Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
emdash
Oct 19, 2003

and?

TheDisreputableDog posted:


Your whining and protestations are partisan and fake - clean your own house.

uh huh. and i'm sure yours aren't, and your house is sparkling. rofl

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

baw
Nov 5, 2008

RESIDENT: LAISSEZ FAIR-SNEZHNEVSKY INSTITUTE FOR FORENSIC PSYCHIATRY
Extrajudicial executions of American citizens are not cool or good. We are only allowed to do that with people from other countries

Talmonis
Jun 24, 2012
The fairy of forgiveness has removed your red text.

BetterToRuleInHell posted:

Oh man does this make me conservative because I genuinely agree with this.

Most people agree with this.

BI NOW GAY LATER
Jan 17, 2008

So people stop asking, the "Bi" in my username is a reference to my love for the two greatest collegiate sports programs in the world, the Virginia Tech Hokies and the Marshall Thundering Herd.
Tax Policy Center rated the Trump Tax PLan and weeelllll: http://taxpolicycenter.org/UploadedPDF/2000560-an-analysis-of-donald-trumps-tax-plan.pdf

burnishedfume
Mar 8, 2011

You really are a louse...

TheDisreputableDog posted:

You do not get to claim the moral high ground when your president targeted and killed a Muslim American (also his teenage son - nbd) just because he was on a list somewhere.

Aw man, you're against the extrajudicial killing of US citizens?

So, you voting straight Socialist this year, or just staying home?

Rhesus Pieces
Jun 27, 2005

radical meme posted:

That's a good long article. Lots of quotable stuff. My takeaway was that Frum danced all around the issue and never came right out and said it: the GOP party elite are losing their grip on their base, they can't continue to lie and abuse their base and expect them to fall in line and vote for a Wall Street stooge. The problem is, they can do it and Frum's ulitimate solution is that the GOP is just going to change the rules of the game at the state level to allow them to do it. it's depressing but true.

He also danced all around the issue of increasingly open racism and bigotry in the Republican Party base.

Frum really wants to believe Trump is running on anti-immigration rhetoric strictly in the rational, economic populism sense, but that's absolutely not the case and acknowledging this fact makes him really uncomfortable.

Latinos, Asians and Muslims are voting democrat because they value education and health care and they're also aware of the fact that the other party is pandering to a base that loving hates them on a personal level.

Rhesus Pieces fucked around with this message at 20:48 on Dec 22, 2015

CommieGIR
Aug 22, 2006

The blue glow is a feature, not a bug


Pillbug

TheDisreputableDog posted:

Your whining and protestations are partisan and fake - clean your own house.

:ironicat:

Seriously, there is so much irony in that statement, I don't know where to begin. Look inwards first.

My Imaginary GF
Jul 17, 2005

by R. Guyovich

Talmonis posted:

Most people agree with this.

CAIR doesn't agree with this.

Pohl
Jan 28, 2005




In the future, please post shit with the sole purpose of antagonizing the person running this site. Thank you.

An 80% increase is HUUUGGE!

Oh, it could potentially increase the national debt by 80%, that is huge. (and not a surprise)

quote:

Increase the standard deduction to $25,000 for single filers and $50,000 for joint filers in 2015, indexed for inflation thereafter.

This is something I can support.

Pohl fucked around with this message at 21:05 on Dec 22, 2015

Boon
Jun 21, 2005

by R. Guyovich

TheDisreputableDog posted:

No.

Stop.

You do not get to claim the moral high ground when your president targeted and killed a Muslim American (also his teenage son - nbd) just because he was on a list somewhere.

The Secretary of State when this decision was made (and has defended it) is now your front runner for President.

Your whining and protestations are partisan and fake - clean your own house.

I think you give yourself away implicitly in your thoughts.

BI NOW GAY LATER
Jan 17, 2008

So people stop asking, the "Bi" in my username is a reference to my love for the two greatest collegiate sports programs in the world, the Virginia Tech Hokies and the Marshall Thundering Herd.
David Frum has an interesting look from the GOP perspective about the tension which mires their house: http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2016/01/the-great-republican-revolt/419118/

Joementum
May 23, 2004

jesus christ

PleasingFungus
Oct 10, 2012
idiot asshole bitch who should fuck off

BI NOW GAY LATER posted:

David Frum has an interesting look from the GOP perspective about the tension which mires their house: http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2016/01/the-great-republican-revolt/419118/

Already posted a page or two back, sorry.

The Aardvark
Aug 19, 2013



I'm surprised it took this long.

radical meme
Apr 17, 2009

by Fluffdaddy

Shageletic posted:

I think GW's administration was the wake up call, that US efficacy abroad through military means is, and has for a long time, been a mirage. I think you're somewhat idealistic about the ability of American power to reshape the world in any sort of positive direction. Getting together something like a climate change compact is about the extent of American influence, and barely that. The idea that the US had the ability to reshape the ME and change the underlying dynamics and fissures, without just smashing whatever was there until even more instability welled up, is extremely foolish.

We can't even get our closest ally in the Middle East to treat its neighbors like human beings.

Luigi Thirty
Apr 30, 2006

Emergency confection port.

The DHS changed the rules and you can now not opt out of the scanner that lets horny TSA agents see your boobs.

http://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/privacy-tsa-pia-32-d-ait.pdf

Joementum
May 23, 2004

jesus christ


The Aardvark posted:

I'm surprised it took this long.

I actually watched the review and the "Pentagon propaganda" aspect is even funnier than I thought. It's because Rey is a strong woman, so this is obviously an attempt to indoctrinate America into supporting the decision to allow women into combat roles in the US military.

Also, the Prequels were all about how the government engages in FALSE FLAGS!!! It's Infowars, so they've gotta work in the FALSE FLAG somehow.

BI NOW GAY LATER
Jan 17, 2008

So people stop asking, the "Bi" in my username is a reference to my love for the two greatest collegiate sports programs in the world, the Virginia Tech Hokies and the Marshall Thundering Herd.

PleasingFungus posted:

Already posted a page or two back, sorry.

Ah, didn't see it.

He generally doesn't call them out as being racists, but I find Frum is generally good for seeing weakness in his own party.

greatn
Nov 15, 2006

by Lowtax

baw posted:

Extrajudicial executions of American citizens are not cool or good. We are only allowed to do that with people from other countries

He was in another country at the time.

And extrajudicial execution of enemy combatants is fine, it doesn't matter where they were born. Dude was actively part of a terrorist organization in a war zone planning and executing attacks.

Woof Blitzer
Dec 29, 2012

[-]
Good to know D&D supports assassinating American citizens.

Talmonis
Jun 24, 2012
The fairy of forgiveness has removed your red text.

Teflon Don posted:

Good to know D&D supports assassinating American citizens.

I mean, what is your alternative here? Being born in the U.S. doesn't give you diplomatic immunity to commit terrorist attacks against the country.

VikingofRock
Aug 24, 2008




I actually agree with TheDisreputableDog here-- the US government should kill its citizens only if they pose an immediate threat (i.e. a gunman shooting people at a mall), and even then only as a last resort. If the US had sufficient evidence on al-Awlaki to convict him of a crime, they should have worked with the Yemeni government (who was also after him) to arrest him, and then either tried him in the US or let the Yemenis deal with him. Your right to a trial doesn't go away just because the government suspects that you are a member of a terrorist organization.

Boon
Jun 21, 2005

by R. Guyovich

Teflon Don posted:

Good to know D&D supports assassinating American citizens.

Reported for trolling false equivalency.

Anyway, I don't have much of a problem with it personally given the circumstances and his status as an operative in a terror organization. I don't think it's really unprecedented either.

CommieGIR
Aug 22, 2006

The blue glow is a feature, not a bug


Pillbug

VikingofRock posted:

I actually agree with TheDisreputableDog here-- the US government should kill its citizens only if they pose an immediate threat (i.e. a gunman shooting people at a mall), and even then only as a last resort. If the US had sufficient evidence on al-Awlaki to convict him of a crime, they should have worked with the Yemeni government (who was also after him) to arrest him, and then either tried him in the US or let the Yemenis deal with him. Your right to a trial doesn't go away just because the government suspects that you are a member of a terrorist organization.

Its okay, better to capture them, torture them in Black facilities in other countries regardless of guilt or innocence, and then fly them to a prison where they have no hope of trial.

Joementum
May 23, 2004

jesus christ
At the US Naval Observatory: a gingerbread version of the Joseph R. Biden Amtrak Station in Wilmington, Delaware.

MothraAttack
Apr 28, 2008

VikingofRock posted:

I actually agree with TheDisreputableDog here-- the US government should kill its citizens only if they pose an immediate threat (i.e. a gunman shooting people at a mall), and even then only as a last resort. If the US had sufficient evidence on al-Awlaki to convict him of a crime, they should have worked with the Yemeni government (who was also after him) to arrest him, and then either tried him in the US or let the Yemenis deal with him. Your right to a trial doesn't go away just because the government suspects that you are a member of a terrorist organization.

Of course they had enough evidence to convict him, him being a major AQAP asset and all. The problem is there's little stomach for exfiltration ops in AQAP territory and that Saleh's military was a bungling joke.

burnishedfume
Mar 8, 2011

You really are a louse...

Joementum posted:

I actually watched the review and the "Pentagon propaganda" aspect is even funnier than I thought. It's because Rey is a strong woman, so this is obviously an attempt to indoctrinate America into supporting the decision to allow women into combat roles in the US military.

Also, the Prequels were all about how the government engages in FALSE FLAGS!!! It's Infowars, so they've gotta work in the FALSE FLAG somehow.

I just don't get conservatives anymore. Are Troops are our nation's most precious resource that we must send into every war forever for no good reason, give the DoD infinite money forever so the traitors who run it can waste money on policy changes we hate, we can't let women become Are Troops because we need to make sure only the best of the best join the army which is why we need to make sure the army continues dropping the enlistment requirements to compensate for the lack of qualified recruits.

Like, I thought when it became widely known that the policy change to allow women into combat roles was actually at the behest of the Pentagon itself, the issue of women soldiers would fizzle out, instead of the Pentagon becoming liebral traitors.

E:

Teflon Don posted:

Good to know D&D supports assassinating American citizens.

I think it's Not Good but a) literally everyone who could become president in 2016 is for it so there's not much to talk about, and b) a staunch Republican doesn't really have any room to criticize a president for extrajudicial killings.

VikingofRock
Aug 24, 2008




CommieGIR posted:

Its okay, better to capture them, torture them in Black facilities in other countries regardless of guilt or innocence, and then fly them to a prison where they have no hope of trial.

Actually I don't think we should do that either.

CommieGIR
Aug 22, 2006

The blue glow is a feature, not a bug


Pillbug

VikingofRock posted:

Actually I don't think we should do that either.

I know, it was rhetorical and not aimed at you, sorry.

VikingofRock
Aug 24, 2008




CommieGIR posted:

I know, it was rhetorical and not aimed at you, sorry.

No worries, it's hard to tell sometimes.

Seraphic Neoman
Jul 19, 2011


VikingofRock posted:

I actually agree with TheDisreputableDog here-- the US government should kill its citizens only if they pose an immediate threat (i.e. a gunman shooting people at a mall), and even then only as a last resort. If the US had sufficient evidence on al-Awlaki to convict him of a crime, they should have worked with the Yemeni government (who was also after him) to arrest him, and then either tried him in the US or let the Yemenis deal with him. Your right to a trial doesn't go away just because the government suspects that you are a member of a terrorist organization.

Same. Due process doesn't fly out the window just because of varying degrees of "terrorist sympathies". If you have evidence, arrest and send him to trial. If you don't then oh well you can't. I know that's not how the country functions nowadays, but it should be.


CommieGIR posted:

Its okay, better to capture them, torture them in Black facilities in other countries regardless of guilt or innocence, and then fly them to a prison where they have no hope of trial.

I hope you're being ironic because that is in no way a point anyone here supports.

CommieGIR
Aug 22, 2006

The blue glow is a feature, not a bug


Pillbug

SSNeoman posted:

I hope you're being ironic because that is in no way a point anyone here supports.

Yes. Its very ironic.

My Imaginary GF
Jul 17, 2005

by R. Guyovich

VikingofRock posted:

Actually I don't think we should do that either.

If you don't wish to face extraordinary rendition, don't join Al Qaeda or any other State listed terrorist groups. Your rights as a citizen come with responsibilities for their use; if you avoid these responsibilities, your rights no longer apply as they used to.

Talmonis
Jun 24, 2012
The fairy of forgiveness has removed your red text.

SSNeoman posted:

Same. Due process doesn't fly out the window just because of varying degrees of "terrorist sympathies". If you have evidence, arrest and send him to trial. If you don't then oh well you can't. I know that's not how the country functions nowadays, but it should be.


I hope you're being ironic because that is in no way a point anyone here supports.

It wasn't vague sympathies that earned Al-Awlaki a death sentence. Basically he had links to the 2009 Fort Hood Massacre and the 2009 attempted destruction of a Detroit-bound passenger-plane.

Combed Thunderclap
Jan 4, 2011



MothraAttack posted:

Of course they had enough evidence to convict him, him being a major AQAP asset and all. The problem is there's little stomach for exfiltration ops in AQAP territory and that Saleh's military was a bungling joke.

Don't see why they can't at least try him in absentia; legally attempt to summon him and have a dedicated set of defenders

...it'd still probably end up half a show trial, but you can't reasonably argue that these kinds of executions aren't extremely problematic/flat out illegal from a rule of law perspective.

GalacticAcid
Apr 8, 2013

NEW YORK VALUES
Extrajudicial state killings carried out by airborne murder drones are good and keep you safe.

Talmonis
Jun 24, 2012
The fairy of forgiveness has removed your red text.

Combed Thunderclap posted:

Don't see why they can't at least try him in absentia; legally attempt to summon him and have a dedicated set of defenders

...it'd still probably end up half a show trial, but you can't reasonably argue that these kinds of executions aren't extremely problematic/flat out illegal from a rule of law perspective.

It's not practical to try international terrorists in open court, as much of the evidence against the defendent would be classified intellegence.

Talmonis
Jun 24, 2012
The fairy of forgiveness has removed your red text.

GalacticAcid posted:

Extrajudicial state killings carried out by airborne murder drones are good and keep you safe.

Debatable in the safe keeping aspect, but arguably effective in hampering the ability of international terror groups to coordinate. "Good", depending on your perspective.

radical meme
Apr 17, 2009

by Fluffdaddy

DrProsek posted:

I just don't get conservatives anymore. Are Troops are our nation's most precious resource that we must send into every war forever for no good reason, give the DoD infinite money forever so the traitors who run it can waste money on policy changes we hate, we can't let women become Are Troops because we need to make sure only the best of the best join the army which is why we need to make sure the army continues dropping the enlistment requirements to compensate for the lack of qualified recruits.



Don't forget we need to always support them but we also support our Congressmen who vote to decrease spending on the socialist medical and Veteran's benefits our patriotic troops receive and god bless them for fighting for our right to refuse them medical care and turn them into homeless people that we can further denigrate and abuse when we see them sleeping on the street.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Combed Thunderclap
Jan 4, 2011



Talmonis posted:

It's not practical to try international terrorists in open court, as much of the evidence against the defendent would be classified intellegence.

You're right, we'd just end up with another FISA court :sigh: But even a closed or semi-open court would be better than the alternative, which is straight up execution (and at least the courts would at hopefully treat the death penalty with some modicum of reverence).

  • Locked thread