Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Fados
Jan 7, 2013
I like Malcolm X, I can't be racist!

Put this racist dipshit on ignore immediately!
Death by gillotine sounds better than death by centrism. Sign me up.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Fulchrum
Apr 16, 2013

by R. Guyovich

Hot Diggity! posted:

Democrats could push more aggressively for unionizing the service sector, but as we've seen with their tepid reaction to the Fight for Fifteen that ain't gonna happen.

You mean being attacked for suggesting $12 instead of $15 long, long, LONG after they put their support behind $15, to the point where people will continue to claim that the dems never supported $15 and that's a sign they are corporatism shills?

That the reaction you think makes it unlikely? Cause, yeah, that sounds right.

Hot Diggity!
Apr 3, 2010

SKELITON_BRINGING_U_ON.GIF

Fulchrum posted:

You mean being attacked for suggesting $12 instead of $15 long, long, LONG after they put their support behind $15, to the point where people will continue to claim that the dems never supported $15 and that's a sign they are corporatism shills?

That the reaction you think makes it unlikely? Cause, yeah, that sounds right.

I'm talking about unionizing which the moderate wing has been opposed to. Please stick to the topic at hand, friend. Some Democrats have supported $15, but not nearly enough.

Crowsbeak
Oct 9, 2012

by Azathoth
Lipstick Apathy

stone cold posted:

You said we should appeal to racists, but ok 👌

Now all poor people are racist. Why don't you got to a Walmart and tell the workers they're racist.

stone cold
Feb 15, 2014

Crowsbeak posted:

Now all poor people are racist. Why don't you got to a Walmart and tell the workers they're racist.

You literally said we should appeal to racists. Also, lol as if you actually give a poo poo about the working class, and telling that you think the working class is all white. No room for poor POC's in your ideal Democratic Party, eh, pedophilia-normalizer?

stone cold
Feb 15, 2014

Crowsbeak posted:

Yeah I think we from now on should rely on grassroots not the data driven cucks. There are a lot of racist shits in the states. There is also a lot of badly ran but entrenched democratic parties that have no desire to turn their states around. Purge the parties of the useless centrists and organize.

Crowsbeak posted:

I would prefer that we make it so when you put in centrist it says cuck and when you put in cuck it says centrist.

Crowsbeak posted:

We learned it from you guys virtue signaling on blm and gay rights.

Crowsbeak posted:

Not at rallies. His platform was get rid of illegls. Bring Jobs back by getting rid of trade policies like NAFTA, and ho he would protect SS, Medicare, and Medicaid. No one pays attention to the GOP platform. THey pay attention to what Trump said at the rallies.

Crowsbeak posted:

Gay Marriage is settled unless of course you mean putting bakers out of business is protecting it.

Trans rights. Yeah considering that it doesn't actually bring the votes out I don't see how it helps.
Opposing police brutality? How can that not be coupled with people having better economic standards so they don't live in decaying urban or suburban wastelands? (I know the answer you don't want your taxes to go up).
Abortion rights? Maybe. Didn't win the Dems Texas. Actually lost them votes in 2014. I mean when the GOP runs guys who start question rape you can win on it. But when they just talk about how they love life. It becomes a hard sell.

Crowsbeak posted:

Yeah most people here don't give a poo poo about Bangaldeshis. I want you to go to one of the poor people you claim to know and tell them they should be happy that their job is now in Bengaldesh.

Crowsbeak posted:

Look I cannot help I am white. I mean I wish doctor Yacob hadn't created my ancestors in a lab. But he did so lets get beyond that point.

You're just a real charmer ITT, crowsbeak.

Nocturtle
Mar 17, 2007

Fados posted:

Dont be fooled by Trudeau, will most likely usher a conservative revolt after he's done with his neoliberal poo poo. Surface charisma only goes so far as Obama showed.

Corbyn is a bit different. I still am on the fence about him. He's probably liable to fall to the left nationalist temptation, we'll see.

Corbyn's more likely to fall while tending to his allotment. Trudeau will flame out in an upcoming minority govt, but the Liberals need only elect Rick Moranis permanently playing Bob McKenzie to stay in power.

More seriously, left-wing parties around the world are in retreat with the demise of organized labour. No-one has a real solution yet, and there certainly weren't any bold new ideas proposed during the recent DNC leadership race. However it's interesting to compare Democrats with similar parties in different countries, because the Democrat's situation is so uniquely hopeless. Canada is a petro-state dominated by neoliberal centrists, but at least it has non-partisan electoral district maps and effective political campaign spending limits. Australia is a racist wasteland, but compulsory voting makes voter suppression harder. Most European democracies have some form of proportional representation. All of these common-sense institutions are effectively wild fever dreams for progressives in the US. The Democrat's only hope is (another) well-timed major recession, because the US political system is inherently conservative.

Nocturtle fucked around with this message at 07:51 on Feb 28, 2017

Fulchrum
Apr 16, 2013

by R. Guyovich

Hot Diggity! posted:

I'm talking about unionizing which the moderate wing has been opposed to.

Horseshit, and $15 an hour is in the loving platform so by very definition it's a core belief of the party. Wait wait, I forgot, this is the super secret special definition of supporting unionization and a higher minimum wage, which is never written down so we can conveniently attack any Democrat for not meeting standards.

Crowsbeak
Oct 9, 2012

by Azathoth
Lipstick Apathy

stone cold posted:

You're just a real charmer ITT, crowsbeak.

Wow you're really angry that I actually tell people the reasons Trump won. Look I know that truth hurts you Just like you don't like to hear that pooor people are not the racist trogyldytes that your fever dreams make them out to be.

stone cold
Feb 15, 2014

Crowsbeak posted:

Wow, you're really angry that I actually tell people the reasons Trump won (like calling them cucks). Look, I know that truth hurts you. Just like you don't like to hear that poor people are not the racist troglodytes that your fever dreams make them out to be.

I fixed your typos for you, dear.

I trust you to not be projecting your racism onto poorer people, person who calls living beings "illgls (sic)," "cucks," and "Bangaldeshis (sic)," definitely the bourgeoisie such as yourself are not the true racists. But also, as you suggested, we should deffo pander more to all racists, and make the Democratic Party white again. Please tell me more truth about how you're not a racist, preach!

Could you be a skosh less thin-skinned, pedophilia-normalizer?

Crowsbeak
Oct 9, 2012

by Azathoth
Lipstick Apathy
Hey your the one who keep claiming the poor are all racists. But then you keep declaring me a bigot for liking them and wanting to improve their part in life.

I actually apologized about the pedo joke. But then Adults are known for trying to press issues long after everyone else has dropped them.

What I will not apologize for is not hating the poor like you do.


Fulchrum posted:

Horseshit, and $15 an hour is in the loving platform so by very definition it's a core belief of the party. Wait wait, I forgot, this is the super secret special definition of supporting unionization and a higher minimum wage, which is never written down so we can conveniently attack any Democrat for not meeting standards.

Good, hope they never drop it just because you think we should never push for any change.

Crowsbeak fucked around with this message at 07:49 on Feb 28, 2017

stone cold
Feb 15, 2014

Crowsbeak posted:

Hey your the one who keep claiming the poor are all racists. But then you keep declaring me a bigot for liking them and wanting to improve their part in life.

I actually apologized about the pedo joke. But then Adults are known for trying to press issues long after everyone else has dropped them.

What I will not apologize for is not hating the poor like you do.


Good, hope they never drop it just because you think we should never push for any change.

Haha, calling out your racism = calling the poor racist. Could you project any harder, bourgeois scum?

And you are a bigot. Calling living people "illegals," is an incredibly bigoted thing to do. But yes, my hatred of your petty middle-class bigotry means I think the poor are racist. You keep on trying to make the Democratic Party white again!

Crowsbeak
Oct 9, 2012

by Azathoth
Lipstick Apathy

stone cold posted:

Haha, calling out your racism = calling the poor racist. Could you project any harder, bourgeois scum?

And you are a bigot. Calling living people "illegals," is an incredibly bigoted thing to do. But yes, my hatred of your petty middle-class bigotry means I think the poor are racist. You keep on trying to make the Democratic Party white again!

I could care less what ski color dominates the democratic party. All I want is a democratic party without classist bigots like you. Now you'll probably accuse me of making this up. But then lets be honest. You use the word bigot as a slur against anyone who won't immediately agree with you. Same with Effectronica. The thing is that over time that word loses meaning and actual bigotry increasingly becomes something people cannot identify when they have people like you screaming at anyone who disagrees with them that they are bigots. I mean keep doing it I am sure it will get you everything you want in life. With no repercussions.

Mormon Star Wars
Aug 13, 2005
It's a minotaur race...

The Democrats are already courting racists, we let Bloomberg speak at the convention.

(Arabs and Muslims don't count as a real minority to centrist dems, which is why it's okay to throw them to the dogs repeatedly.)

Fulchrum
Apr 16, 2013

by R. Guyovich

Crowsbeak posted:

Good, hope they never drop it just because you think we should never push for any change.

Stop spewing nazi propaganda constantly.

Wraith of J.O.I.
Jan 25, 2012


Okay so I just read like the last ten pages of this thread, whew. I've seen a lot of the left leaning people putting out suggestions for how maybe the dems could win more voters and take back some red seats, most of these ideas I will admit I'm sympathetic to. But I want to ask the more center leaning people in as genuinely sincere and noncofrontational way as possible: what is your plan for the dems' comeback? I just see people shooting down ideas saying why they are bad or why they won't work, and I understand the reasoning there even if I don't necessarily agree with it. But—and correct me if I'm wrong and point me to some posts here—what I haven't seen a whole lot of from these more center people is what should actually be done to regrow the party. Like what message do you think the dems should run on in 2018 for instance? What platform do you think will convince more people to turn out? What are some ideas you have on how to win back some states and ideally the house?

stone cold
Feb 15, 2014

Crowsbeak posted:

I could care less what ski color dominates the democratic party. All I want is a democratic party without classist bigots like you. Now you'll probably accuse me of making this up. But then lets be honest. You use the word bigot as a slur against anyone who won't immediately agree with you. Same with Effectronica. The thing is that over time that word loses meaning and actual bigotry increasingly becomes something people cannot identify when they have people like you screaming at anyone who disagrees with them that they are bigots. I mean keep doing it I am sure it will get you everything you want in life. With no repercussions.

"People who despise the bourgeoisie and bigots who call living human beings "illegals," are the true classist scum, and the worst insult you can call somebody is a bigot."

Could you :qq: any harder, you nazi scum?

Your whiteness is really showing, dear.

stone cold
Feb 15, 2014

Mormon Star Wars posted:

The Democrats are already courting racists, we let Bloomberg speak at the convention.

(Arabs and Muslims don't count as a real minority to centrist dems, which is why it's okay to throw them to the dogs repeatedly.)

I'm glad you delineated that because frankly not enough people do. Nobody ever talks about Malaysian Muslims or Pinoy Muslims or South Asian Muslims, and that really pisses me off.

Crowsbeak
Oct 9, 2012

by Azathoth
Lipstick Apathy

stone cold posted:

"People who despise the bourgeoisie and bigots who call living human beings "illegals," are the true classist scum, and the worst insult you can call somebody is a bigot."

Could you :qq: any harder, you nazi scum?

Your whiteness is really showing, dear.

I am sorry that Yacob created me in a lab I cannot help that.

Also I never knew all the people who have had their jobs stolen from them and sent outside the country are bourguis. I mean I thought the bourguis had to own the means of production but according to you who know better then a poor decscendent of yacub experiments it means any former factory worker.

Fulchrum posted:

Stop spewing nazi propaganda constantly.

Coming from a person who literally thinks of others as apes that is funny.


Mormon Star Wars posted:

The Democrats are already courting racists, we let Bloomberg speak at the convention.

(Arabs and Muslims don't count as a real minority to centrist dems, which is why it's okay to throw them to the dogs repeatedly.)

I wonder why the people here who keep saying Sanders supporters are racists don't take offence to the man who was the main booster of actual racist policies speaking at the convention. Of course one of these people also openly engaged in racism against Keith Ellison for being a Muslim.

Crowsbeak fucked around with this message at 08:09 on Feb 28, 2017

Lightning Lord
Feb 21, 2013

$200 a day, plus expenses

stone cold posted:

I'm glad you delineated that because frankly not enough people do. Nobody ever talks about Malaysian Muslims or Pinoy Muslims or South Asian Muslims, and that really pisses me off.

And non-Muslim Arabs are just used as a weapon against Muslims.

Crowsbeak posted:

I am sorry that Yacob created me in a lab I cannot help that.

Do you really think that anyone who cares about civil rights thinks like this ?

stone cold
Feb 15, 2014

Crowsbeak posted:

I am sorry that Yacob created me in a lab I cannot help that.

Also I never knew all the people who have had their jobs stolen from them and sent outside the country are bourguis. I mean I thought the bourguis had to own the means of production but according to you who know better then a poor decscendent of yacub experiments it means any former factory worker.


Coming from a person who literally thinks of others as apes that is funny.

It's funny how dense you are. I am calling you and your 1% buddies who think it's ok to call living human being illegal bourgeois scum, but keep pretending like you care about the poor, you swine.

Lightning Lord posted:

And non-Muslim Arabs are just used as a weapon against Muslims.

:sigh:

The loving rhetoric in this country towards not just Arabs, but to all people in the Middle East is goddamn disgraceful. The fact that they don't even have a loving slot on the loving census makes me see red.

Crowsbeak
Oct 9, 2012

by Azathoth
Lipstick Apathy

Lightning Lord posted:

And non-Muslim Arabs are just used as a weapon against Muslims.


Do you really think that anyone who cares about civil rights thinks like this ?

Does attacking me for being white add to discussion?

Lightning Lord
Feb 21, 2013

$200 a day, plus expenses

Crowsbeak posted:

Does attacking me for being white add to discussion?

Is that even happening?

Fulchrum
Apr 16, 2013

by R. Guyovich

Crowsbeak posted:

Coming from a person who literally thinks of others as apes that is funny.


I think white people are violent, stupid apes, and you're doing a lot to prove my point. Minorities actually understand how politics works.

Fulchrum
Apr 16, 2013

by R. Guyovich

Crowsbeak posted:

Does attacking me for being white add to discussion?

We're attacking you for being a piece of poo poo. Because you're white, stupid and egotistical, you took it as reverse racism (which you think is the only real racism).

Mormon Star Wars
Aug 13, 2005
It's a minotaur race...

stone cold posted:

It's funny how dense you are. I am calling you and your 1% buddies who think it's ok to call living human being illegal bourgeois scum, but keep pretending like you care about the poor, you swine.


:sigh:

The loving rhetoric in this country towards not just Arabs, but to all people in the Middle East is goddamn disgraceful. The fact that they don't even have a loving slot on the loving census makes me see red.

As a Muslim, I would like if we could fix this in our own party, especially if we are going to brag about protecting the marginalized.

icantfindaname
Jul 1, 2008


Mormon Star Wars posted:

The Democrats are already courting racists, we let Bloomberg speak at the convention.

(Arabs and Muslims don't count as a real minority to centrist dems, which is why it's okay to throw them to the dogs repeatedly.)

It depends on whether they support American-Israeli geopolitical hegemony. If yes they are allowed in the club, if not no

edit: and yes brown/non-MENA Muslims may as well not even exist

icantfindaname fucked around with this message at 08:22 on Feb 28, 2017

Crowsbeak
Oct 9, 2012

by Azathoth
Lipstick Apathy

stone cold posted:

It's funny how dense you are. I am calling you and your 1% buddies who think it's ok to call living human being illegal bourgeois scum, but keep pretending like you care about the poor, you swine.



I care about my countries poor. If someone wants to come to my country. They can do so legally. Of course I also understand plenty of those who come here illegally come because they are encouraged by the 1% putting up ads in their countries telling them where to find work. So I intend to make the penalties for the hiring of those who are here legally much worse. I know that those people wouldn't come here if they knew they wouldn't get jobs. Also genius just so you know the 1% likes illegal immigration. It keeps wages down.


Lightning Lord posted:

Is that even happening?

Read the lack of content in Stone COld's posts and get back to me.

Fulchrum
Apr 16, 2013

by R. Guyovich

icantfindaname posted:

It depends on whether they support American-Israeli geopolitical hegemony. If yes they are allowed in the club, if not no

That's why Schumer endorsed Ellisson, after all.

Fulchrum
Apr 16, 2013

by R. Guyovich

Crowsbeak posted:

I care about my countries poor. If someone wants to come to my country. They can do so legally.

Holy gently caress is there literally any bit of nazi propaganda to try to divide the left that you DON'T mindlessly repeat?!

icantfindaname
Jul 1, 2008


Fulchrum posted:

That's why Schumer endorsed Ellisson, after all.

he was then forced to denounce BDS and attacked as antisemitic and lost anyways. not sure why you think chuck schumer's endorsement negates the racism directed at a black anti-zionist muslim by certain sectors of the dems

Crowsbeak
Oct 9, 2012

by Azathoth
Lipstick Apathy

Fulchrum posted:

Holy gently caress is there literally any bit of nazi propaganda to try to divide the left that you DON'T mindlessly repeat?!

Is there in any way that you're not a sociopath?

I mean you decried racism and in the next post attack Ellison on racist grounds.

Crowsbeak fucked around with this message at 08:28 on Feb 28, 2017

Fulchrum
Apr 16, 2013

by R. Guyovich

icantfindaname posted:

he was then forced to denounce BDS and attacked as antisemitic and lost anyways. not sure why you think chuck schumer's endorsement negates the racism directed at a black anti-zionist muslim by certain sectors of the dems

He wasn't forced to denounce BDS. Schumer endorsed him because Ellisson is a passionate defender of Israel. Which I'm sure is a trait his many favors love about him.

Fulchrum
Apr 16, 2013

by R. Guyovich

Crowsbeak posted:

Is there in any way that you're not a sociopath?

The part where I'm not the one who defended pedophilia?

Crowsbeak
Oct 9, 2012

by Azathoth
Lipstick Apathy

Fulchrum posted:

The part where I'm not the one who defended pedophilia?

I actually apologized for that. You never apologized for your attack on Ellison. You cancer.

stone cold
Feb 15, 2014

Mormon Star Wars posted:

As a Muslim, I would like if we could fix this in our own party, especially if we are going to brag about protecting the marginalized.

:same:
(I mean to your sentiment, I'm not a Muslim and wouldn't want to leave the ambiguity :3:)

Crowsbeak posted:

I care about my countries poor. If someone wants to come to my country. They can do so legally. Of course I also understand plenty of those who come here illegally come because they are encouraged by the 1% putting up ads in their countries telling them where to find work. So I intend to make the penalties for the hiring of those who are here legally much worse. I know that those people wouldn't come here if they knew they wouldn't get jobs. Also genius just so you know the 1% likes illegal immigration. It keeps wages down.

Human beings are not illegal, jfc, and guess what, maybe we should engage in immigration reform instead of sticking our thumbs up our asses and saying "they took our jobs, the one percent encourages the idiot illegals," you agency denying scum sucker. They're loving human beings!

And by the way, if you're white, which you said you are, this isn't "your" country. The US belongs firstly to Native Americans, and then to every American, not just white nazi scum like you. Have you even heard of Aztlán?!

Crowsbeak posted:

Is there in any way that you're not a sociopath?

I thought you "didn't like armchair psychology," you bigoted swine.

Crowsbeak
Oct 9, 2012

by Azathoth
Lipstick Apathy

stone cold posted:




Human beings are not illegal, jfc, and guess what, maybe we should engage in immigration reform instead of sticking our thumbs up our asses and saying "they took our jobs, the one percent encourages the idiot illegals," you agency denying scum sucker. They're loving human beings!

And by the way, if you're white, which you said you are, this isn't "your" country. The US belongs firstly to Native Americans, and then to every American, not just white nazi scum like you. Have you even heard of Aztlán?!


I thought you "didn't like armchair psychology," you bigoted swine.

1. Actually its called a country you see we have borders as does everywhere else. If you tried to get into Canada and didn't have a passport you screaming that you're a human being wouldn't mean poo poo. Same thing with illegals aliens. You have to respect a countries laws and its right to decide who it lets in. Sorry you cannot accept how things actually are and how they have been since the beginning of the twentieth century. Also Atzlan was more likely was in Neuvo Leon. Finally yes being that I and the 330 million citizens in do own this country, as much as the 40-50 million Canadians own their country and so on and so forth, because the citizens have the right to decide who gets in.

BTW I noticed you stopped calling me boruguis scum.


Also someone who openly engages in racism against a defender of civil rights like Ellison while right before pretending to be a champion of civil rights is a sociopath in my book.

Crowsbeak fucked around with this message at 08:45 on Feb 28, 2017

Pedro De Heredia
May 30, 2006
People do stay in America (or other countries) illegally; or against the immigration laws of that country. It really doesn't matter what other word you use to describe this: it will carry a negative connotation soon enough.

It is easy for anti-immigration sentiment in America to rise, and less so for pro-immigration sentiment, because people who are against immigration actually have a semi-coherent political framework by which they explain their anti-immigration position. It is a real political/social argument. A bad, factually incorrect one, sure, but it is an argument. It has bad guys, good guys, people who benefit politically, people who don't, a mechanism that explains it, etc.

Liberals, comparatively speaking, don't have a political/social argument. Just a vague, apolitical "compassion", idiotic claims that "immigrants are good for capitalism!", and downright piety/hostility. Wow, how convincing. *Trump wins election*

stone cold
Feb 15, 2014

Crowsbeak posted:

1. Actually its called a country you see we have borders as does everywhere else. If you tried to get into Canada and didn't have a passport you screaming that you're a human being wouldn't mean poo poo. Same thing with illegals aliens. You have to respect a countries laws and its right to decide who it lets in. Sorry you cannot accept how things actually are and how they have been since the beginning of the twentieth century. Also Atzlan was more likely was in Neuvo Leon. Finally yes being that I and the 330 million citizens in do own this country, as much as the 40-50 million Canadians own their country and so on and so forth, because the citizens have the right to decide who gets in.

BTW I noticed you stopped calling me boruguis scum.

Having borders does not mean you can declare people, like as a loving concept, illegal. People are not goddamn "illegals," you ginormous piece of loving poo poo. Undocumented immigrants are loving people and part of having responsibility and sovereignty as the United States is maybe acknowledging how hosed up our repeated incursions into central and South America totally hosed it up and forced people into the kind of desperation it takes to break the loving laws. Somehow, I don't see you owning up to American imperialism though. People are not loving "illegals," they're loving living human goddamn beings, you racist swine.

Also, Aztlán, you white thicko, does not refer to the loving legendary place, it refers to the states illegally seized by the American government. I see somebody knows nothing of the history of the United States, so I'll give you a nice little fifth grade jumping off point: go ahead and google the "Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo."

Also, I wasn't aware you moonlit at USCIS or CBP, but your naziness would fit right in at CBP, let me tell you.

A girl gets bored, and nazi bourgeois scum doesn't trip off the tongue as easily.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

stone cold
Feb 15, 2014

Pedro De Heredia posted:

People do stay in America (or other countries) illegally; or against the immigration laws of that country. It really doesn't matter what other word you use to describe this: it will carry a negative connotation soon enough.

It is easy for anti-immigration sentiment in America to rise, and less so for pro-immigration sentiment, because people who are against immigration actually have a semi-coherent political framework by which they explain their anti-immigration position. It is a real political/social argument. A bad, factually incorrect one, sure, but it is an argument. It has bad guys, good guys, people who benefit politically, people who don't, a mechanism that explains it, etc.

Liberals, comparatively speaking, don't have a political/social argument. Just a vague, apolitical "compassion", idiotic claims that "immigrants are good for capitalism!", and downright piety/hostility. Wow, how convincing. *Trump wins election*

How about these are actual human loving lives at stake and maybe deporting 11 million people is not just inhumane, it's a logistical loving nightmare?

Look up Operation Wetback, and you tell me how successful you think deporting 11 million people would be. Here's a thought: let's keep taxpaying people who commit crimes at a lower rate than the genuine populace, and deport nazi scum like Crowsbeak.

But, yeah, you're right, having basic human compassion and decency for people is a lovely bourgeois value, and the true leftist will kick out all those "illegals."

Also, gently caress off with this centrist nonsense. Having an argument doesn't make anything you say valid, or are you gonna start rallying for Spencer, Duke, and Yiannopoulos. After all, they have "arguments."

  • Locked thread