|
Stoatbringer posted:Rum, sodomy and the lash. Our grand naval tradition. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=705FYkvs_94
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 17:14
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 14, 2024 15:34 |
|
|
Brawnfire posted:How many replies does a single post get before someone is allowed to type "shut up" at the thread? shut up
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 17:16
|
|
|
StrangersInTheNight posted:This isn't that hard to understand. Generally, the people creating have been able to follow their dreams to some extent and find a measure of happiness, and find a lot of value in that, so more than likely what they create is going to convey this as a more important message overall than earning money. I thought this was a LoB post for a few minutes.
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 17:16
|
|
|
I want to hear more about Muslim women and their handjobs
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 17:18
|
|
|
Brawnfire posted:How many replies does a single post get before someone is allowed to type "shut up" at the thread? People are getting better at sniffing out a bad argument that will poo poo up the thread for 4 pages if it isn't stopped immediately.
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 17:32
|
|
|
StrangersInTheNight posted:This isn't that hard to understand. Generally, the people creating have been able to follow their dreams to some extent and find a measure of happiness, and find a lot of value in that, so more than likely what they create is going to convey this as a more important message overall than earning money. I was laughing at the username sharing this post, dude.  Holy poo poo Fashionable Jorts posted:People are getting better at sniffing out a bad argument that will poo poo up the thread for 4 pages if it isn't stopped immediately. This
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 17:35
|
|
|
Fashionable Jorts posted:People are getting better at sniffing out a bad argument that will poo poo up the thread for 4 pages if it isn't stopped immediately. Omg shut up
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 18:13
|
|
|
Brawnfire posted:Omg shut up https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qYa0jpGFUeY
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 18:21
|
|
|
cash crab posted:I'm so sad. I just unfriended a few good mines for IoSM for posting super-unfunny poo poo. So, I'll go to my other favourite source, people who share trending news with walls of text. Lmao, doesn't Kim Kardashian give 10% of all of her earnings to charity? She sure as gently caress can afford it but I don't think I know more than one person who gives more than 0,001% of their monthly earnings to charities.
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 18:41
|
|
|
Sarcopenia posted:Lmao, doesn't Kim Kardashian give 10% of all of her earnings to charity? She sure as gently caress can afford it but I don't think I know more than one person who gives more than 0,001% of their monthly earnings to charities. Yeah she donates a lot, but people can still get salty because they're not giving 90% of their income to charity or something. quote:The problem comes in when I get attacked for giving and trying to help people. My dad always taught me the importance of giving back. I don’t publicize everything I do to help charities and people all over the world. I do it because I want to. I do it because my dad taught me to. I do it because it’s the right thing to do. So for people to attack me for giving 10% of my eBay auction sales to the people of the Philippines, that hurts.
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 18:59
|
|
|
I just love that picture so much because he's got this idea that you can't be a charitable and caring person AND occasionally remove your shirt. Like, you can only do one of these things a day. "Oh, poo poo, I donated to the SPCA. I guess I have to shower with my pants on now." Anyways. I know a guy who follows this page, and likes their posts a lot, so...  Are troops exist in a vacuum I should really unfriend that guy
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 19:32
|
|
|
he couldn't find something NEWER to be sexist about?
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 19:38
|
|
|
china bot posted:he couldn't find something NEWER to be sexist about? a lot of people have a hard-on for WW2 for some reason.
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 19:49
|
|
|
Laurenz posted:a lot of people have a hard-on for WW2 for some reason. Cmon guys, it's the GREATEST WAR fought by the GREATEST GENERATION.
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 19:52
|
|
|
40-Degree Day posted:Cmon guys, it's the GREATEST WAR fought by the GREATEST GENERATION. This might be BS, but I recall hearing somewhere that Bill Clinton got some flack during his first presidential run because he was born in 1946, and couldn't possibly be mature enough to run the country if he didn't even storm a single beach in Europe first.
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 19:55
|
|
|
BigglesSWE posted:This might be BS, but I recall hearing somewhere that Bill Clinton got some flack during his first presidential run because he was born in 1946, and couldn't possibly be mature enough to run the country if he didn't even storm a single beach in Europe first. This sounds absurd, but I am not even a little bit surprised that some people would feel that way.
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 20:18
|
|
|
Laurenz posted:a lot of people have a hard-on for WW2 for some reason. Thats also a WW1 photo. Besides, I think we all can agree here, there has never been a soldier that was an rear end in a top hat. Its just never happened in all of human history.
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 20:21
|
|
|
Yeah it's probably not real because I haven't found any mention of it when I looked for it but we all know there's some republican down in a mosquitos swamp somewhere who resent Obummer because he didn't fry any Charlie in 'Nam.
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 20:23
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 20:37
|
|
|
Solice Kirsk posted:Thats also a WW1 photo. Besides, I think we all can agree here, there has never been a soldier that was an rear end in a top hat. Its just never happened in all of human history. Yep! All soldiers are literal saints. Except the baddie ones, but OUR soldiers are always great.
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 20:39
|
|
|
I wish one of the mods was actually named Goon Mod and had this for an av.
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 20:40
|
|
|
BigglesSWE posted:This might be BS, but I recall hearing somewhere that Bill Clinton got some flack during his first presidential run because he was born in 1946, and couldn't possibly be mature enough to run the country if he didn't even storm a single beach in Europe first. I distinctly remember hearing a family member rant against Clinton for this very reason when I was a kid. So, yes, at least a few people held it against him. But to be more specific, the objection had less to do with age, and more being super pissed people would for a "draft dodging coward" over WWII vets like H.W. Bush and Dole. Of course, the relative who embraced this argument is that same one which, to this day, will rant at length about how Clinton only won both his elections because female voters thought he was cute. So... Kind of a shame I've made it a point to never add this person to Facebook, I bet there's gold there... FoxTerrier has a new favorite as of 20:57 on Mar 31, 2016 |
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 20:54
|
|
|
Laurenz posted:a lot of people have a hard-on for WW2 for some reason. It's the last time there was a war of that style with a clear enemy no one has much contention about. So basically it's an easy war to go with because it was super clear who the "bad guys" were and what would happen if they weren't stopped. You can't do that with any recent military actions because the political issues get a lot messier.
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 21:01
|
|
|
Moon god always makes me laugh, but that one always loving slays me.
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 21:02
|
|
|
dirksteadfast posted:It's the last time there was a war of that style with a clear enemy no one has much contention about. So basically it's an easy war to go with because it was super clear who the "bad guys" were and what would happen if they weren't stopped. You can't do that with any recent military actions because the political issues get a lot messier. Of course, realistically the Nazis would have never actually been able to conquer farther than Western Europe (and had trouble just crossing the English Channel). The US was almost totally insulted from direct conflict during the war in the first place, as we faced basically zero direct combat except at Pearl Harbor and the Aleutian Islands (both islands that were still territories that hadn't earned statehood until 1959, so it wasn't really the same as striking California or anything) and neither Germany nor Japan could have realistically started an invasion. World War II GIs "fought for our freedom" much like how they fought for our freedom in Vietnam or Iraq. That's not to say that intervention in WW2 was totally selfish or that it was a morally ambiguous war. Germany and Imperial Japan really were awful governments attempting to subjugate other nations that needed to be stopped, there's no denying that unless you're the kind of person who also doubts that the Holocaust happened. But I don't think that an American soldier has truly fought to ensure the continued existence of the United States since 1865.
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 21:40
|
|
|
Kracken posted:I'm in the red, trying to argue. I guess it's me that's the idiot. That 19 year old girl = Albert Einstein. Also a cashier somewhere clapped, and a womens lit professor lost her job.
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 22:43
|
|
|
chitoryu12 posted:But I don't think that an American soldier has truly fought to ensure the continued existence of the United States since 1865. Even in 1865, the United States would've still existed. 1814 was the last time we were actually under threat of being conquered.
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 23:26
|
|
|
Byzantine posted:Even in 1865, the United States would've still existed. 1814 was the last time we were actually under threat of being conquered. And the only good thing that came out of that was a novelty song.  Now clumsily illustrated. LOL at squirrel guns. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=50_iRIcxsz0
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 23:30
|
|
|
chitoryu12 posted:Of course, realistically the Nazis would have never actually been able to conquer farther than Western Europe (and had trouble just crossing the English Channel). The US was almost totally insulted from direct conflict during the war in the first place, as we faced basically zero direct combat except at Pearl Harbor and the Aleutian Islands (both islands that were still territories that hadn't earned statehood until 1959, so it wasn't really the same as striking California or anything) and neither Germany nor Japan could have realistically started an invasion.  Good lord you're a lovely poster.
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 23:47
|
|
|
I once read in a Weird War 2 RPG book that said the only way for the Axis to have won the war and have reached American soil was with supernatural help. I don't know if this is correct, but it had ideas like revenant Frederik I having every German soldier who have ever died march through the bottom of the Atlantic Ocean or the Japanese soldiers being carried by the Divine Wind, so that was pretty cool.
paradoxGentleman has a new favorite as of 23:58 on Mar 31, 2016 |
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 23:56
|
|
|
Karma Monkey posted:And the only good thing that came out of that was a novelty song. Now now there's nothing novelty about remembering to take a little bacon and to take a little beans.
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2016 23:58
|
|
|
paradoxGentleman posted:I once read in a Weird War 2 RPG book that the only way for the Axis to have won the war and get to American soil was with supernatural help. I don't know if this is correct, but it had ideas like revenant Frederik I having every German soldier who have ever died march through the bottom of the Atlantic Ocean or the Japanese soldiers being carried by the Divine Wind, so that was pretty cool. I read a similar thing, where Germany nuked New York, Leningrad, and the soviet armor columns at Kursk. They also had zombies with suicide vests, resurrected skeletal knights and Prussians, vamps and werewolves, and still could barely stem the Allies. The allies had powered armor, though. Tiberius Thyben has a new favorite as of 00:08 on Apr 1, 2016 |
|
#
?
Apr 1, 2016 00:03
|
|
|
Weatherman posted:
he's actually good and nice. LoB, do your thing!
|
|
#
?
Apr 1, 2016 00:07
|
|
|
 hhhhhuuuuuurrrrr hurrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr period gurl joke AMIRITE huuuuurrrrrr /tagswife
|
|
#
?
Apr 1, 2016 00:12
|
|
|
Yay thread title! I told him it was a bit closed-minded and he compared non-atheists to being drug users. Insufferable rear end.
|
|
#
?
Apr 1, 2016 00:12
|
|
|
Scathach posted:Yay thread title! I kept parsing 'reasonistink' as 'reason I stink' and it fits the whole mess nicely I feel.
|
|
#
?
Apr 1, 2016 00:23
|
|
|
The best utilitarian argument I can think for ensuring a child does not starve is that the poorer and more wretched a person is the more likely they are to breed. Bring back the work houses for the little wretches, and let the breeders become social outcasts.
|
|
#
?
Apr 1, 2016 00:24
|
|
|
Scathach posted:Yay thread title! The highest sign of intellect is the continued use of the expression "butthurt"
|
|
#
?
Apr 1, 2016 01:20
|
|
|
Scathach posted:Yay thread title! I can understand religion or lack thereof influencing a decision on a long term relationship, though I would want to get to know someone first. On the other hand, buying some lame rear end shirt and bragging about it on the internet is kinda dumb. Tiberius Thyben has a new favorite as of 01:27 on Apr 1, 2016 |
|
#
?
Apr 1, 2016 01:23
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 14, 2024 15:34 |
|
|
 Myself is so awesome.
|
|
#
?
Apr 1, 2016 01:27
|
|
