|
Parallel Paraplegic posted:I would very much like to see someone win a medal for refilling a fire extinguisher using a killer drone, if that's what you mean. Medals were only invented as a way to get out of paying soldiers high combat bonuses.
|
# ? May 25, 2016 15:51 |
|
|
# ? May 30, 2024 12:13 |
|
Did he really just complain that they didn't let him keep his guns when he went to prison
|
# ? May 25, 2016 16:01 |
|
ansel autisms posted:Here's some pictures I took at the first pro-LaVoy rally in Portland. The saddest, whitest funeral
|
# ? May 25, 2016 16:10 |
|
If the ghost of Christmas future showed Lavoy that his death would spark 8 people to hold signs and not the grand revolution. Would he still have suicide by
|
# ? May 25, 2016 16:19 |
|
I'm remarkably petty
|
# ? May 25, 2016 16:23 |
|
Bombadilillo posted:If the ghost of Christmas future showed Lavoy that his death would spark 8 people to hold signs and not the grand revolution. He'd have probably just assumed that the federal government was behind the vision of the future and double down on his crazy even more
|
# ? May 25, 2016 16:35 |
|
Mirthless posted:Did he really just complain that they didn't let him keep his guns when he went to prison SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED
|
# ? May 25, 2016 16:36 |
The court response is predictable, but a fun read. https://www.scribd.com/doc/313779216/05-24-2016-ECF-446-USA-v-Cliven-Bundy-Order-Denying-Motion-to-Dq-Judge-Navarro Choice quote: quote:Similarly, the Government aptly explains why Defendant’s belief that the Court is involved in a conspiracy with President Obama and Senator Reid displays a lack of respect and/or complete ignorance of the independent role of the judiciary. (Gov’t Resp. 8–10, ECF No. 435). In fact, the spurious allegations raise very serious concerns about defense counsel’s ability to effectively represent his client in this complex criminal case. See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984) (a criminal defendant has a constitutional right to effective assistance of counsel); see also Model R. of Prof’l Conduct 3.1 (Am Bar rear end’n 2016) (“A lawyer shall not bring or defend a proceeding, or assert or controvert an issue therein, unless there is a basis in law and fact for doing so that is not frivolous, which includes a good faith argument for an extension, modification or reversal of existing law.”).[footnote omitted]
|
|
# ? May 25, 2016 16:45 |
|
Discendo Vox posted:The court response is predictable, but a fun read. I'm "Am Bar rear end"
|
# ? May 25, 2016 16:48 |
Hey, remember when I linked that Washington Post article on the Patriot movement? The Oath Keepers have a response up:quote:Then there were the embedded video with law professor Louis Michael Seidman. What’s interesting is the “legal scholar” makes a totally unsupported assertion that thinking the words mean what they say is not a “natural” interpretation. Curiously, he concedes “it’s not obvious the federal government should own as much land as it does currently,” but turns around and resorts to the familiar stand-by deflection that we just have no way of knowing “what words written 250 years ago” mean, which is refutable, by the way. Seidman's far enough into legal realism and crit theory that he really was a pretty bad choice to use as an authority attacking the movement. On the bright side, the word "refutable" in that first paragraph is a link to the home of the Tenth Amendment Center, a site and organization that promises even more sovcit funtimes. Parallel Paraplegic posted:I'm "Am Bar rear end" That's American Bar Association, so it's a good thing to be.
|
|
# ? May 25, 2016 16:55 |
|
Discendo Vox posted:That's American Bar Association, so it's a good thing to be. I guessed it was that, but to me it will always be Am Bar rear end
|
# ? May 25, 2016 16:57 |
|
Also lol at the guy basically saying white propertied slave-owning rich men 250 years ago are pure and great and capable of figuring out everything we need today but a modern law professor is much too biased to listen to. E: I do think that we actually are capable of determining what the founders intended to do with the country though through social history, it's just probably not the wonderful libertarian christian freedom land they imagined.
|
# ? May 25, 2016 17:01 |
|
Discendo Vox posted:The court response is predictable, but a fun read. Lol, "this argument was so stupid, we wonder if the lawyers is competent to do his job?"
|
# ? May 25, 2016 17:45 |
|
The federal government better not gently caress up a single one of these trials. If even one of these fuckheads gets his charges thrown out the sovcits will bring it up for decadesParallel Paraplegic posted:Also lol at the guy basically saying white propertied slave-owning rich men 250 years ago are pure and great and capable of figuring out everything we need today but a modern law professor is much too biased to listen to. Considering these people also believe Noah and his Ark were real, it shouldn't be a surprise that they want to rigidly follow the written word of somebody who died centuries before. The constitution is the infallible word of Columbia, who passed Mirthless has issued a correction as of 17:54 on May 25, 2016 |
# ? May 25, 2016 17:49 |
|
Mirthless posted:The federal government better not gently caress up a single one of these trials. If even one of these fuckheads gets his charges thrown out the sovcits will bring it up for decades I'm not a lawyer, but I'm fairly sure the federal government is pretty meticulous when it comes to prosecuting someone. They don't charge someone unless they know they're going to win and if not they'll let the person continue to gently caress up while they collect more evidence.
|
# ? May 25, 2016 18:04 |
|
Bombadilillo posted:If the ghost of Christmas future showed Lavoy that his death would spark 8 people to hold signs and not the grand revolution. I think the ghost would just have to show LaVoy his grave, covered in suction cup dildos like a pornographic sea anemone, to make LaVoy fall to his knees and regret his the error of his ways.
|
# ? May 25, 2016 18:39 |
|
Rick_Hunter posted:I'm not a lawyer, but I'm fairly sure the federal government is pretty meticulous when it comes to prosecuting someone. They don't charge someone unless they know they're going to win and if not they'll let the person continue to gently caress up while they collect more evidence. Usually, but not always.
|
# ? May 25, 2016 18:51 |
|
Bombadilillo posted:If the ghost of Christmas future showed Lavoy that his death would spark 8 people to hold signs and not the grand revolution. He'd convince himself that this is just the forerunner of the true revolution where the millions of patriots that laid in such deep hiding for long rise up and destroy the foul Kenyan usurper. Nothing would be enough the break their self delusion. Even the most gutless cowards still convinced themselves that they were right about it all in some way. The alternative of facing their depressing lives is too bleak to consider.
|
# ? May 25, 2016 18:53 |
|
cumshitter posted:pornographic sea anemone Mods
|
# ? May 25, 2016 18:57 |
|
Parallel Paraplegic posted:Where did he say that? Read, like, the second sentence. "My right to life is being violated"
|
# ? May 25, 2016 19:17 |
|
2 more pics. One shows the size of the rally - it was pretty tiny in terms of supporters.
|
# ? May 25, 2016 20:53 |
|
So 20 people?
|
# ? May 25, 2016 20:57 |
|
Maybe 40, max - there were a few more standing to the left and some still gathered in the center of the park. Plenty were driving around in pickups flying confederate flags, because, you know, Oregon is totally part of the south
|
# ? May 25, 2016 20:58 |
|
ansel autisms posted:2 more pics. One shows the size of the rally - it was pretty tiny in terms of supporters. Lol that is the most confusing political cartoon What is that even. Yahoo Sirius reference?
|
# ? May 25, 2016 20:59 |
|
ansel autisms posted:2 more pics. One shows the size of the rally - it was pretty tiny in terms of supporters. I can't tell if that's a protester or a counter protester.
|
# ? May 25, 2016 21:01 |
|
Sign dude was a counter protestor, he was extremely chill and said he'd been making protest signs like that for years.
|
# ? May 25, 2016 21:06 |
|
Ted Rall lookin old there
|
# ? May 25, 2016 21:07 |
|
ansel autisms posted:Sign dude was a counter protestor, he was extremely chill and said he'd been making protest signs like that for years. That sounds like a fun old guy hobby
|
# ? May 25, 2016 21:42 |
|
hobbesmaster posted:All of them? Did the army move into his house? https://www.fws.gov/refuge/malheur/
|
# ? May 26, 2016 03:05 |
|
Goodpancakes posted:A major in my unit noticed that some of the fire extinguishers missed their inspection date. He got paraded around in front of formation and given a safety award. A Good Major
|
# ? May 26, 2016 04:20 |
|
A young Second Lieutenant approaches the crusty old CSM and asked about the origin of the commissioned officer insignias. The CSM replied, "It's history and tradition ... First we give you a gold bar representing that you are very valuable and also malleable. The silver bar also represents significant value, but is less malleable. When you make Captain, your value doubles, hence the two silver bars. As a Colonel you soar over military masses, hence the eagle. As a General, you are, obviously, a star. Does that answer your question?" "Yes," said the Second Lieutenant, "but what about Majors and Lieutenant Colonels?" "That goes waaaay back in history ... to the Garden of Eden even. You see we've always covered our pricks with leaves
|
# ? May 26, 2016 06:19 |
|
So Ammon Bundy for whatever reason has appointed a new lawyer http://www.oregonlive.com/oregon-standoff/2016/05/ammon_bundy_retains_new_lawyer.html
|
# ? May 26, 2016 14:30 |
|
Hopefully he hired a sovcit legal expert who really groks the constitution
|
# ? May 26, 2016 15:19 |
|
gently caress Molalla.
|
# ? May 26, 2016 16:14 |
|
Otisburg posted:A young Second Lieutenant approaches the crusty old CSM and asked about the origin of the commissioned officer insignias. Does have some basis as fact. The Captains always seemed pretty chill compared to the fuckhead majors in MASH Jumpingmanjim posted:So Ammon Bundy for whatever reason has appointed a new lawyer http://www.oregonlive.com/oregon-standoff/2016/05/ammon_bundy_retains_new_lawyer.html Because even the dumbest of the dumb can see he's hosed unless he has someone that doesn't major in sovcit dickery
|
# ? May 26, 2016 17:01 |
Marijuana Nihilist posted:Hopefully he hired a sovcit legal expert who really groks the constitution While I don't think he's a full on sovcit, he's definitely a creature of the right wing; Here's his old state senate campaign site. Choice quote: quote:PRINCIPLES More generally, I can note that he graduated from a fourth tier law school that was founded in 1999 to teach law from a specifically Catholic perspective. Philpot himself is a Mormon, though again I gotta emphasize that the LDS Church is desperately distancing themselves from this whole mess. The language he's been quoted using so far is the political framing of the land use argument, not the underlying sovcit ideology- but it's still just as wrong. He may be going for jury nullification. Discendo Vox has issued a correction as of 17:40 on May 26, 2016 |
|
# ? May 26, 2016 17:35 |
|
Jumpingmanjim posted:So Ammon Bundy for whatever reason has appointed a new lawyer http://www.oregonlive.com/oregon-standoff/2016/05/ammon_bundy_retains_new_lawyer.html http://archive.is/hcLUs
|
# ? May 26, 2016 20:42 |
|
What the living gently caress does 'He does not put his trust in the arm of the flesh.' mean?
|
# ? May 26, 2016 20:51 |
|
Knight posted:Ritzheimer said this was a bad idea on Facebook, Briana Bundy responded telling him NEVER to question her husband! They're already at each other's throats. This is gonna be a good year. Ratoslov posted:What the living gently caress does 'He does not put his trust in the arm of the flesh.' mean? Mirthless has issued a correction as of 20:57 on May 26, 2016 |
# ? May 26, 2016 20:54 |
|
|
# ? May 30, 2024 12:13 |
|
Discendo Vox posted:While I don't think he's a full on sovcit, he's definitely a creature of the right wing; Here's his old state senate campaign site. "Freedom to worship God. You know, the only correct one."
|
# ? May 26, 2016 20:57 |