|
Coin toss coming up, Kempski will live stream it. https://twitter.com/JimmyKempski/status/837705464079069190
|
# ? Mar 3, 2017 18:15 |
|
|
# ? Jun 5, 2024 08:45 |
Should have a phili proxy on the vikings side
|
|
# ? Mar 3, 2017 18:21 |
|
Eagles won.
|
# ? Mar 3, 2017 18:34 |
|
Alex Marvez, Sirius XM Host, claims Cooks will be an Eagle. For their second round pick. Dunno how respectable he is. Also, I can't get twitter to post on here with the formatting. I post the URL and it just posts a URL. https://twitter.com/alexmarvez/status/837666412491653121?s=09 https://mobile.twitter.com/alexmarvez/status/837667677342732289 Nm it worked
|
# ? Mar 3, 2017 18:36 |
2nd seems a bit too much
|
|
# ? Mar 3, 2017 18:39 |
|
El Patron posted:Coin toss coming up, Kempski will live stream it. I didn't know they did a custom coin. Pretty cool.
|
# ? Mar 3, 2017 18:43 |
|
CyberPingu posted:2nd seems a bit too much Dude is younger than Wentz, about the same age as Corey Davis and Mike Williams. Has turned in the seasons of: 2014 - 53/550/3 2015 - 84/1,348/9 2016 - 78/1,173/8 Only concern is that he's on the last year of his rookie deal. Would need to get a long term deal done with him.
|
# ? Mar 3, 2017 18:44 |
|
Titans don't have a second round pick and may not want to pay a 1st for Cooks even though they have 2 of them
|
# ? Mar 3, 2017 18:47 |
|
89 posted:Dude is younger than Wentz, about the same age as Corey Davis and Mike Williams. Has turned in the seasons of: Your concern should be that Cooks might be just a cog in a high-powered passing offense led by Drew Brees. It's not as bad as if he were the #2 guy in that offense (those almost never work out), but his catch rate isn't spectacular and it's an extremely safe bet that Carson Wentz won't throw for 5,200 yards next year. I think a 2nd for Cooks is too high given what his contract situation is. The Eagles aren't exactly in "win now" mode--they should be building for long-term success.
|
# ? Mar 3, 2017 18:54 |
|
Eagles were also in love with Cooks back in the 2014 draft and were going to draft him until the Saints snapped him up right before them. (And then the Packers snapped up their last guy on their draft board, Clinton-Dix, so we traded down and got...Marcus Smith..)
|
# ? Mar 3, 2017 18:58 |
|
Wait a minute I don't follow the Saints closely but I thought Cooks was good, why are the Saints looking to trade him
|
# ? Mar 3, 2017 19:14 |
|
Febreeze posted:Wait a minute I don't follow the Saints closely but I thought Cooks was good, why are the Saints looking to trade him On his last year and he wants out, better to trade now and get something for him than let him walk next year.
|
# ? Mar 3, 2017 19:16 |
|
El Patron posted:On his last year and he wants out, better to trade now and get something for him than let him walk next year. It's smart for them, but I think it's better for the Eagles to sign him to a new deal early rather than wait for him to hit free agency next year. Stats-wise, his last two seasons have been very solid but it's very, very unlikely he'll be able to replicate those results in Philly. He is a major step up from what they have, but then so is any street free agent WR, really
|
# ? Mar 3, 2017 19:29 |
TheChirurgeon posted:
|
|
# ? Mar 3, 2017 19:41 |
|
Febreeze posted:Wait a minute I don't follow the Saints closely but I thought Cooks was good, why are the Saints looking to trade him Because Drew Brees could get 1,000 yards out of a thalidomide baby.
|
# ? Mar 3, 2017 19:58 |
|
Febreeze posted:Wait a minute I don't follow the Saints closely but I thought Cooks was good, why are the Saints looking to trade him I was suprised too, but apparently they like last year's second round pick, Michael Thomas, more. CyberPingu posted:2nd seems a bit too much I think so too, but I'd do the deal if they are sure they can resign him. I'd much prefer to give them Mychal Kendricks and a 3rd.
|
# ? Mar 3, 2017 21:34 |
|
Febreeze posted:Wait a minute I don't follow the Saints closely but I thought Cooks was good, why are the Saints looking to trade him The reports say the Saints really aren't looking to trade Cooks, along with some suggestion that Cooks may be looking to go be a true #1 somewhere else, but that the Saints are just listening to see if there's a market there. I mean, Cooks was a first-rounder in 2014 that panned out (only player from the draft that panned out, good god it hurts to look at the rest of that draft), so you'd need a first+ to be worth trading. EDIT: that same article re: "eagles likely landing spot" lists the Saints as wanting a first.
|
# ? Mar 4, 2017 00:04 |
|
ulmont posted:The reports say the Saints really aren't looking to trade Cooks, along with some suggestion that Cooks may be looking to go be a true #1 somewhere else, but that the Saints are just listening to see if there's a market there. ewwww I hope the Eagles do offer a first cause that'd be dumb as hell
|
# ? Mar 4, 2017 00:25 |
|
Eagles, Patriots, Lions, and Colts are the teams in play for LB Paul Worrilow. He always did great for my IDP fantasy league Eagles for sure have Mychal Kendricks on the trade block. Eagles have placed a 2nd round tender on TE Trey Burton.
|
# ? Mar 4, 2017 02:13 |
|
The Redskins are so hosed.
|
# ? Mar 4, 2017 02:32 |
|
Beer4TheBeerGod posted:The Redskins are so hosed. You're 150 years too late.
|
# ? Mar 4, 2017 04:20 |
|
Chichevache posted:You're 150 years too late. 500 years
|
# ? Mar 4, 2017 05:23 |
|
Flikken posted:500 years Columbus literally sold 13 year old girls as sex slaves. I can't believe Ohio has a city named after him.
|
# ? Mar 4, 2017 10:12 |
|
89 posted:Eagles for sure have Mychal Kendricks on the trade block. I hope they trade him to the Patriots so all the fans that have been making GBS threads on him for 2 years will suddenly consider him a pro-bowler.
|
# ? Mar 4, 2017 16:21 |
|
https://twitter.com/john_keim/status/838259044943032320 This is the first head coach extension ever in the Snyder era.
|
# ? Mar 5, 2017 09:22 |
|
Feels like when they panic extended McNabb to try and divert attention from some controversy.
|
# ? Mar 5, 2017 12:07 |
|
Ishin posted:Feels like when they panic extended McNabb to try and divert attention from some controversy. I think it's good, since it eliminates the risk of signing a deal for a coach that won't be around for long.
|
# ? Mar 5, 2017 19:43 |
|
Gruden seems like a good coach, or at least good enough to keep around. I remember in his first year the controversy with Gruden not wanting to start RG3 and taking away RG3 privileges, and it looked like Gruden was a dead man walking. Maybe the Skins are figuring poo poo out. *Gives up Kirk Cousins for a 6th and Mark Sanchez*
|
# ? Mar 5, 2017 19:49 |
|
Febreeze posted:Gruden seems like a good coach, or at least good enough to keep around. I remember in his first year the controversy with Gruden not wanting to start RG3 and taking away RG3 privileges, and it looked like Gruden was a dead man walking. Good enough definitely seems to be the case, and it would be nice to have some consistency from year to year. I still don't understand the FO, or WTF is happening with our GM, but it's definitely better than before.
|
# ? Mar 5, 2017 21:13 |
|
Beer4TheBeerGod posted:Good enough definitely seems to be the case, and it would be nice to have some consistency from year to year. I still don't understand the FO, or WTF is happening with our GM, but it's definitely better than before. The McCloughan situation aside I won't totally poo poo on the team's handling of Kirk Cousins. He wants a deal that is closer to Cutler and Stafford where he's your QB whether you like him or not for 4-5 years rather than the Tannehill or Dalton deal where you can move on after a couple of years. The Andrew Luck deal probably drove up the minimum bid too. Bruce Allen is probably looking at the Bears being stuck with Jay Cutler for years and worried that'll be case if they extend Cousins (I think that'd be the case). The criticism I would have is that, one way or another, you pick a direction and go all in. Either call everyone in the league looking for a trade partner or give him the extension.
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 17:53 |
|
I don't think Cutler was ever really the bears' problem.
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 20:42 |
|
Cash Monet posted:The McCloughan situation aside I won't totally poo poo on the team's handling of Kirk Cousins. He wants a deal that is closer to Cutler and Stafford where he's your QB whether you like him or not for 4-5 years rather than the Tannehill or Dalton deal where you can move on after a couple of years. The Andrew Luck deal probably drove up the minimum bid too. Bruce Allen is probably looking at the Bears being stuck with Jay Cutler for years and worried that'll be case if they extend Cousins (I think that'd be the case). The market has shown that QBs are at a premium. They didn't necessarily have to offer him a long term deal, but they were offering him a contract worth $15M a year when Brock Osweiler was getting $72M over four years ($37M guaranteed) and Sam Bradford got $36M over two years ($26M guaranteed). Now he'll get $24M and any offer has to start there, plus he's guaranteed to hit FA next year. Washington completely flubbed the negotiation and now has to pay out the nose or lose their QB. Also I feel like we can criticize them for stupid poo poo like this (found by FizFashizzle): quote:Appearing on 106.7 The Fan in D.C., the Washington Post's Mike Jones referred to NFL Network's "report" of a three-way trade involving Kirk Cousins, Tony Romo, and the 49ers as "fake."
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 20:58 |
|
https://twitter.com/ProFootballTalk/status/838276242621227008?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw https://twitter.com/PierreGarcon/status/838592091433365505?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw So I guess Pierre is disponible?
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 22:03 |
|
NotWearingPants posted:So I guess Pierre is disponible? He doesn't seem interested in coming back. Nor does Jackson.
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 22:08 |
|
Beer4TheBeerGod posted:The market has shown that QBs are at a premium. They didn't necessarily have to offer him a long term deal, but they were offering him a contract worth $15M a year when Brock Osweiler was getting $72M over four years ($37M guaranteed) and Sam Bradford got $36M over two years ($26M guaranteed). Now he'll get $24M and any offer has to start there, plus he's guaranteed to hit FA next year. Washington completely flubbed the negotiation and now has to pay out the nose or lose their QB. They were going have to pay out the nose even if they weren't prepared. The fact that the market dictates Kirk Cousins will be one of the highest paid players in the league means the market is broken. I won't fault them if they want to move on from him. quote:Also I feel like we can criticize them for stupid poo poo like this (found by FizFashizzle): Well, yeah, obviously. That dumb bullshit is still dumb bullshit.
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 22:26 |
|
Cash Monet posted:They were going have to pay out the nose even if they weren't prepared. The fact that the market dictates Kirk Cousins will be one of the highest paid players in the league means the market is broken. I won't fault them if they want to move on from him. The market isn't broken. Cousins is a proven starter in an incredibly supply limited position in a league with a constantly expanding salary cap. Unless you already have someone on your roster there is nothing to move on to.
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 23:23 |
|
Beer4TheBeerGod posted:The market isn't broken. Cousins is a proven starter in an incredibly supply limited position in a league with a constantly expanding salary cap. Unless you already have someone on your roster there is nothing to move on to. They could try building an All-Pro offensive line with All-Pro RB and then just sticking a 4th round draft pick in there at QB.
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 23:28 |
|
NotWearingPants posted:They could try building an All-Pro offensive line with All-Pro RB and then just sticking a 4th round draft pick in there at QB. I thought that's what they tried with RG3.
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 23:32 |
|
Beer4TheBeerGod posted:I thought that's what they tried with RG3. *wooosh*
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 23:34 |
|
|
# ? Jun 5, 2024 08:45 |
|
TheChirurgeon posted:*wooosh* I keep on forgetting Cousins was a 4th round pick, not a 3rd.
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 23:37 |