Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Chucat
Apr 14, 2006

forkboy84 posted:

There's also Private Eye.

Please stop correctly guessing the papers and magazines I buy.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Zohar
Jul 14, 2013

Good kitty
More Angela Moments

quote:

The Labour leadership candidate [Eagle] brought up her referendum debate performance, where she told Johnson to stop using the £350m figure. “Oh Boris, isn’t he great for just bouncing around,” she joked.

A cry went up from the audience: “He’s the foreign secretary!” Eagle laughed initially, but then looked thunderstruck. “Boris?!” she exclaimed, then temporarily lost for words.

(from the Guardian feed)

Also Nige is a fan of the new Cabinet in case you had any doubts:

https://twitter.com/Nigel_Farage/status/753310314356236289

Nothingtoseehere
Nov 11, 2010


namesake posted:

I don't think the EU would stand for that kind of brinkmanship bullshit to be honest.

They might not stand for it, but (legally) its possible.

HorseLord
Aug 26, 2014

Breath Ray posted:

capitalism is good. extreme poverty has been halved, globally, in just 20 years

Worldwide poverty has taken a nosedive thanks to the efforts of the People's Republic of China but I'm not sure you can credit that to capitalism

Breath Ray
Nov 19, 2010

forkboy84 posted:

It's a worthless pledge because he's not going to be Prime Minister. Putting that practicality aside, if you're going to ignore a referendum result then just loving ignore it, don't keep running plebiscites until you get the result you want.


Let me know when you're going to stop being a WUM & I'll get back to you.

I would never wind someone up. If anything I'm trying to calm you down because you said may is thatcherite when she is really a bit more old fashioned than that. She can be pretty centrist as labour have gone left and brexit gives her an excuse for isolation so I don't think wars are on the cards either. Just a few reasons too be cheerful itpo plus Scotland where you are you have further insulation

coffeetable
Feb 5, 2006

TELL ME AGAIN HOW GREAT BRITAIN WOULD BE IF IT WAS RULED BY THE MERCILESS JACKBOOT OF PRINCE CHARLES

YES I DO TALK TO PLANTS ACTUALLY

HorseLord posted:

Worldwide poverty has taken a nosedive thanks to the efforts of the People's Republic of China but I'm not sure you can credit that to capitalism

china's a fair chunk of the progress, but a) free market reforms are a large part of china's improvement and b) it's down a lot outside of china too



https://ourworldindata.org/world-poverty/

JFairfax
Oct 23, 2008

by FactsAreUseless
Jeremy Corbyn
16 mins ·
I congratulate Theresa May on her appointment as Prime Minister. I was glad we were able to speak on Monday after she won the leadership of the Conservative Party.

I welcome Theresa May's acknowledgement that, after six years of Tory government in which she was a senior minister, the economy is not working for working people. Her promise to give workers a say in boardrooms and act against exploitative zero hours contracts is also a step in a better direction.

But most important is for the new administration to abandon the destructive austerity policies which have damaged our economy and undermined living standards for most people.

Labour will hold her government to account and make the case for a complete change of economic direction. It is vital that negotiations for Britain's withdrawal from the European Union, in particular, reflect the broadest political agenda.

The referendum result sent a clear message from parts of Britain that have been left behind by globalisation.

It is essential that the new government recognises that and acts to ensure future generations have the chance to fulfil their potential.

But Labour is clear that democratic legitimacy for Theresa May's government can only come from a general election.

Zephro
Nov 23, 2000

I suppose I could part with one and still be feared...

Grouchio posted:

I wonder what PM May will do first...
Write secret letters to Britain's Vanguard submarine captains telling them whether or not to launch their nukes if the government has been destroyed in a decapitation strike.
It's every PM's first job.

spiderbot
Oct 21, 2012


By going with an anti-Brexit line Smith is fishing for short term support from young metropolitans at the expense of long term support from traditional Labour heartlands. What a muppet.

sean10mm
Jun 29, 2005

It's a Mad, Mad, Mad, MAD-2R World

Zephro posted:

Write secret letters to Britain's Vanguard submarine captains telling them whether or not to launch their nukes if the government has been destroyed in a decapitation strike.
It's every PM's first job.

Solid post/AV combo. :golfclap:

Miftan
Mar 31, 2012

Terry knows what he can do with his bloody chocolate orange...

Zephro posted:

Write secret letters to Britain's Vanguard submarine captains telling them whether or not to launch their nukes if the government has been destroyed in a decapitation strike.
It's every PM's first job.

It's very depressing to think that the UK also probably has a Samson Doctrine lying around.

Breath Ray
Nov 19, 2010

coffeetable posted:

china's a fair chunk of the progress, but a) free market reforms are a large part of china's improvement and b) it's down a lot outside of china too



https://ourworldindata.org/world-poverty/

welcome to my buddy list

qhat
Jul 6, 2015


Zohar posted:

More Angela Moments

ahahh

HorseLord
Aug 26, 2014

coffeetable posted:

china's a fair chunk of the progress, but a) free market reforms are a large part of china's improvement

I'm not sure an economy where it's impossible to enter into most industries unless you're either chinese or willing to give the government a 50% share of your business there counts as "free market", nor the part where if you practice business outside a strict set of guidelines the government will send an execution van to your house.

Anyway, has there been any noises of a proper legal challenge to the NEC disenfranchising a whole shitload of people yet?

Breath Ray
Nov 19, 2010

spiderbot posted:

By going with an anti-Brexit line Smith is fishing for short term support from young metropolitans at the expense of long term support from traditional Labour heartlands. What a muppet.

Bonkers if so as our fishing industry will revive overnight when we leave

Rigged Death Trap
Feb 13, 2012

BEEP BEEP BEEP BEEP

coffeetable posted:

china's a fair chunk of the progress, but a) free market reforms are a large part of china's improvement and b) it's down a lot outside of china too



https://ourworldindata.org/world-poverty/

Nah it aint capitalism.
We just got real good at logistics.

Capitalism rode in on the coattails.

namesake
Jun 19, 2006

"When I was a girl, around 12 or 13, I had a fantasy that I'd grow up to marry Captain Scarlet, but he'd be busy fighting the Mysterons so I'd cuckold him with the sexiest people I could think of - Nigel Mansell, Pat Sharp and Mr. Blobby."

nothing to seehere posted:

They might not stand for it, but (legally) its possible.

You can't just slam down a legal opinion from the HoL like a trump card. Every indication from the EU is that the UK is on a course to exit; everyone will be mentally adjusted to an exit, businesses will be making plans for exit, the other EU states politics will be shaped by the expectation of the UK leaving. Going right to the very end of this hard process and then just going 'Nope!' will do the UK no favours at all. There's no legal precedent for this so you're relying on politics and good relations with the other European states; we don't have those and won't have those, so hoping that a EU court rules in our favour after pulling stunts like that is absolutely crazy.

Seriously, the referendum was a bad idea with worse execution but you've got to get on board for fighting for the best possible terms of an exit rather than throwing everything away on a vague hope of not getting kicked out of the EU.

team overhead smash
Sep 2, 2006

Team-Forest-Tree-Dog:
Smashing your way into our hearts one skylight at a time

coffeetable posted:

china's a fair chunk of the progress, but a) free market reforms are a large part of china's improvement and b) it's down a lot outside of china too



https://ourworldindata.org/world-poverty/

Poverty is decreasing, but inequality has been increasing consistently for the last 200 years of capitalist hegemony and is only now maaaaybe starting to come down and that's mostly due to the efforts of (once again) China.

team overhead smash fucked around with this message at 22:17 on Jul 13, 2016

Nothingtoseehere
Nov 11, 2010


namesake posted:

You can't just slam down a legal opinion from the HoL like a trump card. Every indication from the EU is that the UK is on a course to exit; everyone will be mentally adjusted to an exit, businesses will be making plans for exit, the other EU states politics will be shaped by the expectation of the UK leaving. Going right to the very end of this hard process and then just going 'Nope!' will do the UK no favours at all. There's no legal precedent for this so you're relying on politics and good relations with the other European states; we don't have those and won't have those, so hoping that a EU court rules in our favour after pulling stunts like that is absolutely crazy.

Seriously, the referendum was a bad idea with worse execution but you've got to get on board for fighting for the best possible terms of an exit rather than throwing everything away on a vague hope of not getting kicked out of the EU.

I'm not saying it would be a good idea, or one that would go down well. But given that A. Its really hard to expel members from the EU and B. The legal opinion is in that direction, that it is possible for Smith to promise a referendum on a deal as a promise that a labour government in power could plausibly keep.

I agree we should just get on with trying to get the best exit terms and not try to go back, but it is a feasible opinion a opposition or government could take.

pathetic little tramp
Dec 12, 2005

by Hillary Clinton's assassins
Fallen Rib
I feel like Phillip here is a good example of what Boris Johnson will be like as foreign secretary:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vOQcxMhVYlU

Kaislioc
Feb 14, 2008

nothing to seehere posted:

You can actually take back article 50 once you begin negotiates, according to the legal review done for the House of Lords. So you can invoke article 50, negotiate a exit deal, send it to referendum, and then uninvoke article 50 if it comes back a no.

Who did the legal review for the House of Lords? The House of Lords aren't the body that has actual say on whether we could do that.

Cerebral Bore
Apr 21, 2010


Fun Shoe
After the UK invokes article 50 you're out after two years at the latest, and no amount of trying to get a backsie is going to change that. The rest of the EU will unceremoniously tell Grate Britane to get hosed and not to let the door hit your rear end on your way out.

coffeetable posted:

china's a fair chunk of the progress, but a) free market reforms are a large part of china's improvement and b) it's down a lot outside of china too



https://ourworldindata.org/world-poverty/

I think the proper takeaway here is that saying "capitalism is good because poverty has decreased" is horseshit because it's clearly possible for poverty to decrease under lovely politico-economic systems.

Kaislioc
Feb 14, 2008
e: Double post

LemonyTang
Nov 29, 2009

Ask me about holding 4gate!
About Owen Smith...

Oberleutnant posted:

Those of you pontificating about a new PM ignoring the referendum result and refusing to get the ball rolling: you know that'd lead us straight into full fascism, right?

We got where we are now because Farage was prepared to tell the biggest and most brazen lie imaginable to undermine the neoliberal tories (he did this not because he's an ideological racist, but because he's a petty, bitter, selfish arsehole who wanted power and has no sense of shame). The neoliberal lie that its policy of privatisation and deregulation would lead to prosperity for all of us has been running out of steam after a few decades of nobody's life getting better, and Farage has come straight out and said "it's the muzzies and the EU!" This lie is genius because the neoliberal "centre" can't dare refute it. If they reject it entirely they'll have to confront the other (left wing) side of the argument - that it was them all along. That it was their sale of social housing stock that lead to housing shortages, and their underfunding of the NHS that lead to crowded and understaffed hospitals, and so on, and so on. Honestly I think they're secretly grateful for this huge, disgusting lie, because it probably gave them another few years of power through half-arsed (but still disgraceful) pandering.

They know his scapegoating of migrants and the EU is a lie, but by pandering to his base and promising to implement some controls on immigration, and to play hardball with the EU, they guaranteed themselves another 5 years in control. But they know (and Farage knows) that the "cure" being applied is basically snake-oil - it's not going to fix the problem, because the EU and the immigrants were never really the cause of the specific problem that people were complaining about.

The EU referendum itself is almost incidental to this historical process (that is, it would keep going the way it's going even without the referendum), but we've had it now, and people have voted out. If the Tories turn around and say "yeah actually gently caress this we're not going out" all they do is strengthen Farage's position and add credence to the lie. Meanwhile people's lives will continue to get worse as long as neoliberalism is the order of the day, and now people think they've been promised the solution they will go loving berserk if it's denied to them undemocratically. At best UKIP win in a landslide at the next election. At absolute worst we get race riots and more murders and poo poo I don't even want to think about.

All of this is also why you absolutely need, need, need a genuine left wing voice in national politics. Every time Labour panders and promises controls on immigration as the solution to ensuring jobs and homes and hospitals for British people they strengthen the cause of fascism and repression, because they're promising the wrong cure to the problem, and when it inevitably doesn't work? There's Mr Farage again, saying thay if only they had been harder on the migrants and the EU it would have worked, and a few more votes go his way.
We need a socialist left wing voice on the national stage to tell people that actually it's the bastards in government and their mates in media and industry that are ruining your life, and that the solution is raising tax revenues to build houses and fund the NHS.

But right now I don't see any stopping this train. We're heading towards a dirty, grey, ugly little English fascism, and the only solace I can find is the knowledge that the fascist lie is just as empty as the neoliberals', and is doomed to be exposed in its turn.
But a lot of people might suffer along the way, because if Farage (or somebody prepared to lie even harder than he is) gets into power off the back of bashing minorities their only option once in power is to get nastier and nastier and nastier to the most vulnerable because he doesn't have the real answer either.

:godwin:

Thanks for reading Britain's Road to Fascism

Cerebral Bore
Apr 21, 2010


Fun Shoe

nothing to seehere posted:

I'm not saying it would be a good idea, or one that would go down well. But given that A. Its really hard to expel members from the EU and B. The legal opinion is in that direction, that it is possible for Smith to promise a referendum on a deal as a promise that a labour government in power could plausibly keep.

I agree we should just get on with trying to get the best exit terms and not try to go back, but it is a feasible opinion a opposition or government could take.

It's not. If the UK triggers article 50, which it will, you're out after a maximum of two years. Any referendums in the UK about a deal matter for somewhere between jack and poo poo, because you're getting thrown out deal or no deal.

Vengeance of Pandas
Sep 8, 2008

THE TERRIBLE POST WENT THATAWAY!

Breath Ray posted:

What does thatcherite mean to you?

gently caress the poor, gently caress the ill, gently caress the disabled, gently caress the unemployed, gently caress the North of England, gently caress Scotland, gently caress Northern Ireland, gently caress education, gently caress infrastructure, gently caress industry, gently caress manufacturing, gently caress communities, gently caress altruism, gently caress human rights gently caress public services, in summation gently caress everything that isn't the private financial service industry, Corporate America approved, or the city of London.

May has mouthed some soothing words but until her government starts sharing actual policies they're all loving Thatcherites because all the Conservative party has cared about for the past 20 years is how Thatcher-like are you.

Edit:

Cerebral Bore posted:

After the UK invokes article 50 you're out after two years at the latest, and no amount of trying to get a backsie is going to change that. The rest of the EU will unceremoniously tell Grate Britane to get hosed and not to let the door hit your rear end on your way out.

The UN has even given them an extra lever to force us out by saying the UK's austerity policies are violating human rights.

Milotic
Mar 4, 2009

9CL apologist
Slippery Tilde

JFairfax posted:

Jeremy Corbyn
16 mins ·

But Labour is clear that democratic legitimacy for Theresa May's government can only come from a general election.

I really dislike the notion that a particular Prime Minister is only legitimate if he or she was leader when they won a general election. It encourages presidential style leadership rather than first amongst equals. Also come off it Mr Corbyn, Labour is in no position to win a GE. Or possibly even avoid a Tory landslide

Zohar
Jul 14, 2013

Good kitty
Found a video of the Eagle thing:

https://twitter.com/Holbornlolz/status/753335598262394880

Cerebral Bore
Apr 21, 2010


Fun Shoe

Milotic posted:

I really dislike the notion that a particular Prime Minister is only legitimate if he or she was leader when they won a general election. It encourages presidential style leadership rather than first amongst equals. Also come off it Mr Corbyn, Labour is in no position to win a GE. Or possibly even avoid a Tory landslide

He's probably just getting back at the Tories for yelling about Gordon Brown being unelected for years.

Killed By Death
Jun 29, 2013


Kaislioc posted:

Who did the legal review for the House of Lords? The House of Lords aren't the body that has actual say on whether we could do that.
The two witnesses quoted in the report are David Edward and Professor Derrick Wyatt, who both came to the conclusion that it is possible for the invoking member to reverse Article 50, because there is nothing saying they can't, i.e. the Air Bud defence
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jvf0WWxrYRM&t=25s

JFairfax
Oct 23, 2008

by FactsAreUseless

the eagle is flapping

TheRat
Aug 30, 2006

Zohar posted:

Found a video of the Eagle thing:

To be fair, thats roughly my reaction aswell

Bear Retrieval Unit
Nov 5, 2009

Mudslide Experiment

Lmao

Firos
Apr 30, 2007

Staying abreast of the latest developments in jam communism




Brutal.

NRVNQSR
Mar 1, 2009

Vengeance of Pandas posted:

The UN has even given them an extra lever to force us out by saying the UK's austerity policies are violating human rights.

If violating human rights were grounds for EU expulsion they'd have no members left.

Zephro
Nov 23, 2000

I suppose I could part with one and still be feared...
I still can't believe noted fuckwit and waste of amino acids Boris "Moron" Johnson is going to be Foreign Secretary.

Hope is a prison. Skulls for the skull throne.

Jean-Paul Shartre
Jan 16, 2015

this sentence no verb



To quote Article 50, Treaty on the European Union (Lisbon Treaty):

quote:

2. A Member State which decides to withdraw shall notify the European Council of its intention. In the light of the guidelines provided by the European Council, the Union shall negotiate and conclude an agreement with that State, setting out the arrangements for its withdrawal, taking account of the framework for its future relationship with the Union. That agreement shall be negotiated in accordance with Article 218(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. It shall be concluded on behalf of the Union by the Council, acting by a qualified majority, after obtaining the consent of the European Parliament.

3. The Treaties shall cease to apply to the State in question from the date of entry into force of the withdrawal agreement or, failing that, two years after the notification referred to in paragraph 2, unless the European Council, in agreement with the Member State concerned, unanimously decides to extend this period.

So no, the UK can't just say "um, no." They can say it and then get all twenty-seven EU member states to agree within two years of the Article 50 notice, otherwise they're automatically out.

sean10mm
Jun 29, 2005

It's a Mad, Mad, Mad, MAD-2R World

TheRat posted:

To be fair, thats roughly my reaction aswell

If anything, her going :wtc: at the news kind of humanizes her to me. And I think the endless attempts to backstab Corbyn are dumb. But how the gently caress else can you react to finding out that Boris is FOREIGN SECRETARY of all loving things?

Guavanaut
Nov 27, 2009

Looking At Them Tittys
1969 - 1998



Toilet Rascal

Zephro posted:

I still can't believe noted fuckwit and waste of amino acids Boris "Moron" Johnson is going to be Foreign Secretary.
I do not want the amino acids from Boris' Johnson.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Zohar
Jul 14, 2013

Good kitty

sean10mm posted:

If anything, her going :wtc: at the news kind of humanizes her to me. And I think the endless attempts to backstab Corbyn are dumb. But how the gently caress else can you react to finding out that Boris is FOREIGN SECRETARY of all loving things?

I'm mostly just amused by her constant string of bad luck tbf. The people deserting her conference for Leadsom weren't her fault either.

  • Locked thread