|
waterboard snyder with flint's water
|
# ? Feb 5, 2016 04:43 |
|
|
# ? Jun 7, 2024 02:18 |
|
Bad Caller posted:Any time you kill someone, they could have been innocent. Many were. but would you kill baby hitler
|
# ? Feb 5, 2016 04:43 |
|
Yoshifan823 posted:The number of people who get killed despite being innocent is greater than zero, so the death penalty is terrible Worst part is keeping them in prison is cheaper because of how lovely our prison system is underfunded.
|
# ? Feb 5, 2016 04:43 |
|
SpiderHyphenMan posted:Hillary Clinton: Give Snyder the death penalty. Bernie reverses immediately.
|
# ? Feb 5, 2016 04:43 |
|
Yoshifan823 posted:The number of people who get killed despite being innocent is greater than zero, so the death penalty is terrible
|
# ? Feb 5, 2016 04:43 |
|
reminder that the GOP gives no fucks about poors and lead poisoning
|
# ? Feb 5, 2016 04:43 |
|
SpiderHyphenMan posted:Life in prison without parole is actually worse than the death penalty but good luck getting Americans to understand that. Depends on how we choose to handle our prisoners. Life without parole can be made to be acceptable with work. Death is irreversible. Also if you're dead if you get exonerated it doesnt loving matter to you. We can still let the living out of prison.
|
# ? Feb 5, 2016 04:44 |
|
SpiderHyphenMan posted:Life in prison without parole is actually worse than the death penalty but good luck getting Americans to understand that. Yeah but that leaves the choice up to the person. is this horrible to think, that a person can kill themselves if they choose to? I mean you can't let a guy like Timothy McVeigh (to use Hillary's example) free. You lock them up. If that person does not want to be alive anymore, then I don't care if they kill themselves. But the govt killing people, no.
|
# ? Feb 5, 2016 04:44 |
|
Isn't it more costly to execute than to just sentence to life? I don't remember where I read this.
|
# ? Feb 5, 2016 04:44 |
|
i'm hillary clinton and blood for the blood god!
|
# ? Feb 5, 2016 04:44 |
|
Logikv9 posted:reminder that the GOP gives no fucks about poors and lead poisoning Yeah seriously, for all the rancor and back in forth in this debate and this thread, people shouldn't forget that the GOP don't give a single goddamned gently caress about actual important things.
|
# ? Feb 5, 2016 04:44 |
|
They really should go over privacy issues. Like allowing the government back doors into encryption and the patriot act. Hillary isn't ver progressive there I don't think.
|
# ? Feb 5, 2016 04:44 |
|
Logikv9 posted:reminder that the GOP gives no fucks about poors and lead poisoning Hillary doesn't care about minorities if she's okay with the death penalty.
|
# ? Feb 5, 2016 04:44 |
|
Logikv9 posted:reminder that the GOP gives no fucks about poors and lead poisoning They need to pull themselves and their children up by their bootstraps and move. Never mind that the lead poisoning has restricted the use of their arms.
|
# ? Feb 5, 2016 04:44 |
|
Glad we're getting policy questions about the death penalty and water quality at 10:45pm.
|
# ? Feb 5, 2016 04:44 |
|
Rasta_Al posted:Isn't it more costly to execute than to just sentence to life? I don't remember where I read this.
|
# ? Feb 5, 2016 04:45 |
|
i'm hillary clinton and blood for the blood god!
|
# ? Feb 5, 2016 04:45 |
|
Thump! posted:Yeah seriously, for all the rancor and back in forth in this debate and this thread, people shouldn't forget that the GOP don't give a single goddamned gently caress about actual important things. Also true, but "will gently caress over black people less than the GOP" shouldn't be our goal post
|
# ? Feb 5, 2016 04:45 |
|
Joementum posted:Glad we're getting policy questions about the death penalty and water quality at 10:45pm. west coast bias
|
# ? Feb 5, 2016 04:45 |
|
Rasta_Al posted:Isn't it more costly to execute than to just sentence to life? I don't remember where I read this. Yes, overwhelmingly. There's no reason to kill them except to get some kind of vengeance. Its really dumb.
|
# ? Feb 5, 2016 04:45 |
|
JHVH-1 posted:They really should go over privacy issues. Like allowing the government back doors into encryption and the patriot act. Hillary isn't ver progressive there I don't think. Neither of them really know how computers work and Hillary wants a Manhattan Project to solve the whole thing so it'd be hilarious
|
# ? Feb 5, 2016 04:45 |
|
Remember all those innocent people Texas executed because it was that newfangled DNA that exonerated them? Well I'm sure that's completely in the past and innocent people never get executed anymore.
|
# ? Feb 5, 2016 04:45 |
|
Hillary Clinton bravely condemning Lead on national television just wait until Big Lead hears about this are copper companies donating to this shill?
|
# ? Feb 5, 2016 04:45 |
|
Joementum posted:Glad we're getting policy questions about the death penalty and water quality at 10:45pm. I genuinely don't know what you expected
|
# ? Feb 5, 2016 04:45 |
|
Rasta_Al posted:Isn't it more costly to execute than to just sentence to life? I don't remember where I read this. It is, vastly more.
|
# ? Feb 5, 2016 04:45 |
|
Rasta_Al posted:Isn't it more costly to execute than to just sentence to life? I don't remember where I read this. It indeed is
|
# ? Feb 5, 2016 04:45 |
|
Optimus Subprime posted:west coast bias (mountain)
|
# ? Feb 5, 2016 04:45 |
|
Isn't one of the next GOP debates in Detroit
|
# ? Feb 5, 2016 04:45 |
|
Bad Caller posted:Hillary doesn't care about minorities if she's okay with the death penalty. She said she'd be fine with abolishing it at the state level, but wants to keep it at the federal level for terrorism, etc. 99% of executions are at the state level.
|
# ? Feb 5, 2016 04:46 |
|
Optimus Subprime posted:west coast bias California values
|
# ? Feb 5, 2016 04:46 |
|
Rasta_Al posted:Isn't it more costly to execute than to just sentence to life? I don't remember where I read this. yes, because of the long process of appeals
|
# ? Feb 5, 2016 04:46 |
|
SpiderHyphenMan posted:Hillary Clinton: Give Snyder the death penalty.
|
# ? Feb 5, 2016 04:46 |
|
Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:She said she'd be fine with abolishing it at the state level, but wants to keep it at the federal level for terrorism, etc. Yeah because that totally won't be exploited. Just get rid of it entirely.
|
# ? Feb 5, 2016 04:46 |
|
I'm afraid if Clinton wins I'm gonna feel like I'm in trouble every time she's upset over something. She was going off on Flint and I almost blurted out some lie about how it wasn't me even though I had nothing to do with it
|
# ? Feb 5, 2016 04:46 |
|
Bad Caller posted:Also true, but "will gently caress over black people less than the GOP" shouldn't be our goal post For the record, I don't think Bernie or Hillary will gently caress over minorities either way.
|
# ? Feb 5, 2016 04:46 |
|
EugeneJ posted:Isn't one of the next GOP debates in Detroit march 3
|
# ? Feb 5, 2016 04:46 |
|
Hillary nodding her head until Bernie says what if it was a white community and her nodding snapped so still.
|
# ? Feb 5, 2016 04:46 |
|
"I suspect the Secretary agrees" is a great way of telling Clinton "align with this or hoo boy you're hosed"
|
# ? Feb 5, 2016 04:46 |
|
I thought this was supposed to be 90 minutes I gotta get to bed soon
|
# ? Feb 5, 2016 04:46 |
|
|
# ? Jun 7, 2024 02:18 |
|
Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:She said she'd be fine with abolishing it at the state level, but wants to keep it at the federal level for terrorism, etc. That is basically the incrementalist answer for abolishing the death penalty.
|
# ? Feb 5, 2016 04:47 |