|
Popular Thug Drink posted:yokel haram This is a better term than Y'all Qaeda. Alert the media.
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2016 21:50
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 20, 2024 20:16 |
|
|
ToxicSlurpee posted:Conspiracy nonsense. It's a common belief (that I think might be kind of sort of true) that the government can listen to any cellphone they want whenever they want, even if they're turned off, so obviously the government is listening to all cellphones, all the time. Since these guys are a threat to liberal tyranny then obviously Oblammo is spying on them literally all day every day. Gotta carry a jammer to make sure. Oh those sweet analog children
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2016 21:50
|
|
|
So when the rebels fall to a glorious flurry of fascist gunfire are FEMA doing bulldozing and remodeling to death camp
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2016 21:50
|
|
|
ChlamydiaJones posted:I sent Blaine glitter when he was trying to start CW2 with the miners a few months back! Such a pleasant fellow is our Blaine! Its not like we have a bunch of aircraft specifically built to intercept and track coms. No. No such thing. Whatosever.  Oh.
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2016 21:52
|
|
|
Small note on cellphone jammer talk- cell phone jammers are very extra special illegal under federal law(FCC I think)- to use or own. Don't run a cell phone jammer.
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2016 21:53
|
|
|
Kazak_Hstan posted:The refuge wildlife biologist probably would have something to say about around the clock 90dB shrill noise. Right there with you, brother. 
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2016 21:54
|
|
|
Talmonis posted:Their discomfort pleases me. I am feuled by schadenfreude. As long as we don't use Billy Joel, Supertramp or Yoko Ono. I was pissed when Cheney used torture and have not softened on the topic.
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2016 21:54
|
|
|
Radbot posted:First, you can get those shipped from China for under $100. Second, why would they do that? Uhh, more importantly than "why", is that even legal? Just imagine the shitshow if Timmy is on the phone giving 911 the location of his dying mom, when Dr. Dumbass strolls by with his jamming box and cuts the signal.
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2016 21:55
|
|
|
Spun Dog posted:As long as we don't use Billy Joel, Supertramp or Yoko Ono. I was pissed when Cheney used torture and have not softened on the topic. I've determined that "Make 'em say Uhh" infuriates racists more than any other song ever produced. I base this on entirely anecdotal evidence.
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2016 21:57
|
|
|
LeoMarr posted:
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2016 21:57
|
|
|
mentally unbalanced, I'd guess. Never liked either one of them to begin with, so I just told them to turn them off and never bring them back.
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2016 21:57
|
|
|
illumn8d posted:I just mailed them a case of seed bells to: 
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2016 21:57
|
|
|
Captain Bravo posted:Uhh, more importantly than "why", is that even legal? Just imagine the shitshow if Timmy is on the phone giving 911 the location of his dying mom, when Dr. Dumbass strolls by with his jamming box and cuts the signal. All jamming devices are super illegal per the FCC. Did the Bundy Bunch forget about the NSA? It isn't that hard to get a warrant to cooperate with the cell tower owners and service providers.
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2016 22:00
|
|
|
Feed the birds Bundy
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2016 22:00
|
|
|
Jewel Repetition posted:I heard some of the yeehawdists felt like federal agencies were bullying to try to get them to sell their land. It seems that their land is fairly intermingled with the federally-owned land, to the point where the shortest route between one section of their land and another section of their land might be over a tract of land owned by the feds. Previously, when moving their cattle from point A to point B, they were permitted to move their cattle across the shorter route through federal land, as long as they notified federal authorities and requested approval far enough in advance, didn't leave their herd on federal land for more than a certain period of time, and so on. Naturally, they routinely ignored and broke those rules and restrictions, which led to that permit being revoked. So they've made up a story about the feds wanting their land, in an attempt to tap into the same anger people get when they hear about a poor black neighborhood being eminent domain'd by the city so that it can be bulldozed in order to build a shopping center or highway. Nonsense posted:None of them will see jail time, they won't even be questioned, they'll be allowed to leave, the right declare victory, and they'll still get to go home to seeing Obama being impeached on the news over squashing gun rights. No jail time, but they will be fined for the damages done. Cliven Bundy may have "won" his little standoff, but it didn't make his court case - or the million-plus dollars of back fees he owes - go away, and most of the militiamen camping out on his ranch gave up and went home after they failed to crowdfund their daily bills and ended up having to go home and back to work. The federal government can afford to wait and take their sweet time; these guys can't.
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2016 22:01
|
|
|
illumn8d posted:I just mailed them a case of seed bells to: Now I can put a username to the face!
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2016 22:02
|
|
|
Send them only President's Choice beverages with "You're welcome -Obama"
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2016 22:09
|
|
|
Rhesus Pieces posted:Has anyone actually taken their side yet? Where's that convoy of sympathizers we were told to expect by now? In my Facebook feed apparently; my family is all in support of these guys, and when I went downstairs the night before last sometime after posting negative things about the militia lunatics my dad said that sometimes he has trouble believing I'm his son and we got into a huge argument that went nowhere because whenever I say anything even remotely negative about a Republican or conservative my dad goes on a long rant about the various terrible things liberals have done. He has yet to comment on the article I posted earlier where his favorite presidential candidate Ted Cruz expressed the exact same sentiments I did (sans my calling the militia terrorists). I wonder if he'll disavow Cruz for this. Who What Now posted:Huh, I had thought that Popehat was a SovCit, but that was fairly straightforward and even-handed. Maybe I was thinking of someone else. Thanks for the link! Ken is usually sensible about law stuff, though he's really dumb about free speech. However, he allows his site to be a platform for a man who, among other things, unironically thinks that the liberal media controls everything, supports GamerGate, thinks Vox Day is awesome, and tweets "scientific proof" that that black people are mentally inferior at famous black people. That might be the cause of your confusion.
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2016 22:10
|
|
|
Is this the final step in the realization of the film 'Network'? I'll see you on the #MaoTseTungHour - on CBS Next Fall
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2016 22:16
|
|
|
Roland Jones posted:Ken is usually sensible about law stuff, though he's really dumb about free speech. However, he allows his site to be a platform for a man who, among other things, unironically thinks that the liberal media controls everything, supports GamerGate, thinks Vox Day is awesome, and tweets "scientific proof" that that black people are mentally inferior at famous black people. That might be the cause of your confusion. Patrick left after he was caught tweeting something to Neil Tyson about how blacks are mentally inferior. He said he was leaving on his own, but I imagine there was a "jesus christ" meeting.
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2016 22:20
|
|
|
Radbot posted:So as long as someone's breaking into something that "no one" cares about, there should be no law enforcement response? I mean I'm pro squatters rights, but that seems like a stretch. i dont see how trucking out the riot gear is the bare minimum LE response. we can also just figure out who these dudes are, where they live, and serve them summons when they get bored and return home. i mean it would cost millions just to set up a pointless cordon so these dudes can feel like they're accomplishing more than embarassing themselves having cops show up there in person would be warranted if they were holding hostages, but it's certainly not useful just to soothe the ruffled feathers of internet liberals pounding the table and yelling about punishing the locals boner confessor fucked around with this message at 22:27 on Jan 5, 2016 |
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2016 22:24
|
|
|
Gaybee posted:Send them only President's Choice beverages with "You're welcome -Obama" We should send them fleeces and hoodies to keep them warm in such frigid weather! Heres some: http://www.whitehousegiftshop.com/The-White-House-Presidential-Fleece-Jacket-p/whitehousefleecejacketblack.htm
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2016 22:26
|
|
|
pathetic little tramp posted:Patrick left after he was caught tweeting something to Neil Tyson about how blacks are mentally inferior. He said he was leaving on his own, but I imagine there was a "jesus christ" meeting. Oh, Ken finally realized that just because he supports free speech he doesn't have to condone every word his awful friends say on his site or give them a platform for hate speech? If this is a trend I might start reading Popehat again instead of avoiding it because I don't want to read yet another article where Clark does something like defend actual neo-Nazis. Edit: I mean, Ken can still be a massive idiot at times, independent of his allowing racist extremists to post on his site, but his legal analyses are good at least. Edit again: I just checked the site, it was in fact Clark who left, who was the one who sent the tweet we both mentioned. Alright, well, the community fostered there by things like letting an rear end in a top hat like Clark post there for so long is terrible, and Ken and co. can still be terrible at times, but the site might be worth using again now that the worst is gone. Roland Jones fucked around with this message at 02:55 on Jan 6, 2016 |
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2016 22:27
|
|
|
Popular Thug Drink posted:i dont see how trucking out the riot gear is the bare minimum LE response. we can also just figure out who these dudes are, where they live, and serve them summons when they get bored and return home. i mean it would cost millions just to set up a pointless cordon so these dudes can feel like they're accomplishing more than embarassing themselves I would have to guess there's at least one person there undercover for feds/staties keeping track of names and any personal info people have there (license plates, ect) so if poo poo really starts popping off the feds know who they are manhunting.
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2016 22:28
|
|
|
LeoMarr posted:Feed the birds Bundy Bund Mouth eat the seeds
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2016 22:29
|
|
|
Thump! posted:We should send them fleeces and hoodies to keep them warm in such frigid weather! I think this would be more fitting. 
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2016 22:33
|
|
|
Regarding that Bundy brother who looks like his photo was taken mid-face-punch, this was the first thing I thought of: 
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2016 22:40
|
|
|
Popular Thug Drink posted:i dont see how trucking out the riot gear is the bare minimum LE response. we can also just figure out who these dudes are, where they live, and serve them summons when they get bored and return home. i mean it would cost millions just to set up a pointless cordon so these dudes can feel like they're accomplishing more than embarassing themselves You could say that about the vast majority of crimes, and yet you're only here defending the Militiamen. Trucking out the riot gear should be the bear minimum LE response to a barricade situation.
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2016 23:02
|
|
|
Should we bring out riot gear when someone starts squatting, too?
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2016 23:03
|
|
|
Radbot posted:I get why they're not shooting these guys up, but why aren't they placing LRADs or other non-injurious but highly annoying things? There's no way this lasts for more than a day when you're getting 24 hours of 90db shrill sirens in your ears. Because annoying and depriving unstable people of sleep tends to make them more unstable.
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2016 23:05
|
|
|
Don't worry they'll bring in an LAV soon.
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2016 23:12
|
|
|
Xandu posted:Because annoying and depriving unstable people of sleep tends to make them more unstable. So? Who cares? Set up a loudspeaker outside the front door, then walk away. So insane that people care about the acute mental wellbeing of people barricaded in a federal building. Perhaps we should just give them what they want, lest they become unhappy.
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2016 23:13
|
|
|
Do you think we should be raiding the Gathering when they barricade themselves on federal land without permission?
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2016 23:24
|
|
|
ansel autisms posted:Do you think we should be raiding the Gathering when they barricade themselves on federal land without permission? Considering that's an unarmed gaggle of hippies versus a declared revolutionary group that's armed to the teeth, something tells me this comparison isn't made in good faith. But yes, if it came down to it, I would support a measured law enforcement response, which is exactly what has happened on numerous occasions. You may note that The Gathering has an extremely strong law enforcement presence whenever it happens, including riot gear at the ready. Something that isn't happening here.
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2016 23:26
|
|
|
ansel autisms posted:Do you think we should be raiding the Gathering when they barricade themselves on federal land without permission? given that radbot only seems interested in bringing down the hammer on people whose politics he doesn't like, it could go either way personally i don't see the point in antagonizing a bunch of armed weirdos who pose no threat to anyone but maybe i'm just crazy Radbot posted:Considering that's an unarmed gaggle of hippies versus a declared revolutionary group that's armed to the teeth, something tells me this comparison isn't made in good faith. so it turns out no, radbot agrees with the hippies enough to want the police to harass them when they peacefully squat on federal land
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2016 23:28
|
|
|
Radbot posted:So? Who cares? Set up a loudspeaker outside the front door, then walk away. You're the one who wants to give them what they want.
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2016 23:29
|
|
|
Popular Thug Drink posted:given that radbot only seems interested in bringing down the hammer on people whose politics he doesn't like, it could go either way That's the kind of SovCit thinking I like seeing around here. Whenever you're targeted by law enforcement, it's because cops don't like your politics. Vienna Circlejerk posted:You're the one who wants to give them what they want. A speaker outside their door? Link? Popular Thug Drink posted:so it turns out no, radbot agrees with the hippies enough to want the police to harass them when they peacefully squat on federal land I agree with the hippies enough, to want the police to harass them. A good sentence that makes sense.
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2016 23:29
|
|
|
as a leftist, i can only hope that the police brutally crack down on all nonviolent offenders regardless of their political statement or skin color
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2016 23:30
|
|
|
Popular Thug Drink posted:as a leftist, i can only hope that the police brutally crack down on all nonviolent offenders regardless of their political statement or skin color You forgot "jackbooted thugs" along with your "brutal crack down"
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2016 23:31
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 20, 2024 20:16 |
|
|
Radbot posted:A speaker outside their door? Link? they want a confrontation with the police. you want the police to confront them, rather than taking the much more sensible option of monitoring them from as a distance as they continue to waste time pointlessly and attract media attention to how silly they are. for someone who ostensibly opposes the squatters it turns out you have remarkably similar goals
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2016 23:32
|
|