|
As long as she she doesn't need to move her forehead, then by all means keep Ming-Na in the role. Otherwise, Brenda Song just got (another) break of a lifetime.
|
# ? Mar 23, 2017 02:54 |
|
|
# ? May 11, 2024 09:02 |
|
i've read on chinese rumour mills that people are actively advocating for Jing Tian of The Great Wall and Kong (and the upcoming Pacific Rim 2) NOT be Mulan. If you've watched any of these movies, you'll be surprised at how top billing she gets with her... uh, acting prowess.
|
# ? Mar 23, 2017 03:03 |
|
The Saddest Rhino posted:i've read on chinese rumour mills that people are actively advocating for Jing Tian of The Great Wall and Kong (and the upcoming Pacific Rim 2) NOT be Mulan. If you've watched any of these movies, you'll be surprised at how top billing she gets with her... uh, acting prowess. Apparently she's related to one of the owners of the Chinese studio that co-produces these movies.
|
# ? Mar 23, 2017 03:11 |
|
Nepotism: not just a Western thing!
|
# ? Mar 23, 2017 03:43 |
|
Chloe Bennett would make sense I guess since she's basically been the real Mulan's protege for five years now.
|
# ? Mar 23, 2017 04:27 |
|
Did anybody even care about Disney's Mulan? I was under the impression it was one of the more underwhelming movies at the tail- end of the golden period.
|
# ? Mar 23, 2017 08:56 |
|
Grendels Dad posted:Did anybody even care about Disney's Mulan? I was under the impression it was one of the more underwhelming movies at the tail- end of the golden period. It's well liked, and I'll Make a Man Out of You is popular beyond being a meme. Also despite B&B making all the money, most of what I've been hearing is that's a mess.
|
# ? Mar 23, 2017 09:18 |
|
Grendels Dad posted:Did anybody even care about Disney's Mulan? I was under the impression it was one of the more underwhelming movies at the tail- end of the golden period. Mulan is immensely enjoyable
|
# ? Mar 23, 2017 10:55 |
|
Vegetable posted:I will cut you To be fair, my impression comes from its German release. I guess it was better received even here than say, Tarzan. But compared to Lion King and what have you it just didn't feel the same.
|
# ? Mar 23, 2017 11:21 |
|
wyoming posted:It's well liked, and I'll Make a Man Out of You is popular beyond being a meme. Mainly it is far too long. They stretched a well paced 84 min film to 129 min.
|
# ? Mar 23, 2017 11:35 |
|
Looking at the movies that made up the Disney Renaissance, I had forgotten that The Rescuers Down Under even existed.
|
# ? Mar 23, 2017 11:40 |
|
QuoProQuid posted:Looking at the movies that made up the Disney Renaissance, I had forgotten that The Rescuers Down Under even existed. Cool villain, golden eagle, Australia, tolerable rodent people with cool bird pilot. Think I liked it better than the first one.
|
# ? Mar 23, 2017 13:00 |
|
syscall girl posted:Cool villain, golden eagle, Australia, tolerable rodent people with cool bird pilot. Think I liked it better than the first one. I don't remember much about it but I know I preferred it to the first one.
|
# ? Mar 23, 2017 13:02 |
|
How could you forget George C Scott? https://youtu.be/xPgTj46X5tg I had that on vhs, great film. First one's good too but not as funny.
|
# ? Mar 23, 2017 14:17 |
|
QuoProQuid posted:Looking at the movies that made up the Disney Renaissance, I had forgotten that The Rescuers Down Under even existed.
|
# ? Mar 23, 2017 14:31 |
|
Disney has over a dozen live action remakes currently in production. Lion King, Aladdin and Dumbo will probably come out pretty soon and others include Peter Pan, The Little Mermaid, Pinocchio, Snow White and the Seven Dwarves and a 101 Dalmatians spinoff focusing on Cruella deVille. Grendels Dad posted:Did anybody even care about Disney's Mulan? I was under the impression it was one of the more underwhelming movies at the tail- end of the golden period. I wouldn't have thought that The Jungle Book was all that popular any more but the live action remake Disney put in theatres last year came just shy of making a billion dollars worldwide. But then again their Pete's Dragon live action remake didn't set the world on fire so they're not all record breakers.
|
# ? Mar 23, 2017 14:39 |
|
There was just a live action Pinocchio 20 years ago (not Disney), do we really need another one?
|
# ? Mar 23, 2017 14:41 |
|
Yes. For all time forever.
|
# ? Mar 23, 2017 14:42 |
|
Mulan killed hundreds of nomad dudes, possibly even a few thousand, most other princesses only have a body count of one if at all.
|
# ? Mar 23, 2017 14:46 |
|
Casimir Radon posted:There was just a live action Pinocchio 20 years ago (not Disney), do we really need another one? Did that one have the songs?
|
# ? Mar 23, 2017 14:46 |
|
got any sevens posted:Did that one have the songs?
|
# ? Mar 23, 2017 14:49 |
|
Casimir Radon posted:There was just a live action Pinocchio 20 years ago (not Disney), do we really need another one? Disney also made a live action TV movie in 2000 starring Drew Carey and Julia-Louis Dreyfus https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1los3Jz7lwU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rw7_U2vwsSw Snowglobe of Doom fucked around with this message at 14:51 on Mar 23, 2017 |
# ? Mar 23, 2017 14:48 |
|
Snowglobe of Doom posted:Disney also made a live action TV movie in 2000 starring Drew Carey and Julia-Louis Dreyfus
|
# ? Mar 23, 2017 14:50 |
|
With Jonathan Lipnicki as Pinocchio. Or Haley Joel Osmond. Or young Anakin Skywalker, something like that
|
# ? Mar 23, 2017 14:50 |
|
I'm definitely not the target market for Disney stuff but I can see why they'd remake poo poo if it'll net them more cash. Are they just pretty much straight copies of the animated ones or do they differ?
|
# ? Mar 23, 2017 14:53 |
|
Casimir Radon posted:There was just a live action Pinocchio 20 years ago (not Disney), do we really need another one? I agree, we should've stopped adapting this poo poo since 964 √PINOCCHIO.
|
# ? Mar 23, 2017 15:15 |
|
Does anyone remember Roberto Benigni's Pinocchio? Now that was a strange adaptation. Olympic Mathlete posted:I'm definitely not the target market for Disney stuff but I can see why they'd remake poo poo if it'll net them more cash. Are they just pretty much straight copies of the animated ones or do they differ? Cinderella and The Jungle Book follow a lot of the same plot beats, though with a different execution, so they're essentially alternative takes on the same source material. Maleficent completely rewrites the premise of the original to turn the villain into a heroic figure. I haven't seen Beauty and the Beast, but from what I've heard, it's fairly close to the animated version with a few additional story elements.
|
# ? Mar 23, 2017 15:17 |
|
Mulan was always my favorite 90s Disney movie, Aladdin/Lion King/B&tB were so popular that I was trying to be cool by liking that and Hunchback when many of my peers did not (really liked the architecture and gothic vibe to the latter). The whole avalanche stampede part was too cool for a Disney cartoon.
|
# ? Mar 23, 2017 15:17 |
|
It's not Pinnochio without Roberto Benigni In fact I'm sure a lot of the darkness our world is currently experiencing is a result of Roberto Benigni not getting screen time anymore Johnny Stecchino Is a classic and better than Johnny Dangerously/insert any mob comedy I miss him directing increasingly mediocre romantic odes to his wife
|
# ? Mar 23, 2017 15:20 |
|
Do you think maybe Disney is doing these remakes in an attempt to retcon the old, handdrawn style of animation out of existence? So, like, in the future they can leave all of their old animated movies in the vault forever, and they can still use the relevant IPs at Disney parks but pretend the new live action movies invented them? To head off questions from future children about why the old animated movies look different from the new animated movies?
|
# ? Mar 23, 2017 15:31 |
|
21 Muns posted:Do you think maybe Disney is doing these remakes in an attempt to retcon the old, handdrawn style of animation out of existence? So, like, in the future they can leave all of their old animated movies in the vault forever, and they can still use the relevant IPs at Disney parks but pretend the new live action movies invented them? To head off questions from future children about why the old animated movies look different from the new animated movies? No. Theyre doing it for the absolute gobs of money it brings them while refreshing aging IPs to be used. All this vaulting and whatever is a side effect of making so much money that they can build a 1:1 replica of scrooge mcducks money vault.
|
# ? Mar 23, 2017 15:51 |
|
The Saddest Rhino posted:i've read on chinese rumour mills that people are actively advocating for Jing Tian of The Great Wall and Kong (and the upcoming Pacific Rim 2) NOT be Mulan. If you've watched any of these movies, you'll be surprised at how top billing she gets with her... uh, acting prowess. I haven't seen any of those yet, better or worse than Angelababy in ID4: Resurgence? Because Angelababy put in the single worst English-language performance I have ever heard in that movie (though I don't feel qualified to judge her Mandarin acting).
|
# ? Mar 23, 2017 15:55 |
|
Director Niki Caro is walking back the no songs in Mulan alreadyquote:“I don’t know where that’s come from. We’ve never talked about songs, and no decision has been made.” Just ignore it was Niki Caro who said there was no songs in the first place! http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/movies/la-et-mn-mulan-songs-niki-caro-20170322-story.html
|
# ? Mar 23, 2017 16:02 |
|
Barudak posted:No. Yeah Disney have always been searching for ways to squeeze more money out of their back catalogue of films. Their live action remakes aren't even anything new, they did live action remakes of The Jungle Book and 101 Dalmatians back in the mid 90s. They've also remade live action movies like Flubber, That Darn Cat!, Escape to Witch Mountain and Freaky Friday and adapted their park rides into movies like Country Bears and Haunted Mansion and some pirate thing.
|
# ? Mar 23, 2017 16:07 |
|
I get why they’d give it no songs because Mulan is fundamentally a war film. The animation subverted it by making it a comedy. But live action would be a lot harder. I just want it to be good. It’s a big deal, a big opportunity for Asian representation in Hollywood.
|
# ? Mar 23, 2017 16:08 |
|
It'd be neat if Disney reversed this trend and started making animated remakes of their old live action properties, like The Absentminded Professor (sorry but Flubber SUCKED, Robin Williams is great but that movie was fundamentally ill-conceived), 20,000 Leagues Under The Sea, and Old Yeller.
|
# ? Mar 23, 2017 16:38 |
|
21 Muns posted:It'd be neat if Disney reversed this trend and started making animated remakes of their old live action properties, like The Absentminded Professor (sorry but Flubber SUCKED, Robin Williams is great but that movie was fundamentally ill-conceived), 20,000 Leagues Under The Sea, and Old Yeller. An animated 20,000 Leagues would rock!
|
# ? Mar 23, 2017 16:45 |
|
Casimir Radon posted:Doubtful in this day in age. Moana had Pacific Islanders in all key roles. I guess Temura Morrison doesn't sing so some guy from Hamilton did that. Plus I kind of doubt that they'd ever be dumb enough to throw away an opportunity to make the big bucks in China while everyone else is shamelessly pandering to them. quote:I hope they don't fly too close to the sun and try to do live action Poctahontas. That would be a loving disaster. From what I've heard, it seems they almost flew too close to the sun with Beauty and the Beast - that drat near everything it got right was just copy-pasted from the animated movie. At least with Mulan, the only fairy-tale stuff there is a few ghosts and a ferret-sized dragon. There's no reason it couldn't yield a respectable live-action movie if the creative control ends up with people who know what they're doing.
|
# ? Mar 23, 2017 16:47 |
|
Flubber v Herbie start capitalizing on the shared universe
|
# ? Mar 23, 2017 16:53 |
|
|
# ? May 11, 2024 09:02 |
|
I want James Bond v Chitty Chitty Bang Bang, start bringing together the Flemingverse. Would Bond be able to save Truly Scrumptious?
|
# ? Mar 23, 2017 16:56 |