Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Fojar38
Sep 2, 2011


Sorry I meant to say I hope that the police use maximum force and kill or maim a bunch of innocent people, thus paving a way for a proletarian uprising and socialist utopia


also here's a stupid take
---------------------------->

The Glumslinger posted:

The likely successors are likely gonna be just as bad, if not worse, but welp, they get their shot now. I hope its Germany +EU and not Russia or China

If a meteor slammed into North America tomorrow but it was a magic meteor that only destroyed North America and left everything else the same, the new center of power would be the EU, although they would need to get to work on building a navy real quick

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Mystic Mongol
Jan 5, 2007

Your life's been thrown in disarray already--I wouldn't want you to feel pressured.


College Slice
Coal is down 86%!!! We must abandon our international obligations to save this extremely profitable industry.

The Glumslinger
Sep 24, 2008

Coach Nagy, you want me to throw to WHAT side of the field?


Hair Elf

Phoix posted:

Reminder that the accord says every country can determine their own standards so when Trump says he wants a better deal, he's just lying outright.

edit: or is just unaware of what he's removing us from which is probably more likely.

Its the second one, he doesn't understand this treaty, he just knows that Obama wanted it, and that means its bad

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster

berserker posted:

To a smart Democratic Party this would cement that whoever is on the 2020 ticket will run on a platform of climate change and staying in the Paris agreement. "If you elect me, we will stay in the Paris agreement, we will not abandon our children and our children's children" We'll see if the Democratic Party is smart.

Majorian
Jul 1, 2009

Mystic Mongol posted:

It's literally their job to clap.

I want Trump to force Jeb! to lead the "please clap" brigade.

Taerkar
Dec 7, 2002

kind of into it, really

Zil posted:

If they don't clap the bomb collars go off.

If they don't clap they're locked in a room with one of the TrumpSpawn.

BarbarianElephant
Feb 12, 2015
The fairy of forgiveness has removed your red text.

Night10194 posted:

If I understand right her party is completely destroying all comers in the polls right now.

Wow. But I'm sure Germans are lapping up how tough and clever she looks next to Trump.

STAC Goat
Mar 12, 2008

Watching you sleep.

Butt first, let's
check the feeds.

"The rest of the world applauded when we signed the agreement. I say gently caress the world!"

John Wick of Dogs
Mar 4, 2017

A real hellraiser


berserker posted:

To a smart Democratic Party this would cement that whoever is on the 2020 ticket will run on a platform of climate change and staying in the Paris agreement. "If you elect me, we will stay in the Paris agreement, we will not abandon our children and our children's children" We'll see if the Democratic Party is smart.

Trump would still be incumbent, the next president elect would not have that power

DoctorGonzo
Jul 25, 2016

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS
Now Hillary can say, vote for me and ill put the coal industry out of job for supra national deals!!!!

wait...

Zeluth
May 12, 2001

by Fluffdaddy
This guy has never even worked at a farm. To say disdain is an understatement.

evilweasel
Aug 24, 2002

Fojar38 posted:

And the next day their administration sought to mollify that sentiment. In addition, words cost nothing, especially words that are done in the middle of a more intense than expected election campaign.

Maybe foreign affairs and the fundamental forces that affect the relationships between nations consist of more than whatever the most recent headline was.

Do you think that this is the first time a European leader has said "We don't need those drat Yankees?" France loving withdrew from NATO in 1958.

my god you're dumb

yes, it is a big deal that one of the lynchpins of the post-war order is openly talking about how the united states is no longer trustworthy

you keep blathering about how the post-war order is super stable and whatever and it's stable because of america which is currently getting wrecked

There Bias Two
Jan 13, 2009
I'm not a good person


Gross. Don't use pie charts.

tetrapyloctomy
Feb 18, 2003

Okay -- you talk WAY too fast.
Nap Ghost

I don't see Melania waiting a year or so to pull the plug if he were on life support. I envision a well-practiced, "My Donald was very clear he would not want to live like this and I would like to withdraw care immediately so that he may die with dignity."

Unless she has more of a social filter than him, after a brief pause she will continue, "Any idea where a lady could get a drink, dinner, and a good lay around here?"

repeating
Nov 14, 2005
Probably already beaten by pages but the US is officially pulling out of the Paris climate agreement, and Trump plans to negotiate a new deal.

https://www.bostonglobe.com/news/po...KUSP/story.html

Solaris 2.0
May 14, 2008

Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

Germany's trade surplus and policies forcing the ECB to maintain deflation in the Eurozone are a short-term boon to Germany relative to its neighbors, but it is setting Germany up for a major economic catastrophe down the road.

Not to mention that Germany's national defense is 100% reliant on the US military and other countries acting as a human shield.

Fascism will probably be fairly popular again in Germany in 2030.

Ha. I'm just being facetious and venting. I realize the world is tied to the US both economically and militarily whether they or we like it or not. Honestly, it makes the fact that Trump is POTUS all that more scary, and how irresponsible we, as American citizens, have been with the awesome power this country has. It makes me disgusted.

Also to the other poster, yea the United States has been on this road for a long time but the Obama years gave the world some hope we were at least pretending to move in the right direction. That is now gone.

Paracaidas
Sep 24, 2016
Consistently Tedious!

STAC Goat posted:

At times like this it feels important to remind everyone that Ivanka doesn't give a single poo poo about climate change or any other liberal policy. She's simply savvy enough to recognize that this decision is bad politics and business so she begged Daddy to include some kind of meaningless "we'll figure it out on our own" thing so she can run around assuring concerned parties that they really are MORE committed to combatting climate change now than ever.

Ivanka is all about brand management and optics at this stage. The media-and even most Dems-are desperate to find "the good ones" on the other side, who they can hold up as the ideal Republican. Coincidentally, this person tends to be whoever gives the most information and insight to the press (see: McCain).

If there's competence in this administration at all (lol), the fine print will be opening a door for the US to return as a signatory in the future in exchange for steep and somewhat punitive concessions-likely an actual enforcement mechanism (which is mostly lacking presently). Dems are going to run on this hard until they regain power; putting costs to reentry will let the GOP kneecap the new administration out of the gate. A wise administration would also gather a committee stuffed with traditionally Democratic stakeholders to 'advise and consent' on the negotiations-using manufacturing, unions, miners, and impoverished consumer groups to better emphasize the costs of compliance... similar tactics to what we see from telecom whenever the FCC tries to restrain cable in any way.

Of course, the meagerly staffs atop State and Commerce have created little more than highlight reels of fumblefuckery so I'm sure the fine print will be something petty aimed at NATO or China.

Fojar38 posted:

You know that this would hurt Europeans as well, right? Europeans who are experiencing a far-right resurgence of their own?
I imagine most of the conservatives in Europe would be glad to reframe the US and Russia as the enemy rather than Brussles. Making the case that foreign abuses are stealing jobs from their citizens and the major driver of the refugee crisis sure sounds like a way to co-opt the resurgence.

Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

This:

- Has never been done before.
- Is illegal under EU law.
- Even if the EU rewrote their law to allow this, they would have to withdraw from the WTO and abolish their current trade deals.
- There is no way to reasonably calculate a "sanction" on excess carbon emissions. The EU would have absolutely no way to measure and enforce it.
- If a product is just shipped or has a value-added process applied to it in the U.S., but is made elsewhere, how would that be measured?
- Do other countries shipping to the U.S. for sale outside of the U.S. count? How would they be sanctioned?
Early returns from the Brexit process (and we'll see what the gently caress happens in the election) indicate that Brussels was preparing for antagonistic negotiations with an equal adversary on a variety of topics, including potential changes to the charter.... and that they're finding May's crew woefully underprepared... they may have some capacity. Trade agreements are emphatically not my wheelhouse, but given that the overwhelming majority of the WTO has signed onto Paris I imagine they can come up with a way to punish free riders... and I imagine that even simply making loud noises on the subject will be enough to get Corporate America to bring Trump and the GOP to heel.

e: I see the conference already started and as such I assume this is all wrong except the Ivanka bits.

Paracaidas fucked around with this message at 20:47 on Jun 1, 2017

haveblue
Aug 15, 2005



Toilet Rascal
So assuming reason prevails eventually, is there a procedure for getting back into the agreement?

Tim Whatley
Mar 28, 2010

https://twitter.com/mikememoli/status/870365489477943296

Rigel
Nov 11, 2016

https://twitter.com/thehill/status/870364340955860994

BarbarianElephant
Feb 12, 2015
The fairy of forgiveness has removed your red text.

tetrapyloctomy posted:

I don't see Melania waiting a year or so to pull the plug if he were on life support. I envision a well-practiced, "My Donald was very clear he would not want to live like this and I would like to withdraw care immediately so that he may die with dignity."

Unless she has more of a social filter than him, after a brief pause she will continue, "Any idea where a lady could get a drink, dinner, and a good lay around here?"

I feel that she will be a very merry widow unless Trump gets tired of her and moves onto #4 before his demise.

Jaxyon
Mar 7, 2016
I’m just saying I would like to see a man beat a woman in a cage. Just to be sure.

this is right tho, it was basically a non-issue in the last election other than a significant portion of trump voters being super mad at "the tree huggers"

Spaced God
Feb 8, 2014

All torment, trouble, wonder and amazement
Inhabits here: some heavenly power guide us
Out of this fearful country!



repeating posted:

Probably already beaten by pages but the US is officially pulling out of the Paris climate agreement, and Trump plans to negotiate a new deal.

YOU DUMB PIECE OF poo poo YOU SET YOUR OWN EMISSION STANDARDS THERE IS NO ONE TO NEGOTIATE WITH.

Anyways I'm gonna blast some anarchist punk, who's in?

The Glumslinger
Sep 24, 2008

Coach Nagy, you want me to throw to WHAT side of the field?


Hair Elf

thats 143%

Solaris 2.0
May 14, 2008


This will change once Climate Change starts making a day-to-day impact on people's lives but lol by then it will be too late.

The Glumslinger
Sep 24, 2008

Coach Nagy, you want me to throw to WHAT side of the field?


Hair Elf

Solaris 2.0 posted:

This will change once Climate Change starts making a day-to-day impact on people's lives but lol by then it will be too late.

It already is, but they just deny that it is caused by climate change

"lol, look at all of the liberals in Califronia with their drought"
*gets 50 year storms every summer*
"Its just god showing us that we shouldn't let gay people get married"

THE BAR
Oct 20, 2011

You know what might look better on your nose?

Chilichimp posted:

Their numbers are fudged, but they are actively engaging in efforts to correct their pollution.

Wasn't there something about China only wanting to be a part of the climate deal, if they would be considered a third world country, thereby slashing the requirements imposed on them?

Yardbomb
Jul 11, 2011

What's with the eh... bretonnian dance, sir?

DoctorGonzo posted:

Now Hillary can say, vote for me and ill put the coal industry out of job for supra national deals!!!!

wait...


I hope the coal voters are never allowed to have a job again to be honest, it's too dangerous to allow if they'll gladly sign off to kill everyone else over a poo poo job like coal in the first place.

Sydney Bottocks
Oct 15, 2004
Probation
Can't post for 9 days!

Chilichimp posted:

Fuckin' Weihenstephaner to the rescue

I'm secretly a double agent working for Oberstleutnant Erdinger :ninja:

DoctorGonzo
Jul 25, 2016

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS

Solaris 2.0 posted:


Obama years gave the world some hope we were at least pretending to move in the right direction. That is now gone.

The drone industry and the surveilance complex love Obama BIGLY. Some hope.

repeating
Nov 14, 2005
Time for some juicy "clean coal" talk. Ugh.

Fojar38
Sep 2, 2011


Sorry I meant to say I hope that the police use maximum force and kill or maim a bunch of innocent people, thus paving a way for a proletarian uprising and socialist utopia


also here's a stupid take
---------------------------->

evilweasel posted:

yes, it is a big deal that one of the lynchpins of the post-war order is openly talking about how the united states is no longer trustworthy

How many times do I need to remind you that talk is cheap before you get it? European leaders attack the US constantly and have been doing so virtually since the end of WWII.

If Germany actually begins to rearm, and actually begins to move its economy away from being based on exports, and actually follows up this talk with action, then you can be scared. But people in this thread have been putting way too much value on talk when it's actions that matter.

STAC Goat
Mar 12, 2008

Watching you sleep.

Butt first, let's
check the feeds.


Because poo poo gets better just by Donald Trump announcing poo poo or walking in the room. Duh.

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster

Paracaidas posted:

I imagine most of the conservatives in Europe would be glad to reframe the US and Russia as the enemy rather than Brussles. Making the case that foreign abuses are stealing jobs from their citizens and the major driver of the refugee crisis sure sounds like a way to co-opt the resurgence.

lol.

I'm guessing you aren't super familiar with the Euroskeptic parties in the E.U. Parliament.

Lord Hydronium
Sep 25, 2007

Non, je ne regrette rien


Trade not being in numerical order is triggering me.

squirrelzipper
Nov 2, 2011

Majorian posted:

That's a genuinely lovely thing to say, especially since no one is arguing that it isn't bad.

If it helps the people who deserve Trump are the ones arguing that there's been no reduction in standing or soft power through this and his other decisions re: NATO and NAFTA. And that's certainly been said in the last couple pages.

Mystic Mongol
Jan 5, 2007

Your life's been thrown in disarray already--I wouldn't want you to feel pressured.


College Slice

haveblue posted:

So assuming reason prevails eventually, is there a procedure for getting back into the agreement?

It's a non binding agreement so no. It's basically 194 countries agreeing to each find their own way to improve their carbon emissions. There is no enforcement mechanism, it is just every country agreeing that climate change is real and to do something. Leaving it is an announcement that you intend to emit more carbon, because reducing carbon in ANYs way is compliance.

STAC Goat
Mar 12, 2008

Watching you sleep.

Butt first, let's
check the feeds.

Oh God, he's ad libbing.

Who are the "obstructionists" in this case? Democrats or the World?

Zeluth
May 12, 2001

by Fluffdaddy
Oh, shaddap.

I am not keen on being embarrassed by my country.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Pellisworth
Jun 20, 2005
Reminder that one of the primary geopolitical goals of the postwar USSR was to break up the American-German alliance.

  • Locked thread