|
|
# ? May 9, 2017 04:44 |
|
|
# ? May 15, 2024 04:42 |
|
By the way have we found out who the fascist voyeur thats been buying the AVs is?
|
# ? May 9, 2017 04:55 |
|
Ora Tzo posted:By the way have we found out who the fascist voyeur thats been buying the AVs is?
|
# ? May 9, 2017 05:03 |
|
|
# ? May 9, 2017 05:09 |
|
|
# ? May 9, 2017 05:11 |
|
This is the worst doctor who antagonist yet
|
# ? May 9, 2017 05:23 |
|
Jordies is a shill for sure and it's unfortunate he doesn't consider and sometimes actively spurns the actual left but I appreciate there's someone speaking against liberal bullshit in a way that's aimed at disengaged young people who at least want to be better than their parents.
|
# ? May 9, 2017 05:29 |
|
Ora Tzo posted:By the way have we found out who the fascist voyeur thats been buying the AVs is? MISSION ACCOMPLISHED!
|
# ? May 9, 2017 06:10 |
|
There is no sign of respite for the nation's struggling retailers, particularly department stores, as shoppers refuse to spend in the face on an uncertain economy. The latest retail sales data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics showed a 0.1 per cent fall in March at the same time as many economists had been tipping a rise. So now not only are people not buying houses, they aren't buying anything else either. Hmmm.
|
# ? May 9, 2017 06:17 |
|
I'll post a Mark Latham tiny face if it gets me a UPF avatar.
|
# ? May 9, 2017 06:46 |
|
Lid posted:There is no sign of respite for the nation's struggling retailers, particularly department stores, as shoppers refuse to spend in the face on an uncertain economy. Jobs and growth?
|
# ? May 9, 2017 06:50 |
|
JBP posted:The only thing wrong with the ad is that they didn't think about the ensuing media beat up. I love how the ABC thought it was a good way to start leadership spill theories in Labor since Albanese spoke up against the ad.
|
# ? May 9, 2017 06:52 |
|
starkebn posted:Qld was trying to have a very similar conversation, about the power of the party to bind elected representatives, at the State Council meeting last weekend. It wasn't pretty. Even just writing the advice on this was ugly. I'm reallllllly happy I wasn't at State Council Sunday. Just getting the frantic messages was bad enough.
|
# ? May 9, 2017 06:55 |
|
https://twitter.com/PeterDutton_MP/status/861767699524763648
|
# ? May 9, 2017 07:08 |
|
Lid posted:There is no sign of respite for the nation's struggling retailers, particularly department stores, as shoppers refuse to spend in the face on an uncertain economy. Thank gently caress the adults are back in charge
|
# ? May 9, 2017 07:21 |
|
Bet they wish all those dead people were still spending their 700 stimulus bucks at JB now
|
# ? May 9, 2017 07:25 |
|
Budgetchat:Guardian AU posted:The government has ruled out any action on negative gearing or capital gains tax concessions, but is reportedly considering introducing a bond aggregator to better fund community housing and allowing first home buyers to use their pre-tax income to purchase a home. Oh good just what the overheated housing market needs, negative gearing 2: this time it's even more explicitly for the rich!
|
# ? May 9, 2017 07:29 |
|
hooman posted:Budgetchat: yes, yes we understand housing is "unaffordable" but what about, bear with me here, we make it EVEN MORE expensive?
|
# ? May 9, 2017 07:31 |
|
Can you explain what is meant by using ones pre-tax income to purchase a home? Am I to understand that this means I can contribute to a house savings fund/account and tax deduct it?
|
# ? May 9, 2017 07:31 |
|
JBP posted:Can you explain what is meant by using ones pre-tax income to purchase a home? Am I to understand that this means I can contribute to a house savings fund/account and tax deduct it? Presumably a first home savers account with favourable tax treatment.
|
# ? May 9, 2017 07:36 |
|
JBP posted:Can you explain what is meant by using ones pre-tax income to purchase a home? Am I to understand that this means I can contribute to a house savings fund/account and tax deduct it? It's rumor and scuttlebutt at the moment. No actual details on anything until budget releases. Just quoted the reporting direct from guardian sorry.
|
# ? May 9, 2017 07:38 |
|
I would blow Dane Cook posted:Presumably a first home savers account with favourable tax treatment. its like a reverse HECS, except instead of borrowing money from the government to pay a corporate university, you give money to the government to pay a rich person. everybody wins.
|
# ? May 9, 2017 07:39 |
|
Lid posted:There is no sign of respite for the nation's struggling retailers, particularly department stores, as shoppers refuse to spend in the face on an uncertain economy. Good thing we can lower interest rates to encourage people to spend!
|
# ? May 9, 2017 07:40 |
|
Lid posted:There is no sign of respite for the nation's struggling retailers, particularly department stores, as shoppers refuse to spend in the face on an uncertain economy. couldn't possibly have anything to do with most of the country spending their paycheck on rent/mortgage repayments instead of buying poo poo, could it?
|
# ? May 9, 2017 07:42 |
|
Can someone please sub in Barnaby Joyce's face to the Latham tinyface pic tia
|
# ? May 9, 2017 07:47 |
|
|
# ? May 9, 2017 07:49 |
|
JBP posted:Can you explain what is meant by using ones pre-tax income to purchase a home? Am I to understand that this means I can contribute to a house savings fund/account and tax deduct it? The rumours I've seen suggest first home owners might be able to salary sacrifice pre-tax income into a savings account that can only be used as a deposit. It means you pay less PAYG tax each week rather than claiming it in your tax return. Salary Sacrificing is usually run though a third party company so it also serves as a big handout from first home owners to certain parts of the finance industry.
|
# ? May 9, 2017 07:50 |
|
anyone know why alan joyce got pied?
|
# ? May 9, 2017 07:55 |
|
NoNotTheMindProbe posted:The rumours I've seen suggest first home owners might be able to salary sacrifice pre-tax income into a savings account that can only be used as a deposit. It means you pay less PAYG tax each week rather than claiming it in your tax return. Salary Sacrificing is usually run though a third party company so it also serves as a big handout from first home owners to certain parts of the finance industry. so in essence the same effect as letting people spend their superannuation on it? I guess if your goal is to put off the inevitable bubble bursting until a) you're not in government and b) you and your mates have sold off their investment properties it might be effective
|
# ? May 9, 2017 07:58 |
|
was he always a russian shill or did they get a pisstape to hold over him as well?
|
# ? May 9, 2017 08:14 |
|
Chadzok posted:was he always a russian shill or did they get a pisstape to hold over him as well? I think the Snowden stuff got him keen on Russia.
|
# ? May 9, 2017 08:21 |
|
Wasn't he a rapid Trump supporter during the US election on the hope that Trump maybe wouldn't go after him? Because lol that's working out well.
|
# ? May 9, 2017 08:30 |
|
NoNotTheMindProbe posted:The rumours I've seen suggest first home owners might be able to salary sacrifice pre-tax income into a savings account that can only be used as a deposit. It means you pay less PAYG tax each week rather than claiming it in your tax return. Salary Sacrificing is usually run though a third party company so it also serves as a big handout from first home owners to certain parts of the finance industry. So I can just live of the money I've saved for a deposit while salary sacrificing 100% of my income resulting in a big bonus from the government to use on a house deposit?
|
# ? May 9, 2017 08:35 |
|
ACC makes yet another strong case for being fired into the sunGuardian AU posted:The Australian Chamber of Commerce chief executive, James Pearson, believes a return to surplus will at least be put on the radar in the current budget, predicting a path out of deficit within the four-year forward estimates. The Coalition has previously pledged to return the budget to surplus by 2021. Pearson wants to see the budget cut red tape, address ballooning debt (gross debt is expected to reach half a trillion dollars) and focus on quality, sustainable expenditure. He wants government expenditure to be reduced to 25% of GDP.
|
# ? May 9, 2017 08:36 |
|
gay picnic defence posted:so in essence the same effect as letting people spend their superannuation on it? It's all speculation at this point so I don't know if the payment would be on top of regular super or instead of it. Either way the effect is to pump up housing prices and transfer more wealth from the young and poor to the old and wealthy.
|
# ? May 9, 2017 08:39 |
|
Periphery posted:So I can just live of the money I've saved for a deposit while salary sacrificing 100% of my income resulting in a big bonus from the government to use on a house deposit? No there will be caps on how much you can deposit each year.
|
# ? May 9, 2017 08:43 |
|
Being able to get a tax break on genuine savings for a house is not the shittest idea ever mooted, particularly considering the government of Australia right now. If I could bank my $500 a month or so like I do now and get tax concessions on it plus interest, I'd be pretty happy with that. e: that's if I was saving for a house and not to take debauched holidays in third world countries.
|
# ? May 9, 2017 08:46 |
|
JBP posted:Being able to get a tax break on genuine savings for a house is not the shittest idea ever mooted, particularly considering the government of Australia right now. If I could bank my $500 a month or so like I do now and get tax concessions on it plus interest, I'd be pretty happy with that. You'll probably just spend it all on smashed avocado you indolent millennial.
|
# ? May 9, 2017 08:51 |
|
|
# ? May 15, 2024 04:42 |
|
I smash me avos at home on the cheap.
|
# ? May 9, 2017 08:52 |