Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
What is the best flav... you all know what this question is:
This poll is closed.
Labour 907 49.92%
Theresa May Team (Conservative) 48 2.64%
Liberal Democrats 31 1.71%
UKIP 13 0.72%
Plaid Cymru 25 1.38%
Green 22 1.21%
Scottish Socialist Party 12 0.66%
Scottish Conservative Party 1 0.06%
Scottish National Party 59 3.25%
Some Kind of Irish Unionist 4 0.22%
Alliance / Irish Nonsectarian 3 0.17%
Some Kind of Irish Nationalist 36 1.98%
Misc. Far Left Trots 35 1.93%
Misc. Far Right Fash 8 0.44%
Monster Raving Loony 49 2.70%
Space Navies Party 39 2.15%
Independent / Single Issue 2 0.11%
Can't Vote 188 10.35%
Won't Vote 8 0.44%
Spoiled Ballot 15 0.83%
Pissflaps 312 17.17%
Total: 1817 votes
[Edit Poll (moderators only)]

 
  • Locked thread
OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

hakimashou posted:

When May resigns or gets forced out the thread title should prob change to "Made June The End Of May"

loving yes.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

NewMars
Mar 10, 2013
I think the new title should be "This is good for Corbyn."

Sydin
Oct 29, 2011

Another spring commute
So maybe it's too early to ask this, but is there any general consensus on why Labour flipped the table and gained like 30 seats? From my understanding the general consensus was that May was probably going to wring a majority out of the elections, and I figured back to back deadly terrorist attacks would be a Tory wet dream given the universal conservative love of fearmongering voters. But somehow she apparently hosed it all up in glorious fashion.

Taintrunner
Apr 10, 2017

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS

Sydin posted:

So maybe it's too early to ask this, but is there any general consensus on why Labour flipped the table and gained like 30 seats? From my understanding the general consensus was that May was probably going to wring a majority out of the elections, and I figured back to back deadly terrorist attacks would be a Tory wet dream given the universal conservative love of fearmongering voters. But somehow she apparently hosed it all up in glorious fashion.

Because the Tories are bloody right cunts, that's why.

Ammanas
Jul 17, 2005

Voltes V: "Laser swooooooooord!"

Sydin posted:

So maybe it's too early to ask this, but is there any general consensus on why Labour flipped the table and gained like 30 seats? From my understanding the general consensus was that May was probably going to wring a majority out of the elections, and I figured back to back deadly terrorist attacks would be a Tory wet dream given the universal conservative love of fearmongering voters. But somehow she apparently hosed it all up in glorious fashion.

T
R
U
M
P

Al-Saqr
Nov 11, 2007

One Day I Will Return To Your Side.
kinda wierd how it's scotland of all places that's turning tory and not labour lol.

Extreme0
Feb 28, 2013

I dance to the sweet tune of your failure so I'm never gonna stop fucking with you.

Continue to get confused and frustrated with me as I dance to your anger.

As I expect nothing more from ya you stupid runt!


jabby posted:

So we're gonna have a Tory government because of Scotland. Awesome.

Hope people learned their lesson about the SNP. Tartan Tories are tories all the same.

SpaceDrake
Dec 22, 2006

I can't avoid filling a game with awful memes, even if I want to. It's in my bones...!

axeil posted:

That absolutely makes sense. It brings me back to thinking about last year and how utterly :psyduck: the entire Brexit argument was.

I mean...is it even possible the UK could say "lol jk" and not leave the EU after all?

IIRC, Junker or one of the other top EU dudes said that withdrawing Article 50 is on the table and that the EU governing body would accept it. Art 50 is kind of worded like it's not really meant to be revokable, but they're clearly willing to be flexible because nobody in the EU really wants this to happen.

NewMars
Mar 10, 2013

Sydin posted:

So maybe it's too early to ask this, but is there any general consensus on why Labour flipped the table and gained like 30 seats? From my understanding the general consensus was that May was probably going to wring a majority out of the elections, and I figured back to back deadly terrorist attacks would be a Tory wet dream given the universal conservative love of fearmongering voters. But somehow she apparently hosed it all up in glorious fashion.

Youth vote, actually good and likeable policies and corbyn being The Boy.

Postorder Trollet89
Jan 12, 2008
Sweden doesn't do religion. But if they did, it would probably be the best religion in the world.
So, the Tories limp away to the brexit negotiation table like the mutilated mad cow that they are. Corbyn is safe as Labour leader and gets to lay all the blame for whatever shitshow brexit ends up becoming on the Tories well in time for the next election?

Sounds like good news to me.

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

Sydin posted:

So maybe it's too early to ask this, but is there any general consensus on why Labour flipped the table and gained like 30 seats? From my understanding the general consensus was that May was probably going to wring a majority out of the elections, and I figured back to back deadly terrorist attacks would be a Tory wet dream given the universal conservative love of fearmongering voters. But somehow she apparently hosed it all up in glorious fashion.

We won't be able to say for sure without more in depth vote analytics but he ran a positive campaign with a positive message and was straight with people. That counts for a lot after 30 loving years of utter bollocks from all parties.

Why did trump win, other than racism?

30 TO 50 FERAL HOG
Mar 2, 2005



Al-Saqr posted:

kinda wierd how it's scotland of all places that's turning tory and not labour lol.

Just like in America it's the inbred whisky making hillbillies that ruin it for everyone else

Dr Kool-AIDS
Mar 26, 2004

It's kind of interesting how much everyone seems to hate Tony Blair given that he's the only Labour leader to win an election since the 1970's. Obviously the Iraq War was plenty bad, so I get it, but he's still the only winner in four decades.

Kill All Cops
Apr 11, 2007


Pacheco de Chocobo



Hell Gem

Sydin posted:

So maybe it's too early to ask this, but is there any general consensus on why Labour flipped the table and gained like 30 seats? From my understanding the general consensus was that May was probably going to wring a majority out of the elections, and I figured back to back deadly terrorist attacks would be a Tory wet dream given the universal conservative love of fearmongering voters. But somehow she apparently hosed it all up in glorious fashion.

I'm very clear that the strong and stable campaign did not sit well amongst owners of wheat fields

axeil
Feb 14, 2006

Mister Adequate posted:

There's no apparently way to do a soft Brexit without loving the border with the Free State. If it's soft enough to not gently caress the border it implies we're still utterly beholden to every single EU regulation etc., so Brexit would just mean we don't get any more say in making those regulations.

Yep. The Brexit Referendum may be the most head-scracthing thing ever.

If I'm in the Tory leadership right now I'm wondering if it's better to just call another election rather than risk a soft Brexit with DUP and people going "the gently caress was the point of all that?"

TheRat
Aug 30, 2006

Sinteres posted:

It's kind of interesting how much everyone seems to hate Tony Blair given that he's the only Labour leader to win an election since the 1970's. Obviously the Iraq War was plenty bad, so I get it, but he's still the only winner in four decades.

Tony Blair is a genocidal warcriminal oval office

Murderion
Oct 4, 2009

2019. New York is in ruins. The global economy is spiralling. Cyborgs rule over poisoned wastes.

The only time that's left is
FUN TIME

Sydin posted:

So maybe it's too early to ask this, but is there any general consensus on why Labour flipped the table and gained like 30 seats? From my understanding the general consensus was that May was probably going to wring a majority out of the elections, and I figured back to back deadly terrorist attacks would be a Tory wet dream given the universal conservative love of fearmongering voters. But somehow she apparently hosed it all up in glorious fashion.

She screwed up her manifesto so it looked the racist grandpa party was killing old people. She was also home secretary presiding over massive police cuts, screwing up her ability to capitalize on the secure conservative stereotype.

Al-Saqr
Nov 11, 2007

One Day I Will Return To Your Side.

Sinteres posted:

It's kind of interesting how much everyone seems to hate Tony Blair given that he's the only Labour leader to win an election since the 1970's. Obviously the Iraq War was plenty bad, so I get it, but he's still the only winner in four decades.

it's because he helped kill around a million people and set up labour to fail in a big way.

CAPS LOCK BROKEN
Feb 1, 2006

by Fluffdaddy

Sinteres posted:

It's kind of interesting how much everyone seems to hate Tony Blair given that he's the only Labour leader to win an election since the 1970's. Obviously the Iraq War was plenty bad, so I get it, but he's still the only winner in four decades.

Third wayism also created the material conditions for the massive discontent that led to brexit et. al.

TomViolence
Feb 19, 2013

PLEASE ASK ABOUT MY 80,000 WORD WALLACE AND GROMIT SLASH FICTION. PLEASE.

we live we die we live again

Cerebral Bore
Apr 21, 2010


Fun Shoe

Sinteres posted:

It's kind of interesting how much everyone seems to hate Tony Blair given that he's the only Labour leader to win an election since the 1970's. Obviously the Iraq War was plenty bad, so I get it, but he's still the only winner in four decades.

It's because he's the reason nobody else has won, hth.

Solemn Sloth
Jul 11, 2015

Baby you can shout at me,
But you can't need my eyes.

SpaceDrake posted:

The media, especially the Conservative-friendly parts owned by Murdoch, would be ever more vicious, though.


how the drat hell

They literally called him a terrorist who will get Britain nuked, there's no next level for them to take it to

SpaceDrake
Dec 22, 2006

I can't avoid filling a game with awful memes, even if I want to. It's in my bones...!

Sinteres posted:

It's kind of interesting how much everyone seems to hate Tony Blair given that he's the only Labour leader to win an election since the 1970's. Obviously the Iraq War was plenty bad, so I get it, but he's still the only winner in four decades.

It's mostly because the post-Attlee Labour really struggled, and the actual labor disputes of the 70s didn't help.

Jezza might actually turn it around and, next election, win it all for real.

Also many see Blair as a straight-up war criminal regardless of anything else, so.

meanwhile

https://twitter.com/CNN/status/873035792192491520

christ, will the Tories even hit 310, I wonder. Are we looking at a flat out hung Parliament? More elections next fuckin' week?

Sydin
Oct 29, 2011

Another spring commute

NewMars posted:

Youth vote, actually good and likeable policies and corbyn being The Boy.

Cool.

OwlFancier posted:

Why did trump win, other than racism?

Populism, general voter ignorance, and Putin.

Taintrunner
Apr 10, 2017

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS

TheRat posted:

Tony Blair is a genocidal warcriminal oval office

Who deserves the loving firing line and that's being generous to the little twit

mila kunis
Jun 10, 2011

Sinteres posted:

It's kind of interesting how much everyone seems to hate Tony Blair given that he's the only Labour leader to win an election since the 1970's. Obviously the Iraq War was plenty bad, so I get it, but he's still the only winner in four decades.

Who cares if someone wins if they don't enact good policies

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

Sydin posted:

Populism, general voter ignorance, and Putin.

Ok well one of those is applicable here.

Dongicus
Jun 12, 2015

big fan of the cunting itt

Al-Saqr posted:

kinda wierd how it's scotland of all places that's turning tory and not labour lol.


gently caress

Cerebral Bore
Apr 21, 2010


Fun Shoe

axeil posted:

"the gently caress was the point of all that?"

TBF that kinda seems to be the Tories thing nowadays.

Dr Kool-AIDS
Mar 26, 2004

tekz posted:

Who cares if someone wins if they don't enact good policies

Preventing the other side from doing worse is something? It's not unfair to hate him for the Iraq War, of course, but any other plausible leader at the time would have done the same thing given the context of the time and alliance with the US. That doesn't excuse it, but he was still presumably better for the UK than the Conservatives would have been, though I suppose having Conservatives lose a war and discredit themselves for a generation would have ended up being good for Labour eventually.

Ms Adequate
Oct 30, 2011

Baby even when I'm dead and gone
You will always be my only one, my only one
When the night is calling
No matter who I become
You will always be my only one, my only one, my only one
When the night is calling



Sydin posted:

So maybe it's too early to ask this, but is there any general consensus on why Labour flipped the table and gained like 30 seats? From my understanding the general consensus was that May was probably going to wring a majority out of the elections, and I figured back to back deadly terrorist attacks would be a Tory wet dream given the universal conservative love of fearmongering voters. But somehow she apparently hosed it all up in glorious fashion.

The terror attacks didn't do their expected right-wing-aiding shite because the loving police cuts became a MASSIVE issue as a result.

Labour has some other very popular proposals that got traction too.

Aside from that, May was intensely unlikable and remote (e.g. sending Amber Rudd, whose dad died two days earlier, to do the TV debate while May stayed in a dark room meditating on Brexit) whilst Corbyn was extremely good on the stump and evidently convinced a lot of people that he was sincere.

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

The best thing is that if the new parliament makes the country unrunnable then who called the loving election :v:

Tories not winning is bad for tories.

WhiskeyWhiskers
Oct 14, 2013


"هذا ليس عادلاً."
"هذا ليس عادلاً على الإطلاق."
"كان هناك وقت الآن."
(السياق الخفي: للقراءة)

Sinteres posted:

Preventing the other side from doing worse is something? It's not unfair to hate him for the Iraq War, of course, but any other plausible leader at the time would have done the same thing given the context of the time and alliance with the US. That doesn't excuse it, but he was still presumably better for the UK than the Conservatives would have been, though I suppose having Conservatives lose a war and discredit themselves for a generation would have ended up being good for Labour eventually.

If it helps, Corbyn wouldn't have.

Vegetable
Oct 22, 2010

Does Labour look like they'll have enough to form a coalition government? Is Labour + SNP + Lib Dem likely to be enough?

axeil
Feb 14, 2006

OwlFancier posted:

We won't be able to say for sure without more in depth vote analytics but he ran a positive campaign with a positive message and was straight with people. That counts for a lot after 30 loving years of utter bollocks from all parties.

Why did trump win, other than racism?

poo poo Dem candidate + poo poo minority/youth turnout

And I say that as someone who voted for her in the primaries and volunteered for her in the general.

Basically the UK had the opposite election we did.

Julio Cruz
May 19, 2006

SpaceDrake posted:

christ, will the Tories even hit 310, I wonder. Are we looking at a flat out hung Parliament? More elections next fuckin' week?

There's 23 to go and the Tories will probably take 18-20 of them.

Dr Kool-AIDS
Mar 26, 2004

WhiskeyWhiskers posted:

If it helps, Corbyn wouldn't have.

He may look plausible now, but he absolutely wasn't when Blair was elected.

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

Sinteres posted:

Preventing the other side from doing worse is something? It's not unfair to hate him for the Iraq War, of course, but any other plausible leader at the time would have done the same thing given the context of the time and alliance with the US. That doesn't excuse it, but he was still presumably better for the UK than the Conservatives would have been, though I suppose having Conservatives lose a war and discredit themselves for a generation would have ended up being good for Labour eventually.

You can't fight delaying actions forever, "less bad" doesn't actually do good.

TheRat
Aug 30, 2006

Too close for comfort

https://twitter.com/britainelects/status/873038426416701440

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Zoran
Aug 19, 2008

I lost to you once, monster. I shall not lose again! Die now, that our future can live!

OwlFancier posted:

We won't be able to say for sure without more in depth vote analytics but he ran a positive campaign with a positive message and was straight with people. That counts for a lot after 30 loving years of utter bollocks from all parties.

Why did trump win, other than racism?

The fact that UKIP split roughly evenly between the Tories and Corbyn's Labour suggests that many people who voted for hard-right loonies don't sincerely believe in racist ideology nearly as much as they believe they're getting hosed by the system and want to vote for someone, anyone, who promises to help make their lives better.

So I would say Hillary face planted mainly because she refused to offer anyone a better life and in fact swore up and down that it could never happen.

  • Locked thread