|
those spoilers my goodness. I'm surprised they acknowledged the movie's roots at all.
|
# ? Mar 19, 2017 06:13 |
|
|
# ? May 15, 2024 04:14 |
|
HIJK posted:those spoilers my goodness. I'm surprised they acknowledged the movie's roots at all. They could of called it Lady Robo Cop. Tenzarin fucked around with this message at 07:40 on Mar 19, 2017 |
# ? Mar 19, 2017 07:37 |
|
Are you ok? That post was way too short for you.
|
# ? Mar 19, 2017 10:30 |
This movie is going to be loving retarded.
|
|
# ? Mar 19, 2017 12:49 |
|
Should be some pretty good memes once it's out on DVD, tho.
|
# ? Mar 19, 2017 13:00 |
I'm curious how the gently caress they're going to magic away the reason she's called Major. In the anime it's because she actually was a Major. In this it's because........?
|
|
# ? Mar 19, 2017 13:06 |
|
Is there a reason beyond the obvious why they're not doing junkets for the movie?
|
# ? Mar 19, 2017 14:08 |
|
I think the obvious reason is reason enough. If none of us were complete losers, would we willingly expose ourselves to part of the primordial subculture that gave rise to goons?WMain00 posted:I'm curious how the gently caress they're going to magic away the reason she's called Major. In the anime it's because she actually was a Major. In this it's because........? Part of her new identity I assume.
|
# ? Mar 19, 2017 15:21 |
|
Late night shows aren't exactly the wokest bunch, so the YouTube interviews are one thing, but it seems like they're just going to keep promoting it from a distance with weird social-media marketing and a bunch of billboards.
|
# ? Mar 19, 2017 15:40 |
|
Is there a Blu ray set for the stand alone TV show? All I can find is what looks like a movie based on the show?
|
# ? Mar 19, 2017 22:08 |
|
Kingtheninja posted:Is there a Blu ray set for the stand alone TV show? All I can find is what looks like a movie based on the show? It also appears to be a pretty disastrous transfer. I ordered the DVD version a while back, and I must've done it for the same reasons. ufarn fucked around with this message at 22:27 on Mar 19, 2017 |
# ? Mar 19, 2017 22:24 |
|
Kingtheninja posted:Is there a Blu ray set for the stand alone TV show? All I can find is what looks like a movie based on the show? The recent release is bad bad bad. If you can get the Korean release from a few years ago it's much better.
|
# ? Mar 19, 2017 22:31 |
|
Kingtheninja posted:Is there a Blu ray set for the stand alone TV show? All I can find is what looks like a movie based on the show? There might be an over priced dvd set on amazon.
|
# ? Mar 19, 2017 23:03 |
|
I'm thinking about diving in to some of this stuff, there's the two movies, SAC, and something called arise?
|
# ? Mar 19, 2017 23:07 |
|
Kingtheninja posted:I'm thinking about diving in to some of this stuff, there's the two movies, SAC, and something called arise? Arise is an origin story of Section 9. It does not occur in the same universe as any of the other media. In addition to the four episodes there is a movie. The four episodes were recut for TV in a series called Alternative Architecture that also added a fifth episode called Pyrophoric Cult, which bridges the series into the movie. Pyrophoric Cult has so far not been officially released in the US. Edit: this image outlined it pretty well: Midjack fucked around with this message at 23:25 on Mar 19, 2017 |
# ? Mar 19, 2017 23:15 |
|
Kingtheninja posted:I'm thinking about diving in to some of this stuff, there's the two movies, SAC, and something called arise?
|
# ? Mar 19, 2017 23:22 |
|
ufarn posted:The original movie (not the 2.0 crap) plus the two seasons of SAC are what I recommend. All of them are fantastic, but season 2 of SAC is only so-so as it progresses. I felt that SAC's season one main plot gets worse, but it takes time for it to go bad (I want to say that it goes off the rails when Umibozu raids Section 9 which is when it jumps the shark, which is late, late in the series). Season two's main plot starts off bad (with it's take on the assassination at the beginning of the movie and manga being a groaner) but picks up steam and gets interesting when the Individual Eleven get together and chop off their own heads.
|
# ? Mar 19, 2017 23:30 |
|
Young Freud posted:So, the Art of GITS artbook came out and it has some very spoilerific images worthy of discussion and/or anger... She looks hotter now. Already bought my ticket.
|
# ? Mar 19, 2017 23:34 |
|
Young Freud posted:I felt that SAC's season one main plot gets worse, but it takes time for it to go bad (I want to say that it goes off the rails when Umibozu raids Section 9 which is when it jumps the shark, which is late, late in the series). Season two's main plot starts off bad (with it's take on the assassination at the beginning of the movie and manga being a groaner) but picks up steam and gets interesting when the Individual Eleven get together and chop off their own heads.
|
# ? Mar 19, 2017 23:35 |
|
One thing SAC does really well is the transition between the monster of the week episodes and the actual plot. That's usually clunky as hell, but SAC gets it almost organic feeling.You just sort of switch at some point, without really noticing.
|
# ? Mar 20, 2017 00:35 |
|
Kingtheninja posted:I'm thinking about diving in to some of this stuff, there's the two movies, SAC, and something called arise? Just watch anything really, but the tv series was the best stuff made about the about it, in my opinion. First and the second season, the second season really opens up with some of the other team characters. Watch Arise if you really like the series. One of my favorite ones is where Saito tells a story about how he met the major, I think its also the episode he talks the most. Some of the best episodes don't even have the major in them. The second season has a better build up at the end because all that happens in the first season is that a crazy intelligent person finds out something bad and crazy being done but does not want to fight and just finds the major and tells her everything. Even the side characters get action at the end of the second season even if all it is just punching some guy trying to carjack them which is related to the plot. Tenzarin fucked around with this message at 02:08 on Mar 20, 2017 |
# ? Mar 20, 2017 01:32 |
|
Snowman_McK posted:One thing SAC does really well is the transition between the monster of the week episodes and the actual plot. That's usually clunky as hell, but SAC gets it almost organic feeling.You just sort of switch at some point, without really noticing. They tell you at the title screen of each episode if it's a "stand alone" or "complex" episode.
|
# ? Mar 20, 2017 01:40 |
|
You're either a Oshii GitS fan or an SAC GitS fan. Personally, I'm an Oshii fan. GitS95 and Innocence are treasures. SAC is poo!
|
# ? Mar 20, 2017 02:43 |
|
SuperMechagodzilla posted:I guess you haven't noticed, but the thread consensus is actually that this film is replete with confrontational, racially charged imagery and 'dangerous messages' - whereas the original is backhandedly praised as a pretty-but-meaningless Nipponese tits movie, wherein our authentically Asian ninjess protagonist harms the baddie. How can you of all people call the original meaningless? It's about Oshii's identity crisis choosing between art and the seminary. Giving up a piece of your personal identity in an organisation larger than yourself that asks for a Spartan lifestyle vs inspiration derived from overindulging looking at tits on the internet. It's about Oshii wanting it both ways and getting enlightenment with tits. What happened to you man? You know there's subtext between the boobies.
|
# ? Mar 20, 2017 03:43 |
|
Frogfingers posted:How can you of all people call the original meaningless? He's not. He's saying that's the conclusion the thread as a whole has made.
|
# ? Mar 20, 2017 04:21 |
|
Even before seeing that art book stuff I never thought Rupert Sanders could oversee or 'envision' a police procedural plot worth a goddamn...
|
# ? Mar 20, 2017 07:45 |
|
Midjack posted:They tell you at the title screen of each episode if it's a "stand alone" or "complex" episode. I watched all 50 episodes and never noticed this, which says something worrying about me.
|
# ? Mar 20, 2017 09:18 |
|
Snowman_McK posted:I watched all 50 episodes and never noticed this, which says something worrying about me. To be fair, if you're watching one episode at a time you might overlook it. It's easier to notice if you watch a few in a row and it switches a few times.
|
# ? Mar 20, 2017 12:23 |
|
The cards are also different colors. I think they used blue and green in S1 and red and blue in S2. Also, they tend to distribute them somewhat weirdly, S1 has like 3 complex episodes for the first 20 episodes and then the last 4 are all complex.
|
# ? Mar 20, 2017 15:21 |
|
WMain00 posted:I'm curious how the gently caress they're going to magic away the reason she's called Major. In the anime it's because she actually was a Major. In this it's because........? It's because she's a Major. It means exactly the same thing that it means in the '95 film: Section 9/Hanka are the bad guys. The really funny thing about singling out Sanders' alleged character-progression note-card for ridicule is that all it does is demonstrate in a rudimentary sense that Sanders was always intent on making a film organized around themes of identity and technological singularity, following a leader of a counter-terrorist task force. Again, it's the same story as the '95 film, but now it's spelled out on what is really just a tool of the writer to eliminate needless exposition and focus on the visual, cinematic narrative. The sheer act of filmmaking, which bares no relationship to the spectator actually watching any GitS, is treated as disgusting and infantile. But it turns out that it's a body horror, cyberpunk movie. The character in the original manga, Major/Motoko Kusanagi, is destroyed by the technological singularity, and what's born from it is the monstrous Scarlett Johansson.
|
# ? Mar 20, 2017 15:37 |
|
Kingtheninja posted:Is there a Blu ray set for the stand alone TV show? All I can find is what looks like a movie based on the show? I went looking for it a few months back and it must have only had a limited print or something ridiculous because the only copies on Amazon had insane prices attached to them.
|
# ? Mar 20, 2017 20:38 |
|
K. Waste posted:The really funny thing about singling out Sanders' alleged character-progression note-card for ridicule is that all it does is demonstrate in a rudimentary sense that Sanders was always intent on making a film organized around themes of identity and technological singularity Well I dont think anyone is disputing that the movie is based around identity. I think people are just making fun of the fact it looks like it was made by a 10 year old. Not like, a proffesional film-maker.
|
# ? Mar 20, 2017 23:16 |
|
cosmically_cosmic posted:Well I dont think anyone is disputing that the movie is based around identity. I think people are just making fun of the fact it looks like it was made by a 10 year old. Not like, a proffesional film-maker. Right: It's a projection and a joke in bad faith. Elementary-level children, when committed to the project of writing, generally don't make neatly written notecards mapping out the hero's journey of their protagonist in three-act structure. Those are just generic, good techniques of writing and organization of which most professional filmmakers employ some variation, and which need to be first taught and then practiced. It goes back to the problem of memes, and folks cavalierly joking that Paramount could have avoided controversy by setting the film in the U.S. Rather than clarifying the political content of GitS'17 as it emerges, the reductive emphasis is always on ridicule, even though, overtly, there is nothing remarkable about the development and production of GitS'17 in and of itself.
|
# ? Mar 21, 2017 00:57 |
|
K. Waste posted:Right: It's a projection and a joke in bad faith. Elementary-level children, when committed to the project of writing, generally don't make neatly written notecards mapping out the hero's journey of their protagonist in three-act structure. Those are just generic, good techniques of writing and organization of which most professional filmmakers employ some variation, and which need to be first taught and then practiced. This is the card we're talking about right? I think its bad faith to say that this is pro-film-making in action. Aside from being 'neatly written' (which I guess kids can't do) its nothing but embarassing. I mean I'll type out this 'mapping out of the hero's journey'. quote:Lost: Who/What am I? It would be lame to make fun of if it was just a scrap of paper from the first day he decided to write the drat thing, but it's published. They decided that this would fill everyone with good expectations of a well written and thought out film. Maybe you're talking about something else and I'm confused, but the only person I'd expect to defend that thing as important film-making technique is the guy who wrote it.
|
# ? Mar 21, 2017 01:48 |
|
cosmically_cosmic posted:
What is embarrassing about what's written on the director's note card, and what you have transcribed? You are giving an inaccurate explanation of the context of the image, which appears on the same page as a bunch of concept art and storyboards. This is not a trailer for the film. The book exists for absolutely anybody who for any reason might be interested in the development and production of Ghost in the Shell, regardless of whether or not they would personally like Ghost in the Shell.
|
# ? Mar 21, 2017 03:18 |
|
Yeah, those 'making of books' tend to give you a pretty bare bones view of how the thing got made. They'll tell you they wanted a 'natural look' but they don't exactly break down lense and lighting choices, or walk you through what size nails the carpenters use. It would make perfect sense for them to inlcude a napkin sized summary of her arc, seeing as that's pretty much the 'we wanted a natural look' of story structure. As silly as the film will probably be, this is more a reason that making of book is stupid, not the movie.
|
# ? Mar 21, 2017 10:08 |
|
This is the director who had an affair with Kristen Stewart during the filming of The Huntsman. Let's at least not paint him as some misunderstood genius.
|
# ? Mar 21, 2017 11:21 |
|
ufarn posted:This is the director who had an affair with Kristen Stewart during the filming of The Huntsman. What does that have to do with anything? It's relatively tame compared to a lot of other more prominent directors and artists.
|
# ? Mar 21, 2017 13:20 |
|
Bugblatter posted:What does that have to do with anything? It's relatively tame compared to a lot of other more prominent directors and artists.
|
# ? Mar 21, 2017 13:40 |
|
|
# ? May 15, 2024 04:14 |
|
ufarn posted:That his IMDB pedigree is poo poo, and "assume the dude knows what he's doing for whatever reason" is how he got the job in the first place. That's what cheating on your wife by having an affair with your lead actress means? Man, I guess I have to reevaluate my opinion of Spielberg now. Also, fwiw, he directed Snow White, not the Huntsmen spinoff (Which didn't even star Kirsten Stewart).
|
# ? Mar 21, 2017 14:42 |