|
Rhesus Pieces posted:https://twitter.com/kennycollins88/status/695739911706689536 I guess that explains why Bush redirected most of his attack ads to Trump. Wonder if Romney might endorse Rubio before Tuesday as well now too.
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2016 22:15
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 13, 2024 00:55 |
|
|
Mitt Romney posted:Wonder if Romney might endorse Rubio before Tuesday as well now too. Well make a decision bucko
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2016 22:20
|
|
|
I mean, if Jeb only said he'd "reconsider" than I don't think it changes anything. If Kasich and Christie do badly and drop out than I imagine Jeb will hang around and try to pick up their small numbers and become the #4 guy. But if Kasich and Rubio do well and Jeb ends up buried back with Carly while the field stays big then it just gets more and more pointless and embarrassing.
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2016 22:21
|
|
|
I expect there's some humiliation fetish people who are going to bring Jeb Bush roleplay into the bedroom.
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2016 22:27
|
|
|
¿Jeb? needs an intervention. There's no shame in spending the rest of your life as a board member of a few corporations and charities. Maybe make a few bucks as a lobbyist or public speaking. That's how George eked out a living before he became TX governor. Back in the days when he was considered the dumb one.
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2016 22:34
|
|
|
Pick posted:I expect there's some humiliation fetish people who are going to bring Jeb Bush roleplay into the bedroom. People will go to a dominatrix and say "I want the full Jeb"
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2016 22:39
|
|
|
I think Jeb has no chance but if I were to play devil's advocate and try to find a path for him I guess it has to be Kasich, Christie, and Carly all failing in NH and dropping out and Rubio having a weak enough performance so he doesn't reinforce his spot as the establishment guy. He should probably be pulling hard for Trump to crush Cruz and Rubio and keep the field open enough for him to sneak in with a 4th place finish. I don't think that really has much of a chance of happening or that it would really bring Jeb any closer to the presidency. I think his chances died in Iowa when he did so badly while Cruz and Rubio moved up. But if I was deluded and trying to find a reason to stay in I think that's probably the only one I can come up with. If Rubio has a strong performance and/or Kasich does well enough to justify hanging around Jeb's just out of any hopes, though. So I imagine that's when he'd "reconsider" things.
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2016 22:41
|
|
|
enjoy jeb's WWE entrance video Nehru the Damaja posted:Have a stupid thing I made
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2016 22:46
|
|
|
I may be alone but I love this guy. He's a common enemy for republicans and democrats. He's clearly won at this whole capitalism thing, raising the price of the drugs he owned was 100% his legal right but economic conservatives who love the free market more than their own mothers have to act like he's some kind of monster. It's also a nice bonus that you couldn't write a less likable douchey Wall Street villain. You may not agree with the Koch brothers politics but they come off as semi normal in interviews and give millions to charity.
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2016 22:47
|
|
|
TheTatteredKing posted:Anyone following Trump can tell he isn't though. The amount of times his tune has changed around shows he's just winging it and has no convictions he's fighting for other than him being huge and great. Same with Bernie really, both are really good at exuding authenticity while being calculating and pragmatic.
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2016 22:54
|
|
|
On interviews they come off as everyday guys. In practice they'll assemble dossiers on journalists critical of them. They'll give colleges funding but that funding means changes to curriculum thats slanted to their dogma. Literally, they are trying to wind back all the labor rights we've made I the last century. E: They've been very cool about criminal justice reform. They seem very true to most aspects of libertarianism. Automatic Slim fucked around with this message at 23:05 on Feb 6, 2016 |
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2016 22:58
|
|
|
From an LA Times reporter "I just talked to a voter who thought Rubio won the Iowa caucuses. "He didn't win? So what the hell is he celebrating about?""
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2016 22:59
|
|
|
Nehru the Damaja posted:Have a stupid thing I made Next season's True Detective intro looks like it's gonna be weird.
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2016 23:05
|
|
|
Automatic Slim posted:On interviews they come off as everyday guys. In practice they'll assemble dossiers on journalists critical of them. They'll give colleges funding but that funding means changes to curriculum thats slanted to their dogma. Literally, they are trying to wind back all the labor rights we've made I the last century. Lol what
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2016 23:11
|
|
|
Pompous Rhombus posted:Next season's True Detective intro looks like it's gonna be weird. I think you mean the next season of American Horror Story 
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2016 23:16
|
|
|
Mitt Romney posted:I guess that explains why Bush redirected most of his attack ads to Trump. Wonder if Romney might endorse Rubio before Tuesday as well now too. Talking in the 3rd person; possible glitch in the firmware?
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2016 23:23
|
|
|
mike12345 posted:People will go to a dominatrix and say "I want the full Jeb" Responsible doms will, of course, ensure that the client is aware of and ready for the extreme experience they are requesting.
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2016 23:24
|
|
|
Hodgepodge posted:Responsible doms will, of course, ensure that the client is aware of and ready for the extreme experience they are requesting before putting the barbara bush mask on.
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2016 23:32
|
|
|
Tainen posted:From an LA Times reporter The GOPe/media machine in a nutshell. Too perfect.
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2016 23:44
|
|
|
I wonder who most Americans, if asked, would say were the top 3 in Iowa. I'm guessing maybe 1. Rubio 2. Cruz 3. Trump?
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2016 23:47
|
|
|
William Bear posted:I wonder who most Americans, if asked, would say were the top 3 in Iowa. I'm guessing maybe You should tweet PPP and tell them to ask this.
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2016 23:55
|
|
|
it'd be tough to put it in a full poll because either you ask it first and skew the results of the rest of the poll or you ask it after the question where you rattle off all the people running for the primary, skewing the results of the iowa question maybe you could only ask the people whose responses to the first few questions don't pass your likely voter screening or w/e, so you're getting the normal poll on one hand and a one-question 'what do politically disengaged people think happened in iowa?' poll on the other. on the face of it that seems like it would work i bet you'd get a lot of bush answers just because some people would be hard-pressed to come up with three names they think were running in the thing
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2016 23:59
|
|
|
Pillowpants posted:You should tweet PPP and tell them to ask this. I just did but pile on, the world needs this poll.
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2016 00:03
|
|
|
oystertoadfish posted:it'd be tough to put it in a full poll because either you ask it first and skew the results of the rest of the poll or you ask it after the question where you rattle off all the people running for the primary, skewing the results of the iowa question Nah, just ask who they think won Iowa. No need to follow up or tell them the right answer. That way it doesn't screw up subsequent questions, and you can even crosstab to see who the uninformed voters are supporting. It needs to happen.
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2016 00:10
|
|
William Bear posted:I wonder who most Americans, if asked, would say were the top 3 in Iowa. I'm guessing maybe Are you giving respondents a list, or allowing for free response?
|
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2016 00:15
|
|
|
mdemone posted:Nah, just ask who they think won Iowa. No need to follow up or tell them the right answer. That way it doesn't screw up subsequent questions, and you can even crosstab to see who the uninformed voters are supporting. If people who thought Rubio won make up much of the surge, the media is gonna get crucified. PLEASE DO IT PPP (maybe tweet other pollsters too?)
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2016 00:16
|
|
|
LuciferMorningstar posted:Are you giving respondents a list, or allowing for free response? I would say a list of those 3, randomized, and make sure they feel confident and aren't guessing.
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2016 00:17
|
|
|
mdemone posted:Nah, just ask who they think won Iowa. No need to follow up or tell them the right answer. That way it doesn't screw up subsequent questions, and you can even crosstab to see who the uninformed voters are supporting. I think the idea is that even asking the question could affect the answers to subsequent questions, and it's not worth running a poll just to ask which candidate people think won in Iowa.
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2016 00:17
|
|
Oiled and Ready posted:I would say a list of those 3, randomized, and make sure they feel confident and aren't guessing. Some will still be guessing, if you're just intending to poll all citizens (rather than just people who are at least sort of following the primary).
|
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2016 00:19
|
|
|
LuciferMorningstar posted:Some will still be guessing, if you're just intending to poll all citizens (rather than just people who are at least sort of following the primary). Just ask the Iowa tracking poll?
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2016 00:23
|
|
|
Boston Globe interview with Bush herequote:LACONIA, N.H. -— Sitting on his campaign bus — laptop, turkey jerky, and coffee all nearby — Jeb Bush was befuddled over his campaign’s failure to capture more attention in the news media.
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2016 00:27
|
|
|
Xenophon posted:Boston Globe interview with Bush here The saddest thing is his polls would improve if he did.
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2016 00:37
|
|
|
Gentlemen, I bring you XCOM: Presidential Edition 2016. Thus far, we've gone through the first mission of the game, Gatecrashing Iowa, with         
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2016 00:52
|
|
|
Adar posted:Gentlemen, I bring you XCOM: Presidential Edition 2016. Thus far, we've gone through the first mission of the game, Gatecrashing Iowa, with Bravo 
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2016 00:57
|
|
|
What about Kasich and Carson? Did they fall (asleep)?
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2016 00:59
|
|
|
Not a huge surprise. The man who wrote the articles of impeachment against Clinton and defended Baby Doc Duvalier endorses Ted Cruz. https://twitter.com/bobbarr/status/696119936566038528
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2016 01:03
|
|
|
Adar posted:Gentlemen, I bring you XCOM: Presidential Edition 2016. Thus far, we've gone through the first mission of the game, Gatecrashing Iowa, with You just made my day
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2016 01:03
|
|
|
Rincewinds posted:What about Kasich and Carson? Did they fall (asleep)? They may or may not become reinforcements provided they haven't dropped out by then.
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2016 01:04
|
|
|
Adar posted:Gentlemen, I bring you XCOM: Presidential Edition 2016. Thus far, we've gone through the first mission of the game, Gatecrashing Iowa, with This is a good post.
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2016 01:05
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 13, 2024 00:55 |
|
|
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2016 01:09
|
|