Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Bar Ran Dun
Jan 22, 2006




Rust Martialis posted:

Millennials: other people had it worse and whined less about it you annoying babies.

"Just don't have it in them" from "And Keep Your Powder Dry" an example of the WWI generation's attitude of the WWII generation.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Boot and Rally
Apr 21, 2006

8===D
Nap Ghost

Jealous Cow posted:

https://twitter.com/ThePlumLineGS/status/878959840378466304

This is why I think even the Fox News audience might be exposed to the truth on this bill. Even the local papers here in NE Ohio are putting stuff like this on the front page.

I bet someone uses this as proof that 14 million people are getting abortions or contraceptives through the ACA expansion of medicaid.

FUCK SNEEP
Apr 21, 2007




Rust Martialis posted:

You don't get it maaaaan, how millennials are all doooooomed.

Seriously growing up in the 1970s the odds of dying in a full-on nuclear strategic exchange we're ALWAYS present. You lived knowing there were enough missiles aimed at your city to wipe it off the map multiple times.

Millennial angst over this is stupid, they think the world didn't exist before they got woke or something. It's like the US habit of chest beating about how many casualties they took at some tiny island fight like Bloody Tarawa, to which any European combatant just rolls their eyes.

Millennials: other people had it worse and whined less about it you annoying babies.

Oh boy another person to tell me how entitled I am! Joy!!

SocketWrench
Jul 8, 2012

by Fritz the Horse

Young Freud posted:

Russia sure seems to think so. Why do you think they're in Ukraine and Ossetia? Or why they've always desired buffer states?

Because they don't want to get stuck with rear end in a top hat border countries like North Korea that they can't control

Hellblazer187
Oct 12, 2003

achillesforever6 posted:

Yeah but its just not a good way to argue with my folks. Though my mom did reveal a big blindspot on me when she said, "For someone who hates the rich you sure do like going down to our family friend's million dollar house in Virgina near the bay". I know too many rich family friends and the worst part is it wouldn't be easy to cut ties off with most of them. :negative:

Now my uncle from Omaha he's easy since I don't see him often and apparently he's :freep: as gently caress on facebook and I wasn't surprised one bit since he's a high end dentist.

Why would you hate "the rich"? I hate the things some rich people do with their riches. There's also a big difference between regular rich people and enormously rich people. I don't think that the guillotines need to come out for successful lawyers or dentists with net worth between 1m and 5m. Those are basically regular people who have very good lives. Those folks aren't the problem, and there's no reason to lump in your friend in a million dollar house with David loving Koch.

Captain Invictus
Apr 5, 2005

Try reading some manga!


Clever Betty

haveblue posted:

Maybe if they were all fired directly at Yellowstone but it's a wilderness area hundreds of miles from any strategic targets.
I guess what I'm asking is if it would be possible to pop the supervolcano "zit" that sits underneath Yellowstone with nukes, which would result in immense devastation to the entire US in one go.

Majorian posted:

A Russian analyst suggested this a couple years ago, but it's unlikely to work. Neither the US nor Russia have bunker busters that would dig deep enough.
Really? Do you have a link to that? And I'm unfamiliar with how much damage a nuke does to a surface area, in terms of displacement. They don't leave decently huge craters when detonated at ground level? Figured multiple missiles hitting in succession might do enough damage to destabilize the caldera.

Hellblazer187 posted:

Why would you hate "the rich"? I hate the things some rich people do with their riches. There's also a big difference between regular rich people and enormously rich people. I don't think that the guillotines need to come out for successful lawyers or dentists with net worth between 1m and 5m. Those are basically regular people who have very good lives. Those folks aren't the problem, and there's no reason to lump in your friend in a million dollar house with David loving Koch.
And while I'm certainly pro-guillotine, not all of the super rich are monsters made flesh like the Kochs. Bill Gates isn't flawless but he's helped a lot of people. Paul Newman has helped a lot of folks through his Newman's Own brand, too. While he was alive, anyways. :v:

Captain Invictus fucked around with this message at 17:22 on Jun 25, 2017

F_Shit_Fitzgerald
Feb 2, 2017



DaveWoo posted:

https://twitter.com/politico/status/878957209761271809

“The policy of the United States should be regime change in Iran,” said Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.), who speaks regularly with White House officials about foreign policy. “I don’t see how anyone can say America can be safe as long as you have in power a theocratic despotism,” he added.


This was a few pages ago, but...yeah. We sure can't have anything like that. Right, Franklin Graham, Jerry Falwell Jr. and Mike Pence?

Mulaney Power Move
Dec 30, 2004

When I was a grad student I had to teach sociology of medicine about four or five times and it was mind boggling how many students at a respected state university couldn't understand the basics of how healthcare works. Half of them were usually even pre med. But like, the basic idea that making sure there are more people insured especially if they are healthy lowering overall costs was beyond them. Dont expect anyone who thinks Obamacare bad/Trump good to be convinced otherwise with any sort of evidence.

OddObserver
Apr 3, 2009
Rich people are a good source of tax money to help poor people.

(AKA I am a liberal, not a socialist)

Milosh
Oct 14, 2000
Forum Veteran

Mulaney Power Move posted:

When I was a grad student I had to teach sociology of medicine about four or five times and it was mind boggling how many students at a respected state university couldn't understand the basics of how healthcare works. Half of them were usually even pre med. But like, the basic idea that making sure there are more people insured especially if they are healthy lowering overall costs was beyond them. Dont expect anyone who thinks Obamacare bad/Trump good to be convinced otherwise with any sort of evidence.

It's just a function of people don't know about it until they have to use it. I worked in mental health for years but didn't really fully understand how much things cost until I had a seizure and was diagnosed with epilepsy at 33. I figured my insurance would take care of everything but the ambulance cost 1k, and the hospital stay + surgeries from tearing my rotator cuff and breaking my finger ended up being ~10k. That was with insurance.

I think it's also why the republican's might get away with it, for a while. Everyone has had some familial experience with health care but it really hits when you get hurt and you are writing the checks.

Avalanche
Feb 2, 2007

Mulaney Power Move posted:

When I was a grad student I had to teach sociology of medicine about four or five times and it was mind boggling how many students at a respected state university couldn't understand the basics of how healthcare works. Half of them were usually even pre med. But like, the basic idea that making sure there are more people insured especially if they are healthy lowering overall costs was beyond them. Dont expect anyone who thinks Obamacare bad/Trump good to be convinced otherwise with any sort of evidence.

Although not completely analogous, the old "strength in numbers" mantra is rather fitting and I don't understand either why people can't make the connection even when you break it down into wording that simple.

Party Plane Jones
Jul 1, 2007

by Reene
Fun Shoe
Grim way to start off Twitter today:
https://twitter.com/ASlavitt/status/878838830752833536
https://twitter.com/ASlavitt/status/878981850701725697
(thread continues)
https://twitter.com/StevenTDennis/status/878792080549609472
https://twitter.com/aravosis/status/878975054020845568
https://twitter.com/ddiamond/status/878995161619025920
https://twitter.com/daveweigel/status/878941204301451264
https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/878756708532842496
https://twitter.com/josh_zeitlin/status/879008885922832385
https://twitter.com/existentialfish/status/879011585179754496
https://twitter.com/ddiamond/status/879002218485223424
https://twitter.com/ddiamond/status/879002832178958339
https://twitter.com/DannyZuker/status/878667551110176768
https://twitter.com/ddiamond/status/879006789244768256
https://twitter.com/GStephanopoulos/status/879007068417478656
https://twitter.com/dinapomeranz/status/878618572226011137
https://twitter.com/mmfa/status/879006096379215872
Don't you just want to punch him?:
https://twitter.com/mmfa/status/878982607542906880

And a lighter note:
https://twitter.com/ABCPolitics/status/879010078640222208

Party Plane Jones fucked around with this message at 17:28 on Jun 25, 2017

Hellblazer187
Oct 12, 2003

Captain Invictus posted:

And while I'm certainly pro-guillotine, not all of the super rich are monsters made flesh like the Kochs. Bill Gates isn't flawless but he's helped a lot of people. Paul Newman has helped a lot of folks through his Newman's Own brand, too. While he was alive, anyways. :v:

Yeah, Bill Gates owns. Saying the rich should pay more taxes to help the poor, and saying that the Kochs are cancer, isn't the same as "hating the rich." It's dumb to hate the rich.

The Phlegmatist
Nov 24, 2003

mcmagic posted:

Basically what republicans in DC want to do is so craven, demented and evil that when told about it, their voters literally won't believe it's true because it's too craven, demented and evil to be true.

We ran into this problem while explaining Ryan's Medicare vouchers in the 2012 election. The concept that grandma could simply "run out" of healthcare in the middle of the year and be forced into self-pay for medical care was seen as ludicrous; that's too brazenly evil, you must be lying about what Ryancare actually does, etc.

BCRA though, if it passes, is going to directly affect a lot of the rural white voters that make up Trump's base. A lot of GOP politicians in these areas run on "making sure the wrong sort of people don't get government help" and they nod along, because their voters know exactly what that means. But when your grandson loses Medicaid coverage because BCRA annihilated federal funding and the blame lies solely on the politicians you voted into office, who knows what will happen.

cant cook creole bream
Aug 15, 2011
I think Fahrenheit is better for weather

Potential BFF posted:

A war with Iran would be such a profound clusterfuck that a sick little piece of my mind is intrigued at the prospect. The first antiship missile slamming into an oil tanker and the subsequent $10/gal gas would be a hell of a thing to behold.

Just to be clear: HOLY gently caress DON'T GO TO WAR WITH IRAN

I kinda wonder how Russia would think about that scenario. On the one hand, they are allies to Iran. On the other hand, a war which blocks the Suez canal and basically destroys middle eastern oil exports, would be a mayor boon for the Russians dying economy. Maybe they would support Iran, just to escalate it further.

cant cook creole bream fucked around with this message at 17:31 on Jun 25, 2017

SocketWrench
Jul 8, 2012

by Fritz the Horse

There Bias Two posted:

Kindly gently caress off with your moronic nay-saying. "There will never be another Great War!" said many right before the bombs dropped on their cities.

There is always a risk of war, and downplaying that is a terrible idea.

Yeah, but in this case it's a country with everything to lose dropping a nuke/starting a war with another powerhouse nation for literally no reason because some fat orange fucker bitched about that country to drum support from his unhinged base

theres a will theres moe
Jan 10, 2007


Hair Elf

Mulaney Power Move posted:

When I was a grad student I had to teach sociology of medicine about four or five times and it was mind boggling how many students at a respected state university couldn't understand the basics of how healthcare works. Half of them were usually even pre med. But like, the basic idea that making sure there are more people insured especially if they are healthy lowering overall costs was beyond them. Dont expect anyone who thinks Obamacare bad/Trump good to be convinced otherwise with any sort of evidence.

I have a buddy who was talking about his young impoverished brother being forced to pay $400/mo under the ACA. Obviously that's not true or he picked a nonsensical plan, but I ignored that part of the argument and suggested hey wouldn't it be great if we had a single payer system instead of forced private insurance?

And despite gently trying to explain that it would obviously be cheaper to pay for healthcare without guaranteeing a private middleman a profit, he was incapable of imagining a system where taxes pay for medicine.

And then to top it all off his final words on the topic were something about how his brother was paying more into insurance than he's getting out and that's just not fair! That's how insurance works man! What the poo poo

Oxxidation
Jul 22, 2007

The Phlegmatist posted:

We ran into this problem while explaining Ryan's Medicare vouchers in the 2012 election. The concept that grandma could simply "run out" of healthcare in the middle of the year and be forced into self-pay for medical care was seen as ludicrous; that's too brazenly evil, you must be lying about what Ryancare actually does, etc.

BCRA though, if it passes, is going to directly affect a lot of the rural white voters that make up Trump's base. A lot of GOP politicians in these areas run on "making sure the wrong sort of people don't get government help" and they nod along, because their voters know exactly what that means. But when your grandson loses Medicaid coverage because BCRA annihilated federal funding and the blame lies solely on the politicians you voted into office, who knows what will happen.

They won't understand and they won't care.

Dick Trauma
Nov 30, 2007

God damn it, you've got to be kind.

Rust Martialis posted:

You don't get it maaaaan, how millennials are all doooooomed.

Just put him on Ignore. He's a troll.

Hellblazer187
Oct 12, 2003

Oxxidation posted:

They won't understand and they won't care.

But they will die.

Mendrian
Jan 6, 2013

Rust Martialis posted:

You don't get it maaaaan, how millennials are all doooooomed.

Seriously growing up in the 1970s the odds of dying in a full-on nuclear strategic exchange we're ALWAYS present. You lived knowing there were enough missiles aimed at your city to wipe it off the map multiple times.

Millennial angst over this is stupid, they think the world didn't exist before they got woke or something. It's like the US habit of chest beating about how many casualties they took at some tiny island fight like Bloody Tarawa, to which any European combatant just rolls their eyes.

Millennials: other people had it worse and whined less about it you annoying babies.

The presumption that millennials have never opened a history book is exactly as stupid as the very thing you are accusing them of.

Avalanche
Feb 2, 2007

The Phlegmatist posted:

We ran into this problem while explaining Ryan's Medicare vouchers in the 2012 election. The concept that grandma could simply "run out" of healthcare in the middle of the year and be forced into self-pay for medical care was seen as ludicrous; that's too brazenly evil, you must be lying about what Ryancare actually does, etc.

BCRA though, if it passes, is going to directly affect a lot of the rural white voters that make up Trump's base. A lot of GOP politicians in these areas run on "making sure the wrong sort of people don't get government help" and they nod along, because their voters know exactly what that means. But when your grandson loses Medicaid coverage because BCRA annihilated federal funding and the blame lies solely on the politicians you voted into office, who knows what will happen.

Well you see the BCRA was a direct response to OBAMACARE which would of completely bankrupted the entire country and took away everyone's job because something something SOCIALISM so Trump had absolutely no choice but to cut Medicaid to save the country!

Hellblazer187
Oct 12, 2003

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/trump-health-care-bill-mean_us_594fb481e4b0da2c731c1b1c?ncid=inblnkushpmg00000009

Skip to about 20 seconds in, when Trump is talking. He's BRIGHT RED now.

Bar Ran Dun
Jan 22, 2006




Oxxidation posted:

They won't understand and they won't care.

It's very hard to understand if you are spoken to with concepts you haven't internalized.

SocketWrench
Jul 8, 2012

by Fritz the Horse

enraged_camel posted:

Trump's grudges are legendary. He gets offended at the slightest perceived insult and does his best to gently caress the other person in revenge, sometimes years later.

This.
Check out his book where he brags about destroying some woman's life because she wouldn't do something manipulative for him so he could avoid responsibility. He spent years dragging her life into the gutter. He's a loving scumbag and if daddy had any morals would have taken Donny over his knee and beat him with a rubber hose decades ago

FuturePastNow
May 19, 2014


Dmitri-9 posted:

Even if they defeated the Iranian military and the Revolutionary Guard, the Mahdi Army would just cross the border and then we get to fight the middle part of Operation Iraqi Freedom again.

It'd be the middle part of OIF again but with a country that has 3x the population and they're not divided at all

SocketWrench
Jul 8, 2012

by Fritz the Horse

Eeyo posted:

I wonder if Trump could be convinced to veto? He's said it's "mean", maybe if there was enough noise about how the veto is one of the most powerful tools a president has to shape legislation and Trump hasn't been using that power to the fullest extent. Then make it about Obama using his power to veto, and how Trump needs a show of force.

Probably not though, Trump bad.

He won't because he can't pass responsibility if he did

empty whippet box
Jun 9, 2004

by Fluffdaddy

He seems like he's straining in general. Just looks like absolute poo poo. And this is, I assume, with some very skilled people trying their damndest to make him look as good as possible.

Overwined
Sep 22, 2008

Wine can of their wits the wise beguile,
Make the sage frolic, and the serious smile.
Yeah Trump looks like a guy that could have a heart attack at any time.

Tatsuta Age
Apr 21, 2005

so good at being in trouble


The amount of just straight up lying on the sunday shows today is high even by this admin's standards

https://twitter.com/daveweigel/status/879018377951555585
https://twitter.com/ddiamond/status/879000887171088385

Trabisnikof
Dec 24, 2005

Mendrian posted:

The presumption that millennials have never opened a history book is exactly as stupid as the very thing you are accusing them of.

Meanwhile the risk to the species from Climate Change is larger than the risk to the species from nuclear war ever was.

Megillah Gorilla
Sep 22, 2003

If only all of life's problems could be solved by smoking a professor of ancient evil texts.



Bread Liar

BiggerBoat posted:

I'm actually beginning to wonder if there's really something to the hacking and the database breaches that genuinely does influence the vote tabulations. If one were to manipulate votes, they'd do it in a way that wouldn't seem TOO obvious, like the Idiocracy plan where they steal percentages of pennies. They'd peel off a small percentage of votes and influence relatively close precincts and blocs, not change areas where's there's a 10% point swing. Consistently winning districts where the polls turned out to be off by 4-6%, in along with being a tad suspicious, also has the added effect of discrediting the media, whom we know the GOP hates.

All of this smoke (and some fire) in conjunction with Trump winning EVERY close State in 2016 by incredibly small margins and his increasingly weird behavior surrounding the investigations has me thinking there might actually be something to this (affecting election outcomes). I'm starting to think it already happened.

Whoah, d you have a link on that "Trump winning EVERY close State in 2016 by incredibly small margins" because that suspicious as all hell.


EDIT: Okay, I've found this article, Rigged election: Donald Trump won every surprise swing state by the same 1% margin

quote:

As the 2016 election results played out, observers on both sides were shocked that Donald Trump won four key swing states – Florida, Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin – where Hillary Clinton had been heavily favored. She had seemingly locked up Florida with early voting alone, and the other three have all reliably gone blue for a generation. But more suspicious than the fact that Trump won these states was the fact that he won them all by the same margin.

Ask any statistician and they’ll tell you that a reasonable distribution of the results would have been Trump winning one of the states by one percent, won one of them by perhaps three percent, won one of them by two percent, lost one of them by one percent, or something along those lines. But instead the voting tallies looked startlingly different from any natural distribution. In fact they looked startlingly the same.

According to the New York Times, the voting results broke down like this: Trump won Florida by just over one percent of the vote. He also won Pennsylvania by just over one percent. He won Michigan by just under one percent. And he won Wisconsin by precisely one percent. That’s not how numbers tend to work in the real world.


That's some pretty frightening stuff, so why hasn't it been shouted from the rafters?

Hieronymous Alloy
Jan 30, 2009


Why! Why!! Why must you refuse to accept that Dr. Hieronymous Alloy's Genetically Enhanced Cream Corn Is Superior to the Leading Brand on the Market!?!




Morbid Hound

Tatsuta Age posted:

The amount of just straight up lying on the sunday shows today is high even by this admin's standards

https://twitter.com/daveweigel/status/879018377951555585
https://twitter.com/ddiamond/status/879000887171088385

Nobody loses the opportunity for coverage, and technically the states retain the option to maintain Medicaid coverage at current levels.

empty whippet box
Jun 9, 2004

by Fluffdaddy

Tatsuta Age posted:

The amount of just straight up lying on the sunday shows today is high even by this admin's standards

https://twitter.com/daveweigel/status/879018377951555585
https://twitter.com/ddiamond/status/879000887171088385

gently caress it, it'll probably work better to just outright lie than to try to stretch the truth or avoid it. Just lie.

SocketWrench
Jul 8, 2012

by Fritz the Horse

Captain Invictus posted:


Really? Do you have a link to that? And I'm unfamiliar with how much damage a nuke does to a surface area, in terms of displacement. They don't leave decently huge craters when detonated at ground level? Figured multiple missiles hitting in succession might do enough damage to destabilize the caldera.

Unless you can direct the force of the explosion the energy from it will just take the easiest path. Hell, if they dug craters when they went off Nevada would be a huge hole in the ground by now

Hieronymous Alloy
Jan 30, 2009


Why! Why!! Why must you refuse to accept that Dr. Hieronymous Alloy's Genetically Enhanced Cream Corn Is Superior to the Leading Brand on the Market!?!




Morbid Hound

Gorilla Salad posted:

Whoah, d you have a link on that "Trump winning EVERY close State in 2016 by incredibly small margins" because that suspicious as all hell.


EDIT: Okay, I've found this article, Rigged election: Donald Trump won every surprise swing state by the same 1% margin



That's some pretty frightening stuff, so why hasn't it been shouted from the rafters?

It can't be proven except by a large scale federal investigation, and guess who would have to authorize that?

Deceptive Thinker
Oct 5, 2005

I'll rip out your optics!

empty whippet box posted:

gently caress it, it'll probably work better to just outright lie than to try to stretch the truth or avoid it. Just lie.

It works for Trump - so why not everyone else?

Kekekela
Oct 28, 2004

Rip Testes posted:

I'm trying to search for news articles that tout the benefits of the AHCA and how it would be superior to Obamacare and I'm not having any luck whatever combo of terms I string together

They're way easier to find if you view killing poor people as a benefit.

theres a will theres moe
Jan 10, 2007


Hair Elf

Gorilla Salad posted:


That's some pretty frightening stuff, so why hasn't it been shouted from the rafters?

If the official investigators are finding evidence like this, they will keep it close to the vest to prevent the subjects from preparing a corroborated defesne.

They'd take damning info, and before the subjects have an opportunity to agree on a story, interview them separately to shake out the lies or inconsistencies which will then also be used as clues.

The news media wants you to believe that their lack of new info on the Russia investigation means something. It doesn't.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

DaveWoo
Aug 14, 2004

Fun Shoe

empty whippet box posted:

gently caress it, it'll probably work better to just outright lie than to try to stretch the truth or avoid it. Just lie.

Lying probably is the best strategy for them at this point. After all, the media's not going to call them out on it, and even if they do, the GOP can just attack them for being "biased".

  • Locked thread