other checks and oversights of the various open ended catch-all capabilities that exist?
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2015 02:10
|
|
|
Party Plane Jones posted:Knowing the FL Democratic Party they're going to nominate some chucklefuck that'll lose to David Jolly. Grayson probably. Close. Murphy seems to be winning the primary for the senate seat, since Grayson--as fun as he was to watch--is utter poo poo at campaigning. So the guy who only barely beat a literal war criminal in a presidential election year by 2500 votes will be the hope for overcoming the GOP machine in florida. At least he isn't just a recycled republican.
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2015 02:11
|
|
|
GlitchThief posted:How do you feel the list is justified? Our sitting President is attempting to use it as a tool for policy.
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2015 02:13
|
|
|
Are snakes real?
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2015 02:16
|
|
|
quote:How do you feel the list is justified?
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2015 02:17
|
|
|
TheDeadlyShoe posted:Where do you put guys who haven't committed crimes in the USA but are still clearly dangerous i.e. a guy who joined ISIL Paper bag test dummy.
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2015 02:21
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2015 02:21
|
|
|
TheDeadlyShoe posted:Where do you put guys who haven't committed crimes in the USA but are still clearly dangerous i.e. a guy who joined ISIL Police academies.
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2015 02:23
|
|
|
Quick, now photoshop Jeb's head onto Hobbes
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2015 02:24
|
|
|
I don't get it. Someone explain it to me . Explain as you would to a child.
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2015 02:31
|
|
|
http://www.rawstory.com/2015/12/tennessee-school-wins-right-to-ban-gays-and-women-whove-had-sex-this-is-who-we-are/ Has this been posted yet? It seems like something like this should have been stopped right away.
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2015 02:33
|
|
|
Hollismason posted:I don't get it. Lots of Dem seats up for re-election and it's a midterm.
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2015 02:34
|
|
|
computer parts posted:Lots of Dem seats up for re-election and it's a midterm. Oh shi...
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2015 02:35
|
|
|
Hollismason posted:I don't get it. There are lots of Republican Senate seats up for election in 2016, because Republicans won a lot of seats in 2010, a non-Presidential election. 2016 is a Presidential election year. There are lots of Democratic Senate seats up for election in 2018, because Democrats won a lot of seats in 2012, a Presidential election. 2018 is a non-Presidential election year.
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2015 02:36
|
|
|
computer parts posted:Lots of Dem seats up for re-election and it's a midterm. The GOP will be so far along to destroying the country by then after Trump wins the presidency it won't matter. Either that or they'll be in shambles after losing the presidency 3 times. in a loving. row.
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2015 02:37
|
|
|
bobjr posted:http://www.rawstory.com/2015/12/tennessee-school-wins-right-to-ban-gays-and-women-whove-had-sex-this-is-who-we-are/ I could be wrong, but I'm pretty sure that if it's a privately owned university receiving no federal funding, then they can do whatever the gently caress they want. Not that that would make it any less terrible - if anything the fact that they can get away with it makes it more terrible.
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2015 02:39
|
|
|
What. The. gently caress. http://www.statesman.com/news/news/gun-rights-groups-to-stage-mock-mass-shooting-at-u/npf38/ Holy poo poo is this guy serious? posted:The Open Carry Walk and Crisis Performance Event will involve actors “shot” by perpetrators armed with cardboard weapons, said Matthew Short, a spokesman for the gun rights groups Come and Take It Texas and DontComply.com.
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2015 02:40
|
|
|
bobjr posted:http://www.rawstory.com/2015/12/tennessee-school-wins-right-to-ban-gays-and-women-whove-had-sex-this-is-who-we-are/ Man that is a terrible article. Title: "School wins right to ban gays!" Article: "School files for waiver that Federal Government can deny asking to ban gays!"
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2015 02:41
|
|
|
TheDeadlyShoe posted:Where do you put guys who haven't committed crimes in the USA but are still clearly dangerous i.e. a guy who joined ISIL It's not legal to join ISIL so prison.
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2015 02:41
|
|
|
TheDeadlyShoe posted:Where do you put guys who haven't committed crimes in the USA but are still clearly dangerous i.e. a guy who joined ISIL Dusty Baker 2 posted:It's not legal to join ISIL so prison.
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2015 02:44
|
|
|
JT Jag posted:The President's party tends to win Senate seats during Presidential elections, and lose them on off-year elections. I would just straight-up put it that Presidential elections favor Democrats and off-years favor Republicans. It's a question of turnout, and low turnout literally always plays out as "octogenarians with nothing better to do decide the election". That effect is way more powerful than the party currently in power. The recent counterexample was 2006 I guess, but that was after Bush's fall from favor had begun in earnest, with Iraq turning to poo poo, Afghanistan forgotten, and a failed attempt to privatize social security, and basically just presaged the 2008 Democratic blowout. Still though Democrats are probably boned in 2018, there's basically no pickups for Democrats there and a lot of chances to lose a seat. Paul MaudDib fucked around with this message at 02:49 on Dec 10, 2015 |
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2015 02:47
|
|
|
Paul MaudDib posted:I would just straight-up put it that Presidential elections favor Democrats and off-years favor Republicans. It's a question of turnout, and low turnout literally always plays out as "octogenarians with nothing better to do decide the election". That effect is way more powerful than the party currently in power. There's also the fact that a heap of states put measures in place to make it harder for college students to vote.
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2015 02:51
|
|
|
Paul MaudDib posted:I would just straight-up put it that Presidential elections favor Democrats and off-years favor Republicans. It's a question of turnout, and low turnout literally always plays out as "octogenarians with nothing better to do decide the election". That effect is way more powerful than the party currently in power.
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2015 02:52
|
|
|
Gonna be interesting to see what happens if Clinton's president with a GOP held House an a GOP Senate with 60+ seats. By interesting I mean terrifying since they could successfully impeach and remove a Dem president and VP on a whim.
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2015 03:01
|
|
|
Party Plane Jones posted:There's also the fact that a heap of states put measures in place to make it harder for college students to vote. College students aren't the only youth, and even if they were it doesn't explain why they consistently vote during Presidential elections.
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2015 03:03
|
|
|
Evil Fluffy posted:Gonna be interesting to see what happens if Clinton's president with a GOP held House an a GOP Senate with 60+ seats. Also, a 2/3rds majority is required in the Senate, and they definitely won't get 66.
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2015 03:06
|
|
|
Artificer posted:Christ Almighty this is a depressing as gently caress thread. Here's a South Carolina poll, overlapping the time of Trump calling for banning muslims from entering the country http://www.foxnews.com/politics/interactive/2015/12/09/fox-news-poll-south-carolina-primary-races/ He jumped 8 points
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2015 03:24
|
|
|
Fried Chicken posted:Here's a South Carolina poll, overlapping the time of Trump calling for banning muslims from entering the country Edit: I can't find it now, maybe I imagined it. Samurai Sanders fucked around with this message at 03:29 on Dec 10, 2015 |
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2015 03:26
|
|
|
Fried Chicken posted:Here's a South Carolina poll, overlapping the time of Trump calling for banning muslims from entering the country I saw a poll today that had 65% of Republicans, not Trump supporters, but all Republicans, supported his Muslim immigration ban. That is loving insane.
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2015 03:40
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 1, 2024 13:48 |
|
|
zoux posted:I saw a poll today that had 65% of Republicans, not Trump supporters, but all Republicans, supported his Muslim immigration ban. That is loving insane. Uh.. I'm pretty sure you'll see that this is really the death of Trump's campaign.
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2015 03:41
|
|