|
these threads move to fast and make me weird post. and triple ppost
|
# ? Jan 28, 2017 07:33 |
|
|
# ? May 30, 2024 13:38 |
The Titanic posted:The programmers are hosed. Chris shot himself in the foot by adding Star Marine. You can bet your jpegs all the programmers will be spending most of 2017 bandaid fixing there instead of working on the headaches of the rest of the game. MeLKoR posted:
This is a magic post; anytime I think about I start to chuckle.
|
|
# ? Jan 28, 2017 07:33 |
|
https://www.reddit.com/r/starcitizen/comments/5qkn6m/star_citizen_used_eve_online_nebula/dd06w6p/
|
# ? Jan 28, 2017 07:34 |
|
Foo Diddley posted:I'm sure it's just perfectly normal turnover. Most game companies go through employees quicker than the local McDonalds, right? If the average person stays on for three years, and there are three hundred people, you'd expect two people leaving every week. Obviously I'm making some assumptions here, but it's safe to say that there will people regularly leaving any big company. With the amount of junior talent working at the studio, it probably isn't far off from a McDonalds.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2017 07:36 |
ManofManyAliases posted:I know I said it a number of times: I really expect at least a mission or two out of SQ42 this year as a teaser, with release of SQ42 next year (summer maybe)? And I'm thinking we'll enter beta by the end of next year with full release in 2018. That said, my 'oh-poo poo' moment will likely be observation of progress by end of Q2 next year: if procedural tech, netcode and and other gameplay mechanics aren't more refined at that point, it's probably too far past a salvage point. Then again, I fully expect the grey-market to still be a viable alternative to offload most of my assets, even by Summer of next year. MoMA can you name your most crucial 'must be working in 2017' feature? I'm pretty astonished a space game can get this far with no demonstratable mining or trade. But tell us what you think is most important. It's very easy to argue over if the netcode has improved or not so please choose something concrete.
|
|
# ? Jan 28, 2017 07:43 |
|
ManofManyAliases posted:No - absolutely not. Just more FUD to get the thread moving a bit. Prove it.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2017 08:18 |
|
Sillybones posted:these threads move to fast and make me weird post. and triple ppost That's fine. nobody reads what the gently caress i post anyway, and everyone here loves to suck each other's dick (and/or hoo-hah, I don't discriminate) on this stupid megathread. cat post
|
# ? Jan 28, 2017 08:29 |
|
Raskolnikov posted:answer the call I have no idea what's happening here but it is good
|
# ? Jan 28, 2017 08:30 |
|
ManofManyAliases posted:No - absolutely not. Just more FUD to get the thread moving a bit. FUD: Facts U Dislike
|
# ? Jan 28, 2017 08:34 |
|
Dementropy posted:https://www.reddit.com/r/starcitizen/comments/5qkn6m/star_citizen_used_eve_online_nebula/dd06w6p/ Imagine being such a beta that the only thing you can think to spend your "disposable" 22k on is fake spaceships.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2017 08:46 |
|
ManofManyAliases posted:No - absolutely not. Just more FUD to get the thread moving a bit. I have it on good sources that they did happen.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2017 08:55 |
|
ddiddles posted:Imagine being such a beta that the only thing you can think to spend your "disposable" 22k on is fake spaceships. A doctor interested in SC ? Probably a pediatrician.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2017 08:55 |
|
$22K would be better spent by me playing drunken poker at the dog track with free drinks because at least I'd get drunk and have fun
|
# ? Jan 28, 2017 09:15 |
|
You know something bad is happening when Toast starts posting a lot here
|
# ? Jan 28, 2017 09:19 |
|
ManofManyAliases posted:No - absolutely not. Just more FUD to get the thread moving a bit. Hello lethality
|
# ? Jan 28, 2017 09:39 |
|
Foo Diddley posted:FUD: Facts U Dislike
|
# ? Jan 28, 2017 09:49 |
|
ManofManyAliases posted:Ok - an alpha version of a game-to-be. Whatever man. Give us an alternative fact. We know you're full of them.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2017 10:41 |
|
ManofManyAliases posted:a company making a revolutionary game? Wow that sounds great when do you think they'll start working on that??
|
# ? Jan 28, 2017 10:48 |
|
Oh come on! A whole day of me awaiting what the 'big news' will be and instead we get some coy: "BTW more people left tee hee, can't say which?" Spill the goddamn beans, already, or don't do the hype train. After more than a year of going through this cocktease with the Warlord it does get kinda old. Tho I at least appreciate some good ole Archering to fill the void.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2017 10:53 |
|
ManofManyAliases posted:Lol no. My degrees mean I never need to work in sales. Thanks though. Are you calling me a wageslave plebscrub?
|
# ? Jan 28, 2017 11:09 |
|
ManofManyAliases posted:Other than that, no investigations, no calls to cease business, no .... well, nothing at all! Gotta hand you that one Toast. Not even a game. e. darn need to read thread faster.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2017 11:17 |
|
ManofManyAliases posted:Ok - an alpha version of a game-to-be. Whatever man.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2017 11:41 |
|
ewe2 posted:Give us an alternative fact. We know you're full of them. he has degrees.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2017 12:08 |
|
Never forget https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l6UpYsOwlGY
|
# ? Jan 28, 2017 12:16 |
|
Theres a couple people in the Eve reddit thread saying SC can use it as its fair use for concepts. Not if you are using it as marketing material dipshits. edit: Christ now they're saying newsletters etc are just "inside looks at dev, not marketing" TrustmeImLegit fucked around with this message at 12:44 on Jan 28, 2017 |
# ? Jan 28, 2017 12:35 |
|
ManofManyAliases posted:Decent salary managing a multi-million dollar marketing campaign for a company making a revolutionary game? Sounds good. Sign me up. Yea, it's called nepotism.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2017 12:37 |
|
ManofManyAliases posted:Decent salary managing a multi-million dollar marketing campaign for a company making a revolutionary game? Sounds good. Sign me up. Urrr, I think you mean startup?
|
# ? Jan 28, 2017 12:43 |
|
intardnation posted:he has degrees. Toast you mean? Nah, just a paralegal.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2017 12:46 |
|
I just noticed the thread Arf made in QCS. lol
|
# ? Jan 28, 2017 12:56 |
|
TrustmeImLegit posted:Theres a couple people in the Eve reddit thread saying SC can use it as its fair use for concepts. Reach a verdict, then interpret the law to justify it. That's how it works right?
|
# ? Jan 28, 2017 13:05 |
|
ARF ARF HE'S OUR MAN IF HE KEEPS POSTING HE'LL GET A BAN!
|
# ? Jan 28, 2017 13:06 |
|
Tokamak posted:I just noticed the thread Arf made in QCS. We better get some doxxing done before the next qcs thread shuts us down
|
# ? Jan 28, 2017 13:07 |
|
Le funny game company
|
# ? Jan 28, 2017 13:19 |
|
Kosumo posted:IMHO that is far from them Archering it. Agreed. The overall CIG style is definitely "inspired" by the original, and the backdrop was absolutely archered, but the station looks too different. But then again, they've "borrowed" from several images to make a composite before.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2017 13:20 |
|
Has anyone compared GIS results for "rising steam" with the art?
|
# ? Jan 28, 2017 13:21 |
|
ManofManyAliases posted:No - absolutely not. Just more FUD to get the thread moving a bit. Thanks for the update MOMA Ann.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2017 13:22 |
|
And all of that would be 100% a-okay if they used it for internal concept. But now its been used in marketing to help make money. A big no-no.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2017 13:22 |
|
Someone has advice for you MoMA quote:It's pretty easy to not read a forum. I recommend doing that to everybody here up in arms.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2017 13:33 |
|
Honestly the people who go "Hahaha wow big things just happened teehee can't say" need a nice tall glass of shut the gently caress up.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2017 13:38 |
|
|
# ? May 30, 2024 13:38 |
|
TheAgent posted:it did and like every other piece of news about this poo poo project, it isn't being covered by anyone Oh, weird.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2017 13:41 |