|
Has Trump released the speaker list for the convention yet
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2016 19:02
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 14, 2024 00:34 |
|
|
Joementum posted:https://twitter.com/alexburnsNYT/status/751889581805596672 Christie's not even going to pretend to be governor anymore, trump needs a daily handjob guy
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2016 19:03
|
|
|
Can't Boot The Newt
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2016 19:03
|
|
|
Rocks posted:Has Trump released the speaker list for the convention yet Nope.
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2016 19:04
|
|
|
mannerup posted:kristol already has a candidate in mind Kasich would actually do very well head to head against Clinton, but the thing those polls don't take into account are the fact that Trump won and if they screw him out of the nomination, they lose the tea party completely, setting up this weird mish mosh where Johnson would get better than middling support and Trump becomes a wildcard where anything is possible, maybe even running as the libertarian candidate. Dems stay unified, Kasich maybe wins Ohio then wins the deep red states like Montana and West Virginia, Libertarian takes Utah and splits the vote enough to give Hillary Georgia, South Carolina, Mississippi, Kansas
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2016 19:05
|
|
|
pathetic little tramp posted:Kasich would actually do very well head to head against Clinton, but the thing those polls don't take into account are the fact that Trump won and if they screw him out of the nomination, they lose the tea party completely, setting up this weird mish mosh where Johnson would get better than middling support and Trump becomes a wildcard where anything is possible, maybe even running as the libertarian candidate. Dems stay unified, Kasich maybe wins Ohio then wins the deep red states like Montana and West Virginia, Libertarian takes Utah and splits the vote enough to give Hillary Georgia, South Carolina, Mississippi, Kansas dont worry, bill kristol is completely delusional.
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2016 19:06
|
|
|
can't dispute the newt
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2016 19:06
|
|
|
DaveWoo posted:Wait, wait, I'm hearing reports now that Trump is considering General Jack D. Ripper for his VP slot Doubt it, he's stated that he believes in amnesty for the undocumented multiple times. Apparently the Catholic Mexicans are naturally inclined to oppose communism.
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2016 19:09
|
|
|
Rocks posted:Has Trump Joementum posted:Nope.
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2016 19:11
|
|
|
Trump is going to name Newt, Pence, Flynn, and Christie as his combined VP. They will rotate on a 15-minute basis except for Christie, who gets to be VP only on Sundays from 12:00 to 12:01 AM.
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2016 19:11
|
|
|
Deteriorata posted:Trump is going to name Newt, Pence, Flynn, and Christie as his combined VP. He's not going to do this, but one interesting thing would be for him to propose a list of nominees and let the convention delegates decide.
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2016 19:17
|
|
|
Atrocious Joe posted:Doubt it, he's stated that he believes in amnesty for the undocumented multiple times. Apparently the Catholic Mexicans are naturally inclined to oppose communism. well, in the sense that elements of the Mexican peasantry have a history of taking the socially conservative side in civil conflicts, there's some basis for that
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2016 19:20
|
|
|
*VAPES*
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2016 19:22
|
|
|
Joementum posted:He's not going to do this, but one interesting thing would be for him to propose a list of nominees and let the convention delegates decide. Don't let the cable networks hear about this idea, we won't hear the end of it.
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2016 19:24
|
|
|
Jewel Repetition posted:I agree with almost all of this wtf. jr i think your brain is starting to break down because all the jebness inside you
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2016 19:27
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/752207752852832256
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2016 19:31
|
|
|
And you know who runs a world of the make believe? A KING! OBAMA THINKS HE'S ROYALTY!!
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2016 19:34
|
|
|
Deteriorata posted:Trump is going to name Newt, Pence, Flynn, and Christie as his combined VP. Show me there in the rulebook it says you can't have more than one VP!
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2016 19:34
|
|
|
For a guy who's days late on his convention speaker deadline, he sure has a lot of free time to do nothing on Twitter.
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2016 19:34
|
|
|
Yikes, Mr Rogers would not approve of the Trump campaign. A truly damning indictment.
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2016 19:35
|
|
|
holy poo poo. really.
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2016 19:35
|
|
|
Defiance posted:Yikes, Mr Rogers would not approve of the Trump campaign. A truly damning indictment. Mr. Rogers when asked about DJ Trump: 
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2016 19:36
|
|
|
Dapper_Swindler posted:holy poo poo. really. Everything is backwards now, like out there is the true world, and in here is the dream.
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2016 19:38
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/752211419634933760 Just release the convention speakers list, Don, I promise not to laugh.
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2016 19:44
|
|
|
MC Nietzche posted:Mr. Rogers when asked about DJ Trump: wow. he actualy did that. never saw him as someone who would do crude humor.(love mr.rodgers)
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2016 19:45
|
|
|
Man if Paul Ryan actually gets primaried. How the gently caress are they ever going to find someone credible to replace him. The Republican speaker position is going to end up like being a Kamikaze. Before they walk into the chamber and pick up the gavel for the first time, they'll have to drink a bowl of sake and write a farewell Haiku. Edit: 'Trump Supporters Expectations Unreal Career is over' Deptfordx fucked around with this message at 19:55 on Jul 10, 2016 |
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2016 19:45
|
|
|
Tautologicus posted:Preventing people on the federal no fly list from buying any weapon was the latest thing he proposed. And i thought he was going to stay away from the gay marriage debacle, although federal courts overruling state courts about gay marriage bans seems to be a violation of states rights, which trump has also expressed a number of opinions about (marijuana being another one) out of curiosity, how did you feel about the Defense of Marriage Act?
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2016 19:47
|
|
|
i'm getting dizzy... etalian posted:Everything is backwards now, like out there is the true world, and in here is the dream.
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2016 19:48
|
|
|
Deptfordx posted:Man if Paul Ryan actually gets primaried. How the gently caress are they ever going to find someone credible to replace him. Maybe they'll make one of the Koch brothers speaker, they can elect a private citizen to that position right? Or do they need to be in congress?
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2016 19:49
|
|
|
Joementum posted:He's not going to do this, but one interesting thing would be for him to propose a list of nominees and let the convention delegates decide. Isn't that a House of Cards episode?
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2016 19:50
|
|
|
It would be pretty cool if Newt got humiliated by a second Clinton.
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2016 19:51
|
|
|
Slate Action posted:https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/752211419634933760 It better be the Long Form speakers list. 
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2016 19:51
|
|
|
If I say "it is Wednesday" the dishonest media will post "trump states what day of the week it is" when in reality I was answering my own internal question, which was "what was the name of the daughter in the Addams family?"
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2016 19:56
|
|
|
PleasingFungus posted:out of curiosity, how did you feel about the Defense of Marriage Act? Did? I was 11. My opinions are complicated and at this point contradictory, but at the end of the day I believe that marriage is primarily about family. There are outliers but family and children is the reason people ought to be compelled to get married. Personally I am against gay couples intentionally going out and adopting or looking for sperm donors because one of the parents can not be the genetic parent and I think parents being the genetic parents of their children is important, although of course there are always outliers, but they should not be encouraged. Special cases should remain special cases, yet everyone should be accepting of them on a case by case basis. I don't support widespread adoption, sperm donation, egg donation, or any other general confusions introduced into parenting and childbirth. Lineages including behavior, emotional patterns, inclinations and so on are passed down from parent to child and that continuity is important for many reasons, to do otherwise introduces chaos and confusion into human societies.
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2016 19:57
|
|
|
Dapper_Swindler posted:wow. he actualy did that. never saw him as someone who would do crude humor.(love mr.rodgers) He was doing a counting on fingers game and the double middle fingers was the next logical step. He realizes what's happening and cracks up as he looks at the camera but keeps going.
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2016 19:59
|
|
|
I was kind of with you on the mental health debate, at least I understood what you were driving at, but being opposed to adoption is pretty hosed up? I mean, how can you not support widespread adoption? The kids would just end up abandoned and stuck in a lovely government-run system.
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2016 20:00
|
|
|
Deptfordx posted:'Trump Supporters
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2016 20:01
|
|
|
Tautologicus posted:Did? I was 11. My opinions are complicated and at this point contradictory, but at the end of the day I believe that marriage is primarily about family. There are outliers but family and children is the reason people ought to be compelled to get married. Personally I am against gay couples intentionally going out and adopting or looking for sperm donors because one of the parents can not be the genetic parent and I think parents being the genetic parents of their children is important, although of course there are always outliers, but they should not be encouraged. Special cases should remain special cases, yet everyone should be accepting of them on a case by case basis. I don't support widespread adoption, sperm donation, egg donation, or any other general confusions introduced into parenting and childbirth. Lineages including behavior, emotional patterns, inclinations and so on are passed down from parent to child and that continuity is important for many reasons, to do otherwise introduces chaos and confusion into human societies. This is possibly the most regressive post I've seen on here.
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2016 20:04
|
|
|
Defiance posted:I was kind of with you on the mental health debate, at least I understood what you were driving at, but being opposed to adoption is pretty hosed up? I mean, how can you not support widespread adoption? The kids would just end up abandoned and stuck in a lovely government-run system. i'm not opposed to adoption in the sense of banning it, im opposed to widespread adoption as kind of "we must do this" idea. a good friend of mine, now kind of in the past but a lot of things feel in the past now, he was adopted from a south american country and ive just seen his identity issues growing up from his mid teens to now, 15 years, issues ive never seen in anyone who knew their parents. was a street kid in his home country but at least that was his home country. i dunno, not therefore everyone has crippling identity issues, but the point is the general rule i think is that genetic parents ought to be far preferable to the alternatives. there's things like primitive villages raising kids between the community, and israeli kibbutzes and so on, and those are tight knit groups and it comes out to the same thing. but i think grabbing a kid from a thousand miles away and sticking them in another cultuer with new parents, with all fo their behavior encoded from their actual parents in their dna, they dont know where any fo their issues come from, they have no continuity. i can't be for that.
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2016 20:06
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 14, 2024 00:34 |
|
|
Timeless Appeal posted:Honestly though I think this is the first legitimately smart choice presented. To a lot of people, McChrystal is a reliable witness to Obama and Clinton's failing on security and foreign policy. He provides a sense of authority to Trump's bullshit. There's tons of people who fit this description. Most would not be willing to be associated with Trump.
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2016 20:07
|
|
